Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Free Download Process Systems Engineering For Pharmaceutical Manufacturing 1St Edition Ravendra Singh Full Chapter PDF
Free Download Process Systems Engineering For Pharmaceutical Manufacturing 1St Edition Ravendra Singh Full Chapter PDF
Edited by
Ravendra Singh
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey,
Piscataway, NJ, United States of America
Zhihong Yuan
Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
Copyright # 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek
permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright
Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or
medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein.
In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety
of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors,
assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products
liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products,
instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-0-444-63963-9
ISSN: 1570-7946
v
vi Contents
3. Plant-Wide Model.......................................................................144
4. Results and Discussions..............................................................146
4.1. Impact of Wash Factors .....................................................149
4.2. Impact of Purge Ratio ........................................................151
5. Conclusions .................................................................................155
References........................................................................................ 156
A.8. Costs...................................................................................591
A.9. Objective Function.............................................................592
References........................................................................................ 592
CHAPTER 24 Perspective on PSE in pharmaceutical
process development and innovation ............................597
Emmanouil Papadakis, John M. Woodley, Rafiqul Gani
1. Introduction .................................................................................597
2. Integrated Framework for Pharmaceutical Process
Development ...............................................................................600
2.1. Framework Architecture.....................................................600
3. Framework Work Flow and Data Flow .....................................602
3.1. Section A. Reaction Pathway .............................................602
3.2. Section B. Reaction Analysis .............................................603
3.3. Section C. Separation Synthesis.........................................606
3.4. Section D. Process Evaluation ...........................................609
4. Supporting Model-Based Methods and Tools............................614
4.1. Methods...............................................................................614
4.2. Knowledge Databases.........................................................617
4.3. Model Libraries ..................................................................620
4.4. Computational Tools ..........................................................620
5. Application Example: Ibuprofen Synthesis................................621
5.1. Problem Definition .............................................................623
5.2. Section A. Reaction Pathway Identification ......................623
5.3. Section B. Reaction Analysis .............................................628
5.4. Section C. Separation Synthesis.........................................639
5.5. Section D. Process Analysis/Simulation and
Analysis...............................................................................646
5.6. Summary .............................................................................650
6. Concluding Remarks...................................................................650
References........................................................................................ 652
Further Reading ............................................................................... 655
Index.......................................................................................................................657
Contributors
Kaoutar Abbou Oucherif
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, United States
Catherine Azzaro-Pantel
Laboratoire de G
enie Chimique, Universite de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France
Brahim Benyahia
Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
Richard D. Braatz
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
Paul Brodbeck
QbD Process Technologies, Allendale, NJ, United States
Vanessa Cárdenas
University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR, United States
Bumjoon Cha
The University of Massachusetts Lowel, Lowell, MA, United States
Brianna Christian
Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
Selen Cremaschi
Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
Denise M. Croker
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Dheeraj R. Devarampally
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
Samir A. Diab
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Rolf Findeisen
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
Miguel Florı́an
University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR, United States
Shaun Galbraith
The University of Massachusetts Lowel, Lowell, MA, United States
Rafiqul Gani
Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Elçin Içten
Amgen Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States
xix
xx Contributors
Marianthi Ierapetritou
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
Hikaru G. Jolliffe
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Iftekhar A. Karimi
National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Richard Lakerveld
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong
Kong
Huolong Liu
The University of Massachusetts Lowel, Lowell, MA, United States
Songsong Liu
Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
Ali Mesbah
University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
Julian Morris
Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Zoltan K. Nagy
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
Dónal P. O’Brien
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Carlos Ortega-Zuñiga
University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR, United States
Emmanouil Papadakis
Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Lazaros G. Papageorgiou
UCL (University College London), London, United Kingdom
Joel A. Paulson
University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
Leonel Quiñones
University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR, United States
Rohit Ramachandran
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
Gintaras V. Reklaitis
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
s D. Román-Ospino
Andre
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
Contributors xxi
Maitraye Sen
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
Rahamatullah Shaikh
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Levente L. Simon
€nchwilen, Switzerland
Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Mu
Elena Simone
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Ravendra Singh
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
Stefan Streif
Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany
Shallon Stubbs
Samsung Display Co., Ltd., Yongin, Republic of Korea
Naresh Susarla
National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Ashutosh Tamrakar
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
Carlos Velázquez
University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR, United States
Gavin M. Walker
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
Zilong Wang
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States
John M. Woodley
Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Seongkyu Yoon
The University of Massachusetts Lowel, Lowell, MA, United States
Jie Zhang
Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
The pharmaceutical industry is a global business sector with more than $1 trillion
annual sales focusing on performance-based products designed to address the
health care needs of the world’s population. Currently, the pharmaceutical industry
is experiencing a number of significant changes in its business and regulatory
environments. Especially, the pharmaceutical industry is under pressure to mod-
ernize its manufacturing process and to deliver its end products with minimum
time, space, cost, and resources while guaranteeing desirable quality of the prod-
ucts. The pharmaceutical companies are therefore going through a paradigm shift
from traditional manufacturing mode to modernized mode built on cutting-edge
technology and computer-aided methods and tools. Apparently, such shift can
benefit tremendously from the application of methods and tools of process systems
engineering (PSE). Therefore, systematic process and system engineering methods
and tools are needed that can solve the problems related to pharmaceutical industry
more efficiently.
This book elucidates how the PSE methods and tools help and promote the dis-
covery, development, deployment of pharmaceutical products, and the relevant
manufacturing processes. The state-of-the-art computer-aided methods and tools
in PSE field have been described in different chapters that will help to modernize
the pharmaceutical industry and can solve its problems more efficiently. The four
interesting areas where PSE methods and tools can significantly contribute have
been included. These areas are pharmaceutical product and process synthesis and
design; pharmaceutical production process modeling, simulation, analysis, and
optimization; pharmaceutical production process dynamics, control, monitoring,
and operations; and enterprise-wide optimization and supply chain management
for pharmaceutical-manufacturing processes.
Continuous manufacturing (CM) is evolving as a preferred platform for pharma-
ceutical products. One advantage of CM among others is that the product quality can
be controlled in real time and thereby it opens the possibilities of achieving Quality
by Design (QbD), Quality by Control (QbC), and real-time release (RTR) paradigms.
The different types of continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing processes such as
powder to tablet, drop on demand, and end-to-end continuous pharmaceutical
manufacturing processes have been included. The application of PSE for continuous
pharmaceutical manufacturing such as modeling, optimization, automation, sensing,
and control has been systematically illustrated.
This book includes 24 chapters. The first chapter describes the new product
development and supply chains in the pharmaceutical industry. The development
of a pharmaceutical oral solid-dosage form has been described in Chapter 2.
Chapter 3 explains the innovative process development and production concepts
for small-molecule API manufacturing. Plant-wide technoeconomic analysis and
separation solvent selection for continuous active pharmaceutical ingredients
manufacturing has been described in Chapter 4.
xxiii
xxiv Preface
Ravendra Singh
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
The dynamics of innovation of a company can be assessed through the life cycle of its
products. Classically, the life cycle of a product includes the phases of development,
launch, growth, maturity, and ends with a stage of decline. The typical features of
these stages depend on the scope of application in which the company is competing.
Whatever the domain, the steps are carried out by a number of functional groups
within the company, including R&D, manufacturing and distribution networks, in
compliance with environmental, safety, and environmental standards as well as
the quality of products developed. In that context, a supply chain has a pivotal role
including all the organizational, operational, and value-adding activities needed to
manufacture products from development to the marketplace and get them to the cus-
tomer. So, a pharmaceutical supply chain covers every activity from new product
development (NPD) through to delivery to the hospital, retail pharmacy, or patient.
The choices of these entities are guided, among others, by strategic decisions
involving the allocation of capital expenditures, economic profitability, marketing
strategies, product and technology portfolio management, supply chain design deci-
sions, including the manufacturing and structure of the distribution network as well
as the selection of strategic partners. The complexity of this environment stems from
the multiple stakeholders and strategic decisions must involve multiple functional
units and integrate the tactical and operational levels of the entire product portfolio.
In the pharmaceutical context, the problem is made difficult by the presence of
several key stakeholders, such as drug manufacturers, wholesale distributors, retail
pharmacies, hospitals, managed care organizations, and insurance companies.
The decisions must be taken in an environment in which both external and inter-
nal uncertainties are encountered: external pressures and uncertainties include, for
example, product demand, price setting, entry of some competitors into the market,
suppliers and buyers, overall economic dynamics, whereas internal uncertainties
result in particular from unexpected technical problems, production deviation due
to the variation in the quality of raw materials, the risks of failure of R&D
activities, etc.
Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Volume 41, ISSN 1570-7946, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63963-9.00001-4
© 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1
2 CHAPTER 1 New product discovery and development
This chapter presents the main characteristics of the life cycle of a drug and the
decision-making problems faced by a pharmaceutical company. It discusses some
relevant solution methods of new product portfolio management and pharmaceutical
supply chain design and operation. It identifies the challenges that must be addressed
for the integration of the different levels.
Preclinical
Exploratory Preclinical
trials: Registration Commercialization
research trials
Phases I, II, and III
5 years
10 R&D years
20 years
Patent Patent
deposit expiration
FIG. 1
Drug development process.
2 Typical features of pharmaceutical industry 3
Phase I. In this stage, first clinical trials are carried out and drugs are administered
to healthy volunteers. At the same time, acute/chronic and reproductive studies
are also conducted in animals (mice/rats). Positive results will allow to the drug to
go on the process, whereas an unacceptable behavior in human and animal studies
can terminate the study.
Phase II. The Drug is administered to unhealthy human patients with the disease
by using the results of dosing studies from Phase I. Coincident with these
studies are long-term oncogenic toxicological studies in animals and market
research to obtain sales estimates. If the compound fails to treat the disease or is
inferior to competitive products, it is destaged or returned to the discovery phase
for modification.
Phase III. Large-scale clinical studies are carried out on unhealthy human
patients. The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is involved and indicates
benchmarks for giving their approval. In addition to confirming the efficiency,
these studies identify drug-drug interactions, human demographics, etc. This
most expensive phase of the development process requires extensive global
coordination and cooperation. The results should confirm what was learned in
Phase II but on a much larger scale; otherwise, the compound may be terminated.
4 CHAPTER 1 New product discovery and development
Simultaneously, the marketing strategy is evolving, price negotiations are being con-
ducted with suppliers/distributors, and promotional materials are being developed.
The building of a commercial plant is in progress. Approval for selling the new drug
is the anticipated outcome.
Prelaunch activities. This is the final stage before launch-approval has been
received from FDA; a global penetration strategy has been completed; the
commercial plant has been built and started up; the promotional campaign
launched. This phase ends when the new drug is distributed.
Launch activities. The product is launched over a period of years in various global
markets until mature sales levels are reached the ramp-up period. Mature sales are
maintained until patents expire or competition is carried out either from
competitors or planned cannibalization.
Product supply chain activities. Sample preparation, process research, process
development, process design, and plant construction occur simultaneously with
other development activities (see Fig. 2). Initial focus is on preparing sufficient
sample material for various animal/human studies. Once the launch prospects
Discovery of a
? ? ?
drug candidate
Total duration:
Plant
10–18 years
building
Sale Sale
Mature sales Sale ramp up I
ramp up III ramp up II
First
Prelaunch I submission
for approval
FIG. 2
Drug life cycle.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
And hereof sprang the false namde prophesies,
That goe by letters, siphers, armes, or sines:
Which all bee foolish, false, and crafty lyes,
Deuisde by gesse, or guiles vntrue deuines:
For whan they saw that many[1194] of many lynes
Gaue[1195] armes alyke, they wist not which was hee
Whom Merlyne ment the noted beast to bee.
34.
35.
36.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
This feate atchiued, yet could they not for shame
Cause mee bee kild by any[1206] common way,
But like a wolfe the tyrant Richard came,
(My brother, nay my butcher I may say)[1207]
Unto the tower when all men were away,[1208]
Saue such as were prouided for the feate:
Who in this wise did straungely mee entreate.
53.
54.
55.
57.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Where is now my conquest and victory?
Where is my riches and royall array?
Where be my coursers and my horses hye,
Where is my myrth, my solace, and my play?
As vanity to nought all[1228] is wythered away:
O lady Bes long for mee may you call,
For I am departed vntill dome’s day:
But loue you that lord that is soueraine of all:
Where bee my castles and buildings royall?
But Windsore alone now haue I no moe,
And of Eton the prayers perpetuall,
Et ecce nunc in puluere dormio.
6.
7.