Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Attitude and Impact Factors Toward Organ Transplantation and

Donation Among Transplantation Nurses in China


J.-F. Xiea,b, C.-Y. Wangb, G.-P. Heb, Y.-Z. Minga, Q.-Q. Wana, J. Liua, L.-N. Gonga, and L.-F. Liua,*
a
Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, HuNan Province, China; and the bXiangya Nursing School, Central South
University, Changsha, HuNan Province, China

ABSTRACT
Background. Health workers’ awareness and knowledge of transplantation medicine can
improve people’s sensitivity and reduce their degree of opposition to donations. The
medical literature contains numerous examples of attitudes toward organ transplantation
and donation aimed at university students or medical staff members, but rarely for trans-
plantation nurses.
Objective. The purposes of the study were to investigate the attitudes toward organ trans-
plantation and donation among transplantation nurses and to explore the impact factors.
Methods. The study was conducted in 37 transplantation surgery wards in 22 hospitals
using cross-sectional approach. SPSS (International Business Machines Corporation,
Armonk, New York, USA) 7.0 software was used to analysis descriptive and inferential
statistics for data.
Results. Five hundred thirty-six effective questionnaires were received and the effective
rate was 89.33%. Nurses’ mean age was 28.40 years with a mean service length of 6.54
years. Among these nurses, 66.6% and 78.0% were willing to accept organ transplantation
surgery for themselves and their relatives, respectively. Of these nurses, 33.4% would
donate their organs after death; whereas 39.9% were uncertain. Only 38.2% were willing
to register in the national organ donation system. Of these nurses, 28.2% were willing to
sign the organ donation consent forms when their relatives became potential organ
donors, and 45.7% were uncertain. Eight independent variables that affected nurses’
attitudes toward donating their organs from most to least significant were: ratio of nurse
to bed, title, employment form, age, length of service, position, monthly income, and the
highest educational degree earned. Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant
correlation among nurses’ attitudes toward organ transplantation, organ donation, and
online registration.
Conclusion. The attitude toward donation and transplantation in the hospitals was not
too optimistic, and an improvement in the training regarding transplantation and donation
among nurses in China is necessary. Nurses are an important group who generate opinion
in the patient population, and their negative attitudes can have a significant negative
impact on society’s attitudes toward organ donation.

O RGAN transplantation has become the optimal choice


to save and extend lives [1]. After February 2013,
when the human organ donation plan was officially
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China Youth Science Fund Project (NO. 81502701).
*Address correspondence to Li-Fang Liu, Third Xiangya Hos-
launched in China, donation after cardiac death has become pital, Central South University, Changsha, HuNan province,
the main source of organ donation, which eases the great No.138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, HuNan Province 410013,
tension of the Chinese donor market to a certain extent. China. E-mail: 2308321132@qq.com

0041-1345/17 ª 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.02.060 230 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10169

1226 Transplantation Proceedings, 49, 1226e1231 (2017)


TRANSPLANTATION NURSES IN CHINA 1227

However, the organ donor shortage has always been a questionnaire was self-designed and consisted of several questions.
problem disturbing transplantation professionals worldwide. These types of questionnaires have been proven to be effective tools
Attitudes about organ donation and volunteerism are for assessing the attitudes of organ transplantation and donation of
important factors in the lack of donors. hemodialysis patients in our preliminary research [6]. The study team
was comprised of 22 nurse managers and 4 nursing postgraduates.
Health care professionals are key elements in facilitating
Firstly, team members explained the purpose of the study and asso-
the cadaveric organ donation process [2], especially the ciated concepts. All questionnaires were completed anonymously. To
transplantation nursing professionals who have more con- increase the accuracy of the questionnaires, 30 minutes to 45 minutes
tact with patients than any other professionals. The nurses’ were allowed for completion.
awareness and knowledge of transplantation and donation
can affect other people’s sensitivity and attitudes. There Data Analysis
have been many medical studies regarding attitudes toward
All information from the questionnaires was input to a computer
organ transplantation and donation aimed at university according to sequential numbers. Both descriptive and inferential
students or medical staff members [3e5], but these are rarely statistics were used for data analysis using SPSS 17.0 software
about transplantation department nurses. As direct partici- (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, New
pants in the transplantation and donation process, trans- York, USA). A value of P < .05 was considered statistically sig-
plantation nurses are thought to have more active attitudes nificant. An alpha of .05 was determined a priori.
toward transplantation and donation. Their attitudes and
behaviors are on behalf of the transplantation and donation
RESULTS
organization, which will have significant impact on the Demographic Information of Subjects
general patient population. The aims of the present study
were to assess the attitudes toward to organ transplantation A total of 600 questionnaires were sent out; 591 were
and donation among transplantation nurses using a ques- completed and returned, and 536 were valid for our study
tionnaire designed by the authors, to identify influencing (89.33%). The mean age of the study group was 28.40 years
factors, and then to provide information for the governor to (SD ¼ 4.800, range: 20w51 years), and the mean length of
make changes to the educational policy and program. service was 6.54 years (SD ¼ 5.302, range: 1w31 years). The
mean ratio of nurse to bed was 0.38 (SD ¼ 0.11, range:
0.22w0.59 years). As shown in Table 1, the majority of the
MATERIAL AND METHODS participants were female (96.3%), their ages were between 26
Design
years and 30 years (42.5%), they were temporarily employ-
This study used a cross-sectional approach. Between July 2015 and ment (39.7%), primary nurses (44.4%), with no title (86.2%),
November 2015, 600 nurses of transplantation surgery wards their first degree was junior college (50.4%), their highest
completed a self-designed questionnaire for assessing the attitudes degree was undergraduate (80.2%), they were married
toward organ transplantation and donation. The study was con- (52.1%), had no children (57.6%), their monthly income was
ducted in 37 transplantation surgery wards in 22 hospitals.
between 3001w5000 Yuan ($460w$790) (42.0%), their
length of service was less than 5 years (44.2%), the ratio of
Subjects
nurses to beds was less than 0.4 (58.4%), and their number of
The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) length of service for at night shifts were more than 8 per month (48.3%).
least 1 year; 2) working in organ transplantation surgery ward; 3)
agreeing to participate in the study. The study group consisted of a Attitudes Toward Organ Transplantation and Donation
convenience sample of 600 nurses. Informed consent was obtained
from each subject and this work was approved by the Ethics Attitudes toward organ transplantation and donation
Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South among transplantation nurses were shown in Table 2.
University. Among these nurses, 66.6% were willing to accept the organ
transplantation surgery for themselves, 14.4% were not, and
Data Collection Procedure 19.0% were uncertain. Of the participants, 78.0% were
Each nurse completed a two-part questionnaire. The first part con- willing to accept the organ transplantation surgery for their
cerns general data (i.e., gender, age, length of service, employment relatives, 8.6% were not, and 13.4% were uncertain.
form, title, first degree, highest degree, and monthly income). The Of the nurses, 33.4% would donate their organs after death,
second part of the questionnaire regarding transplantation and 26.7% would not, 39.9% were uncertain, and only 38.2% were
donation-related data (attitude toward organ transplantation for willing to register in the national organ donation system. Of
yourself or relatives if necessary, attitude toward donating your organs the nurses, 28.2% were willing to sign the organ donation
after death, willingness to sign the organ donation consent when facing
consent when their relatives became potential organ donors,
your relatives becoming potential organ donors, attitude toward online
26.1% were not, and 45.7% were uncertain.
registration for self-donation, understanding of transplantation pro-
cedures, and understanding of donation procedures, had received
Among the replies regarding understanding of the
specific training in donation and transplantation procedures, and transplantation procedures of the participants, 22.2%
attitude to receive training). At present, there is no standard ques- strongly agreed, 64.0% agreed, 10.1% were uncertain, 3.0%
tionnaire to measure the attitude toward organ transplantation and disagreed, and 0.7% strongly disagreed. Replies regarding
donation of medical personnel throughout the world. The the understanding of donation procedures, 24.6% strongly
1228 XIE, WANG, HE ET AL

Table 1. Characteristics of the Participants (n [ 536) Table 1. (continued)


Characteristics N % Characteristics N %
Gender Number of night shifts per month (day)
Male 20 3.7 0 64 11.9
Female 516 96.3 1e8 213 39.7
Age, yrs >8 259 48.3
<25 172 32.1
26e30 228 42.5
31e35 100 18.7 agreed, and 45.9% agreed, 22.0% were uncertain, 5.4%
36e40 20 3.7 disagreed, and 2.1% strongly disagreed.
>40 16 3.0 With regard to training, 39.7% of respondents said they
Employment form had received specific training on donation procedures at some
Temporary 213 39.7 time during their job training, although 77.1% acknowledged
Contractor 141 26.3 that they would like to receive training in this area.
Employee 181 33.8
Missing 1 0.2 The Influence of Basic Characteristics on Attitudes to Organ
Title Donation
Nurse 208 38.8
Senior nurse 238 44.4
The influence of basic characteristics on nurses’ attitudes
Supervisor nurse 86 16.0 toward organ donation was analyzed (Tables 3 and 4).
Associate chief nurse 4 0.7 Different employment forms (temporary, contract, etc.),
Position positions, highest degrees earned, and ratios of nurses to
General nurse 462 86.2 beds groups had statistical significance in the difference of
Team leader 46 8.6 the attitudes toward donating their own organs after death
Head nurse 24 4.5 (P < .05). Compared with the general nurse group (32.5%)
Supervisor 4 0.7 and the quality control leader group (34.8%), the head
First degree nurse group (46.4%) exhibited significantly greater willing-
Below junior college 70 13.0
ness to donate their organs after death. In the highest
Junior college 270 50.4
Undergraduate 192 35.8
degree earned group, the education level above under-
Master degree or above 4 0.8 graduate group (50.0%) was significantly higher than those
Highest degree whose education levels were undergraduate (34.7%), and
Below junior college 4 0.7 junior college (23.8%). The ratio of nurses-to-beds-greater-
Junior college 80 14.9 than-0.5 group (50.4%) was statistically higher than the
Undergraduate 430 80.2 other two groups. There were no statistical differences
Master degree or above 22 4.1 between males and females regarding self-donations and
Marriage relatives’ donations (P > .05).
Married 279 52.1 Results showed that different employment forms,
Widowhood 4 0.7
positions, ratios of nurses to beds, and lengths of service had
Divorced 2 0.4
Unmarried 251 46.8
statistical significance effect on the attitudes toward signing
Children the organ donation consent forms when their relatives
None 308 57.5 became potential organ donors (P < .05). The ratio of
Had children 224 41.8 nurses-to-beds-greater-than-0.5 group (46.0%) was statisti-
Missing 4 0.7 cally higher than the other two groups. Comparison of pos-
Monthly income (RMB) itive attitude responses based on length of service revealed
<3000 58 10.8 that the length between 11w15 years’ group (45.5%) had a
3000e5000 225 42.0 higher positive attitude as compared to other groups.
5001e7000 167 31.2 The differences of intention to donate among different
7001e9000 60 11.2
understandings of transplantation procedures and donation
>9000 26 4.9
Length of service, yrs
procedures groups were statistically significant (P < .05).
<5 237 44.2 Nurses who were willing donate their own organs and their
5e10 179 33.4 relatives’ organs were statistically higher in the “strongly
11e15 77 14.4 agreed” group for understanding of transplantation
>15 42 7.8 procedures and donation procedures, respectively.
Missing 1 0.2
Ratio of nurse to bed Multiple Linear Regression Equation of Nurses’ Attitudes
<0.4 313 58.4 Toward Their Organ Donation and Associated Variables
0.4e0.5 84 15.7
The F test revealed that F ¼ 2.171, P ¼ .008 which was less
>0.5 139 25.9
than 0.01. That is, the multiple linear regression equation
TRANSPLANTATION NURSES IN CHINA 1229

Table 2. Attitudes Toward Organ Transplantation and Donation Table 3. The Influence of Basic Characteristics on Nurses’
Among Transplantation Nurses (N [ 536) Attitudes to Self-organ Donation (n [ 536)
Variables n % Attitude Toward Own Donation
P
Willingness to accept the organ transplant surgery for their relatives Variables Yes (%) No (%) Uncertainty c2 Value
Yes 418 78.0 Employment form
Not sure 72 13.4 Temporary 48 (22.5) 75 (35.2) 90 (42.3) 29.787 .000
No 46 8.6 Contractor 58 (41.1) 39 (27.7) 44 (31.2)
Willingness to donate organs after death Employee 73 (40.3) 29 (16.0) 79 (43.6)
Yes 179 33.4 Position
Not sure 214 39.9 General nurse 150 (32.5) 128 (27.7) 184 (39.8) 12.931 .044
No 143 26.7 Team leader 16 (34.8) 15 (32.6) 15 (32.6)
Willingness to register in the national organ donation system Head nurse and 13 (46.4) 0 (0) 15 (53.6)
Yes 205 38.2 above
Not sure 228 42.5 Highest degree
No 103 19.2 Below junior college 0 (0) 2 (50.0) 2 (50) 12.673 .049
Willingness to sign the organ donation consent when facing their Junior college 19 (23.8) 31 (38.8) 30 (37.5)
relatives becoming potential organ donors Undergraduate 149 (34.7) 106 (24.7) 175 (40.7)
Yes 151 28.2 Master degree or 11 (50.0) 4 (18.2) 7 (31.8)
Not sure 245 45.7 above
No 140 26.1 Ratio of nurse to bed
Willingness to accept a donated organ for transplantation if <0.4 85 (27.2) 87 (27.8) 141 (45.0) 30.543 .000
necessary 0.4e0.5 24 (28.6) 19 (22.6) 41 (48.8)
Yes 357 66.6 >0.5 70 (50.4) 37 (26.6) 32 (23.0)
Not sure 102 19.0 Understanding of transplantation procedures
No 77 14.4 Strongly agree 61 (51.3) 17 (14.3) 41 (34.5) 42.083 .000
Agree 102 (29.7) 105 (30.6) 136 (39.7)
Uncertainty 13 (24.1) 18 (33.3) 23 (42.6)
Disagree 3 (18.8) 0 (0) 13 (81.3)
fitting the data showed statistical significance. The high abso- Strongly disagree 0 (0) 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0)
lute value of the standardized regression coefficient indicated a Understanding of donation procedures
significant effect of corresponding independent variables on Y. Strongly agree 57 (43.2) 16 (12.1) 59 (44.7) 51.485 .000
Eight independent variables that affected nurses’ attitudes to- Agree 88 (35.8) 88 (35.8) 70 (28.5)
ward donating their organs from most to least significant were: Uncertainty 27 (22.9) 33 (28.0) 58 (49.2)
ratio of nurses to beds, title, employment form, age, length of Disagree 4 (13.8) 4 (13.8) 21 (72.4)
service, position, monthly income, and highest degree. Strongly disagree 3 (27.3) 2 (18.2) 6 (54.5)

DISCUSSION greater than 0.5 (50.4%) was statistically higher than the
Public acceptance of routine medical procedures is nearly other two groups on attitudes toward self-donation and
universal, but controversy over invasive procedures such as signing the organ donation consent form when facing their
transplantation is common. Organ transplantation is the relatives becoming potential organ donors. Thus, the ratio
most preferred treatment for end-stage organ disease and of nursing beds is the biggest influencing factors on nurses’
organ failure. It offers a better quality of life with better attitudes toward organ donation, and it indicates that we
survival benefits. Therefore, the magnitude of organ must pay more attention to this issue. In this study, the head
retrieval is extremely important. Nurses play vital roles in nurse group (46.4%) exhibited significantly greater willing-
imparting positive knowledge towards organ transplantation ness in attitudes toward deceased donation when compared
and donation. The multiple linear regression equation has to the general nursing group (32.5%) and the quality control
shown that the effects of eight independent variables on leader group (P < .05). The education-level-above-
nurses’ attitudes toward donating their organs from large to undergraduate group (50.0%) was significantly higher than
small were as follows: ratio of nurses to beds, title, those whose education levels were undergraduate (34.7%)
employment form, age, length of service, position, monthly and junior college (23.8%). Higher education positively
income, and highest degree. Factors determining attitudes promotes desirable knowledge and willingness of organ
toward signing the organ donation consent form when donation. This is similar to the findings of other study
facing their relatives becoming potential organ donors are groups [5,7]. In China, nurses are mostly female. This has
similar to attitudes toward self-donation. Ratio of nurses to been identified in the present study; the majority (n ¼ 516,
beds in human resources management has been a sensitive 96.3%) of the study participants were females. In our study,
topic in China. In this study, there were 58.4% participants there were no statistical differences between males and
in a ward with a ratio less than 0.4, which exposed a serious females regarding self-donation of organs and relatives’
shortage of nurses. The group with a ratio of nurses to beds organ donation. This finding contradicts with other studies
1230 XIE, WANG, HE ET AL

Table 4. The Influence of Basic Characteristics on Nurses’ organ donation in Southeastern Spain found that there was
Attitudes to Relatives’ Organ Donation (n [ 536) a very favorable attitude toward organ donation, especially
Attitudes Toward Relatives’ Donation among physicians, among who up to 88% are in favor of
P
Variables Yes (%) No (%) Uncertainty c2 Value donation [14]. However, in our study, the attitude toward
donation of the transplantation nurses were not very
Employment form
Temporary 32 (15.0) 73 (34.3) 108 (50.7) 42.516 .000 favorable; only 33.4% of nurses would donate their organs
Contractor 57 (40.4) 38 (27.0) 46 (32.6) after death, which was less than what had been reported by
Employee 62 (34.3) 29 (16.0) 90 (49.7) foreign countries (56.6%w70.8%) [15e17]. The proportion
Position of nurses who would register in the national organ donation
General nurse 128 (27.7) 125 (27.1) 209 (45.2) 12.421 .053 system for cadaveric donation was only 38.2% and less than
Team leader 14 (30.4) 15 (32.6) 17 (37.0) a third of nurses (28.2%) were willing to sign the organ
Head nurse and 9 (32.1) 0 (0) 19 (67.9) donation consent form when facing their relatives become
above potential organ donors. Health professionals are a funda-
Ratio of nurse to bed
mental link between society and the health system when it
<0.4 58 (18.5) 84 (26.8) 171 (54.6) 43.624 .000
comes to fostering donation and transplantation. Several
0.4e0.5 29 (34.5) 19 (22.6) 36 (42.9)
>0.5 64 (46.0) 37 (26.6) 38 (27.3) studies have found that health professionals are not always
Length of service, yrs properly aware of the question of donation and brain death
<5 68 (28.7) 51 (21.5) 118 (49.8) 28.446 .000 and display a lack of knowledge in this area [18]. This lack
5e10 38 (21.2) 65 (36.3) 76 (42.5) may influence the way in which donation is presented to the
11e15 35 (45.5) 17 (22.1) 25 (32.5) relatives of potential donors, resulting in an unfavorable
>15 10 (23.8) 7 (16.7) 25 (59.5) outcome. Other studies revealed that, despite a positive
Understanding of transplantation procedures attitude toward donation, health professionals can be reti-
Strongly agree 55 (46.2) 16 (13.4) 48 (40.3) 40.936 .000 cent when it comes to talking to relatives about donation
Agree 80 (23.3) 103 (30.0) 160 (46.6)
[19]. Almost half of the health workers studied was unde-
Uncertainty 12 (22.2) 18 (33.3) 24 (44.4)
cided regarding transplantation. This implies activities that
Disagree 4 (25.0) 0 (0) 12 (75.0)
Strongly disagree 0 (0) 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0) motivate and encourage positive attitudes through appro-
Understanding of donation procedures priate information dissemination are still needed. With
Strongly agree 52 (39.4) 16 (12.1) 64 (48.5) 34.743 .000 regard to training, 39.7% of respondents said they had
Agree 62 (25.2) 85 (34.6) 99 (40.2) received specific training on donation procedures at some
Uncertainty 29 (24.6) 33 (28.0) 56 (47.5) time during their job training, and 77.1% acknowledged that
Disagree 4 (13.8) 4 (13.8) 21 (72.4) they would like to receive training in this area. Evanisko
Strongly disagree 4 (36.4) 2 (18.2) 5 (45.5) et al [20] reported in their study that less than one-third of
those taking part had received specific training, whereas
Jenilek et al [4] found that only one-quarter of the sample
[8e10] that found that females had more positive attitudes population had received training in donation and trans-
as they may have more emotional values compared to males. plantation. Attitudes and lack of knowledge among health
A possible reason for this may be that the amount of males care workers have been identified as barriers and pivotal to
in our study were so small, which was insufficient to successful organ donation [21]. Knowledge level had a
compare with females. In this study, there were 66.6% significant direct effect on attitudes and an indirect effect on
nurses who would undergo transplantation for themselves if subjective norms and perceived behavioral controls [22]. In
necessary, less than what was reported by foreign countries this study, nurses willing to donate their own organs and
(73.3%) [11]. This finding may be related to the relatively their relatives’ organs were statistically higher in the
young ages, shorter lengths of service, and temporary “strongly agreed” group for understanding of trans-
appointment in transplantation nurses (Table 1). Moreover, plantation procedures and donation procedures, respec-
48.3% nurses’ numbers of late night shifts were greater than tively. When people have a greater understanding of the
8 per month. People tend to have only one job in their transplantation and donation procedures, they are likely to
lifetime in China; therefore, job stability, guaranteed have more active attitudes toward transplantation and
income, and flexible work time were the main factors donation. It shows that transplantation nurses with higher
influencing the nurses’ emotional failure and professional levels of information about transplantation and donation
minds. Thus, temporary appointment is bound to affect showed plausible attitudes toward transplantation and
young nurses’ professional minds [12]. donation.
A study in Poland found that the attitude toward organ More specific education directed toward organ donation
donation of nursing students was favorable in 69% [13]. In rather than general education is more relevant in improving
Georgiadou’s study conducted in Greece, nearly half of the attitude of health workers to organ donation [23,24]. In a
people (48.3%) wanted to become donors and 49.1% would study about knowledge of the brain death concept
donate the organs of their relatives after death [10]. A study conducted by personnel in Spanish and Latin-American
about primary health care personnel faced with cadaveric health care centers, a direct relationship had been found
TRANSPLANTATION NURSES IN CHINA 1231

between understanding of the concept and attitudes toward [7] Gore JL, Singer JS, Brown AF, et al. The socioeconomic
deceased donation (P < .001); people who understand the status of donors and recipients of living unrelated renal transplants
in the United States. J Urol 2012;187(5):1760e5.
concept more were more likely to have a positive attitude [8] Burra P, De Bona M, Canova D, et al. Changing attitude to
toward deceased donation [25].Within 13 years, Portugal organ donation and transplantation in university students during
reported more than 100% increases in organ donation by the years of medical school in Italy. Transplant Proc 2005;37(2):
training health professionals [26]. Medical staff members 547e50.
are the first to establish contact with potential donors, and if [9] Mekahli D, Liutkus A, Fargue S, et al. Survey of first-year
medical students to assess their knowledge and attitudes toward
they are well-informed and convinced, they could engender organ transplantation and donation. Transplant Proc 2009;41(2):
successful organ donation [27] d both living and cadaveric. 634e48.
Nursing plays a fundamental role within the process of [10] Georgiadou E, Sounidakis N, Mouloudi E, et al. Attitudes
organ donation and transplantation. In this respect, nurses and behavior toward organ donation in Greece. Transplant Proc
2012;44(9):2698e701.
of transplantation surgery wards have major influence on [11] Kabbali N, Mikou S, Bardai G, et al. Attitude of hemodi-
the opinions of the rest of the general patient population alysis patients toward renal transplantation: a Moroccan interre-
regarding organ donation and transplantation, especially gional survey. Transplant Proc 2014;46(5):1328e31.
nurse managers [1]. [12] Xiao XL, Hu QQ, Liu YP, et al. Perceptions of benefits and
The primary limitation of our study was that it was its effects on job burnout in nurses. Chinese Nurs Manag
2014;14(1):56e60.
questionnaire-based. More valid research tools are needed [13] Mikla M, Rios A, Lopez-Navas A, et al. Factors affecting
to develop more detailed data. Also, the study was attitude toward organ donation among nursing students in Warsaw,
conducted among only 22 hospitals of nurses in trans- Poland. Transplant Proc 2015;47(9):2590e2.
plantation surgery wards. Therefore, our results cannot be [14] Ríos A, Ramírez P, Galindo PJ, et al. Primary health care
personnel faced with cadaveric organ donation: a multicenter study
generalized to the community. More studies should be in south-eastern Spain. Clin Transplant 2008;22:657e63.
performed to rectify the decline in organ donation rate. [15] Lomero MM, Rasero MJ, Fuentes L, et al. Knowledge and
attitude of health personnel at the Garraf Health Consortium
regarding donation and transplantation. Transplant Proc
CONCLUSIONS
2015;47(8):2318e21.
This study showed that Chinese transplantation department [16] Wale J, Arthur A, Faull C. An analysis of knowledge and
nurses have little willingness toward transplantation and attitudes of hospice staff towards organ and tissue donation. BMJ
Support Palliat Care 2014;4(1):98e103.
donation in the hospitals. They are a group that generates [17] Wakefield CE, Watts KJ, Homewood J, et al. Attitudes
opinion in the population, and their negative attitudes can toward organ donation and donor behavior: a review of the inter-
have a significant negative impact on society’s attitudes national literature. Prog Transplant 2010;20(4):380e91.
toward organ donation. The proposed line of work to follow [18] Bøgh L, Madsen M. Attitudes, knowledge, and proficiency
in relation to organ donation: a questionnaire-based analysis in
in the future is to ensure that health professionals, especially
donor hospitals in northern Denmark. Transplant Proc 2005;37(8):
the transplantation nurses, are given adequate training 3256e7.
regarding transplantation and donation so as to increase [19] Chernenko SM, Jensen L, Newburn-Cook C, et al. Organ
donation rates. On the other hand, government organiza- donation and transplantation: a survey of critical care health
tions should take up the awareness programs to the masses professionals in nontransplant hospitals. Prog Transplant
2005;15(1):69e77.
through social media. [20] Evanisko MJ, Beasley CL, Brigham LE, et al. Readiness of
critical care physicians and nurses to handle requests for organ
REFERENCES donation. Am J Crit Care 1998;7(1):4e12.
[21] Li Y, Song A, Li N, et al. The Research on the medical
[1] Tam WW, Suen LK, Chan HY. Knowledge, attitudes and students’ willing of body donation. J Jining Med Univ 2015;2:145e8.
commitment toward organ donation among nursing students in [22] Kim EA, Choi SE. Structural equation modeling on living
Hong Kong. Transplant Proc 2012;44(5):1196e200. and brain death organ donation intention in nursing students.
[2] Chakradhar K, Doshi D, Srikanth Reddy B, et al. Knowl- J Korean Acad Nurs 2015;45(6):802e11.
edge, attitude and practice regarding organ donation among In- [23] Kim JR, Fisher MJ, Elliott D. Undergraduate nursing stu-
dian dental students. Int J Organ Transplant Med 2016;7(1): dents’ knowledge and attitudes towards organ donation in Korea:
28e35. implications for education. Nurse Educ Today 2006;26:465e74.
[3] Potenza R, Guermani A, Peluso M, et al. Effectiveness of an [24] Irving MJ, Tong A, Jan S, et al. Factors that influence the
education program on donation and transplant aimed at students decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative
of the nursing degree course. Transplant Proc 2015;47(7): literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:2526e33.
2097e101. [25] Ríos A, López-Navas AI, Ayala-García MA, et al. Knowl-
[4] Jelinek GA, Marck CH, Weiland TJ, et al. Organ and tissue edge of the brain death concept by personnel in Spanish and Latin-
donation-related attitudes, education and practices of emergency American healthcare centers. Int J Artif Organs 2014;37(4):336e43.
department clinicians in Australia. Emerg Med Australas [26] The Madrid resolution on organ donation and trans-
2012;24(3):244e50. plantation: national responsibility in meeting the needs of patients,
[5] Schaeffner ES, Windisch W, Freidel K, et al. Knowledge and guided by the WHO principles. Transplantation 2011;91(Suppl. 11):
attitude regarding organ donation among medial students and S29e31.
physicians. Transplantation 2004;77:1714e8. [27] Kosieradzki M, Czerwinski J, Jakubowska-Winecka A, et al.
[6] Qiao B, Liu L, Liu J, et al. A study on the attitude toward Partnership for transplantation: a new initiative to increase
kidney transplantation and factors among hemodialysis patients in deceased organ donation in Poland. Transplant Proc 2012;44(7):
China. Transplant Proc 2016;48:2601e7. 2176e7.

You might also like