Tseni 1

Fragko Tseni

Julie Baker

English 1301- 280

03/28/2024

Analyzing Rhetorical Choices in "Multi-model ensemble projections of climate

change effects on global marine biodiversity"

Because of the pressing need to address how climate change is affecting

biodiversity worldwide, academics are doing thorough study to evaluate probable

outcomes and future possibilities. One such study, "Multi-model ensemble projections

of climate change effects on global marine biodiversity" by Jones and Cheung,

explores the projected impacts of climate change on marine biodiversity using multi-

model ensemble projections, that is why critical analysis of the rhetorical choices

employed by the authors in persuading readers to accept their conclusions regarding

the future trajectory of marine biodiversity under climate change is needed. After that,

readers can better understand the writers' persuasive strategies and how they influence

attitudes and action on this urgent environmental issue by analyzing how they employ

ethos, pathos, logos, and language. By dissecting the authors' rhetorical choices,

readers can gain valuable insight into the efficacy of different persuasive techniques

employed in scholarly discourse, ultimately contributing to a more nuanced

understanding of climate change's impact on global marine biodiversity and the

urgency of addressing this critical issue.

In "Ensemble Multi-Model Projections of Climate Change Impacts on Global

Marine Biodiversity," Jones and Cheung use a combination of ethos, logos, passion,

and language to persuade readers to recognize the urgent need to address climate
 Tseni 2

change's impacts on marine biodiversity. Readers can discover the subtleties of how

authors construct their arguments, arouse feelings, and offer proof by probing into

their rhetorical decisions. By using this lens, readers will be able to comprehend how

these research activities go beyond academic discourse, striking a personal chord with

people and inspiring group action in the direction of environmental stewardship.

Therefore, in order to fully understand the significant impact of the authors' work in

influencing attitudes and promoting positive change about the future of our planet,

readers of all kinds are asked to critically assess the rhetorical methods employed by

the authors.

Jones and Cheung establish credibility by meticulously drawing on a diverse

range(ethos) of peer-reviewed studies and reports. The Intergovernmental Panel on

Climate Change (IPCC) and top scientific journals are just two of the many reliable

sources that the writers mention in their work. This careful citation boosts the writers'

credibility, which helps the readers believe them and backs up what they say about

how climate change impacts marine biodiversity. Furthermore, they not only show

their competence but also reinforce the legitimacy and dependability of their argument

by firmly basing their claims on previously published research. This thorough

reference not only raises the writers' stature but also highlights how urgent the

problem is by demonstrating the depth of scholarly agreement on the subject. Thus,

readers are more likely to accept the authors' conclusions regarding the projected

impacts of climate change on marine biodiversity due to the established ethos.

Emotional appeals (passion) are used effectively through vivid descriptions of

potential biodiversity loss. Readers' empathy and concern are sparked by Jones and

Cheung's emotional portrayal of the potential loss of iconic sea creatures and their

habitats in the article, using emotion to appeal to revelers. The authors connect readers
 Tseni 3

emotionally to the problem by depicting the real effects of climate change on marine

ecosystems, which distresses them and emphasizes the urgency of taking action to

reduce its effects. By telling stories about coral reef bleaching and the resulting

habitat loss, authors make the effects of climate change more real and help readers

connect with the problem. and its significant impact on the world's ecosystems.

The authors present compelling logical arguments(logos) supported by multi-

model ensemble projections. Through rigorous analysis of climate models and

statistical methods, Jones and Cheung provide robust evidence to support their

projections of future marine biodiversity under different climate change

scenarios. They also improve the logical consistency of their argument and the

persuasiveness of their findings by firmly establishing the validity of their claims

through scientific investigation, by methodically analyzing the results of several

climate models, the authors allow for a thorough assessment of the uncertainty and

variability in predicted outcomes. This analytical technique not only raises the study's

credibility but also offers insightful information about the possible range of

biodiversity outcomes in the future under various climatic scenarios. The authors

make the effects of climate change more relatable to readers by sharing stories of

coral reef bleaching and the subsequent devastation of marine habitats. In addition, by

intertwining scientific rigor with real-world examples, Jones and Cheung effectively

bridge the gap between abstract climate projections and tangible ecological impacts,

making the consequences of climate change more palpable and urgent for readers.

Jones and Cheung use clear and accessible language (language) to

communicate complex scientific concepts to a wide audience by making

communication easier. While the article contains technical terminology specific to the

field of marine science, the authors provide explanations and context to ensure
 Tseni 4

understanding by readers with different levels of expertise, this language choice

effectively reaches a wider audience improving the article's accessibility and

encouraging engagement with the subject of matter, thus attracting each kind of

reader. By adopting clear and concise language, the authors increase the accessibility

and understanding of study findings for stakeholders, decision makers, and the

general public. This inclusive method of communication enhances the impact of the

article by highlighting the importance of clear communication of scientific facts in

shaping public opinion and decision-making, including the whole of society.

In "Ensemble Multi-Model Projections of Climate Change Impacts on Global

Marine Biodiversity," Jones and Cheung deftly use a combination of rhetorical

strategies to persuade readers to recognize the seriousness of the issue and the urgent

need to address the impacts of climate change on marine biodiversity. By using ethos,

passion, logos and understandable language, writers successfully captivate readers

and convey the seriousness of the problem and grasp the text. Through critical

analysis of the authors' rhetorical choices, readers develop a deeper understanding of

persuasive strategies in scientific discourse and their influence on attitudes and

actions toward pressing environmental issues. As readers reflect on the power of

effective communication in shaping social perspectives and driving positive change,

they are reminded of our collective responsibility and take action to protect the

planet's future for generations to come.

Works Cited
 Tseni 5

Jones, Miranda C.; Cheung, William W. L. “Multi-model ensemble projections of

climate change effects on global marine biodiversity.” ICES journal of marine

science, March 2015,

https://tamiu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01TAMIU_INST/1uu8ptt/

cdi_unpaywall_primary_10_1093_icesjms_fsu172.