S.

no Nature of Name of the Covered/Review

Literature Review Research Gap Intended
Literature Literature in Literature Research
1 Article The Role of AI The Article The Article The authors of
Technology for Legal examines how discusses how the Article, Md
Research and Artificial Artificial Shahin Kabir
Decision Making- Intelligence (AI) Intelligence (AI) and Mohammad
Md Shahin Kabir impacts the is changing the Nazmul Alam,
and Mohammad profession in the profession in intended to
Nazmul Alam.(2018) areas of legal terms of legal provide an
research and research and analysis of the
decision making. It decision making. impact of AI
emphasizes the It highlights the technology on
advantages of AI in benefits of AI, the legal
terms of improved such, as increased profession, with
efficiency and efficiency and a focus on legal
accuracy providing accuracy by research and
real life examples mentioning tools decision-
of AI tools used in the field. making. They
currently used in The Article aimed to explore
the field. The acknowledges the potential
Article also concerns like benefits and
discusses transparency, bias ethical
considerations and privacy issues considerations
concerning AI in stressing the associated with
law such, as importance of the use of AI in
transparency, bias oversight. law and provide
and privacy Although it examples of AI
concerns while emphasizes the tools currently
stressing the impact of AI on being used in the
significance of outcomes it legal field. The
oversight. Overall doesn't authors also
this Article specifically emphasized the
highlights how AI identify any gaps importance of
has the potential to in research. carefully
transform the sector Further monitoring and
positively and exploration could regulating the
influence focus on use of AI in law
outcomes. unaddressed to ensure that it
aspects, serves the
inconsistencies, interests of
within existing justice.
literature and how
AI technologies
are evolving in the
field. By
identifying and
addressing these
gaps we can gain a
understanding of
how AI can
 responsibly
integrate into the
legal profession
and enhance its
effectiveness.
2 Article A systematic This Article of The research gap, The intended
literature review of systematic in the statement research in this
machine learning literature review highlights the article is a
methods in investigates the need for systematic
predicting application of exploration and literature review
court decisions- machine learning in investigation into of machine
International predicting court the concerns learning
Journal of Artificial decisions within the surrounding the methods in
Intelligence(2021) legal system. The use of machine predicting court
Article provides a learning in decisions. The
comprehensive predicting court authors aim to
overview of current decisions. While provide an
research in this the Article overview of the
area, highlighting recognizes the current state of
both the advantages issues of bias and research in this
and limitations of lack of area, including
employing machine transparency it the advantages
learning methods. suggests that more and limitations
It emphasizes the research is of using
potential benefits, necessary to machine
including reduced address and learning in the
workload and time mitigate these legal field. They
savings for legal ethical challenges. also aim to
professionals. The statement identify
However, ethical indicates an potential ethical
concerns such as understanding that concerns
bias and there are gaps in surrounding the
transparency issues our understanding use of machine
are acknowledged, of how machine learning in the
underscoring the learning methods legal system.
need for further may introduce The research is
research in these biases into intended to
areas. The findings predictions well as contribute to the
suggest that while the transparency ongoing
machine learning needed for discussion about
can be effective in ethically the use of AI in
predicting court deploying these the legal field
decisions, technologies. and to inform
addressing ethical future research
challenges is To bridge this gap in this area.
crucial for its future research
responsible could delve deeper
implementation in into cases where
the legal domain. bias occurs
Overall, the article examine its impact
contributes on decision
 valuable insights making and
into the evolving explore strategies
relationship to improve
between artificial transparency in
intelligence, machine learning
particularly models used in
machine learning, legal systems.
and the legal Additionally
system. exploring methods
to reduce bias and
enhance
interpretability, in
machine learning
algorithms for
predictions would
contribute to a
comprehensive
understanding of
the ethical
implications
involved and
promote
responsible use of
these technologies
within the legal
field.
3 Research Legal Information The paper The paper presents The intended
Paper Extraction and advocates for a an approach, to research in this
Retrieval using hybrid extracting article is to
Support Vector methodology that information by propose a mixed
Machines and integrates linguistic combining approach that
Syntactic/ Semantic information and linguistic combines
Analysis- André F. T. machine learning, knowledge and linguistic
Martins, Mário J. employing Support machine learning information and
Silva, and João P. Vector Machines techniques. By machine
Neto.(2005) (SVM) for Article utilizing Support learning
classification and a Vector Machines techniques to
natural language (SVM) and a identify and
parser to identify natural language extract concepts
named entities in parser, the and named
legal Article methodology entities from
Specifically effectively. legal legal
targeting locations, Extracts named document s. The
organizations, entities from paper aims to
dates, and Article Article showing demonstrate the
references, this great potential for potential of this
approach aims to advanced legal approach in the
create a simple information legal domain
ontology, retrieval systems. and to evaluate
enhancing Article The application of its effectiveness
content and this approach to by applying it to
facilitating the EUR Lex legal a corpus of legal
development of document s legal document s
advanced legal yielded results. from the EUR-
information However there are Lex site. The
retrieval systems. still some areas research also
The study applies that require aims to
this methodology to investigation. contribute to the
legal legal These include development of
document s from assessing the high-level legal
the EUR-Lex site, adaptability of the information
yielding promising approach across retrieval systems
results. The paper cons addressing by using the
underscores the ethical extracted
potential of this considerations information to
mixed approach in regarding AI in populate a
addressing the legal legal information simple ontology.
information extraction The paper
extraction comparing its concludes by
challenge, performance with suggesting that
emphasizing the existing methods this approach
role of artificial gathering user may be a
intelligence, feedback on promising
particularly usability and solution to the
machine learning exploring legal
and natural scalability, for information
language larger datasets. extraction
processing, in Addressing these problem and
advancing gaps would highlights the
capabilities within greatly enhance potential for
the legal domain. our understanding future research
Consequently, it and practical in this area.
positions the implementation of
proposed this proposed
methodology as a methodology.
promising solution These tasks
to effectively encompass the
extract legal requirement of
concepts and testing the
entities, bridging approach in areas
the gap between AI addressing ethical
and law in the con considerations
of legal information related to AI in
extraction. legal settings
conducting
comparative
assessments with
current techniques
gathering user
feedback to
enhance usability
and exploring the
 scalability of the
methodology, for
larger datasets.
Accomplishing
these objectives
would enhance the
practicality and
applicability of the
methodology in
extracting
information.
4 Article Intersections This Article offers The Article lacks The intended
between Law and a concise a perspective, on research in this
Artificial exploration of the AI as it focuses on Article file is to
Intelligence- intricate the viewpoints of provide a
Alžběta relationship legal scholars concise
Krausová*(2017) between law and while disregarding overview of the
artificial the insights from interplay
intelligence (AI). It computer between
spans key topics scientists. It artificial
such as algorithmic primarily intelligence and
decision-making, emphasizes law in a
intellectual considerations systematic
property, legal without exploring manner. The
reasoning, liability, discrepancies or paper aims to
machine learning, commonalities describe various
privacy, robotics, with the technical aspects of the
and societal community. relationship
implications. Moreover it fails between AI and
Notably, the legal to delve into law, including
document emerging AI how AI is
emphasizes a issues. Doesn't applied in law,
comprehensive clarify whether how law
analysis of the empirical studies regulates AI,
application of AI in have been and what are
legal cons, the conducted thus some theoretical
reciprocal leaving a gap in legal questions
regulation of AI by understanding the that have been
legal frameworks, real world impact raised with
and theoretical of AI on systems. regard to the
legal questions Additionally there developments in
arising from AI is no mention of artificial
developments. It how different intelligence. The
distinguishes its jurisdictionsre paper also aims
focus on the grappling with to provide a
perspective of legal concerns, which bigger picture of
scholars, raises questions the discipline in
prioritizing legal about the global a succinct paper,
considerations over dimension of AI as the
technical aspects, regulation. To knowledge on
thereby providing a enhance the AI and law is
 holistic overview of comprehensivenes fragmented in
the intersection s of this analysis various papers,
between law and future research specialized
AI. The file also should aim to books, reports,
includes references bridge these gaps opinions, notes,
to pertinent articles by incorporating comments, etc.
and research the viewpoint
studies, offering a exploring
valuable resource emerging
for those seeking challenges in AI
further insights into conducting studies
this dynamic and and providing a
evolving field. more
comprehensive
global perspective,
on the legal
implications of
artificial
intelligence. This
interdisciplinary
approach would
contribute to a
understanding of
how law and AI
interact.
5 Article Machine Learning The article explores The article The intended
and Legal Argument the merging of explores the research in this
- Jack Mumford, Machine Learning intersection of paper is to
Katie Atkinson, and (ML) and Legal Machine Learning explore how
Trevor Bench-Capon Argument focusing (ML) and Legal Machine
(2020) on how ML Argument Learning
approaches can highlighting how approaches can
contribute to ML approaches contribute to
reasoning. It can contribute to legal argument
highlights the reasoning. It and to identify
questions needed to discusses the key questions
establish questions that that must be
explanations, in need to be explored to
ML systems used answered in order provide
in the legal field. to provide acceptable
The authors explanations, in explanations for
emphasize the legal ML systems. legal ML
challenges of The authors systems. The
interpreting emphasize the authors aim to
predictions from difficulties of provide con and
ML models and understanding directions for
stress the predictions made their current
importance of by ML models and research project,
transparency and stress the which focuses
interpretability importance of on developing
when making transparency and acceptable
 decisions. The interpretability in explanations for
article provides decision making. legal ML
examples to By providing systems. They
demonstrate how examples the also discuss the
ML can be article challenges of
incorporated into demonstrates how explaining
arguments while ML can be predictions from
also acknowledging incorporated into ML approaches
the limitations and argumentation and the
potential biases that while also importance of
come with these acknowledging the transparency and
approaches. Overall limitations and interpretability
it emphasizes the potential biases in legal
need, for continued associated with decision-
research and these approaches. making.
development to Overall it
ensure effective use emphasizes the
of ML in decision need, for research
making. and development
to ensure that ML
is used ethically
and effectively in
making decisions.
6 Research Preserving the rule The research paper The research paper The intended
Paper of law in the era of file delves into the discusses the research in the
artificial intelligence complex dangers that Research paper
(AI) - Stanley relationship artificial file is to explore
Greenstein. between artificial intelligence (AI) the potential
intelligence (AI) poses to the rule threats that
and the rule of law, of law and the artificial
highlighting difficulties that intelligence (AI)
potential threats arise when poses to the rule
and challenges traditional law of law and the
arising from the intersects, with challenges that
rapid integration of advancing arise when
technology into technology. traditional law
legal systems. It Although the intersects with
outlines specific content provides rapidly
instances where AI an overview of developing
is employed in the these issues there technology. The
legal domain, may be a research paper aims to
including the use of gap in terms of examine specific
algorithms for details regarding examples of
predicting the nature and how AI is being
recidivism and extent of these used in the legal
data-driven threats. For system, such as
determinations of example while it the use of
welfare benefit mentions AI being algorithms to
eligibility. The used to predict predict
paper emphasizes recidivism and recidivism rates
the discrepancy determine welfare and the use of
between the swift benefits it does not data collection
evolution of delve deeply into to determine
technology and the the ethical eligibility for
comparatively implications or welfare benefits.
sluggish adaptation potential biases The paper also
of traditional legal associated with discusses the
frameworks. It these applications. importance of
argues that the To improve the transparency and
global nature of the depth of research accountability in
rule of law faces a it would be decision-making
significant beneficial to systems that use
challenge due to the explore cases or AI and suggests
impact of AI, examples in detail steps that can be
posing risks such as along with an taken to address
the erosion of legal analysis of how the potential
principles and the existing legal threats that AI
potential for frameworks can poses to the rule
algorithmic address emerging of law.
governance to challenges posed
undermine the by AI.
concept of
reciprocity. In addition the
Additionally, the research paper
paper underscores briefly touches on
the importance of transparency and
transparency and accountability in
accountability in decision making
decision-making based on AI. Does
systems utilizing not elaborate on
AI, proposing steps or
measures to address frameworks that
the identified could be
threats to the rule established to
of law. Overall, the ensure these
article highlights principles. There
the need for a may be a research
nuanced gap in terms of
understanding of providing
the interplay recommendations
between AI and or strategies for
legal structures to mitigating the
safeguard identified threats
fundamental legal to the rule of law.
principles in the A focused
face of examination of
technological solutions, policy
advancements. recommendations
or best practices,
within the con of
AI and the legal
system would
 contribute to a
more
comprehensive
understanding of
how to effectively
tackle these
challenges.
7 Article Thirty years of The Article focuses The field of AI The Article
artificial intelligence on the intersection and Law is commentaries
and law: the third of AI and Law continuously. It’s on papers
decade- Serena specifically crucial to address published in the
Villata, Michal highlighting the the challenges and journal
Araszkiewicz , Kevin growing use of limitations that "Artificial
Ashley, Trevor machine learning arise when Intelligence and
Bench-Capon, techniques, in this applying machine Law" during the
L. Karl Branting , field. The legal learning to tasks. third decade of
Jack G. Conrad , document While the article the field, and
Adam Wyner emphasizes the acknowledges the discusses the
importance of shift, towards shift towards
transparency when using machine machine
it comes to machine learning learning
learning systems in techniques it techniques in AI
relation to . It doesn't explore the and Law. The
provides an nuanced paper also
overview of six difficulties that provides an
applications that might hinder their overview of six
utilize machine integration into legal
learning workflows. To applications that
demonstrating how bridge this gap we utilized machine
AI can assist in need to examine learning
legal tasks. The the nature of legal techniques, and
paper underscores language the lack discusses the
the increasing of specialized importance of
significance of AI training datasets transparency in
in the domain and and how machine
advocates, for interpretable learning systems
continued research machine learning dealing with
and development. models are in legal legal . The paper
Additionally it decision making. is based on the
discusses the By understanding CLAUDETTE
CLAUDETTE and addressing project, which
project, which these challenges aimed to
aimed to automate we can effectively automate
the reading and adopt AI in reading and
assessment of practices. legal assessment
consumer contracts of online
and privacy Additionally there consumer
policies using is a need for contracts and
natural language transparency in privacy policies
processing (NLP) machine learning with NLP
techniques. The systems that deal techniques, and
 project aimed to with . The article evaluate their
evaluate whether mentions the compliance with
these legal significance of EU consumer
document s comply transparency and data
with EU consumer without discussing protection law.
and data protection how to achieve it.
laws. To tackle this
issue we must
explore methods
for making
machine learning
models
interpretable and
explainable within
cons. This
involves not
developing tools
and techniques for
model
transparency but
also understanding
the ethical
implications
associated with
transparency in AI
decision making
processes.
Navigating this
research gap is
vital for
establishing trust
in AI applications,
within the domain
ensuring
accountability and
upholding
standards.
8 Article Artificial Intelligence The article provides The article The Article can
and Law: An an overview of how provides an be seen as a
Overview-Harry Artificial overview of how comprehensive
Surden Intelligence (AI)'s Artificial review and
impacting the legal Intelligence (AI) analysis of the
field. It starts by impacts the current state of
defining AI and profession. AI in the legal
explaining its However there profession,
types, such, as rule seems to be a exploring its
based systems, research gap, in potential
machine learning terms of delving benefits and
and natural into the challenges drawbacks,
language and complexities current and
processing. The related to the potential uses,
Article explores the professional and ethical and
advantages of AI in responsibilities professional
law, such as associated with responsibility
improving using AI in law. implications.
efficiency and Although the The author
accuracy in tasks importance of provides
like reviewing transparency and examples of
Article and accountability in how AI is
conducting AI decision currently being
research. It also making is used in the legal
addresses concerns mentioned there is field and
like bias risks and a lack of explores
potential job exploration on potential future
displacement. implementation. uses, as well as
Establishing examining the
With examples the frameworks for ethical and
article demonstrates responsible AI use professional
how AI is currently within the legal responsibility
being used in law field. implications of
including contract AI in the legal
review and e Furthermore while profession.
discovery. It also the paper briefly
speculates about mentions Therefore, the
applications like drawbacks like author's
analytics and legal bias and job intended
chatbots. displacement research can be
Additionally the caused by AI it seen as
paper discusses the does not providing a
considerations thoroughly discuss comprehensive
related to AI in law strategies or overview of AI
practice recommendations and its impact
emphasizing the for addressing on the legal
importance of these issues. A profession,
transparency and detailed including its
accountability in examination of potential
decision making solutions, benefits and
processes involving guidelines or best drawbacks,
AI. practices to tackle current and
the identified potential uses,
Throughout the challenges and and ethical and
discussion the concerns professional
article emphasizes regarding AI in responsibility
that AI serves as a law would greatly implications.
tool for lawyers, by enhance the
automating tasks researchs
and allowing applicability.
professionals to
focus on more Moreover it would
complex legal be beneficial for
issues. However it the paper to
emphasizes that provide an
 human judgment analysis of AIs
and expertise limitations and
cannot be replaced boundaries within
by AI completely in legal scenarios.
legal situations Identifying areas
where human where human
involvement judgment and
remains crucial. expertise remain
In general the paper indispensable
offers an despite
examination of the advancements, in
connection, AI would
between AI and contribute to a
law. It recognizes nuanced
the benefits and understanding of
difficulties that how AI can
arise from collaborate with
incorporating AI legal
into the field. professionals.
Essentially
delving deeper
into the
application of
considerations
finding ways to
minimize
limitations and
developing a
nuanced
understanding of
the boundaries of
AI in the legal
field could be
fruitful areas, for
additional
research.
9 Article Procedural Justice in The paper The Article offer The intended
the Age of Artificial examines the an exploration of research of this
Intelligence- potential impact of how tech impacts article is to map
Benjamin van legal tech on the the civil justice legal tech's
Rooij(2020) civil justice system system and conceptual
and procedural procedural rules. landscape and
rules through three However there is a identify a set of
case studies. The research gap that key procedural
authors focus on needs to be questions it
specific legal tech addressed implicates,
tools, including regarding the charting further
outcome-prediction analysis of the productive lines
tools and advanced challenges and of inquiry. The
legal analytics, and ethical authors aim to
analyze how these considerations be both far-
tools may reshape associated with thinking and
litigation dynamics the use of concrete,
by altering the intelligence (AI), achieving a
distribution of costs in legal tech tools. salutary, middle-
and information While the Article level of
within the legal touch on the abstraction that
system. The benefits and is grounded in
discussion drawbacks a actual, not
encompasses both deeper hypothetical,
the potential examination of the legal tech tools,
benefits and implications as mediated by
drawbacks biases in AI existing, not
associated with the algorithms and the hypothetical,
use of legal tech in overall fairness procedural rules.
litigation. and transparency They seek to cut
of AI driven legal through the "AI
Beyond the case tools would fever" that
studies, the authors contribute to a infects the
delve into broader more nuanced literature on
questions understanding of legal tech, and
concerning the their impact on on AI and law
intersection of litigation. more broadly,
artificial without losing
intelligence (AI) Moreover there is generality or
and law. They a mention in the zing. Ultimately,
consider the article about how the authors hope
implications of legal tech may that the insights
legal tech on the affect the offered in this
vanishing trial authority and article can aid
phenomenon, the profitability of the thinking of
incentives for lawyers. It would judges,
private litigants to be valuable to policymakers,
engage in socially conduct an in and scholars as
valuable discovery, depth they oversee
and the dynamic investigation into legal tech's
evolution of legal how legal continued move
norms. The paper professionals to the center of
also contemplates adapt to and the civil justice
how the continued navigate this system.
advancement of changing
legal tech might landscape brought
influence the about by tech.
professional This includes
authority and exploring shifts in
profitability of their roles and
lawyers. responsibilities
Additionally, the providing
authors highlight perspectives.
specific civil
procedure rules that Additionally
may require although specific
 reevaluation in legal tech tools are
response to the discussed there
advancements in seems to be room
legal tech. for research into a
range of emerging
In summary, the technologies and
paper provides a their potential
thorough impact on civil
exploration of the procedure. For
multifaceted instance while
relationship outcome
between legal tech, prediction tools
particularly AI and advanced
tools, and civil legal analytics are
procedure. It mentioned other
considers specific innovations such,
tools' effects on as technology,
litigation, broader natural language
questions about the processing
impact of legal tech techniques or
on legal practices, online dispute
and potential resolution systems
implications for could also warrant
established exploration.
procedural rules. To sum up
conducting an
analysis of the
issues linked to AI
in legal
technology
delving deeper
into the changing
roles of legal
professionals and
exploring a wider
range of emerging
technologies can
help enhance our
understanding of
the research
landscape at the
intersection of
legal technology
and civil
procedure.
10 Research Role of Artificial The research The research paper The intended
Paper Intelligence in paper explores offer an overview research in this
Transforming the how Artificial of how Artificial paper is to
Justice Delivery Intelligence (AI) Intelligence (AI) examine the
could impact the various areas in
System can play a role, in
sector and justice which AI is
in COVID 19 reshaping the delivery, during affecting the
Pandemic- justice system the COVID 19 legal profession,
Geetanjali during the pandemic. evaluate the
Chandra, Ruchika COVID 19 However there is a extent of its
research gap that impact on legal
Gupta and Nidhi pandemic. It
calls for a employment,
Agarwal(2020) emphasizes how exploration of the assess the tasks
AI is being used specific in the legal
in the sector challenges, ethical sector which
discussing the concerns and cannot be
emergence of potential biases undertaken by
software and related to AI, discuss the
lawyer bots that implementing AI legal issues in
aim to enhance in legal cons. The the
legal clarity and Research Paper implementation
make justice more touch on the role of AI, and
of AI, including suggest the way
accessible. The
software and forward with
authors also lawyer bots. regards to the
discuss the Nonetheless it is future of the
challenges that crucial to delve legal sector post
traditional law into the COVID-19. The
firms face when implications and paper aims to
adopting AI potential biases provide insights
technologies and embedded in these into the potential
explore how AI technologies to of AI in
enabled lawyer gain a more transforming the
bots could holistic legal sector and
understanding. improving
revolutionize
access to justice.
services in the Moreover the The authors also
future. paper introduces intend to
the challenges evaluate various
The paper faced by law firms AI tools and
provides an when adopting AI techniques to
overview of the technologies. understand their
state of AI However it would applicability in
integration in the be beneficial to the judicial
legal sector using conduct a analysis delivery system
various references of strategies or and consider use
frameworks that cases from
to support its
could facilitate different
arguments. It smoother countries around
highlights how AI integration of AI the globe.
has the potential into legal
to transform the practices.
profession and Additionally the
improve access to briefly mentions
justice. tasks that AI
cannot handle in
the sector, which
Going beyond AI opens up
tools this paper opportunities for
takes a research in
perspective by defining the
boundaries of AI
examining how
application in law.
AI is
transforming law To summarize
firms and the there is a research
entire legal sector. gap that calls for
It discusses the an in depth
impact of AI examination of
technologies like considerations,
Ross Intelligence potential biases,
and Catalyst strategies for
considers their adoption and
delineation of
implications for
tasks where AI
employment falls short within
within the field the legal sector.
and addresses This will provide a
legal issues perspective, on
associated with both the
implementing AI. transformative
Additionally it potential and
evaluates tasks challenges
within the sector associated with
that may not be implementing AI
in law.
replaceable by AI
offering a
perspective on its
limitations, in this
domain.
In general the
paper presents an
inclusive
examination of
how AI and law
intersect
highlighting its
ability to bring
about changes, in
the justice system.
At the time it
recognizes that
there are
obstacles and
constraints that
 need to be
addressed.
11 Article The Impacts of The Article The Article The intended
Artificial explores the provide a research of this
Intelligence on changes that discussion, on paper is to
Research in the artificial how artificial explore the
intelligence (AI) impacts of
Legal Profession intelligence (AI)
affects research. artificial
Samuel Maireg brings to research. However there is a intelligence on
Biresaw, Abhijit It highlights the research gap in research in the
Umesh Saste use of tools, like terms of exploring legal profession.
natural language strategies, The authors aim
processing, guidelines or to discuss the
machine learning frameworks to current and
and e discovery to address the future positive
analyze amounts acknowledged and negative
of data. drawbacks and impacts of AI on
According to the ethical concerns research in the
associated with AI legal profession,
authors AI has the
in the profession. and to examine
potential to The Article the ways in
greatly improve mention concerns which AI is
the efficiency and about data transforming the
accuracy of privacy, bias and field of legal
research making the potential research. The
legal services displacement of study is
more accessible. lawyers. Do not qualitative in
However they extensively delve nature and
also acknowledge into potential predominantly
concerns such as solutions or best relies on Article
practices to analysis of the
data privacy, bias
mitigate these relevant primary
and the potential issues. and secondary
displacement of sources. The
lawyers by AI. Moreover the authors also aim
paper briefly to examine the
The paper mentions the ethical
emphasizes that advantages of AI implications of
AIs impact on the in terms of using AI in legal
profession is a efficiency and research and to
edged sword. accessibility. discuss the
While it Lacks examples or potential impact
case studies to of AI on the
recognizes the
support these legal profession
advantages of claims. A detailed more broadly.
increased analysis of
efficiency and instances where
accessibility it AI has clearly
also highlights improved legal
considerations research efficiency
related to or expanded
transparent use of access to legal
AI in law. The services could
discussion strengthen the
argument and
extends beyond
offer practical
this to insights for legal
contemplate professionals.
implications such
as automating Additionally the
legal tasks and Article touch on
even the impact of AI
controversially on the profession
replacing human such, as task
lawyers. automation and
replacing human
lawyers. However
Essentially the
they do not
paper calls for an thoroughly
ethical approach explore the
when integrating complexities
AI into research. associated with
It acknowledges these
its potential while transformations.Ta
urging king a look, at the
professionals to tasks that AI can
navigate ethical successfully
considerations automate the
changing role of
with care. The
human lawyers in
balanced collaboration with
perspective, on AI and the
how AI impacts potential
both positively emergence of new
and ethically is an roles could help us
aspect analyzed in gain a better
this paper. understanding of
how the legal
profession may
evolve in the
future.

In essence there is
a lack of
suggestions or
frameworks to
address concerns
tangible instances
showcasing the
advantages of AI
in legal research
and a nuanced
examination of
how roles, within
the legal
profession are
evolving as AI
integration
increases.