Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fysh 2015 Surgical Podcasts Ten of The Best
Fysh 2015 Surgical Podcasts Ten of The Best
Fysh 2015 Surgical Podcasts Ten of The Best
DOI: 10.1308/147363515X14134529299826
Surgical podcasts:
ten of the best
Consultant surgeon Thomas Fysh reviews the
best surgical podcasts on the market.
ICU ROUNDS DR PODCAST CANCER UPDATE SERIES
Jeffrey Guy is a familiar name The Dr Podcast series is (BREAST SURGEON’S EDITION –
among surgical trainees. His designed as a revision tool for OTHERS ARE AVAILABLE)
long-standing podcast series various Royal College mem- For those interested in breast
covers all aspects of intensive bership-level examinations, surgery, Neil Love’s podcast
care unit (ICU) and critical care from fluid bal- including general surgery. Unusually, they series is first class. He interviews well-known
ance, sepsis and pancreatitis through to bomb are not free and cannot be accessed from names in breast cancer research in order to
and blast injuries and the use of blood products. iTunes, but rather the Dr Podcast website. establish how novel research can influence
Guy qualifies his remarks and insights with A subscription containing all 180 podcasts practice. Typically, he will ask a panel of experts
up-to-date research and frequently refers to costs £150 but – given the cost of surgical to comment on the treatment of their own
established guidelines and best treatment textbooks – this does not seem unreasonable patients and discuss how modern research
protocols. Whereas many of these are inter- if the content is up to the task, which it is. influences management.
nationally applicable (such as the Surviving The episodes take the form of ‘the perfect This podcast series highlights the most
Sepsis campaign), others are particular to his answer’, in which an interviewer asks a important and controversial topics in breast
own establishment at Vanderbilt University in question and a ‘candidate’ answers slowly and cancer and provides an evidence-packed
Nashville. Nonetheless, the podcast is engaging flawlessly, covering the surgical curriculum at experience, which is as valuable to the most
and, although home recorded, sounds profes- MRCS level. These podcasts are of no interest established academic as it is to the junior
sional and smoothly edited. This is a fantastic to anyone but the revising MRCS candidate. trainee. It is professionally recorded and
resource for all surgeons, but particularly useful Although they clearly have merit, the tech- linked to Research to Practice (RTP), Love’s
for those revising for the FRCS and MRCS. nique of learning a script in order to pass an established medical education company
exam feels outdated and one gets the feeling in Miami. RTP podcasts are also available,
CONTENT: ENGAGEMENT: that the examiners would rather candidates including a prostate and colorectal series
QUALITY: OVERALL: answered questions by drawing on their for surgeons and 11 other podcasts covering
own experiences and knowledge. That said, I other oncological subspecialties. They are all
would have paid for the series. of similarly high quality.
40
Technology
41