What is Critical Reading?
Does the author have any
Critical reading is the close, careful
reading of a text that is undertaken in
order to understand it fully and assess its
merits. It is not simply a matter of
skimming a text or reading for plot points;
rather, critical reading requires that you
read attentively and thoughtfully, taking
into account the text’s structure, purpose,
and audience, among other characteristics
(e.g., tone, mood, diction, etc.)
-is an active and analytical process of
engaging with a text. It involves more than
just decoding words; it requires
evaluating, questioning, and interpreting
information.
Key Strategies for Critical Reading:
1. Preview the Text
Before diving in, scan the headings,
subheadings, and any visuals. This gives
you an overview and prepares your mind
for the content.
2. Question Everything
Ask questions about the author's
perspective, the purpose of the text, and
the evidence presented. What biases
might be present? Is the information
reliable?
3. Take Notes
Jot down key points, interesting ideas, and
questions that arise. This not only helps
with comprehension but also serves as a
reference for later discussions.
4. Consider the Author's Perspective
Identify the author's stance and potential
biases. Consider the context in which the
text was written.
particular agenda?
5. Analyze the Evidence
Evaluate the evidence presented in the
text. Is it based on facts, opinions, or a
combination? Look for logical reasoning
and the quality of supporting details.
6. Recognize Rhetorical Devices:
Be aware of persuasive techniques used by
the author. This includes appeals to
emotion, logic, or credibility.
Understanding these devices enhances
your critical analysis.
7. Reflect on Your Own Views:
Consider how the text aligns or challenges
your own beliefs and opinions. Critical
reading involves a dialogue between the
reader and the text.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid:
 Passive Reading
Avoid merely skimming the surface.
Engage actively with the text to extract
deeper meaning.
 Ignoring Context
Understand the historical, cultural, and
social context in which the text was
written.
 Overlooking Bias
Be conscious of potential biases in the text
and critically assess the information
presented.
Conclusion:
By approaching reading with a critical
mindset, you not only comprehend the
material more deeply but also develop
essential skills for evaluating information
in various contexts.
NATIONAL INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’
DAY
On 23 December 1994, the United
Nations General Assembly decided, in
its resolution 49/214, that
the International Day of the World’s
Indigenous People shall be observed on
9 August every year. The date marks the
first meeting, in 1982, of the UN Working
Group on Indigenous Populations. This
year’s theme is “The Role of Indigenous
Women in the Preservation and
Transmission of Traditional Knowledge.”
National Indigenous Peoples' Day
acknowledges and honors the rich
cultures, histories, and contributions of
Indigenous peoples. Established to
foster understanding and reconciliation,
the day has evolved into a platform for
cultural expression, community
engagement, and the recognition of
indigenous rights.
As part of the commemoration, various
events are organized nationwide,
ranging from traditional ceremonies to
educational initiatives. While the day has
been praised for raising awareness and
promoting inclusivity, critical
examination reveals areas that warrant
further attention.
One critical aspect lies in the tension
between celebration and the ongoing
challenges faced by Indigenous
communities. While festivities showcase
cultural vibrancy, they may risk masking
the pressing issues of land rights, socio-
economic disparities, and inadequate
access to essential services. It prompts
reflection on whether the day serves as a
genuine catalyst for positive change or
inadvertently perpetuates a superficial
understanding of Indigenous realities.
Another critical lens involves the role of
the government and non-Indigenous
populations in the observance of
National Indigenous Peoples' Day. Some
argue that governmental involvement
may risk tokenism or exploitation of
Indigenous cultures for political gain.
This raises questions about the sincerity
of commitment to reconciliation and the
need for Indigenous communities to
have a significant voice in shaping the
narrative and objectives of the day.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of
National Indigenous Peoples' Day as an
educational tool requires scrutiny. Is the
day contributing to a comprehensive
understanding of Indigenous histories,
or does it risk oversimplification and
distortion of complex narratives? The
critical reader must assess the
educational initiatives associated with
the day and advocate for curricula that
foster a nuanced understanding of
Indigenous experiences.
In conclusion, a critical examination of
National Indigenous Peoples' Day
reveals both its positive contributions
and potential shortcomings. The
celebration's impact on reconciliation,
the role of stakeholders, and its
effectiveness as an educational tool
demand ongoing scrutiny and thoughtful
consideration to ensure meaningful
progress towards understanding and
respect for Indigenous peoples.