Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S.no Nature of Literatur e Name of The Literature Covered/Review Research Gap in Literature Intended Research
S.no Nature of Literatur e Name of The Literature Covered/Review Research Gap in Literature Intended Research
To better
understand the
impact of
arrangements, on
consumers rights
access to works
and overall
experiences
when consuming
copyrighted
goods
researchers can
delve into this
area. By
exploring these
gaps in research
scholars can
enhance our
understanding of
the connection
between
copyright law
and contract law,
in the realm of
creativity.
3 Article Copyright and The document The research gap it appears that
Contracts: Issues & delves into the in this paragraph the author's
Strategies-Katherine complexities of lies in the intention is to
Klosek(2022) licensing content absence of provide
with a focus, on empirical guidance and
how publishers evidence information on
include restrictive regarding the copyright law
terms in licenses prevalence and and digital
for scholarly impact of content
material. These restrictive terms licensing, with
terms impose in digital content a focus on
limitations on licenses. A issues related
what can be done comprehensive to contracts,
under the study examining open-access
Copyright Act. It specific policies, and
highlights the held instances and advocacy
belief that state their efforts. The
contract law consequences for document
enforces these libraries and discusses
restrictions. Also researchers various
suggests a would provide strategies and
potential conflict valuable policies that
preemption theory insights. could be
based on the AAP Additionally, implemented
v. Frosh case. In there is a need to address the
this case the court for more in- challenges
argued that state depth faced by
laws contradicting exploration of libraries and
the Copyright Act legal cases researchers in
could be beyond the cited accessing and
overridden AAP v. Frosh using digital
emphasizing the example to scholarly
importance of establish a robust content, and it
consistency understanding of also highlights
established by conflict the potential
Congress. The preemption in impact of
document also the context of updates to
considers how digital content copyright law
potential updates licensing. Lastly, on these issues.
to Section 108 of the paragraph Overall, the
the US Copyright lacks insight into document
Act, which stakeholder seems to be
governs perspectives, aimed at
reproduction and particularly informing and
distribution in those of empowering
libraries and libraries, stakeholders in
archives might researchers, and the scholarly
affect contracts publishers. publishing
related to digital Investigating ecosystem to
content licensing. their viewpoints advocate for
This analysis could enhance policies and
underscores the the practices that
necessity of understanding of support open
understanding, in the practical access and fair
detail how implications and use of digital
copyright law, challenges content.
contract terms and associated with
possible legal restrictive
developments licensing terms,
interact with each contributing to a
other. more holistic
approach in
addressing these
issues.
4 Article Copyright Policy and The connection, The outlined The intended
the limits of freedom between contracts discussion on the research of the
of contract- Nivan and copyright is relationship article is to
Elkin-Koren(1997) intricate because it between explore the
involves the contracts and relationship
definition of rights copyright between
in "works of provides a copyright law
authorship" comprehensive and the
according to overview, yet a freedom of
copyright law as notable research contract. The
well as the gap exists in the article aims to
establishment of absence of provide an
specific rights specific analysis of the
between examples or economic
individuals cases illustrating rationale for
through the challenges copyright law,
contractual posed by the limits of
agreements. While contractual freedom of
contracts can go arrangements contract, and
beyond the rights that extend the
granted by beyond enforceability
copyright law copyright of contractual
there are provisions. restrictions that
limitations on While the article expand the
their argues for the rights granted
enforceability. general freedom by copyright
This article argues of parties to law. The
that parties should contract around article also
generally have the copyright discusses the
freedom to make provisions, it ProCD, Inc. v.
arrangements that doesn't offer in- Zeidenberg
deviate from depth analysis or case, which is
copyright empirical a significant
provisions. It evidence of case that
advises against instances where defines the
granting owners such contractual proper scope of
with rights that extensions have federal
surpass those led to unintended copyright law.
provided by consequences or Overall, the
copyright law as conflicts. The article seeks to
this could absence of provide a
unintentionally concrete detailed and
restrict access to examples limits informative
information. The the practical analysis of
article highlights insights into the copyright
the balance enforceability policy and the
between an and implications limits of
owners monopoly of contractual freedom of
and a users right arrangements contract.
to access that confer
information owners with
emphasizing that rights surpassing
any changes made those granted by
could potentially copyright law.
distort policy. To
support its Furthermore, the
argument the article touches
article references on the delicate
the ProCD Inc. V. balance between
Zeidenberg case. an owner's
Delves into the monopoly and a
rationale behind user's access to
copyright law information,
advocating for emphasizing the
careful potential
consideration of distortion of
contractual federal policy
arrangements that with alterations.
expand upon However, the
copyright rights in discussion lacks
order to protect a more granular
public interest in examination of
accessing specific policy
information. implications or
Overall this article instances where
provides a this balance has
nuanced been disrupted in
exploration of the practice.
interplay, between Addressing these
contract and research gaps
copyright while would enhance
underscoring the the article's
importance of practical
deliberation when relevance and
altering the contribute to a
existing balance. more nuanced
understanding of
the complexities
involved in the
interplay
between contract
and copyright.
5 Notificati Standing Committee The analysis The paragraph The intended
on on Copyright and provided in the provided lacks research of this
Related Rights- discussion examples or document is to
WIPO (2003)(by - regarding the cases to illustrate provide a
Mr. Sam Ricketson) relationship, the challenges comprehensive
between contracts and study on the
and copyright is consequences of topic of
thorough. It could contractual limitations and
benefit from arrangements exceptions of
including that go beyond copyright and
examples or cases copyright related rights
to illustrate the provisions. in the digital
practical Although it environment.
challenges that acknowledges The study aims
arise when the freedom to to provide
contractual negotiate insights into
arrangements contracts related the role of
extend beyond to copyright it limitations and
copyright does not delve exceptions in
provisions. While into an analysis copyright law,
the article or provide as well as
supports the idea empirical specific
that parties have evidence of provisions
the freedom to situations where under the
contract around such extensions Berne
copyright it falls have resulted in Convention,
short in providing unintended Rome
an analysis or consequences or Convention,
empirical conflicts. This and TRIPS
evidence of absence of Agreement.
situations where examples The document
such extensions represents a gap, also discusses
have led to in the research as the history and
consequences or it fails to offer development
conflicts. The lack insights into the of copyright
of examples limits enforceability law, the impact
our understanding and implications of digital
of how of contractual technology on
enforceable and arrangements copyright, and
impactful granting owners the need for
contractual rights beyond limitations and
arrangements are what copyright exceptions to
when they grant law provides. balance the
owners rights interests of
beyond what's Furthermore copyright
stipulated by there is also a owners and
copyright law. research gap users. The
regarding the study provides
Furthermore balance between a detailed
although the an owners analysis of
article monopoly and a specific
acknowledges the users access to limitations and
balance between information. exceptions in
an owners While it various
monopoly and a mentions countries and
users access to distortions of regions, as
information it policy due to well as
does not alterations the proposals for
thoroughly paragraph lacks future reforms.
examine policy a thorough Overall, the
implications or examination of document aims
instances where specific policy to provide a
this equilibrium implications or valuable
has been disrupted instances where resource for
in real world this balance has policymakers,
scenarios. been disrupted in academics, and
Addressing these real world practitioners in
research gaps scenarios. By the field of
would enhance the addressing these copyright law.
relevance of the gaps we can
article. Contribute enhance the
to a more nuanced articles
understanding of relevance.
how contracts and Contribute to a
copyright interact, more
with each other. comprehensive
understanding of
the complexities
involved in the
interaction,
between contract
law and
copyright.
6 From having copies
to experiencing
works: the
development of an
access rights in U.S.
Copyright- Jane C.
Ginsburg(2002)
7 Article The Relationship
Between Copyright
and
Contract Law-
SABIP(2010)