WRITING EDITING FORM/PEER FEEDBACK FORM

Peer editor: ………………………... Date: …………………………………………

Author: …………………………………….. Work Title: …………………………………..
Legend: NW- Needs Work G- Good O- Outstanding
Remember to give a reason why you chose “Needs work” NW G O Comments
Your peer must use this form to improve their work. They
won’t be able to improve their work if they don’t know what
to improve or how to improve it!
CONTENT
1. The piece of writing is clearly aimed at the target reader.
2. The piece of writing has covered all the content points.
3. All the contents are relevant.
4. The writer supports his/her ideas well.
COMMUNICATIVE ACHIEVEMENT
5. The format and layout are appropriate for the target genre.
6. The register (style) is appropriate and consistent.
7. The piece of writing fulfills the communicative requirements as
set out in the task (e.g. make a complaint, persuade)
8. The writer is able to express ideas in an effective way.
9. The piece of writing holds the reader’s attention and interest.
ORGANISATION
10. Ideas are arranged in a logical order.
11. The piece of writing progresses smoothly from start to
finish.
12. The writer uses a good range of cohesive devices.
a. Basic and high-frequency linking words (and, but, because, first
of all, finally)
b. More complicated linking words and phrases (e.g. it may
appear, as a result)
c. Reference and substitution (e.g. pronouns, articles, synonyms,
comparative reference)
13. Each paragraph has a topic sentence with a clear topic and a
clear controlling idea.
LANGUAGE
14. The writer uses less common vocabulary.
15. The writer uses words and phrases accurately (e.g. accurate
word form, spelling, collocation)
16. The writer uses words and phrases that fit the context of the
given task.
17. Most sentences are grammatically correct.
18. The writer uses a wide range of structures (both simple and
complex sentences)
OTHERS
19. The piece of writing is the required length.
20. The writer leaves enough space for comments.
WRITING EDITING FORM/PEER FEEDBACK FORM