CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION REPORT

INSPECTION OVERVIEW
NEV-OXA-4400017051-NESMA IT- Date 8-10-2023
Report Number
14
NESMA Infrastructure and
Contractor Start Time 8:00
Technology
Project Title 4400017051 NIC NORTH Duration 4 hr.
Report by (name): AZZAM ALMORAIKHI Report by Nesma infrastructure & Technology
(company):

Project Stakeholder Name

NEOM Name: Bruno Lkechi
Attendance

PMC Name: NA
Contractor Env Manager Name: AZZAM ALMORAIKHI
Contractor (Others) Name: (EV)Sudheer

Critical Issues Observed:

Critical
Summary of Critical Environmental Issues Observed
Issue #

1 hazard waste container is not available at the site.

Water leaking need to fix maintenance

Rank in order

2
of criticality

3 Chemicals need to remove and disposal

4
5
6
7
Summary of Inspection Observations & Follow-up:

# Report Content / Summary # %

1 New observations identified during this inspection 3 NA
2 Reported observations not inspected/verified during this inspection NA NA
3 Inspection Observations Closed during this inspection 2 100
4 Inspection Observations were verified as not completed during this inspection 0 0
*Note – All open and current observations must be closed within one week of the date of this report.

Environmental Compliance Score Follow-Up Status - Closure Rate (%)

2.4%
0%

100%
96.6%

Page 1 of 6 Observations Closed Observations Not completed

Compliant Non-Compliant
 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION REPORT

Observed Conditions and Required Corrections

Action Required to Address Non-

(High / Medium / Low)

(Day. Month. Year)

# Details of Observations Made Photo of Observation

(Current; Closed; Not

Date Observed
compliance

Potential

Completed)

Status
 Record all actual and potential environmental issues observed during the inspection  Describe the action that is required to address the non-compliant condition observed  Insert a representative photo of the non-compliant
Insert
 Observations should appear on the report in the chronological order in which they were observed on site  Actions should be specific – avoid inputting multiple actions against a single observation condition observed.
sequential
 Observations may require multiple actions to address the non-compliant condition. In such cases, repeat the  Where an action has been completed to the satisfaction of the inspection lead, strike-through  In the photo, capture where environmental impact has
number
observation, but with a different ‘Action Required’ to rectify the observed condition to indicate that the action has been closed occurred where applicable

Inspection Observations
1 The area need housekeeping Clean the area

8-10-2023
Medium

closed
2 non hazard waste container is full Clean non hazard waste
container

8-10-2023
Medium

closed
3 Hazard waste container is not available The hazard waste container

New Observation
at the site shall be provided through out an

8-10-2023
approved 3rd party

Medium
N\A

4 Water leaking need to fix maintenance The water leaking has been

New Observation
maintaining.

8-10-2023
Medium

5 Chemicals need to remove and disposal Chemicals has been removed and
New Observation

disposal
8-10-2023

Potential Description Potential Failure Consequence example Response

Immediate and/or Direct Environmental Impact; Potential for adverse environmental
High impact
Immediate
Latent and/or Indirect Environmental Impact; Potential for adverse environmental impact
Medium and unwanted conditions exist which may affect projects reputation
1 working day

Low System improvement / Minor environmental impacts 5 working days

Positive N/A Implement project-wide

Page 2 of 6
 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION REPORT

Report
AZZAM ALMORAIKHI Signature Azzam Ali Almoraikhi Date 8-10-2023
Generated by

Distribution (Attendees +):

NEOM Contractor

 Paul Marshall, NEOM  Contractor Environmental Manager

 Damien Trinder, NEOM  Contractor HSE Manager
 Noel Woods, NEOM  Contractor Project Manager
 Projects Team, NEOM

Note:
 The ‘Closure Rate’ is a measure of Contractors ability to successfully address previously identified observations and conditions.
 The Closure Rate is calculated as follows:
o Total number of observations made during the previous inspection = A
o Total number of observations made during the previous inspection not observed during the current inspection = B
o Total number of observations successfully completed = C
o Total number of observations which have not being completed as observed during the current inspection = D
o (A - B) = E
o C / E x 100 = Closure Rate (Closed)
o D / E x 100 = Closure Rate (Not Completed)
 Previous observations on the report which have been assigned a “Closed Status” are highlighted as such and will be deleted from the next report for the same
location. This allows for all location specific observations to be tracked to closure.

Contractor Close-out Report

 This section shall be completed by the Contractor.
 Contractor shall describe actions taken to closed out the observation.
 Provide photographic evidence to demonstrate that the close-out actions are implemented.
 Reference the items number in the report to which the closeout photo relates to.
 Add additional tables by adding additional pages to the report if necessary.
NEV
# item #
Corrective Action adopted by the contractor Photo of the correction action
Insert the
Insert
item# from  Describe the action that has been adopted to address the non-compliant condition observed
sequential Insert a representative photo of the corrective action that has been adopted
NEV Inspection  Actions should be specific
number
Report

1. The water leaking has been maintaining.

2. Chemicals has been removed and disposal

Reply Generated by: AZZAM ALMORAIKHI Report Closed by: (EV)Sudheer

Report Date: 8-10-2023 Report Date: 8-10-2023

Signature AZZAM ALMORAIKHI Signature (EV)Sudheer

Page 3 of 6
 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION REPORT

Page 4 of 6
 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION REPORT
NEOM Environment
Construction Environmental Inspection Checklist
SECTION 1 - HEADER
Contract Name & #:
NEV-OXA-4400017051-NESMA IT-14
SCORING GUIDE:
Contractor Name:
NESMA Infrastructure and Technology Full Compliance = 10
Partial Compliance = 5
Non-Compliant = 0
Date of Inspection: 8-10-2023 Not Applicable = NA
(NA not included in
Report by:
AZZAM ALMORAIKHI computations)

Accompanied by:
Azzam Ali Almoraikhi,SUDHEER Rev10
SECTION 2 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSURANCE CHECK ITEMS
1 Air Emissions Score 8 Fuel and Chemical Management Score
1.1 Are emissions from generators/vehicles/equipment clear and free from dark vapors? 10 8.1 Bulk Fuel Storage
1.2 Is unnecessary operation of engines while equipment/vehicles are stationary prevented? NA 8.1.1 Are site fabricated bulk fuel storage tanks prohibited on site? NA

1.3 Do the movements of vehicles/equipment on site adhere to the site speed limit? NA 8.1.2 Do bulk fuel storage tanks reside within concrete bunds which are free of NA
damage/defects?
1.4 Are vehicle routes kept sufficiently damp with water for the volumes of vehicular movements? NA 8.1.3 Has a bonded refueling apron been installed, within which fuel transfers take NA
place?
1.5 Is airborne dust around loading / unloading areas and activities prevented? NA 8.1.4 Is a spill kit, adequate for stored volumes, available at the bulk fuel storage area? NA
1.6 Are stockpiles actively managed (covered/dampened) to prevent airborne dust? NA 8.1.5 Is fuel dispensed from the bulk fuel storage tanks using an automatic refueling NA
nozzle?
Score Per Section 10 8.1.6 Are fuel hoses used for fuel transfers intact and free from damage? NA
2 Nuisance Control Score 8.2 HAZMAT Chemical Storage
2.1 Are nuisance noise levels, which effect sensitive receptors, prevented on site? NA 8.2.1 Are all containers in the HAZMAT chemical store placed within secondary NA
containment?
2.2 Are all generators encased in integrated acoustic housing, which doors remain closed? 10 8.2.2 Is a chemical spill kit available at the HAZMAT chemical store? NA
2.3 Is the site free of presence of vermin/pests (rats, flies, cats, dogs)? NA 8.2.3 Are MSDS's available for ALL chemicals in storage? NA
2.4 Are materials which attract vermin (food waste, accumulated water) adequately controlled? 10 8.2.4 Is an updated chemical inventory available and displayed within the HAZMAT NA
chemical store?
2.5 Are nuisance odors prevented on site? 10 8.2.5 Are ALL containers stacked less than 1.5m in height? NA
2.6 Is track-out of sediment onto publicly used roads prevented? NA 8.2.6 Is the HAZMAT chemical store free of volatile organic compounds (VOC's)? NA
2.7 Are wheel wash facilities/rumble grids provided on site to eliminate track-out? NA 8.3 Work-front Storage of Chemical and Hydrocarbon Containers
Score Per Section 30 8.3.1 Do all chemical/hydrocarbon containers at point of use reside within spill trays? 10
3 Resources / Materials Score 8.3.2 Are all chemical/hydrocarbon stored in their original, clearly labelled containers? 10
3.1 Are construction materials protected from damage/deterioration? 10 8.3.3 Are leaking/defective chemical/hydrocarbon containers promptly removed off NA
site?
3.2 Are powdered materials stored/managed in a manner which prevents wastage? NA 8.3.4 Are manufactured funnels available and used for chemical / fuel transfers? NA
3.3 Are energy conservation practices promoted and observed on site? NA Score Per Section 20
3.4 Is the mixing of mortar/cement on bare ground prevented? 5 9 Spill Management Score
3.5 Is plastic sheeting used at concrete transfer points? 5 9.1 Are chemical/hydrocarbon spills to bare ground prevented? 10
3.6 Is excess concrete beneficially reused on site, to avoid it becoming waste? NA 9.2 Are soils contaminated by chemical/hydrocarbon spills immediately cleaned? 10
3.7 Is concrete wash-out on site prevented? 10 9.3 Is chemical/hydrocarbon transfer equipment and methodology acceptable? 10
Score Per Section 30 9.4 Is secondary containment (spill trays/concrete bunds) of adequate size and free of 10
spills?
4 Waste Management Score 9.5 Do all spill kits have a spill kit checklist available, completed monthly? 5
4.1 Is the site free of litter? 10 9.6 Are details of emergency spill response teams displayed at all spill sensitive 5
locations?
4.2 Is all waste on site containerized at all times? 10 9.7 Are spill warning signs/awareness material displayed at all spill sensitive 10
locations?
4.3 Are bins/waste containers suitable for the types of waste being generated at work locations? 10 Score Per Section 60
4.4 Are all bins clearly labelled, with lids that remain closed? 10 10 Welfare / Laydown Score
4.5 Is overfilling of bins/waste containers prevented? NA 10.1 Generator
4.6 Is a dedicated central waste storage location (CWSL) provided for the site? 5 10.1.1 Do all site generators reside within concrete bunds? 10
4.7 Is the dedicated CWSL clearly identified with suitable signage? NA 10.1.2 Is the generators concrete bund in good condition/free of holes? 10
4.8 Are there a sufficient number of skips provided at the CWSL? NA 10.1.3 Are spill kits available at all generator locations on site? 5
4.9 Is all waste at the CWSL stored in skips and prevented from being stored on the ground? NA 10.1.4 Do the spill kits at generator locations have adequate contents? 5
4.10 Is the CWSL sited a sufficient distance from sensitive receptors? NA 10.2 Toilet Facilities
4.11 Is waste segregated into the correct dedicated skips/containers at the CWSL? NA 10.2.1 Are the toilet facilities on site free of leaks? NA
4.12 Are skips/containers which contain light-weight material covered with a net? NA 10.2.2 Is the wastewater storage tank linked to the toilet facilities tank in good NA
condition?
4.13 Is overfilling of skips/containers prevented? NA 10.2.3 Does the wastewater storage tank have a securely fitting lid attached? NA
Hazardous Waste 10.2.4 Are spills and unplanned releases of wastewater prevented? NA
4.14 Is a HAZWASTE Storage Facility (HWSF) provided? NA 10.3 Mess hall
4.15 Are stored quantities of hazardous waste suitable for the capacity of the HWSF? NA 10.3.1 Does the mess hall have food waste bins with lids that close? NA
4.16 Is general waste bins/skips/containers free of chemical/contaminated/hazardous waste? NA 10.3.2 Is the mess hall cleaned to prevent the attraction of vermin and pests? NA
4.17 Are liquid hazardous wastes stored in closed top/lidded containers? NA 10.3.3 Is pest control at the mess hall available and effective? NA
4.18 Are all liquid hazardous waste containers provided with secondary containment/spill trays? NA 10.4 Awareness Material
4.19 Are contaminated soils resulting from spills stored in the HWSF? 10 10.4.1 Is there a dedicated environmental notice board at locations where works 10
congregate?
Score Per Section 55 10.4.2 Are environmental awareness material displayed on the environmental 10
noticeboard?
5 Earthworks & Soil Score Score Per Section 50
5.1 Are site and earthworks boundaries clearly marked/identified and being adhered to? 10 11 Ecology / Conservation Score
5.2 Are stockpiles sited in location(s) which do not pose risks to sensitive receptors? 10 11.1 Terrestrial Conservation
5.3 Are soil erosion measures in place at required location(s) and effective? NA 11.1.1 Are protected nests/burrows/fauna habitats fenced off? NA
Score Per Section 20 11.1.2 Are exclusion zones around nests/burrows/fauna habitats installed and NA
observed?
6 Water Resources and Dewatering Score 11.1.3 Are terrestrial fauna fatalities prevented? `NA
6.1 Is water waste generated as a result of defective equipment / systems, prevented? NA 11.1.4 Is appropriate signage erected at protected nests/burrows/fauna habitats? NA
6.2 Is water waste generated as a result of unwanted behaviors by workers, prevented? 10 11.1.5 Are protected plants/vegetation/flora habitats fenced off? NA
6.3 Is wastewater piped to and stored in storage tanks prior to disposal? NA 11.1.6 Are exclusion zones around plants/vegetation/flora habitats installed and NA
observed?
6.4 Are wastewater storage tanks sited within concrete secondary containment? NA 11.1.7 Are heritage/high value ecological sites protected and exclusion zones observed? NA
6.5 Is pools/accumulation of stagnant water on site prevented? NA 11.2 Marine Conservation
6.6 Are water resources adequately protected from pollution risks? 10 11.2.1 Is nearshore/floating/benthic marine litter prevented? NA
6.7 Are hazardous/chemical materials stored min 50 meters away from water bodies? NA 11.2.2 Are marine fauna fatalities prevented? NA
Dewatering 11.2.3 Are marine environments unaffected by project activities? NA
6.8 Do all dewatering wells have well casings installed? NA 11.2.4 Are coastal systems unaffected by project activities? NA
6.9 Do all dewatering booster pumps sit within a spill tray? NA 11.2.5 Are pollution risks to the marine adequately controlled by distance/barriers? NA
6.1 Is dewatering equipment free from defects/operating efficiently? NA 11.2.6 Are vessel/equipment movement risks in the marine environment adequately NA
controlled?
6.11 Are dewatering hose clamps/connections free of damage, well maintained and free of leaks? NA Score Per Section 0
6.12 Are all dewatering hoses clearly identified with a unique labelling system? NA 12 Landform/Topography Preservation Score

Page 5 of 6
 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION REPORT
6.13 Is localized flooding/unplanned release of water prevented? NA 12.1 Are landform and topography modifications outside approved work boundaries NA
prevented?
6.14 Are sediment tanks free of silt and of adequate capacity for throughput volumes of water? NA 12.2 Is material extraction, infilling and stockpiling restricted to approved locations? NA
6.15 Are sediment lagoons effective in removing suspended sediment from the water? NA 12.3 Is blasting activities restricted to approve locations? NA
Score Per Section 20 12.4 Is blasting activities controlled to minimize impacts from fly rock and projectiles? NA
7 Vehicle and Equipment Management Score Score Per Section 0
7.1 Are site temporary roads demarcated, graded/stabilized and used for all movements? 10 SUMMARY5
7.2 Is Vehicle / Equipment on site in a good state of repair and suitable for the tasks? 10 1 Air Emissions 100%
7.3 Are spill trays clean & free of litter/sediment? 10 2 Nuisance Control 100%
7.4 Are all vehicles and equipment free of hydrocarbon leaks? 10 3 Resources / Materials 75%
7.5 Are hydraulic hoses free of damage/excessive wear and tear? NA 4 Waste Management 91.6%
7.6 Is maintenance conducted in a bonded maintenance workshop with impervious flooring? NA 5 Earthworks & Soil 100%
Score Per Section 40 6 Water Resource and Dewatering 100%
7 Vehicle and Equipment Management 83.3%
8 Fuel and Chemical Management 100%
9 Spill Management 87.5%
10 Welfare / Laydown N/A
11 Ecology / Conservation N/A
12 Landform/Topography Preservation N/A
0
NEV-TGD-701-FRM-01 R Final Score 93.04%

Page 6 of 6