Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Proposal MBR (Incomplete)
Research Proposal MBR (Incomplete)
TOPIC:
Impact of Digital Marketing on Generation Z/Generation Alpha
1.0. Introduction
1.1. Background
Born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, Generation Z is a cohort that has
matured in an era marked by the rapid expansion of digital technologies. In
contrast to preceding generations, Gen Z is recognized as authentic digital natives,
having been immersed in the internet, smartphones, and social media since their
early years. This distinctive upbringing has bestowed upon them a unique set of
traits and behaviors that significantly influence their interactions with the world,
particularly in the domain of consumerism.
Significance:
Understanding how digital marketing affects the generation-z or
generation alpha and their attitudes towards brands is very crucial due to their
significance in terms of influence as the first fully digital-native generation.
Gap:
Existing research lacks depth and often generalizes findings, leaving a gap in
understanding Gen-Z’s unique response to digital marketing.
Our Contribution:
Our study aims to fill this gap by conducting
comprehensive research to provide actionable insights for businesses and
marketers targeting Gen-Z through digital marketing strategies.
5. Technological Influences:
- Investigating the role of emerging technologies, such as augmented reality or
influencer marketing, in capturing the attention of Generation Z.
- Examining how innovations in technology impact their perception of brands
and products.
3.0. Methodology
Research Design
Sampling Strategy
Research Approach
The study falls under the category of descriptive research, aiming to provide a
thorough and accurate description of how Generation Z interacts with digital
marketing. The approach is quantitative, aligning with the need for numerical data
to analyze the impact of digital marketing on Generation Z. Both qualitative and
quantitative methods are considered, with a focus on surveys and questionnaires
to capture quantitative insights.
To tailor the research design to the topic of the "Impact of Digital Marketing on
Generation Z," modifications are made to the sampling strategy. The emphasis is
on ensuring that the sample is predominantly comprised of Generation Z
individuals. This may involve targeted recruitment through platforms frequented
by Generation Z, such as social media channels and messaging apps.
The data collection method is refined to specifically address the impact of digital
marketing on Generation Z. Questions in the survey can be crafted to explore the
effectiveness of various digital marketing channels, the influence of online
advertisements, and the role of social media in shaping purchasing decisions.
By adapting the research design to focus on the impact of digital marketing on
Generation Z, the methodology becomes more targeted, ensuring that the data
collected is directly relevant to the research topic.
1. Privacy Concerns:
- Concern: Participants might be concerned about the privacy of their responses,
especially in a study focusing on digital interactions.
- Mitigation: Clearly articulate data privacy measures in the informed consent
form. Ensure all personal identifiers are anonymized during analysis. Emphasize the
confidential nature of participant responses.
6. Data Security:
- Concern: Risks associated with data breaches or unauthorized access to
participant information.
- Mitigation: Employ secure data storage practices. Use encrypted platforms for
data transmission and storage. Clearly outline data security measures in the consent
form to reassure participants about the protection of their information.
7. Deceptive Practices:
- Concern: Participants might feel deceived if the study purpose is not clearly
communicated.
- Mitigation: Ensure transparency in all study materials, especially the consent
form. Clearly state the research objectives and methodologies. Avoid any form of
deception or misleading information.
8. Participant Autonomy:
- Concern: Participants may feel pressured to complete the survey or answer
certain questions against their will.
- Mitigation: Clearly state in the consent form that participation is voluntary.
Allow participants the option to skip questions or withdraw at any point without
consequences. Reiterate their rights to autonomy throughout the study.
9. Reporting Bias:
- Concern: There may be a temptation to selectively report findings that align with
preconceived notions.
- Mitigation: Commit to transparent reporting. Present all findings, even if they
deviate from expected outcomes. Acknowledge limitations and potential biases in
the discussion section of the study.
6.0. Reference
7.0. Johnson, O., & Ramirez, S. A. (2020, October 27). The influence of showrooming
on Millennial generational cohorts online shopping behaviour. International Journal
of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-
03-2020-0085
8.0.
9.0. Thangavel, P., Pathak, P., & Chandra, B. (2019, November 7). Consumer Decision-
making Style of Gen Z: A Generational Cohort Analysis. Global Business Review,
23(3), 710–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919880128
10.0.
11.0. Shaouf, A., Lü, K., & Li, X. (2016, July). The effect of web advertising visual
design on online purchase intention: An examination across gender. Computers in
Human Behavior, 60, 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.090
12.0.
13.0. Ligaraba, N., Nyagadza, B., Dӧrfling, D., & Zulu, Q. M. (2022, December 15).
Factors influencing re-usage intention of online and mobile grocery shopping
amongst young adults in South Africa. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research,
41(3), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-06-2022-0088
14.0.
15.0. Gupta, A., Kumar, J., Tewary, T., & Virk, N. K. (2021, November 12). Influence of
cartoon characters on generation alpha in purchase decisions. Young Consumers,
23(2), 282–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-06-2021-1342
16.0.
17.0. Apasrawirote, D., Yawised, K., & Muneesawang, P. (2022, April 1). Digital
marketing capability: the mystery of business capabilities. Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, 40(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-11-2021-0399Apasrawirote,
D., Yawised, K., & Muneesawang, P. (2022, April 1). Digital marketing capability:
the mystery of business capabilities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 40(4),
477–496. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-11-2021-0399
18.0.
19.0. Faruk, M., Rahman, M., & Hasan, S. (2021, December). How digital marketing
evolved over time: A bibliometric analysis on scopus database. Heliyon, 7(12),
e08603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08603
20.0.
21.0. Munsch, A. (2021, January 2). Millennial and generation Z digital marketing
communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration. Journal of
Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 31(1), 10–29.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808812
22.0.
23.0. Tiewul, M. (2020, December 30). Factors Influencing Digital Marketing and Digital
Payment on Consumer Purchase Behaviour. International Journal of Applied
Research in Management and Economics, 3(3), 39–45.
https://doi.org/10.33422/ijarme.v3i3.501
24.0.
25.0. Azizi, S., & Makkizadeh, V. (2012, February 24). Consumer Decision-Making
Style: The Case of Iranian Young Consumers. Journal of Management Research,
4(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i2.1222
26.0.
27.0. Sulastri, A. S., Nawi, N. M., Abdullah, A. M., & Latif, I. A. (2017, June). Factors
Influencing Consumer’s Intention towards Online Grocery Shopping. IOSR Journal
of Humanities and Social Science, 22(06), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-
2206107479