Quantum Technologies of Disease

Programs Management

Valeriy Revo

Toronto - 2024

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 Quantum technologies of disease programs management

Preprint

Valeriy Revo. MD, Ph.D., Full Professor. Toronto, Canada

valeri.revo@gmail.com

Statements and Declarations

Acknowledgment

The author thanks his wife, Zoya Revo, for all possible support in the author’s work when
writing this article.

Funding

The author has not received support from any organization for the submitted work.

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

ISBN 9781990242106

Abstract

Technologies managing the program content of diseases can already be available to

medicine today. The purpose of the publication is to justify the need to study these programs
as quantum-dimensional attributes of living things. The main objectives of the publication are:
1) to introduce specialists to the basic resources necessary to control quantum-dimensional
processes at the level of disease programs during their initiation and development; 2) to justify
the need to use the capabilities of clinical biophysics to manage disease programs. Controlling
quantum-dimensional processes in the organism will dramatically increase the efficiency and
reduce the cost of treatment and prevention.

Keywords: disease management, disease programs, researcher's bestiary, quantum level of the
organism, medicine of quantum processes, fundamental biological constant.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

Introduction

The doctor's main goal was to relieve the patient of pain and other disease
manifestations. However, this was often difficult or even impossible due to subjective and
objective circumstances.
Subjective circumstances are insufficient knowledge and skills of specialists. Objective
circumstances are, first of all, the use of an outdated natural philosophical paradigm, the basis
of which is the attitude towards illness as something initially harmful and external to the
organism. In this case, the doctor mainly paid attention to the symptoms. However, they are
only signs of a disease that do not reveal their content. However, more and more reasons have
accumulated to believe that diseases are one of the natural manifestations of the inherent
properties of living things [1, 2].
Another objective circumstance is the plurality of human diseases. This is his
phylogenetic inheritance. Indeed, disease programs arise at each stage of phylogenesis
simultaneously with the appearance of living beings at this level of systemic organization. The
number of disease programs that emerge at each stage of phylogenesis is constant [3]. Thus,
we can attribute this value to the fundamental biological constant for each stage of
phylogenesis. Living organisms that appear at the next stages of phylogenesis retain in their
phylogenetic memory all the disease programs of the previous stages.
Each disease has external manifestations in the form of its s patterns of symptoms. The
field of knowledge that studies them is pathology. This fundamental clinical discipline includes
pathological anatomy and pathological physiology. Today, some speculative constructs, such
as evidence-based medicine, deny the importance of pathological anatomy for the clinic. This
is a misconception that negatively affects the clinical thinking of practitioners [4].
Any phenomenon has a reason. As a phenomenon of Nature, disease also has an
objective reason for its occurrence both at the stage of phylogenesis and its manifestation in
the organism.

Causal factors of diseases

Until now, the study of disease has taken place at the phenomenological level, mainly
in the dimensional space of Newtonian physics. This approach did not allow us to understand
the nature of these natural phenomena for living things, the reason for their occurrence and the
causal mechanism. In addition, as clinical practice has shown, the presence of one disease can
block the development of another disease. Such relationships were called dystropies
(synonymous with “reverse comorbidity”). Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and
schizophrenia are some examples of dystropias [5]. In other cases, the presence of one disease
provoked and stimulated the development of another disease. For example, the clinical
manifestations of hypertension suggest that this patient also has coronary heart disease, etc.
[6]. Such relationships were called syntropic.
The noted circumstances served as the basis for attempts to use some diseases to treat
others, which were more dangerous to a given person's life. Among the most famous examples
of such “treatment” is the infection of syphilis patients with malaria. The results obtained
helped Julius Wagner-Jauregg, one of the apologists of this technique, receive the Nobel Prize
in 1927 [7].

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 For many reasons, this method did not gain further distribution. Subsequently, it was
transformed into the so-called pyrotherapy when various chemicals were used, the intake of
which was accompanied by hyperthermia of the patient. Subsequently, these speculative
methods were abandoned. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of syntropies and dystropies requires
explanation.
Luigi Fantappiè was the first (1942) to draw attention to the physical nature of syntropic
and dystropic relations, which he presented in his “The Unified Theory of the Physical and
Biological World” [8].
Analysis of the equations of quantum mechanics and special relativity allowed him to
obtain both positive and negative solutions. A positive solution assumes the propagation of
delayed waves from the source in the past, which is accompanied by an increase in entropy,
disorganization and energy dissipation.
The results obtained by Luigi Fantappiè allow us to assume that the phenomenon of
dystropia in clinical practice is due to two circumstances. The entropic impact of the wave
hypostasis of some disease programs in the phylogenetic memory of the organism has a
dystropic effect on already developing programs in it. Syntropic relationships, on the contrary,
imply an increase in diversity in the organism as a systemic integrity. This, in turn, reduces its
entropy.
I believe that there are also effects of interference and resonance of disease programs
that have a wave nature [9]. This circumstance forces us to pay attention to the space of
quantum measurements. Fundamental science defines an organism as a material object in the
dimension of Newtonian physics. Biology also represents it on the same scale. However, the
elements that make up any material object, including those representing the physical body of
any living creature, also have a quantum dimension. Obviously, this is not the limit.
For elements of quantum measurement, the corresponding measure is used – Planck
units (Max Planck, 1899). How do biological objects manifest themselves in this dimension?
Such a question is not even raised, although at this level phenomena that are fundamentally
important for living things are realized. Among them, first of all, systemic metamorphosis,
phylogenetic memory, diseases, and the work of consciousness should be noted.
Systemic metamorphosis is possible precisely at the quantum level. This phenomenon,
which occurs in Planck time (10-44 s), has a dual nature, both quantum and biological. The
temporal extent of this phenomenon cannot be greater than this value since, during this time,
no biological event characteristic of a living organism as a systemic whole should occur. Such
an almost instantaneous phenomenon should be represented as a first-order phase transition. In
this case, the systemic metamorphosis of a living organism is possible only if its elements'
unchanged systemic integrity is maintained, which in the systemic structure of the organism of
a new level of systemic organization acquires the next systemic rank in its hierarchical
structure. Important phenomena manifest systemic metamorphosis. Systemic metamorphoses
exhibit important phenomena.
Each new stage of phylogenesis begins with a systemic metamorphosis, during which
living organisms of a new level of systemic organization (LSO) are formed. In the new structure
of the system input, elements of the new LSO appear, while the total number of system input
elements triples. A third of them will be built into the system's output structure of the system.
In this case, the system rank of each transferred element is reduced by one order of magnitude.
See figure.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 IV LSO V LSO
Legend:

– Single-color circle is a basic system element

– First-order subsystem
– Second-order subsystem
– Third-order subsystem
– Fourth-order subsystem
IV LSO – A highly evolved brain system, V LSO – Highly evolved consciousness system in
systemic unity with the social form of external memory. Roman numerals indicate the levels of
the systemic organization of living Nature and Its basic information biomechanisms.

Figure. System model of a human and a living organism of the previous stage of phylogenesis
[10]. For a system model of all stages of phylogeny, see [11].

Planck units

The dimensions of the elements of the organism and the processes occurring in it, which
are familiar to classical medicine, are within the range accessible to modern measuring
technology. However, many of them, such as spontaneous, reversible, ultra-high-frequency
conformational dynamics (hydration ⇄ dehydration) of living protein, the work of
consciousness, disease programs initiation in the phylogenetic memory organism, and other
fundamental phenomena occur in the intervals, which are designated by Planck units of
measurement. Among them are Planck time and Planck length.
Planck time (10-44 s) is the time during which light travels a path equal to the Planck
length (1,616·10-35 m). This is the shortest possible length of time during which light travels
the shortest possible distance. At this level, modern physical theories stop working. This is
especially true for biological theories since living things are always complex systems by
definition, with fuzzy properties and extremely high uncertainty [12].
As J. V. Goethe wrote (Goethe, J. W. von, 1749-1832): “… ein eingeschränktes
lebendiges Wesen teil an der Unendlichkeit oder vielmehr, es hat etwas Unendliches in sich,
wenn wir nicht lieber sagen wollen, daß wir den Begriff der Existenz und der Vollkommenheit
des eingeschränktesten lebendigen Wesens nicht ganz fassen können und es also ebenso wie
das ungeheure Ganze, in dem alle Existenzen begriffen sind, für unendlich erklären müssen”.
[13].
Among the fundamental biological phenomena, we should be interested in those that
determine the safety of life and its quality. These are, first of all, diseases that have been studied
so far at the phenomenological level.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 Accepting this legacy of Claudius Galen and Paracelsus, we must use new possibilities
of knowledge and achievements of fundamental science. But even on this path, direct study of
a particular object or process is often difficult or impossible due to objective circumstances.
Researchers can turn to either Kant's transcendental experience or a thought experiment in such
a situation.

Bestiary of transcendental experience in science

A bestiary of transcendental experience in science (V. Revo, 2018) (from ancient Greek
δαίμων – spirit, divine power, reads as daimōn, + trans – through, on the other side, + from
Latin scandere – ascension, + … of experience in science) – definition of a hierarchical set of
transcendental entities possessing will and unlimited creativity in the area of their competence.
Since each person has in his phylogenetic memory programs of all diseases that have ever
arisen at the stages of phylogenesis, a number of fundamental questions arise regarding the
biological and physical nature of this part of existence [14]. However, researchers sometimes
do not have the opportunity to comprehend the content of the forms and principles of relations
of being for various reasons. One of them may be the lack of technical capabilities. Therefore,
they turn to a thought experiment with images of the imagination in the form of corresponding
visualized ideas and models that determine, according to I. Kant, “a priori conditions of
possible experience,” in other words, they turn to transcendental experience [15]. These
imageries are allegories of certain demons (according to J. von Goethe, 1811) [16].
I highlight thirteen of this kind's most famous thought experiments with different
hierarchical ranks [17]. These are nine demons of the inert world and four demons of the living
world. Seven demons of the inert world represent it in the quantum dimension, and two demons
represent it in the Newtonian physics dimension. Two demons of the living world represent it
in the quantum dimension, and one demon represents it in the Newtonian physics dimension.
The Leibniz demon has the highest rank among the demons of the inert world of
quantum dimension. (Leibniz G. W. von, 1710) [18]. The other demons in this group are
Laplace's demon (1814) [19], Einstein's demon (1935) [20], Schrödinger's demon (1935) [21],
Wigner's demon (1961) [22], Proietti's demon (2019) [23], and Pines' demon (1956) [24]. Two
demons of the inert world of the dimension of Newtonian physics represent Maxwell's demon
(1867) [25] and Szilard's demon (1929) [26].
Three demons represent the living world. These are two demons of the world of
quantum dimension: Revo’s demon of phylogenesis, synonymous with the demon of systemic
metamorphosis [17], which determines the transcendental imperative of the systemic
metamorphosis of the living at the stages of phylogenesis and Revo’s demon of diseases [17],
which determines the transcendental imperative, selecting from the population a specific
organism in which the program of a particular chronic disease is launched in accordance with
biopathotype [27].
Darwin's demon represents the world of living things in the dimension of Newtonian
physics. This is how Isaac Asimov (1963) outlined the transcendental imperative, which
determines the optimal conditions of natural selection according to his thought experiment [28].
Allegories of thought experiments with images of demons of various ranks contributed
to the knowledge of the fundamental principles of organizing relations in Nature at all stages
and levels of its development. The fact that the number of demons in the world of quantum
dimensions is greater than the number of demons in the world of dimensions of Newtonian
physics is the result of the work of the attractor of scientific thought in the direction of studying
Nature at the quantum level.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 The world of living dimension of Newtonian physics is represented by the demon of
Descartes and the demon of Darwin. Descartes' demon allows a person to substantiate the
primary certainty, the truth of his own existence, which is expressed by the famous maxim:
(Fr.) “Je pense, donc je suis” (“I think, therefore I am”) [29]. According to Isaac Asimov
(1963), Darwin's demon is a transcendental imperative that determines the optimal conditions
of natural selection according to its thought experiment [28].
The number of demons in the world of quantum dimensions is greater than those in the
world of dimensions of Newtonian physics. This is evidence of the work of an attractor of
scientific thought in the direction of studying Nature at the quantum level.
Allegories of thought experiments with images of demons of various ranks contributed
to the knowledge of the fundamental principles of organizing relations in Nature at all stages
and levels of its development.

The quantum world of living things at the stages of phylogenesis

Already today, researchers have the opportunity to study the manifestations of life also
at its fundamental quantum level. In his works, for example, in the monograph “Prolegomena
to the Future Systemic Metamedicine” [17]. I showed that life began its development with the
appearance of protein-polypeptide complexes in narrow cracks (up to 300-600 nm) of the basalt
bottom of the warm, fresh, shallow waters of the land. It was in these first structures that an
ultra-high-frequency mechanism of spontaneous reversible conformational dynamics
(hydration ⇄ dehydration) of the protein molecule appeared. From now on, this fundamental
phenomenon became an attribute of the living, appearing at all subsequent stages of
phylogenesis. I called this mechanism the “Soul of Life” [30].
The frequency of this process (10-11-10-13 s) corresponds to the frequency of natural
vibrations of an individual water molecule near the equilibrium position. Water, which forms
the hydration shell of protein molecules, determines their electret state, generating an external
electric field (Maskarenhas S., 1975). From now on, this fundamental phenomenon has become
an attribute of living things that appear at all subsequent phylogenesis stages. I called this
mechanism the “The Soul of Life.” [30].
This feature of the hydrated form of the protein gave A. Szent–Gyorgyi grounds to
declare: “Water is life’s mater and matrix, mother and medium” [31]. Another statement of this
famous biochemist is also known: “Life is water dancing to the tune of solids” [32].
Hydration water (syn. water in the exclusion zone) is negatively charged, and the bulk
water region is positively charged [32].
The first living beings had a powerful negative charge of the hydration shell due to a
larger supply of electrons [33]. A. Chizhevsky established (1918-1920) that the conservation
of a negative charge is a fundamental attribute of life [17]. It provides energy to the primary
precellular forms of life, maintains the nonequilibrium structure of the molecular forms of the
first living beings, and prevents the clumping of protein molecules and their deposition. It also
creates its own electromagnetic field. When the first living forms appeared, those that had a
more powerful charge of the hydration shell due to a larger supply of electrons received an
advantage. Although this mechanism has been preserved in all phylogenetic subsequent forms
of life, it represents another “blind” field of biology and medicine.
In this field, other manifestations of quantum effects in the systemic organization of
living things are noted. For example, living protein molecules, when hydrated, receive energy
from the protons of hydration water; when dehydrated, this protein loses energy. These kinds
of effects are fundamental for all living organisms that appear at all subsequent phylogenetic
stages, including humans.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 One of the apologists for the quantum nature of consciousness is Sir Roger Penrose, a
Nobel laureate in physics. To explain the participation of quantum effects in the work of
consciousness, he proposed the hypothesis of "Organized Objective Reduction," abbreviated
as “Orch O.R.” The basis of this hypothesis is a model of consciousness and memory
representing quantum calculus. This model was refined by biologist and professor emeritus of
anesthesiology and psychology Stuart Hameroff. He put forward the idea of microtubules in
brain neurons participating in the work of consciousness. They presented their ideas about the
quantum mechanism of consciousness in 1996 [34].
According to the Penrose hypothesis, an organized objective reduction of states
involves a transition from the quantum mechanical to the classical level; when the quantum
superposition of two states is accompanied by “entanglement,” it can be reduced, “contracted”
into one of these states without any external “measuring” influence.
Penrose treats quantum mechanical choice events within a neural network as
“intelligent,” consisting of individual O.R. opportunities. At the same time, he draws attention
to the insulating role of a layer of ordered water molecules on the walls of microtubes. Proteins
associated with microtubes in certain “nodes” of the neural network provide tuning of quantum
activity.
Penrose and Hameroff (1996) believe that consciousness is of a quantum nature and is
realized in the conformational dynamics of water molecules on the walls of microtubes, which
are β-tubulin protein molecules. This hypothesis has attracted much criticism. However,
opponents' arguments do not have a systemic justification.
According to Penrose, “Non-locality and quantum coherence suggest, in principle,
ways in which large areas of the brain could act coherently.” Thus, Stephen Hawking,
criticizing Penrose’s ideas, complained about the impossibility of imagining the work of the
brain, the isolated systems which “could not provide the required speed of thought processes”
[35].
However, the frequency of the process hydration ⇄ dehydration (10-11-10-13 s) of a
living protein molecule is quite sufficient to ensure the thought process. It is such an isolated
system with such a frequency where a quantum superposition is capable of “contracting” into
one of the possible states.
Penrose writes about a certain layer of “ordered water molecules” in the walls of the
microtubules of neurons. According to my model of the first living systems (V.V. Revo, 1990),
these are molecules of hydration water in the systemic structure of living protein. They are the
ones who demonstrate “quantum characteristics that determine the system of bonds inside a
hydrated protein molecule” [14].
Living protein (LP) is a concept representing the main carrier of life. The term was
proposed by E. F. W. Pflüger (1871); later, it was used by M. Rubner (1908), E. Bauer, and
others. These are pregenetic forms of life, the existence of which was ensured by quantum
effects, two of which are of fundamental importance. They have been preserved in all
subsequent forms of life, playing a trophic and informational role. These are protons and
electrons of the hydration shell in the spontaneous reversible ultra-high frequency
conformational dynamics (hydration ⇄ dehydration) of protein molecules. Protons provide the
system (protein and its hydration shell) with energy. This is how the relic mechanism of feeding
the primary living is realized. I proposed the epithet "energotrophic" for it (V. Revo, 2022).
Protons and electrons also provide two-way information communication with the environment,
providing the possibility of adaptation, without which life is impossible. This type of nutrition
is an immanent feature of living beings. It continues to participate in the trophic of living
creatures that appeared as a result of systemic metamorphosis at all subsequent stages of
phylogenesis. Indeed, in the system structure of all these organisms, living proteins are present
as subsystems of different orders and ranks.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 Although the rationale of the “Orch O.R.” hypothesis is incorrect in a systemic relation,
the idea of the participation of quantum effects in many fundamental manifestations of life is
close to me for several circumstances.
I first presented my thoughts on this matter in 1990 [14]. In subsequent publications, I
developed these ideas, considering them the subject of the study of quantum biology [36]. I
noted that quantum biology as a science is just beginning to emerge; it does not yet have the
necessary attributes of a scientific discipline. True, it uses the language of biophysics, which
by definition is higher in a systemic relation than the language of physiology, which represents
only the phenomenology of processes (V.V. Revo, 2015).
I define quantum biology as the branch of biology that studies quantum effects in
biological systems at different levels of their systemic organization [17]. The subject area of
quantum biology is constantly expanding. Indeed, quantum effects manifest themselves, for
example, in the phenomenon of quantum entanglement during photosynthesis in green plants,
during the orientation of birds during seasonal migrations and during the so-called
murmuration of birds, fish, and insects. The coordinated work of neurons in the brain, ensuring
the functioning of consciousness and memory, also demonstrates this phenomenon. I believe
that the phenomenon of quantum entanglement determines the content and operation of disease
programs in the phylogenetic memory of an organism. The ability to control these programs at
any stage of pathogenesis will finally bring medicine from the natural philosophical level to
the scientific level.

Autowave nature of disease programs

A. M. Gorky has a wonderful metaphor: “A hypothesis is a doggy with which they hunt
for the truth” (A. M. Gorky “The Life of Klim Samgin”, 1925–1936). This doggy led me to the
autowave hypothesis of the mechanism of intra- and inter-level interaction of complex systems
[37, 3]. This made it possible to understand the principles of the systemic organization of living
organisms and the nonlinear processes occurring in them, for example, chronic diseases.
Any living creature, which is an open nonequilibrium system, needs constant
consumption of energy, information and matter. The dynamics of energy processes are
manifested by autowaves, which are self-sustaining waves in a medium.
The systemic hierarchical structure of the internal environments of the human organism
consists of five levels, which represent the subject of studying the biodynamics of quantum
processes [36]. The activity of this environment provides a constant supply of energy. This
compensates for the loss due to its radiation into the external environment, i.e., dissipation.
These centers of excitation contribute to the release of energy stored in the environment, which
is necessary for similar processes in neighboring areas.
The propagation of an autowave through each point of the medium is ensured by the
energy available in it, so it is transmitted without attenuation and distortion. A secondary wave
that may come to this zone will not find the necessary energy in it. The same applies to
autowaves reflected from the boundaries of the medium. Unlike ordinary waves, the
characteristics of autowaves (length, amplitude, phase) depend only on the properties of the
medium of their propagation.
The systemic and subsystemic elements of any organism have wave content. This
applies to many processes in living organisms and, above all, to diseases.
Diseases, like some nonlinear processes, are capable of returning to their original, or almost
original, state.

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 Acute diseases have only one bifurcation point, from which the organism can return to
its original state, i.e., recovery. The other outcome involves death. Chronic diseases may have
several bifurcation points, from which the system may return to an almost original state, i.e.,
remission or death may occur.
In physics, an analogue of this phenomenon is called a paradox in chaos theory Fermi
Enrico-Pasta John-Ulam Stanislaw Marcin-Tsingou Mary, (1953) [38]. In biology, this is
known as Le Chatelier-Brown's principle of dynamic equilibrium (Le Chatelier Henri Louis,
1884; Braun Karl Ferdinand, 1887) [39]. Since these phenomena are close to integrable, they
have a high probability of returning the system to its original state.
An exacerbation of a chronic disease shows signs of a wave process. Fluctuations on
the level of the environment of the disease program of any level of the systemic organization
of the organism can greatly increase the manifestation of symptoms. The program of any
disease is a wave process, the characteristics of which are determined by environmental
conditions for the wave form of the corresponding polypeptide.
The development of the disease process in the organism, as an integrated system with
a large number of higher symmetries, is accompanied by the periodic appearance of anomalous
waves. Bifurcation points correspond to the moments of manifestation of modulation instability
in inhomogeneities, which is described by the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (Schrödinger
Erwin, 1925-1926). This allows us to predict the exacerbation of chronic disease, as well as
understand the nature of syntropy clusters, which are groups of stable combinations of
nosologies in the clinical picture of an individual.
I consider the emergence of reverberators at the next stage of phylogenesis as a
mechanism and potential for species diversity, and on the scale of a species and individual - as
a mechanism and potential for all disease programs [3]. Reverberators are capable of
reproduction, but only within the limits of their level of systemic organization. They reflect the
systemic wave hypostasis of a set of nosologies that have identical basic systemic mechanism
(proteoses, genoses, neuroses, etc.). They can generate autowaves only within their level of
systemic organization (USO). This is how they show their systemic specificity.
The reverberator can always be “expelled” from the active medium; to do this, we must
supply it with a high-frequency sequence of autowaves from an external source. This
circumstance determines the vector of strategic therapeutic technologies for all classes and
groups of diseases. Reverberators “expelled” from the active zone cause its forced drift. When
the reverberator reaches the boundary of the medium, it is destroyed since autowaves cannot
be reflected from the boundaries of the medium. In the system structure of every living being,
this boundary for a subsystem is represented by a system element of a higher rank and for the
organism as a whole - by a basic element of the highest system level. This level corresponds to
the phylogenetic stage at which organisms of this level of systemic organization appeared.
Since reverberators and autowaves used the energy of the medium in their movement, there is
no turning back. For programs of chronic disease, this moment represents a bifurcation point,
leading to remission of the disease or death of the individual.
The dynamics of the development and manifestation of diseases are determined by a
strange attractor. It is also an autowave structure that appears in successive multidirectional
cycles. The dimensions of the attractor determine the sensitivity threshold of the system for
each of the dynamic variables [40].
These biodynamic variables are determined by the subsystem's place in the system's
hierarchical structure. The multidirectional cycles themselves determine the development of
processes for which traditional semantic categories are used, such as hereditary predisposition,
unfavorable living conditions, various kinds of “bad” habits, one’s own volitional attitudes,
etc.

10

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 Departure from the equilibrium state through bifurcation points when choosing an
alternative can lead the system's correlated changes to infinity, although it is the system's
nonequilibrium that ensures its activity and self-organization.
Today, doctors cannot offer an alternative to this situation. The narrow specialization
of doctors and the use of template treatment regimens only leads to polypharmacy and
stimulation of those disease programs that the subject had only at the initial stage. The main
result of this situation is manifested in the developing pandemic of chronic diseases and in the
“rejuvenation” of diseases that previously appeared only in old age. This circumstance is of
strategic importance, as it affects the reproductive potential of the population.
The systemic integrity of any living organism is realized under environmental
conditions common to all its subsystemic elements. The lower the rank of a particular
subsystem, the greater the number of heterogeneities in the system it is present in and can
manifest its singular characteristics.

Nature chooses priorities

The organism's disease programs exhibit both informational and energetic content.
Mechanisms for ensuring security and reproduction have priority in access to energy among
all life processes in a tectologically hostile environment. The method of reproduction does not
matter.
It should be noted that during the development of the disease program, elements of the
organism of different dimensions manifest themselves differently. The unfolding of disease
programs in the organism as elements of quantum dimension has a negentropic effect. This
circumstance ensures the interests of the individual [3].
However, the development of the disease reduces its adaptive resource, which
dynamizes the trophic chain. In a tectologically hostile environment, these highlights weakened
individuals. So, at the level of the elements of the organism of the dimension of Newtonian
physics, the organism becomes a victim, and Nature excludes it from the reproductive potential
of a given species. This circumstance ensures the interests of the species.
Since the species had priority in accessing the resources of life before the advent of
man, Nature provided each chronic disease program with its own innate resource of energy,
which the organism cannot use for other purposes.
The development of civilization has changed the balance of interests of the species and
the individual in the development of chronic disease programs in favor of the individual. This
is the merit, first of all, of social institutions. Life expectancy has increased significantly, and
infant mortality has dropped sharply. However, the latter circumstance had an equally dramatic
impact on the quality of the reproductive material of the population. The change in the balance
of interests in favor of the individual has not yet reached critical levels. However, the
emergence of technologies capable of blocking the initiation and development of disease
programs will deprive the organism of access to this negentropic mechanism.
According to the second law of thermodynamics, all living things need energy in order
not to fall victim to a critical value of entropy. Therefore, when developing technologies that
will be able to block disease programs, it is necessary to proactively develop methods for
constantly monitoring the level of entropy of the organism and techniques that have
negentropic potential. They will have a physical nature and will work at the level of structures
and processes of the organism, which have a quantum dimension.

Postulates of medicine of quantum measurement processes

11

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 1) any disease has a programmatic content and cascade development, which makes it
possible to predict its pathogenesis;
2) the pathogenesis of each disease is invariant regardless of the level of systemic
organization of the organism, which makes it possible to create analogue models of many of
them on organisms of a different level of systemic organization;
3) any disease develops according to its own program, so no disease can transform into
another;
4) the language of disease programs is the language of quantum-level processes;
5) disease programs have a wave nature; their interference is manifested by dystropy,
which gave rise to attempts to use so-called competitive therapy;
6) the resonance of disease programs can manifest itself by intensifying their clinical
manifestations;
7) the phenomenon of syntropy, i.e. group stable combination of programs of several
nosologies, is determined by their wave portrait;
8) the frequency spectrum of the wave portrait of the disease program depends on the
phylogenetic age of the disease;
9) the program of a specific disease is invariant at any level of the systemic organization
of living things, i.e. the algorithm for its unfolding remains unchanged for all subsequent stages
of phylogenesis;
10) initiation of the disease program can be caused either by a trigger impulse from the
internal systemic environments of the organism or by external influence, for example, physical
or mental trauma;
11) the programs of all diseases of a living organism are preserved by its phylogenetic
memory, which, like diseases, has a quantum nature;
12) quantum effects determine the dynamics of the systemic metamorphosis of living
things during the emergence of organisms of each subsequent level of systemic organization;
13) living things at any level of systemic organization cannot have in their phylogenetic
memory programs of diseases that will arise at subsequent stages of phylogenesis.

Conclusion

Medicine, in the context of the presented material, is an interdisciplinary systemic field

of activity by definition, the main goal of which is to create and ensure the effective operation
of a system capable of ensuring a person’s life free from disease and infirmity. The main task
of medicine is to ensure the effective management of disease programs and their manifestations
at all levels of the systemic organization of living beings, including humans. It is unacceptable
to replace the meaningful development of medicine with formulaic and semantic initiatives.
Prediction, diagnosis, treatment, prevention and disease modelling must be performed
using the principles and tools of systems analysis. The subject of medicine is a person and his
diseases. The initial multiplicity of disease programs simultaneously developing in the
organism, having, moreover, different phylogenetic origins, is a serious problem.
The subject's systemic complexity requires doctors to use systems analysis tools.
However, this approach requires a change in the archaic paradigm, which modern medical
education does not provide.
Awareness of the incompleteness of knowledge of one’s nature should become a
powerful attractor for researchers to understand its organization on all scales and dimensions
accessible to humans, including at the quantum level.

12

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

 References

1. Davydovsky I. V. The Problem of Causality in Medicine (etiology). M.: Publishing House

“Medgiz”. 1962. Pp. 89-92, 129. In Russian. (Давыдовский И. В. Проблема причинности в
медицине (этиология). М.: Издательство «Медгиз».1962. 130 с.).
2. Selye Hans. From Dream to Discovery. On being a Scientist. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
New York, Toronto, London, 1964. LC Catalog Card Number 63-23306. P. 52.
3. Revo V. V. Human: From Crystal to Consciousness. M.: Publishing House “Economika”
(Economics), 2002. P. 211-214, 278. In Russian. LC Control Number 2003481859. (Рево В.
В. Человек: от кристалла к сознанию. М.: Издательство «Экономика», 2002. 302 с.).
4. Revo Valeriy. Evidence-based Medicine and the Art of the Doctor. ISBN 9781990242069.
DOI 1.2139/ssrn.4635294. December 16, 2023.
5. Salemi Michele, Mogavero Maria Paola, Lanza Giuseppe et al., Examples of Inverse
Comorbidity between Cancer and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Possible Role for Non-
coding RNA. Cells. 2022 Jun 15;11(12):1930. doi: 10.3390/cells11121930.
6. Boyd C. M., Darer J., Boult C. et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older
patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005.
V 294 (6). P. 716-724.]. Such relationships were called syntropic.
7. Wagner-Jauregg, J.: Bruetsch, W. L. (1946). The history of the malaria treatment of general
paralysis. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 102 (5): 577-582. doi: 10.1176/ajp.102.5.577.;
http://www.faqs.org/ health/bios/63/Julius-Wagner-Jauregg.html#ixzz8Q8kjfWHB).
8. Fantappiè L. (1942), Sull'interpretazione dei potenziali anticipati della meccanica
ondulatoria e su un principio di finalità che ne discende, Rend. Acc. D'Italia, 1942, 4(7)].
9. [Revo Valeriy. On the Way to the Medicine of Quantum-dimensional Processes. ISBN
9781990242090. February 27, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4738373.
10. Intellectual property fund "Intelmer." “The Systemic Principle of the Quantitative
Assessment of Human Safety.” Certificate No. 11-303 on registration of an intellectual
property object on February 21, 2011.
11. Revo Valeriy. Method for quantitative assessment of human safety. December 18, 2023.
ISBN 9781990242076. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4635415.
12. Revo V. Hierarchy of Systemic Mechanisms of Reliability. In: NATO-Russia ARW
“Forecasting and Preventing Catastrophes.” University of Aberdeen 2-6 June 2003. Report
13. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Studie nach Spinoza. http://www.zeno.org/nid/20004855817.
14. Revo V. V. Stochastic and Deterministic in Hierarchical Systems. Preprint No. 908. M.:
Radiotechnical Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 1990. In Russian. (Рево В. В.
Стохастическое и детерминированное в иерархических системах. Препринт № 908. М.:
РТИ АН СССР. 1990.).
15. Kant Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and transl. by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood.
Cambridge University Press, 1998. P. 149 (B25).]. These imageries are allegories of certain
demons (according to J. von Goethe, 1811).
16. Goethe von. Aus meinem Leben. Dichtung und Wahrheit. Tübingen: Cotta 1811.
17. Revo Valeriy. Prolegomena to Future Systemic Metamedicine. Toronto. 2022. ISBN
9781990242021.
18. Leibniz’s Monadology. A New Translation and Guide. Lloyd Strickland. Edinburgh.
University Press Ltd. 2014. P. 248.
19. Laplace Pierre-Simon marquis de. Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilités by Pierre Simon
de Laplace. Seconde édition revue et augmenteé par lʹauteur. Paris. 1814.
20. Einstein's letter to Schrödinger of August 8, 1935. In Arthur Fine, The Shaky Game:
Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory. University of Chicago Press, 1986. P. 78.

13

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

21. Schrödinger Erwin (Nov. 1935). "Die Gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
(The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics)." Naturwissenschaften. 23 (48): 807–812.],
22. [Wigner E.: Remarks on the Mind-Body Problem, in I. J. Good, ed.: The Scientist
Speculates (Heinemann, London 1961, 284–302); Basic Books, New York (1962).
23. Proietti Massimiliano et al. Experimental test of local observer independence. Science
Advances. 20 Sep 2019: Vol. 5, no. 9.
24. Pines David. ELECTRON INTERACTION IN SOLIDS. Canadian Journal of Physics. Dec
1956. https://doi.org/10.1139/.p. 56-154.
25, Maxwell James Clerk. Theory of Heat. LL.D. Edin., F.R.SS. L. & E. London: Longmans,
Green, and Co. 1871. P. 308-309.
26. Szilárd, Leó, (1929). “On the Decrease in Entropy in a Thermodynamic System by the
Intervention of Intelligent Beings” (Über die Entropieverminderung in einem
thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen), Zeitschrift für Physik, 53,
840-56.
27. Revo Valeriy, Evidence-based Medicine and the Art of the Doctor. 2023. ISBN
9781990242069. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4635294.
28. Asimov Isaac. “The Modern Demonology” (Jan. 1962) in “View from a Height.”
Doubleday & Company. Inc. Garden City, New York. 1963.
29. Decartes René, Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison, et chercher la vérité
dans les sciences. 1637.
30. Revo Valeriy. General Theory of Relativity and Systemic Insufficiency of Consciousness.
2023. ISBN 978-1-990242-04-5. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.4635603.
31. A. Szent–Gyorgyi. “Biology and Pathology of Water. Perspectives in Biology and
Medicine. John Hopkins University Press. Vol. 14, Number 2, Winter 1971. Pp. 239-249. doi:
10.1353/pbm.1971.0014.
32. Pollack Gerald Y., Figueroa Xavier, and Zhao Qing. Molecules, Water, and Radiant
Energy: New Clues for the Origin of Life. Int J Mol Sci. 2009 Apr, 10(4): 1419–1429. doi:
10.3390/ijms10041419.
33. Datta D., Vaidehi N., Xu X., Goddard W.A. 3rd. Mechanism for Antibody Catalysis of the
Oxidation of Water by Singlet Dioxygen. (2002) Proc. Nat. Sci. USA. 99. Pp. 2636-2641.
34. Hameroff S. R., Penrose R. Conscious events as orchestrated spacetime selections. Journal
of Consciousness Studies. 1996. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 36-53.
35. Penrose R., Shimoni F., Cartwright N., M., Hawking S. Big, Small and the Human Mind.
Cambridge University Press. 2000. Pp. xvii, 128-145, 152-156, 185.
36. Revo V. V. Introduction to Systemic Nanotechnologies of the Internal Environments of
Living Beings. Resources of Biodynamics and Nanotechnology. M.: Publishing House “Belye
alvi.” 2009. Pp. 47, 226-227. In Russian. (Рево В. В. Введение в нанотехнологии живых
сред. Ресурсы биодинамики и нанотехнологии. М.: Издательство «Белые альвы», 2009.
288 с.).
37. Revo V. V. From Crystal to Consciousness. Preprint No. 867. M.: RTI of the Academy of
Sciences USSR. 1986. In Russian. (Рево В. В. От кристалла к сознанию. Препринт № 867.
М.: РТИ АН СССР. 1986. 66 с.),
38. Ganapa, Santhosh (2023). "Quasiperiodicity in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou problem
revisited: An approach using ideas from wave turbulence". Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal
of Nonlinear Science. American Institute of Physics Publishing. 33 (9). arXiv:2303.10297,
39. De Heer J. The principle of Le Châtelier and Braun. J. Chem. Educ. 1957, 34, 8, 375.
August 1, 1957. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed034p375.
40. Skupchenko V. V. Neuromotor disorders and synergetics. Academy of Sciences of the
USSR. Preprint. Vladivostok, 1989. Pp. 27, 32. In Russian. (Скупченко В. В.

14

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020

Нейромоторные нарушения и синергетика. АН СССР. Препринт. Владивосток, 1989, с.
27, 32.

15

Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4771020