Saint Michael College, Cantilan, Incorporated

Cantila, Surigao del Sur

College Department

Pre – Service Teacher’s Actual Teaching Observation and Rating Sheet

Name of Student ____________________________ Time_____________________

Subject Taught _____________________________ Date ____________________

Legend: 4 – Outstanding 3- Very Satisfactory 2 – Fair 1 – Needs Improvement

I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY 4 3 2 1
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerisms that tend to disturb the student’s attention.
C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect and attention.
D. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm.
E. the teacher has well-modulated voice.
II. LESSON PLANNING
A. Lesson plan is well prepared.
B. There is congruence between:
1. objective and subject matter
2. objective and teaching procedure
3. objective and formative test
4. objective and assignment
III. CONTENT
The teacher:
A. demonstrate in depth knowledge of the subject matter.
B. is also able to relate lessons to actual situations.
C. keeps abreast of new ideas and understanding in the field.
D. gives sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful learning experiences.
IV. TEACHING METHODS
A. Method/s used was /were suited to the needs and capabilities of the students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the students’ capabilities
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test results during teaching.
V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
1. attendance
2. assignment/ homework/agreement
3. practice exercises
4. group work/projects
5. passing in and out of the room
6. correcting, distributing and collecting paper
B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom.
C. Instructional materials were within easy reach of the teacher during his/her teaching.
VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS
The teacher’s questioning skill such as the following stimulates discussion in different
ways:
1. probing for learner’s understanding
2. helping students articulate their ideas and thinking process
3. promoting risk-taking and problem solving
4. facilitating factual recall
 5. encouraging convergent and divergent thinking
6. stimulating curiosity
7. helping students to ask questions
Total
Equivalent
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________ __________________________________
Date of Observation Cooperating Teacher’s Signature
 SCORE EQUIV
135
61 73.7 0 70.0
62 73.8 1 70.1
91. 63 73.8 2 70.1
111 1 64 73.9 3 70.2
91. 65 73.9 4 70.2
112 5 5 70.3
66 74.0
91. 6 70.4
67 74.8 7 70.4
113 9 68 75.2 8 70.5
92. 69 75.6 9 70.5
114 2 70 75.9 10 70.6
92. 71 76.3 11 70.7
115 6 72 76.7 12 70.7
93. 73 77.0 13 70.8
116 0 74 77.4 14 70.8
93. 75 77.8 15 70.9
117 3 76 78.1
16 71.0
93. 17 71.0
77 78.5 18 71.1
118 7 78 78.9 19 71.2
94. 79 79.3 20 71.2
119 1 80 79.6 21 71.3
94. 81 80.0 22 71.3
120 4 82 80.4 23 71.4
94. 83 80.7 24 71.5
121 8 84 81.1 25 71.5
95. 85 81.5 26 71.6
122 2 86 81.9
27 71.6
95. 87 82.2
28 71.7
123 6 29 71.8
88 82.6 30 71.8
95. 89 83.0 31 71.9
124 9
90 83.3 32 71.9
96.
91 83.7 33 72.0
125 3
92 84.1 34 72.1
96. 35 72.1
93 84.4
126 7 36 72.2
94 84.8
97. 37 72.2
95 85.2
127 4 38 72.3
96 85.6
97. 39 72.4
97 85.9
128 6 40 72.4
98 86.3 41 72.5
98.
99 86.7 42 72.5
129 8
100 87.0 43 72.6
99.
101 87.4 44 72.7
130 2
102 87.8 45 72.7
99. 46 72.8
103 88.1
131 6 47 72.8
104 88.5
132 100 48 72.9
105 88.9
49 73.0
106 89.3
50 73.0
107 89.6
51 73.1
108 90.0 52 73.2
109 90.4 53 73.2
110 90.7 54 73.3
55 73.3
56 73.4
57 73.5
58 73.5
59 73.6
60 73.6