Chapter 5

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In this chapter, the results of the study that the researchers conducted were presented,

along with a summary of the conclusions and suggestions for improving the project that were

drawn from the data that was collected.

Summary

The objectives of this study was to assess and design the Illumination System of the

Duran Hall to contribute to the understanding of the importance of lighting in educational

environments and also provides practical recommendations for optimizing illumination systems

in similar settings. The descriptive method was utilized to describe and discuss the concepts and

findings of this study. The process of the assessment includes; Initial Evaluation, Assessment,

Designing, Measuring, Computation, and Final Evaluation. This research aimed to identify areas

of improvement and provide recommendations for enhancing the overall lighting quality.

Findings

The following were the findings of the study based on the results of the assessment

conducted by the researchers. The site inspection was conducted on April 4 – 7, 2024 from 8 am

to 3 pm. After conducting a thorough assessment and analysis, the following findings emerged:

1. (Functionality) According to the researchers' site inspection, 99% of the luminaires

utilized are operational, meaning that 3 of the 238 luminaires are not operating. The
 building has no broken or flickering luminaires. Every light fixture has been regularly

changed and is dust-free and clean. In addition, they are turned off while not in use.

2. (a) (Lux output) on Area 1 (Office of the Vice-President for Academic Affairs), the

computed luminous flux per unit area was 207.23 LUX which is below the

Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to Manual of Efficient

Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(b) on Area 2 (Office of Curricular Reforms, Quality Assurance & Management Services ),

the computed luminous flux per unit area was 121.104 LUX which is below the

Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to Manual of Efficient

Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(c) on Area 3 (Office of the director Internal Audit Services ), the computed luminous flux

per unit area was 73.806 LUX which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of

Illumination according to Manual of Efficient Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(d) on Area 4 (Old CHS Office), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 139.014

LUX which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(e) on Area 5 (Legal Affairs Office), the computed luminous flux per unit area was

170.815 LUX which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination

according to Manual of Efficient Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(f) on Area 6 (Office of the Chief Administrative Officer), the computed luminous flux per

unit area was 159.49 LUX which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of

Illumination according to Manual of Efficient Lighting for office area (300 LUX).
(g) on Area 7 (CHS), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 135.077 LUX which

is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to Manual of

Efficient Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(h) on Area 8 (ODCME), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 80.616 LUX

which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(i) on Area 9 (Office of the Public Relations & Knowledge Management), the

computed luminous flux per unit area was 67.437 LUX which is below the Recommended

Maintenance Level of Illumination according to Manual of Efficient Lighting for office

area (300 LUX).

(j) on Area 10 (DH 211), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 108.57 LUX

which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for classroom area (300/500 LUX).

(k) on Area 11 (DH 212), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 130.10 LUX

which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for classroom area (300/500 LUX).

(l) on Area 12 (DH 213), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 101.65 LUX

which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for classroom area (300/500 LUX).

(m) on Area 13 (DH 215), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 123.71 LUX

which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for classroom area (300/500 LUX).

 (n) on Area 14 (DH 216), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 125.01 LUX

which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for classroom area (300/500 LUX).

(o) on Area 15 (DH 217), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 113.76 LUX

which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for classroom area (300/500 LUX).

(p) on Area 16 (CEA Faculty), the computed luminous flux per unit area was 160.19

LUX which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of Illumination according to

Manual of Efficient Lighting for office area (300 LUX).

(q) on Area 17 (Comfort Room (Employee, Female)), the computed luminous flux per

unit area was 113.76 LUX which is below the Recommended Maintenance Level of

Illumination according to Manual of Efficient Lighting for office area (100 LUX).

Conclusions

Based on the listed findings, the following conclusions were derived:

a) The current illumination system in Duran Hall is inadequate and does not meet the

required standards for providing a conducive learning and working environment.

b) Inconsistent lighting levels were observed across different areas of the building,

leading to discomfort and reduced productivity. The research revealed uneven lighting

distribution within Duran Hall, with some areas being excessively bright while others

were inadequately illuminated. This inconsistency in lighting levels can lead to visual

discomfort, hinder productivity, and create a less harmonious environment.

Recommendations

In almost every research study, it is an accepted fact that there is always room for

improvement. Considering the findings and conclusions of this research, the following

recommendations are proposed for enhancing the illumination system in Duran Hall:

a) Replace the lighting fixtures with LED models that use less energy, which will

improve illumination while using less electricity.

e) Install dimming and control systems to allow occupants to adjust lighting levels

according to their specific needs and preferences.

f) Regularly monitor and maintain the lighting system to ensure optimal performance and

address any issues promptly.