Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Changing the landscape of care: System impacts and value of telehealth

HISA – ATC 2019


April 2019
“We acknowledge the traditional owners of the land
on which we meet, the Jagara and Turrabul people,
and their continuing connection to the land and
community

We pay respect to them and their culture, and the


Elders past, present and future”
Artwork: Nyiirun Gathay Yayn.Giliyn (“Walking Together”) by Birrbay artist Angela Marr-Grogan
Telehealth: Estimating the impacts

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 3


Telehealth – what the evidence suggests?

61% of the studies found telehealth to be less costly 18 RCTs showed evenly divided results, with 9 studies
than the non-telehealth alternative, 31% found greater reporting telehealth to be more costly and 9 less
costs, 6% gave mixed results. costly than the non-telehealth comparison, and 15
reported the health outcomes to be the same.

33% of studies found improved health outcomes, 58%


found outcomes were not significantly different, and The 18 non-RCTs showed results more favourable to
6% found that telehealth was less effective. telehealth, with 12 reporting telehealth to be less
costly, 3 more costly, and 3 giving equal or mixed
results. Ten reported improved and 8 similar health
outcomes.

A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication (2010), Victoria A Wade, Jonathan Karnon,
Adam G Elshaug and Janet E Hiller

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 4


What are some of the barriers to the realisation of benefits?

1. Focus on implementation and tracking of the short term


successes and implementation outcomes

2. Keeping a consumer focus asking for genuine input and


engagement – from concept to BAU

3. Ongoing appropriate evidence and long term benefits to inform


future investment

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 5


System level implementation
High level theory of change: affecting practice change

System levers

Implementation Indicators
Resourcing Alignment with Quality and Operations and
Awareness Participation safety workflow
models of care

Professional
Development

Transmission mechanism Professional Practice Consumer Outcomes

Tools and
Resources

In consideration of context and Over time, practice would be Changes in consumer outcomes
priorities, leadership teams need to expected to change in line with the are tested overtime, across the
determine the appropriate mix of following capabilities: domains of:
Network • Willingness
inputs to deliver on changes in care • Wellbeing
Collaboration • Capacity
delivery • Satisfaction
• Consistency • Health
• Persistence • Knowledge
• Empowerment

Support and
accountability

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 6


Implementation insights
Evaluation of implementation: embedding a continuous improvement cycle

What is the right model


What is the of delivery? Can How will application in Does the application in
problem/objective? telehealth solve the this setting influence this setting deliver value
problem? Is it evidence-based?
practice? to consumers?
Is it different?
Is it aligned?
Is it accessible?
WHERE DID THE PROGRAM
START? DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PHASE

What are the implementation IMPLEMENTATION


To what extent has the mode of
What are the success factors? Are they delivery been taken up?
What are the perceptions
implementation challenges? being achieved? of the delivery mode?
Implementation fidelity?

IMPLEMENTATION PHASE

REFINEMENT PHASE – CREATING A CYCLE OF


WHAT NEXT? CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Workforce capacity? What are the research How to build on the


Communication? priorities? evidence?
Tools & resources?
Monitor and report?
Relationships?
© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 7
Linking implementation to outcomes

Fidelity is a major determinant Utility and easy of use, ultimately


of project success. Whilst there underpinning uptake, is the final stumbling
are often legitimate reasons block for many programs. Users need to see
from straying from strict the value of the program, and use needs to be
compliance with an integrated into workflows and/or not pose a
implementation plan, risks of time or resource impost that is perceived to
doing so need to be identified be greater than the value of the intervention.
and mitigated through this These considerations should be accounted for
process. in the design phase.
Focus of implementation evaluation

Problem Implementation Implementation


Concept Design Awareness Uptake Outcomes
definition planning execution

Focus of formative evaluation

Poor implementation planning, that fails Awareness of the end-users


to account for site specific contextual and other key community
factors, and adequate engagement of stakeholders and influencers is
stakeholder can have adverse impacts on the first step in changing
the outcomes achieved, independent of behaviour. This stage is closely
how well-designed and appropriate the related to the implementation
intervention is. planning and execution.

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 8

….
Keeping a consumer focus
Asking for genuine input and engagement – from concept to BAU

Principles of engagement
• Purposeful - we know what we want to achieve
• Collaboration and Partnership - we are doing this together
• Clear Communication - we commit to overcoming barriers to
open and timely communications between stakeholders
• Inclusiveness - all interested stakeholders are engaged
• Transparency - we are open and honest and set clear
expectations
• Respect - we acknowledge others' expertise, perspective and
needs
• Commitment - organisational commitment and high level
champions

https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Articles/A_E/Consumer-carer-and-community-engagement

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 9


Benefits Framework for your project
Ongoing appropriate evidence and long term benefits to inform future investment
Stage Requirement

• What is the program trying to address?


• Should be linked to defined problems and evidence-based solutions
Objectives /hypotheses.

• Aligns/maps defined problems, objectives, inputs, activities, outputs,


outcomes and impacts to understand cause and effect and to focus
Program logic evaluation activities.

• What will be evaluated?


• Split by design (e.g. appropriateness), process (implementation) and outcome
Evaluation questions (e.g. effectiveness).

Measuring outcomes and • For each question, how will the impact of the program be measured?
impact

• The Plan sets data sources, timing, target measurement dates.


Data plan, tools and analysis • Where sources don’t exist, develops collection tools (e.g. surveys)
approach

• Sets out key activities, when and how.


• Formalises governance, risks, stakeholder, communication management
Implementation planning arrangements.

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 10

….
Benefit Measures and Methods
Rigour in research and use of appropriate tools, methods and measures is vital.

Any proposed benefit must meet the following eligibility criteria:

Describable – What precisely is the benefit? When will it arise? In describing a


benefit, distinguish between outputs, outcomes/capabilities and benefits. For
direct benefits, there should be clarity around where the benefit will arise and
who will be the recipient. A specific description provides staff, management
and the program team with a motivational objective for their work.

Observable – What verifiable differences should be noticeable between pre-


and post-implementation? For an improvement to be acknowledged as a
benefit it must be possible to clearly observe it. If the benefit cannot be
observed its existence cannot be validated.

Attributable – Can this initiative claim this benefit? To claim a direct benefit a
program must demonstrate that the improvement arose as a result of its
implementation.

Measurable – How and when will the achievement of benefits be measured?


Measurement against this indicator will occur prior to implementation
(baseline) and at regular intervals post-implementation. Measured
improvement against the indicator will be the objective proof that the benefit is
delivered.

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 11


Benefit Measures and Methods
Ongoing appropriate evidence and long term benefits to inform future investment

There are a multitude of benefits which can be


realised with the use of telehealth. There is a need Wholistic
Investment Benefits
to ensure that all benefits are captured but not (Macro)
duplicated in regard to there use and attribution.

Category/Service
Sharing of results and outcomes is am important Level Benefits
(Meso)
step in continuing to evolve telehealth research to
understand what works, for whom and under what
conditions.

Application Level
Benefits (Micro)

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved. 12


Contact details

Natasha Doherty
Ph: 07 3308 7225; 0402 458 607
E: ndoherty@deloitte.com.au

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/au/about for a detailed
description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms.

About Deloitte

Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. With a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries, Deloitte brings world-class capabilities and high-quality
service to clients, delivering the insights they need to address their most complex business challenges. Deloitte's approximately 200,000 professionals are committed to becoming the standard of excellence.

About Deloitte Australia

In Australia, the member firm is the Australian partnership of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. As one of Australia’s leading professional services firms. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and its affiliates provide audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services through
approximately 6000 people across the country. Focused on the creation of value and growth, and known as an employer of choice for innovative human resources programs, we are dedicated to helping our clients and our people excel. For more information, please
visit our web site at www.deloitte.com.au.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

© 2019 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

You might also like