Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stat2 2023 Case 2A Razor Blades
Stat2 2023 Case 2A Razor Blades
Ranks
Mean Sum of
Blade N Rank Ranks
Times Single 8 6.69 53.50
Double 8 10.31 82.50
Total 16
a
Test Statistics
Times
Mann-Whitney U 17.500
Wilcoxon W 53.500
Z -1.530
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .126
Exact Sig. (2-tailed) .137
Exact Sig. (1-tailed) .068
a. Grouping Variable: Blade
1
a. Type of data
Quantitative (or Interval)
b. Hypothesis test
Conditions and assumptions
• Two independent random samples
• Available: quantitative
• Required: ordinal (or higher)
• No reason to assume normality, so we use the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Hypotheses
𝐻𝐻0 : single and double blade razors last the same number of times
𝐻𝐻1 : double blade razors last longer than single blade razors
Test statistic:
𝑇𝑇 = 𝑇𝑇1 = rank sum for single blade razors
(or define test statistic 𝑇𝑇 = 𝑇𝑇2 = the rank sum for double blade razors)
Rejection region: from table 7:
𝐿𝐿
𝑇𝑇1 ≤ 𝑇𝑇𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 = 51
(see table, left-sided rejection region, sample sizes 8 and 8 respectively)
𝑈𝑈
(or: If you had chosen 𝑇𝑇 = 𝑇𝑇2 as test statistic, then 𝑇𝑇2 ≥ 𝑇𝑇𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 = 85)
Calculation of observed value for 𝑻𝑻 :
First assign ranks:
rank: 9 3.5 1 5.5 13 14 2 5.5
single-blade 10 6 3 7 13 15 5 7
double-blade 8 18 10 11 16 10 6 12
rank: 7 16 9 11 15 9 3.5 12
Observed rank sum 𝑇𝑇𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 = 𝑇𝑇1 = 9 + 3.5 + 1 + 5.5 + ⋯ = 53.5 (also seen in SPSS output)
Confrontation:
The observed rank sum 𝑇𝑇𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜𝑜 does not lie within the rejection region, so do not reject 𝐻𝐻0 .
Conclusion:
Using these samples, there is not enough evidence to infer that double blade razors last
longer.
c. Nonparametric
We are not using a specific parameter in 𝐻𝐻0 .
d. Distribution-free
We are not making any assumptions about the form of the distribution in the population.
e. Experimental design
Matched pairs design is better: 8 persons using both a single and a double blade razor.