Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GroupExercise3 Recomendations
GroupExercise3 Recomendations
Contents
AssessmentDay
Practice Aptitude Tests
SECTION 1: Example Exercise Discussion Points
In this section we present some example discussion points which could come up during this
group exercise. These points are designed to get you thinking about your own responses
and how you might react to other people’s ideas. This section should not be considered a
‘model’ answer as there will be numerous other suggestions and outcomes from the same
group exercise which are equally appropriate. Indeed, group exercises are designed not to
have one right answer, but to promote the discussion of ideas and resolution of differing
viewpoints. You may well come up with other ideas to ours, but much more important than
the ideas themselves are how you come up with them and how you interact with the group
to reach agreement.
Disadvantages
- Outsourcing to a company in Brazil may leave JR open to accusations of using Sweat shop labour in
their manufacturing process, which would be a harmful accusation due to JR’s history of using in-
house manufacturing and denouncing sweatshop labour.
- Outsourcing to another company would mean JR loses a degree of control over the manufacturing
process.
- Outsourcing often has many hidden costs, which may add up over time making the use of
outsourcing appear less attractive financially.
Decision
- Decline to employ the use of outsourced manufacturing from the Brazilian manufacturer.
- Reiterate to the media JR’s commitment to avoiding sweatshop labour and providing jobs to
employees in the European mainland.
- Make a case to H&S to convince them not to use their influence to dictate JR policy, and convince
them that maintaining the current manufacturing strategy is in the best interests of both
companies.
Negative implications
- A larger tax liability will mean lower profits for JR.
- Lower profits will ultimately lead to lower retained earnings, which lowers the dividends available
to shareholders and lowers the capital for reinvestment into the company’s operations.
- Other competitors in the market may use tax avoidance schemes, giving them a distinct
competitive advantage over JR.
- JR may be liable to pay double tax rates in certain jurisdictions, therefore being taxed by two
countries instead of being taxed by one.
- JR UK is effectively a start-up venture, with significant risks associated with its launch. Maximising
the company’s tax liability may decrease the capital available for JR UK’s functions, lowering the
overall success of the venture.
- H&S executives may disapprove of this move to maximise JR’s tax liability, and may intervene,
lowering the amount of control JR has on the company.
- Public attention may eventually stray from tax avoidance, protest groups may disband and the
acceptability of tax evasion may increase. Therefore JR may not get negative press, or get negative
press in the future due to utilising tax avoidance. As a result of this JR would have cost itself a
significant amount of money for no benefit.
This section identifies the key competencies an assessor will typically measure during this
group exercise, and a list of behavioural indicators highlighting that competency. The
competency framework in this exercise is designed to be typical of a real group exercise.
The first list describes positive indicators of that competency, showing behaviours which
indicate a high level of competence. The second list describes negative indicators of that
competency, showing behaviours which actively demonstrate a lack of that competency.
The following competencies are assessed in this exercise:
• Interpersonal skills
• Consideration
• Teamwork
• Organisational ability
• Business acumen
• Judgement
Engages with all members of the team and addresses each team member in a personal
fashion
For example you could ensure that you learn the names of each team member, and
subsequently refer to each team member by their name.
Is able to handle interpersonal issues such as low morale, tension and conflict within the
group
For example you could actively try to rally support by providing encouragement, help put
everyone at ease and act as a mediator between two arguing team members. Motivating
the group is a great way to avoid tension, low morale and conflict due to awkward silences
and feelings of unease.
Encourages participation from the entire team and does not show favouritism towards one
or more team members
For example you could try and make sure that everyone is listened to in turn, without leaving
certain team members out of the process. Naturally you will feel more inclined towards
certain people than others, however getting everyone involved is essential to the exercise.
Is strategic in the choice of words, phrases and sentences used, in order to avoid causing
conflicts
For example you would avoid using direct criticism of a team member or their ideas, and
instead provide constructive feedback. Conflict is likely to occur if you simply rubbish a
person’s ideas, instead provide constructive criticism or critique.
Acts bluntly, rudely or is dismissive of the ideas generated by other team members
For example you may directly state that a team member’s idea is bad, ineffective or
intentionally ignore a point raised.
Focuses on their own personal ambitions and aims, with little or no regard for the rest of the
team
For example you could act to “impress” assessors by trying to show off at the expense of
other members of the team.
Does not take into account the “human” considerations of the task or of the group.
For example during the exercise you may fail to take into account the people side of making
organisational decisions. Similarly during the exercise you may not take into account the
feelings of your team members.
Does not react to signals from other team members that are not happy with the progress of
the exercise
For example your team members may be giving subtle hints and signals to you to encourage
you to change your behaviour during the exercise.
Uses body language and nonverbal communication to highlight that they are listening
For example you could ensure that you maintain eye contact with the person whom you are
talking to, and position yourself so that you are facing them directly. Nodding when a team
member is talking to you helps make them aware that you are listening.
Provides team members with the time and space to express their points
For example, you could try not to interrupt team members when they are speaking, and
allow them time to make their points. Interrupting, even to show agreement with a point
raised may put off the team member, preventing the flow of ideas.
Ignores the contributions of others and instead solely gives their own points
For example you may choose to not include the contributions of other team members, and
instead try to market only your solutions.
Shows a greater concern for the group rather than for self-interest
For example you could focus on working as a team rather than trying to compete with other
team members (this is certainly true for group exercises where participants are not assigned
roles; sometimes you will be asked to negotiate the best outcome for your character). You
should be open to changing your mind on an issue if the team present a solution which
appears to satisfy the brief and has been argued strongly.
Listens to the points of others and gives constructive feedback when appropriate
For example you could pay close attention to points raised by others and politely help refine
those points using your own knowledge and expertise. If an idea put forward doesn’t satisfy
an aspect of the brief, you should point this out without being dismissive or critical.
Actively tries to improve and maintain morale and enthusiasm within the group
For example you could try to encourage a more open and collaborative environment and
avoid letting the group feel tense and uneasy. Sometimes the atmosphere can get tense, and
if you add a light-hearted comment with a smile this helps to keep the group as a
collaborative team.
Is overly critical and/or frequently disagrees with other members of the group
For example you could have been rude to other team members when voicing a
disagreement.
Keeps track of time and ensures the correct pace of the meeting
For example you could encourage the group to form a conclusion if time is becoming limited.