Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sanford
Sanford
AND PSYCHOMETRICS
Overview
This scale assesses intelligence across five cognitive domains: Fluid Reasoning, Knowledge,
Quantitative Reasoning, Visual-Spatial Processing, and Working Memory. It is suitable for individuals
aged 2 to 85+.
1. Origins
The Stanford-Binet test traces its origins to the Binet - Simon scale, developed by Alfred Binet and
Theodore Simon in France in the early 20th century.
Binet and Simon's scale aimed to identify children who needed special education assistance by
assessing their mental abilities.
2. Development
In 1916, Lewis TERMAN, a psychologist at Stanford University, revised and standardized the Binet -
Simon scale for use in the United States. This revision became known as the Stanford-Binet
Intelligence Scale.
TERMAN'S version extended the age range of the test, improved its structure, and introduced the
concept of intelligence quotient (IQ).
3. Revisions
Over the years, the Stanford-Binet underwent several revisions to enhance its accuracy, reliability,
and relevance to contemporary understanding of intelligence.
Notable revisions include the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition (SB4), published in 1986, and the
Stanford-Binet Fifth Edition (SB5), released in 2003. The most recent version is the Stanford-Binet
Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5).
4. Structure
The Stanford-Binet test assesses various cognitive abilities, including verbal reasoning, quantitative
reasoning, abstract/visual reasoning, and short-term memory.
It provides an overall IQ score as well as specific index scores that highlight strengths and
weaknesses in different cognitive areas.
5. Applications
The Stanford-Binet test is widely used in educational settings, clinical assessments, and research to
evaluate intellectual functioning, identify intellectual giftedness or developmental delays, and guide
intervention strategies.
6. Criticism and Updates
Like any psychological assessment tool, the Stanford-Binet has faced criticism regarding cultural
biases and the limitations of using a single test to measure complex cognitive abilities.
Updates and revisions aim to address these concerns by incorporating modern theories of
intelligence, improving cultural fairness, and enhancing the test's validity and reliability.