Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NSTP-CWTS Scouting Evaluation
NSTP-CWTS Scouting Evaluation
2. Activities ● The activities ● The activities lack ● Specify time slots for
are interactive time specificity and activities, including a
and leave an are conducted in an limited duration for guest
impact the unstructured manner, speeches.
student won't resulting in slow ● Schedule reflections to
forget. progress of the occur no earlier than
program. midnight to avoid
impacting students' sleep
and subsequent
readiness for early mass.
3. Facilitator ● The ● The students or ● Replace the assigned
facilitators rovers who facilitate rovers with students who
give good reflection sessions are less prone to power
instructions. tend to exhibit power trips to prevent conflicts
trips, turning what during the reflection.
should be a reflective ● Use less aggressive
experience into a wake-up calls; rovers
restrictive one. should refrain from
● These students often banging doors at the
act with a sense of Bates Building.
superiority, which has ● Orient the assigned
resulted in other students before their
students disliking the tasks, as they tend to
reflection process. believe they are superior
● Similarly, during sleep and may act with pride
periods, rovers can during the reflection.
behave in a superior
manner towards
students, creating a
negative and
unpleasant
experience.
● Additionally, the
students who
facilitate wake-up
calls can do so
chaotically and
aggressively, further
adding to the negative
atmosphere.
The choice of venue, activities, and facilitators detracted from what should have been a memorable
experience for the students and guests. Guests should have been better honored and provided
with clear guidance on equipment usage. Overall, the event felt rushed and did not allow students
adequate rest during midterm week, turning the experience into a burden rather than a memorable
occasion.