Navigating Constitutional Reform in the Philippines: The Promise
and Perils of Charter Change
Kyrz B. Santiago
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science 1-1
Prof. Ferman Lazatin
Wesleyan University-Philippines College of Arts and Sciences Bachelor of Arts in Political Science
As a freshman political science student, I am fascinated by the
complex debate surrounding charter change (Cha-Cha) in the Philippines. This discourse on amending the 1987 Constitution presents an opportunity to examine the intricate dynamics shaping Philippine state building. The ongoing Cha-Cha debate encapsulates the interplay between political interests, public sentiment, and the nation's quest for progress.
In analyzing this issue, it is important to recognize the
multifaceted nature of the proposed constitutional changes. Momentum for Cha-Cha has grown, with advocates pushing various modes of amendment, including a Constitutional Convention, Constituent Assembly, and People's Initiative. The range of approaches reflects the serious intent behind the drive for constitutional reform.
However, tensions exist between the perceived need for
constitutional evolution and concerns over political maneuvering. The 1987 Constitution, enacted after the People Power Revolution, represents the democratic aspirations of the Filipino people. Its provisions safeguarding civil liberties and preventing authoritarian rule remain pivotal.
But the shadow of past Cha-Cha attempts driven by politicians
seeking to extend their power breeds skepticism about current efforts. Fears of term limit removal and erosion of checks and balances fuel public wariness over amendments.
Recent proposals to focus solely on economic provisions also
raise suspicions of ulterior motives. While advocates highlight
potential economic gains from easing foreign ownership limits,
critics caution against disregarding broader implications of constitutional changes. The interplay between economic reform Wesleyan University-Philippines College of Arts and Sciences Bachelor of Arts in Political Science
and political dynamics warrants careful scrutiny of Cha-Cha
initiatives.
As an observer of Philippine politics, I grapple with the need
for constitutional reform and the precariousness of political expediency. While recognizing the value of addressing economic challenges, I am wary of how Cha-Cha could entrench vested interests,intensify divisions, and derail broader governance reforms. Clearly, the path to Philippine state building is fraught with nuance and complexity. Constitutional reform may catalyze progress but must be pursued prudently, transparently and in service of democratic principles.
As a fledgling political science student, this reminds me of the
need for vigilant guardianship of democratic ideals amid shifting political landscapes. While Cha-Cha represents a critical juncture, its merits must be weighed against broader imperatives of governance, accountability and upholding democratic norms. I advocate a careful approach to constitutional reform centered on national unity, democratic integrity and the welfare of the Filipino people.
Public Administration Provides the Organization of Joint Activities of People and Manages These Activities Through the Relevant Bodies of the State Apparatus and Civil Servants Who Perform Certain Functions