Fysh 2015 Surgical Podcasts Ten of The Best

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Technology

DOI: 10.1308/147363515X14134529299826

Surgical podcasts:
ten of the best
Consultant surgeon Thomas Fysh reviews the
best surgical podcasts on the market.
ICU ROUNDS DR PODCAST CANCER UPDATE SERIES
Jeffrey Guy is a familiar name The Dr Podcast series is (BREAST SURGEON’S EDITION –
among surgical trainees. His designed as a revision tool for OTHERS ARE AVAILABLE)
long-standing podcast series various Royal College mem- For those interested in breast
covers all aspects of intensive bership-level examinations, surgery, Neil Love’s podcast
care unit (ICU) and critical care from fluid bal- including general surgery. Unusually, they series is first class. He interviews well-known
ance, sepsis and pancreatitis through to bomb are not free and cannot be accessed from names in breast cancer research in order to
and blast injuries and the use of blood products. iTunes, but rather the Dr Podcast website. establish how novel research can influence
Guy qualifies his remarks and insights with A subscription containing all 180 podcasts practice. Typically, he will ask a panel of experts
up-to-date research and frequently refers to costs £150 but – given the cost of surgical to comment on the treatment of their own
established guidelines and best treatment textbooks – this does not seem unreasonable patients and discuss how modern research
protocols. Whereas many of these are inter- if the content is up to the task, which it is. influences management.
nationally applicable (such as the Surviving The episodes take the form of ‘the perfect This podcast series highlights the most
Sepsis campaign), others are particular to his answer’, in which an interviewer asks a important and controversial topics in breast
own establishment at Vanderbilt University in question and a ‘candidate’ answers slowly and cancer and provides an evidence-packed
Nashville. Nonetheless, the podcast is engaging flawlessly, covering the surgical curriculum at experience, which is as valuable to the most
and, although home recorded, sounds profes- MRCS level. These podcasts are of no interest established academic as it is to the junior
sional and smoothly edited. This is a fantastic to anyone but the revising MRCS candidate. trainee. It is professionally recorded and
resource for all surgeons, but particularly useful Although they clearly have merit, the tech- linked to Research to Practice (RTP), Love’s
for those revising for the FRCS and MRCS. nique of learning a script in order to pass an established medical education company
exam feels outdated and one gets the feeling in Miami. RTP podcasts are also available,
CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT:  that the examiners would rather candidates including a prostate and colorectal series
QUALITY:  OVERALL:  answered questions by drawing on their for surgeons and 11 other podcasts covering
own experiences and knowledge. That said, I other oncological subspecialties. They are all
would have paid for the series. of similarly high quality.

CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT:  CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT: 


QUALITY:  OVERALL:  QUALITY:  OVERALL: 

40
Technology

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY TRAUMA LOUPES THE HERNIA DISCOURSE


Although the BJS monthly This monthly podcast from This podcast from Arthur
podcast provides a brief syn- the Journal of Trauma and Gilbert, the founding
opsis of the journal’s content, Acute Care Surgery takes the president of the American
it is not an adequate substitute form of the ‘guest review’. In Hernia Society, has much to
for subscription (and nor is it meant to each short episode, invited guests talk about be said for it. The format is interview based
be). On occasion, the editors provide extra an article of their choice. While some of and covers all aspects of hernia surgery, up
interviews with authors and this is when the contributors deliver their pieces in an to and including in-depth discussion of
the podcast is most interesting. As is the engaging way, they are usually read out and minimally invasive techniques, the use of
case with many of the established academic feel stilted and laboured. I would favour an biologic meshes, technical tips and the man-
journal podcasts, the editing, interviewing, alternative if time was limited. agement of complications. Interviewees are
recording, music and flow feel amateurish primarily from the American establishment,
and the quality of the recorded interviews CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT:  but there are several contributions from the
is sometimes such that they are difficult to QUALITY:  OVERALL:  international community. The interviews
hear. That said, it is quite short and certainly feel natural and make for easy listening. The
provides the listener with the highlights of SURGINFECTION series is let down by poor-quality telephone
the monthly BJS and a synopsis of the main Seamus McHugh’s podcast is lines and lengthy introductions, but the
research findings. specific to surgical infection content can be fascinating and may even
prevention and this is perhaps provoke surgeons to amend or alter their
CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT:  its strength. The episodes are own practice.
QUALITY:  OVERALL:  each less than ten minutes and usually consist
of a single review of a randomised control trial CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT: 
JBJS by McHugh, a registrar in Cork, Ireland. The QUALITY:  OVERALL: 
The Journal of Bone and Joint podcast is an off-shoot of his e-learning re-
Surgery podcast is profes- source, www.surginfection.com. They are home PODCASTS FROM THE
sionally produced and is an recorded but of high quality and well edited. COCHRANE LIBRARY
abbreviated audio version of The Cochrane Library publishes
the monthly journal. Several abstracts are CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT:  its monthly reports as 15-min-
presented from the journal, which are then QUALITY:  OVERALL:  ute ‘round-ups’. While this
elaborated upon by a chosen expert. Listeners podcast seems to be full of potential, not least
are also pointed towards e-learning resources, SURGERY 101 on account of the gravitas behind the Cochrane
including case-based discussions and video This podcast provides short establishment, it is let down by poor recording
tutorials provided by the JBJS. While the (20-minute) episodes covering and editing. Interviews are often incomprehen-
narration is professional, the lack of inter- the main topics in general sible and sound levels are variable. Furthermore,
views and discussion between professionals is surgery (eg appendicitis, peptic the reports are too often concerned with long
a shame; the expert monologues feel scripted ulcer disease, inflammatory bowel disease). They lists of statistics and details of meta-analyses,
and are sometimes not particularly engaging. are aimed at medical undergraduates but would which – although important in terms of the
Nonetheless, this is a useful resource for certainly be of interest to junior surgical trainees written paper – do not make for an enjoyable
orthopaedic surgeons and trainees. too, as they cover the essentials of history, pres- listening experience. This podcast would benefit
entation and management of common surgical from a professional production team.
CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT:  conditions. They do not cover very much in the
QUALITY:  OVERALL:  way of surgical guidelines or evidence and as CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT: 
such are less valuable for those revising for higher QUALITY:  OVERALL: 
examinations or practising surgeons.

CONTENT:  ENGAGEMENT:  Thomas Fysh is a consultant oncoplastic, breast


QUALITY:  OVERALL:  and general surgeon with The Medical Specialist
Group in Guernsey. The author declares no
conflict of interest or financial incentives.

41

You might also like