Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design of Water Networks
Design of Water Networks
References :
1. P.K. Swamee and A.K. Sharma, "Design of Water Supply Pipe
Networks", 2008.
2. E.W. Steel and T.J. McGhee, " Water Supply and Sewerage” , 1988.
3. M.C. Potter, D.C. Wiggert and B.H. Ramada, " Mechanics of Fluids", 4th
edition, 2012.
Topics
Review on Losses in Pipes
Introduction, Flow Hydraulics and Network Analysis
Pipe Network Analysis, Pipe Network Geometry
Analysis of Branched Networks
1
Analysis of Looped Networks
Hardy Cross, Newton-Raphson Method, Linear Theory Method
Essential Parameters for Network Sizing
Water Transmission Lines
Pipe Lines on a Topography With Large Elevation Difference
Choice Between Gravity and Pumping Systems
Water Distribution Mains
Sewer
Flow in Sewers
Examples of design Sewer Systems
Design of a Storm Sewer System
Plumbing Systems
2
• Demand of Water in Building
• Types of Plumbing Fixtures Used in Residences
• Estimating Water Demand
• Hunter’s method, Demand at Individual Water Outlets
• Examples of Calculation Hot , Cold, and Total Water demand
in Building
• Static Head, Dynamic head
• Friction Head Loss
• Examples on Design Pipes in Building
• Different Applications on Design Water lines Systems
3
1- Review on Losses in Pipes
Head loss in pipes
The pipe flow is analyzed by using the continuity equation and the
equation of motion ( Energy Eq. )
Q= D V
+ℎ + = +ℎ + +ℎ
2 2
E.L
H.G.L
4
1-1 : Surface Resistance – hf-
f=
5
For turbulent flow Re ≥ 4000 Colebrook (1938) found f :
∈ 2.51
= 1.325 +
3.7
∈ 5.74
= 1.325 + .
3.7
∈ Ʋ .
Or = 1.325 + 4.618
. 6
Moody chart or Moody diagram
Is a graph in non-dimensional form that relates the Darcy-Weisbach friction
factor f , Reynolds number Re and relative roughness for fully developed
flow in circular pipe.
7
Average Roughness Heights - ∈-
The coefficient of surface resistance for turbulent flow depends on the average
height of roughness projection, ∈, of the pipe wall. The average roughness of
pipe wall for commercial pipes is listed in Table 1. Readers are advised to
check these values with their local pipe manufacturers.
8
1-2: Form Resistance (Minor Losses) – hm-
The form-resistance losses are due to bends, elbows, valves, enlargers, reducers,
and so forth. Unevenness of inside pipe surface on account of imperfect
workmanship also causes form loss. A form loss develops at a pipe junction where
many pipelines meet. Similarly, form loss is also created at the junction of pipeline
and service connection. Form loss is expressed in the following form:
hm = Kf = Kf
Kf = form-loss coefficient ,
1- For bend pipe, Swamee (1990) found the Eq.
.
= 0.0733 + 0.923 .
9
3- For sluice valve = 0.15 + 1.91
10
4- Transition
Or ℎ =
. . .
. .
= 1+ .
= 2 tan-1
ℎ =
11
C- For abrupt expansion
Kf = 1, ℎ =
.
= 0.5 1 + 36 , hm = K f = Kf
= 4.5 − 3.5 , hm = Kf = Kf
12
Example 1
As shown in figure, a discharge of 0.1 m3/s flows through a CI pipe main of 1000 m in
length having a pipe diameter 0.3 m. A sluice valve of 0.3 m. (Kf = 0.15) size is placed
close to point B. The elevations of points A and B are 10 m. and 5 m. respectively.
Assume water temperature at 20 oC. Calculate the following:
1. Terminal pressure h2 at point B and head loss in the pipe if the terminal pressure h1
at point A is 25 m.
2. The discharge in the pipe if the head loss is 10 m.
3. The CI gravity main diameter if the head loss in the pipe is 10 m. and a discharge of
0.1 m3/s flows in the pipe.
13
.
1- υ = 1.792 ∗ 10 1+ = 1.012 × 10 m2/s
4 4 × 0.1
= = = = 419381
Ʋ Ʋ × 1.012 × 10 × 0.3
.
64 ∈ 5.74 2500
= + 9.5 + . −
3.7
f = 0.0197
ℎ =ℎ + − − +
0.0197 × 1000 8 × 0.1
ℎ = 25 + 10 − 5 − 0.15 +
0.3 × 9.81 × 0.3
ℎ = 30 − 6.714 = 23.286
Where h2 = 23.286 m and hL= 6.714 m
2- For ℎ = +
14
. × ×
10 = 0.15 + (Assume f= 0.0197)
. × . × .
Q= 0.122 /
.
∈ Ʋ
= 1.325 + 4.618
3.7
.
0.00025 1.012 × 10 × 0.3
= 1.325 + 4.618
3.7 × 0.3 0.122
= 0.01957 , So Q = 0.122 /
∴ f = 0.01998 15
So, second try Assume f = 0.01998
For ℎ = +
. × × .
10 = 0.15 + → D = 0.2778 m
× . ×
∈ Ʋ .
For checking, = 1.325 + 4.618
.
→ =0.019967
=0.019967 → = 0.2778 m
16