Process Configurations:

1. Expenditure/Cost Management.:
a. Confirmation required from Uneecops how both equipment wise costing and Activity
wise costing including all parameters like Depreciaiton, Interest on the corresponding
loan, spares , diesel and service bills are reported. Either by Standing / Settlement
order or any ORDER or costcenters with two hierarchies.
FI related:
2. Loan Management.
a. Though broadly it is concluded that the loan amount with equipment bifurcation, EMI
payment scheduling is possible in the standard.
b. It is suggested by Uneecops that the interest component is to be computed out side
and posted to SAP (Costcentre wise). If costcenters are at the activity level (how
equipment wise posting is done is not clarified).
c. Also to compute the interest, the balance loan amount will be required to be down
loaded and manually computed outside in SAP. DIMPL believe that this simple step
can be a DEVELOPMENT in SAP.
d. Further how the equipment wise loan amount and Balance loan is reported is not
clarified.
e. It is possible to assign an Order / costcentre at lower herarchy at equipment level and
aggregating all the equipment in one loan to the parent costcentre and assigning to
the BANK LOAN shall be possible.
FI related:

3. Depreciation & Interest Posting at HO and transfer of the costs to HO: The requirement provided
in the initial document and discussed. How this is proposed is not clarified by Uneecops.
FI related:

4. Valuation of Material with different moving average prices:

a. Different moving average prices for two batches – like from OEM and from Market.
b. Diesel with 0 value in some locations where issued free by customer and procured by
DIMPL.
c. The consignment stock with the price of the vendor and the same item procured for
DIMPL maintained equipment from the market.
d. Stocking retrieved spares from old equipment and repaired equipment with 0 price.
e. Uneecops informed that it will be possible by Split valuation, but not demonstrated or
confirmed. It is believed that the ‘Batch Management’ in SAP will meet this
requirement.
Split valuation scenario tested it is working, will prepare UAT and share it with the client.
5. Managing the Purchase of different material with different purchase groups with different levels
of authorization:
a. Uneecops consultant suggested that this is possible only at the material group,
Purchase organization and document level, which is not flexible and does not meet
the requirements of DIMPL. (Some material in the same group may need to be
restricted for procurement from HO while allowing others to procure at project).
b. It is felt that the assignment of purchase group to material is at Material Master Level
and restricting material for purchase groups can be achieved by not assigning these
groups to such material. Uneecops to explore this.
c. Further, the release procedure of Purchase Orders at the Project Purchase Groups
shall differ based on the Order Value. This is believed to be standard SAP and
Uneecops to confirm.
 i. Low Value – Two steps – Create Purchase officer, Release Project Head.
ii. High Value – Three steps- Create, Level 1- Project head recommends/Releases,
Level -2 : Release/Approval at HO.
d. To reduce the complexity, it can be agreed by DIMPL that no restrictions required in
Purchase requisition – can be created and approved at the project itself. However,
purchase order processing is as above.
Workflow configuration is still in progress.
6. RFQ Creation: RFQ creation and Tender evaluation is not demonstrated.
Will prepare UAT and share it with the client.
7. Value / Quantity Contracts: Uneecops only configured/demonstrated the standard purchase
order process. The process of Quantity / Value Contracts and placement of suborders not
demonstrated.
a. For consumables, DIMPL propose to place contracts from HO and Suborders from
Projects. This restricting i.e Placement of Contract only by HO may need to be
achieved by document type. Subcontracts will be different document type and will be
allowed by Project- Based on the document types it can be done with the help of
basis team.
b. Handling Consignment Stocks: In case of consignment stocks, if contract is available in
SAP can the material drawn be possible without a sub-order and placing subsequently
to be Examined-This can be done with the help of ABAP.

8. Sub-Assemblies Fitment – Removals and Cumulative performance monitoring: Given in detail in

the initial requirement. Discussed in detail during the visits. No detailed document given as it is
believed as standard process. If necessary requirement will be given in more detail.
- Process under testing. Will prepare UAT and share it with the client.
9. PM Maintenance Scheduling :
a. Uneecops demonstrated the standard SAP.
b. However, Uneecops is not clear in scheduling the maintenances based on hour meter
reading and generating alerts.
-Hour metering reading will be entered by DIMPL through customization, due to this we
can’t map the scheduling with HMR. If the HMR is created as measuring point, then it is
possible.
10. Log Sheet Management.
a. Process explained in detail and document given. Uneecops to develop and
demonstrate
-FS completed given to ABAP team.
11. Equipment Performance Capturing.
a. Process explained in detail and document given. Uneecops to develop and
demonstrate
-In process.
12. SD Processes and Pricing Requirements
a. Detailed document provided but no discussion. No consultant available so far.
-SD related.
13. Customised data entry for Diesel Issues : Detailed Process document given and discussed.
Uneecops to develop / respond.
-In process.
14. Monitoring the Insurances schedule/Payment, RTO Registration etc :
a. Requirement detailed in Initial Scope. No discussion done so far.
-FI related.
15. Customized fields creation for WBS element:
a. Briefly discussed but no clarity from Uneecops
 - Customized field not yet given by DIMPL.
16. Employee Master Creation and Management:
a. Not discussed so far.
-FI related
17. Pending KDS formats: Though KDS formats to great extent are completed and DIMPL is to
prepare the master data, Certain KDS formats shared recently like Vendor Master need some
clarification from consultants, as these are not discussed well initially and some fields are new.
-Will discuss
18. Other smaller issues like identifying some custom fields : During the discussion of master data
and processes some issues like using the fields available for DIMPL specific data for reporting
and monitoring are discussed. These are to be concluded and confirmed.
Examples :
 Identifying one field in Purchase requisition to identify it from the Breakdown
notification/Equipment number where PR is to be created without creating a
Breakdown Order. – Notification number can be entered in the PR header, already
shared the screenshot.
 Generating Purchase requisition, Reservation etc.. by using ‘External Material
Number’. Only by using Help Tab? This help is not available in creating Requisition
from Breakdown Order.- Need more clarification.
 Mapping Assetnumber and Equipment ID: Exploring standard SAP and if not
available identifying some custom field/unused field to map them.
- As per advice we can use ‘Sort’ field.