Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Snow Falling On Cedars Prompt 2000
Snow Falling On Cedars Prompt 2000
AP Literature
Mrs. T
03/06/2024
Miyamoto's murder trial leaves a reader in a state of suspense by expertly utilizing point of view
and foreshadowing, as details about the investigation of a conflict over land involving multiple
generations ultimately illustrate themes of Japanese Americans struggling through prejudice on
San Piedro Island with the story of the Japanese internment, forbidden love and the treatment of
suspected of a crime in post-WWII America. San Piedro Island has a deeply rooted Japanese
community living on the island, many of whom are American citizens. The internment of this
community during WWII is a major conflict in the novel, and it serves to give a reader
perspective into the struggles that the community had to face. The conflict between the white and
Japanese citizens living on the island ties into the murder trial of Kabuo Miyamoto, a direct
connection to how the mystery serves to illustrate themes of prejudice. The novel foreshadows
the internment by a conversation between Hatsue and Ishmael inside their cedar tree. Guterson
uses the tension between the pair, through Hatsue’s point of view to foreshadow the dark turn of
events soon to be revealed in the coming days. In an internal monologue of Hatuse, she describes
her time with Ishmael that night as, “The temporary safety of a quiet way station one must leave
in the morning” (Guterson 208). The internment plays a role in the mystery aspect of the novel as
well, with it being the main reason the Miyamoto’s lose the land they had been slowly paying the
Heins for. Because the deal the two families had agreed upon was meddled with by Etta Heine
after the Miyamoto were moved the alleged “murder” of Carl Heine is given a motive. Kabuo
Miyamoto is disadvantaged in the trial because of his Japanese heritage, and Etta Heine
demonstrates an immense amount of hatred for people of Japanese descent in her testimony
Therefore creating ties between the mystery of Carl Heines' murder and the unjust prejudice
between communities and as a symbol of the gap between white and Japanese townspeople
living on San Piedro Island. This paradoxical relationship is represented by Hatuse and Ishmeal,
childhood friends who fell in love. They are considered a link because both come from separate
cultures but this also creates division as neither family believes in having relationships with the
other race, which is also ironic as they are more similar than they think. Hatsue and Ishmael are
used to foreshadow events in the book like the Japanese internment mentioned previously. Their
relationship is considered extremely taboo on both sides, something that becomes even more
prevalent after the Pearl Harbour attacks. As the trial of Hatuse’s husband Kabuo continues, the
author reveals more and more about the forbidden love between Hatuse and Ishmael to unravel
the mystery of the story. This serves to highlight the prejudice Hatsue faces by switching
between each point of view so a reader may understand the whole story from both perspectives.
Their young love in the novel is considered tragic in the way they are split apart because of the
hatred between the white and Japanese communities. The romance ends because of the
internment as Hatsue is sent away, and Ishmael is drafted, settling the conflict between them,
which foreshadows the eventual teamwork between the two to free Kabuo.
The treatment of the Japanese citizens on San Piedro Island works in the novel to create
suspension, as the cards seem to be out of Kabuo’s favor because he is Japanese. Guterson brings
the reader through twists and turns in the novel, with a reader never being able to fully determine
if Kabuo is innocent or not. One factor that plays into this is the treatment of him and his
community in and out of the courtroom. Alvin Hooks, a lawyer playing the role of prosecutor in
the case, has an exceptionally racist approach to the case. Hooks implores the jurors to“Look
into his eyes, consider his face, and ask yourselves what your duty is as citizens of this
community” (Guterson 415). This statement very obviously references Kabuo being Japanese,
and the possible outcome of the case is changed because of Hook’s racist undertones. Point of
view is also used to emphasize the prejudice Kabuo faces in the courtroom. By switching
between Hatuse, Ishmael, and Kabuo’s viewpoints on the case. Guterson switches back and forth
between Hatuse and Ishmael regularly simulating a back-and-forth conversation where Hatuse
pleads with Ishmael to write about the injustice against Kabuo in his paper. Kabuo’s feelings are
expressed in his conversation with his lawyer Nels, and he laments about the struggles he faces
being Japanese. Nels states “You figure because you’re from Japanese folks no one will believe
you anyway” (Guterson 391). Kabuo then replies expressing his feelings with sarcasm, “We’re
sly and treacherous. You can’t trust a Jap, can you?” (Guterson 391). These two quotes work
hand in hand to showcase how disadvantaged Kabuo felt just because of the prejudice he has
experienced in the past. It has changed him into who he is, and spending the last few months in
the town’s jail has only helped fester these feelings. Nels tries to comfort Kabuo, however after
going to war for America and still not receiving the treatment he deserves, Kabuo becomes bitter.
This only proves detrimental to him in the courtroom, with his tactics to try and act stoic as the
island, and specifically Kabuo to drive the mystery of the murder trial. Through excellent use of
figurative language and a 3rd person omniscient point of view, a reader is transported through
time and back again as pieces of evidence fit together like pieces in a puzzle, leaving a reader
unaware of the outcome until the moments of the book. Through all of the suspense created by
the unrest a reader experiences going through the stories of prejudice on Sand Piedro island, the
mystery of Kabuo Miyamoto's murder case underlines allusions to real prejudice Japanese