10th International Conference on Networks and Communications (NCO 2024)

May 25 ~ 26, 2024, Vancouver, Canada

https://icaita2024.org/nco/index

PAPER REVIEW

A NEW CLASSIFICATION OF CLUSTERING-BASED FOR DIFFERENT PROBLEMS IN DIFFERENT

Chapter Title: WIRELESS AD-HOC NETWORKS

Authors: Adda Boualem, Marwane Ayaida, Hichem Sedjelmaci, Chaima Khalfi, Kamilia Brahimi,
Bochra Khelil and Sanaa Bouchama

NOTE: Please put X to show your selection

Type of this paper

Research Survey Tutorial Speculative Others

Your Choice X

Evaluation:
Very Poor Poor Average Good Very Good

Significance of the main idea(s) X

Originality X

Technical quality of the paper X

Awareness of related work X

Clarity of presentation X

Organization of the manuscript X

References X

Paper Length X
 10th International Conference on Networks and Communications (NCO 2024)

May 25 ~ 26, 2024, Vancouver, Canada

https://icaita2024.org/nco/index

How comfortable are you in reviewing this paper?

Very Confident Confident Adequate Not Confident Not my Area

Your Choice X

Overall comments and changes that MUST be made before publication:

The paper studies a new classification of clustering based on different problems in different wireless ad-hoc
networks. My major concern is regarding the clustering ideas used in the paper. The authors should notice
that clustering coefficients are closely related to clustering but they are different. see the seminal work:
Clustering coefficients of large networks. It is essential to comment on this aspect, which is often overlooked
in other works.

Suggestions which would improve the quality of the paper but are NOT essential for publication:

To further improve this paper, I have some further minor comments as follows:
(1) For introduction section, Literature review should be more detailed and comprehensive. Authors should
add more recent research progress to this part and give a brief introduction of the development history on
your topic.
(2) It is better for authors to clarify your objectives of your study in the Introduction section.
(3) For your proposed method, advantages compared to other methods should be clarified.
(4) Reasons why you choose this method should be added to your manuscript.
(5) In the comparative study, authors can use other methods to analyze the same problem and highlight your
method's accuracy.
(6) For conclusions, more detailed results should be presented.

Overall Recommendation:
Strongly Reject Reject Marginally Accept Accept Strongly Accept

Recommendation X