Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literacy Lesson Plan and Commentary Assignment 1
Literacy Lesson Plan and Commentary Assignment 1
Part 2a: Common Core State Standard for ELA-Literacy and/or Other Standards
CC.1. R.L.2 Key Ideas and Details: Retell stories, including key details, and demonstrate
understanding of their central message or lesson.
SS.K-2.IS.5
With guidance and support, students will share their findings on the asked and
answered questions with peers about arguments and explanations.
Students should be able to use their prior knowledge of themes and morals to develop the lesson's
overall main idea. Students should be able to use their context clues to answer some questions about
the book's contents. Students should be able to infer what the book will be about. Students should
be able to access information and present it to a peer (turn and talk). Students can use oral language
skills. Previously taught skills that we can use during our lesson include context clues, main idea,
moral, word recognition.
Students will be able to apply vocabulary terms used in context of the story “Turtle and Rabbit” by
using the given names of characters along with contextual vocabulary in discussion with peers, and
in using general academic vocabulary concurrently within the syntax of simple sentences in a news
article activity describing the plot and characters of the same story.
Discourse Demands:
Students will encounter sequential events in the read aloud of “Turtle and Rabbit” in which
the story follows the chronological order of the introduction, beginning of a race, duration
of a race, and completion of the race.
Students will encounter a moral lesson taught by a fable, which is the genre of the story.
They will use this lesson to determine contextually the main idea of the story and its
supporting details.
Students will discuss the cause and effect contextual events of the story in discourse with
peers in which they will determine the causation and events that led to the ending of the
story, the end of the race.
Syntax Demands:
The grammatical intricacy of the story “Turtle and Rabbit” is primarily simple sentences
with one independent clause. Ex. “This will make a great story.” (McLenighan, 1981).
The lexical density of “Turtle and Rabbit” is minimal in the inclusion of few subject
specific and general academic vocabulary per sentence. There is an average of 0-1 per
sentence.
There are very minimal grammatical metaphors included in “Turtle and Rabbit” with only
one sentence including a grammatical metaphor.
There is strong cohesion between pronouns and their referents in “Turtle and Rabbit” as
sentences primarily include one independent clause throughout the story and character
names are stated frequently as proper nouns before being replaced with related pronouns.
Introduction: I will begin the lesson by asking students to transition quietly to the carpet
area of the classroom in front of the smart board. I will set behavioral expectations initially
by asking students to remain seated during the following discussions and read aloud of a
story, ask that students raise their hands to ask questions, and remind students of being
respectful and kind to peers when engaging in discussion.
Students will first be engaged in a pre-discussion of fables and their prior knowledge from
previous lessons within the unit. I will ask students to raise their hands to recall orally the
purpose of fables and any examples of fables they have read as a class prior.
Maecy will cover the topic of what main idea, moral, plot, characters and settings are to
ensure students know what they are looking for. This will allow students to have the
information fresh on their brain.
Students will then be introduced to the cover of the story “Turtle and Rabbit” and a list of
relevant general academic vocabulary terms that I will discuss using the large white board
located near the carpeting area of the room. I will provide a short synopsis of the general
academic vocabulary students may hear when listening to the story and clarify character
names that will be used throughout the story.
Development:
Before beginning a read aloud of “Turtle and Rabbit” students will participate in a turn and
talk with a partner to make pre-assumptions about the story based on their prior knowledge,
which will also be used as a discussion to build student interest in the story. (Formative
Assessment) I will ask students to turn and share any ideas about the story’s plot and
characters prior to listening to the story. Students will be given 2-3 minutes to discuss with
their partners before transitioning back to a group discussion. I will give students the
opportunity to share any ideas they discussed during the turn and talk by raising their hands
to participate. I will call on a few groups of students before moving to the read-aloud
portion.
I will begin a read-aloud of “Turtle and Rabbit” on the carpet. Strategies used to engage
students will include showing illustrations, reading at an appropriate pace, fluctuating tones
of voice, and including thoughtful pauses. Students will be reminded of behavioral
expectations also at this time.
Following the read aloud, I will engage students in a modeling of news article activity using
the smartboard and pen to guide students in their independent work. I will display a copy of
the news article activity on the smart board in which I will describe the components
included. The components of an inference being a pre-assumption about a story’s plot, the
details included in the setting of a story, a definition of a main idea apart from supporting
details, and a description of supporting details will be explained to students in a modeling
fashion. Maecy and I will use the pen to write on the smartboard to show students exactly
where they will describe these components in the story, along with the included characters
and an illustration in the provided box on their news article. Maecy will give students an
explanation of providing a simple sentence with a single clause, character names listed as a
response to the corresponding section, and how many key details to provide in a listed
format. Students will then be asked to raise their hand to ask any remaining questions
following the modeling activity.
During this time Maecy and I will pass out clipboards and worksheets to the students and ask them
to please get out their black marker, which they will use to write on their printed newspaper article
worksheet. Students will also be told how they will use their black marker to illustrate a simple
sketch to apply knowledge of the black and white format of a traditional newspaper.
I will at this point transition students to using clipboards or desks to begin working on their news
article activity.
Closure: I will end the lesson with a discussion while students begin working on the activity
of any further questions following the read aloud and modeling of the activity (Formative
Assessment). Students will begin their independent work on news article activity which
includes the descriptions of the plot, setting, main idea, key ideas, and characters in the
story (Summative Assessment). Closure activity is attached. This activity consists of
creating a newspaper article about Turtle and Rabbit and the key components. The students
will use a black marker to create a “print” on the newspaper. This uses cross subject
curriculum to help students understand the importance of literacy and newspapers.
Learning Extensions: After the student’s work is collected and they are engaged in cleaning
up their supplies at their desks, I will recommend that students read other grade level texts
that are fables or have similar sequential plots. This will allow students to further their
learning by using their knowledge of comprehension and vocabulary stories in various
contexts. They can also connect learned knowledge of fables in determining the main
idea/lesson portrayed in similar stories in the genre.
Part 6: Instructional Materials and Resources
News Article Describing the Plot, Setting, and Lesson/Main Idea of Fable (Copies for
students)
Hard Copy of Read-Aloud Story: “Turtle and Rabbit” (McLenighan, 1981)
Smart Board
Large White Board and Dry-Erase Marker
Pencils
Clipboards
Black Markers
Commentary
This lesson is being cotaught with 2 classes combined. Sarah Wehrle’s class is going to Teresa
Beeler’s room where Meghan and Maecy with co teach together. The lesson is a spinoff of
The Tortoise and the Hare. Students are currently working on Fables, so we are supplementing
their understanding with this lesson.
given in this literacy lesson due to the knowledge of reading and listening skills that
students have obtained prior to this lesson being taught (Gehsmann & Templeton, pg.
133, 2022). This assessment is used to assess students in their reading comprehension
skills in a way that tests their responses to text based and inferential questions
(Gehsmann & Templeton, pg. 134, 2022). The prior knowledge of elements of a text
seen commonly in comprehension written and multiple choice assessments, such as the
written assessment given as independent work in this lesson, would be assessed using
abilities of students in reading a narrative text and answering questions that are based
which students could be grouped accordingly in a turn in talk in a way that would
benefit a larger number of students in their independent work. The students working
results could be enhanced to ensure each student was partnered to guide their peers in
thinking reflectively about the elements of a story. The elements of the story seen in
the questioning of plot, main idea, characters, and setting are clear to some students
while some students may struggle in identifying these concepts based off of a given
text. The comprehension abilities of students vary at this age-level in a way that is
difficult to assess with only a piece of written work due to varying abilities in
components of the story before, during, and after reading aloud to the students. The
students in forming connections between previously used vocabulary and its various
meanings in the story. This included the explanation of vocabulary that pertained to the
story, including the saying “run rings” that the students were unfamiliar with prior to
hearing the story. This guided students in their thinking of figurative language at a
simple level to begin thinking about the main idea of the story that focused on the
rabbit’s intention to easily win the race. The clearing of any confusion about vague
language used with a figurative, rather than literal, meaning aided students in focusing
on the main ideas seen in the story with an understanding of the vocabulary used in the
context of the rabbit’s perspective. The vocabulary explained that pertained to the
activity was also effective in guiding students to think about the elements of plot,
setting, the main idea, and characters in the pre-reading discussion, as well as a
continuation of these ideas with reminders of this academic vocabulary throughout the
lesson that was to be used in the independent work following. The explanation of these
vocabulary in discussion with their peers. The scaffolding used in the frequent usage of
this vocabulary guided students in their comprehension strategies during and after the
read aloud as a continuation of the vocabulary discussion that precluded the story. The
students showed comprehension of these ideas in their work samples in ways such as
correctly listing the setting of the story as inclusive of multiple events that occurred, as
well as the main idea which was defined to students prior to reading aloud to scaffold
their thinking in a way that prepped them to think of these elements throughout the
story. According to our course text, effective instruction incorporates discussion that
occurs throughout a lesson and importantly includes a before discussion that explains
elements of a narrative text in a way that is explicit to ensure students remain clear of
how they should guide their thinking patterns to supplement their comprehension
strategies (Gehsmann & Templeton, pg. 196, 2022). This pre-discussion of important
general and academic vocabulary prepared students to think in a way that effectively
guided them in retaining these thinking patterns throughout and after the story.
C. Elements of this lesson that were not effective included prompting students to think back to
the events of the story in a way that required them to choose one event and provide an
illustration of the event of their choosing. This required students to choose one of multiple
events seen in the chronological order of the story, which in turn prompted them to become
confused about which specific event they should choose. In guiding students to come up with
their own ideas in choosing a specific event to portray in their newspaper article, I gave
students some examples of events they could choose from which were ineffective in engaging
them to think back on the story. The act of listing events and prompting students to discuss
these events with their peers’ led students to all choose a similar event in which they did not
individually use comprehension strategies. The students used almost entirely the first example
that I listed aloud which was the rabbit resting near a tree in the story at a certain point in the
race between the turtle and rabbit. My cooperating teacher gave the suggestion of having
students take notes of key ideas in the read-aloud portion of the lesson in order to aid their
comprehension strategies of remembering key events of the plot that incorporate the lesson
objective of recalling events of the story. This is a suggestion that I would use with the age-
group of students in first grade in the future as there were many components of the activity
that were more straightforward that left this portion to be more open ended with the inclusion
singular event, scaffolding throughout the story would have been beneficial as the race in the
story occurred in chronological order. In referencing the textbook for this course, I would in
the future remind students throughout the story to be thoughtful and reflective about the events
that occur to aid in their comprehension of each event in a way that does not suggest a “right
D. In teaching this lesson in the future, one suggestion I would make is to include a
scaffolding of prompts for the learning activity that students were to complete as
independent work following the lesson. This suggestion is based upon the scenarios that
occurred amongst students in which they were given a worksheet with many prompts that
seemed to be open-ended before they were prompted in completing each question of the
worksheet according to the discussions conducted before, during, and after the story that
plot, main idea, and supporting details seen in the story read aloud. In this age group
students are often overwhelmed when given multiple writing prompts that require them to
conduct written answers that pertain to a previously read-aloud text. This occurred in a
way that did not halt the lesson by any means, but required a more in depth explanation for
each prompt on the worksheet in a way that prolonged the lesson in its entirety. The
students were worried about finding the “right answer” in a way that paused their abilities
to be reflective and thoughtful with the lack of comprehension taking place due to their
thinking of all the elements at once with little scaffolding on the worksheet (Gehsmann &
Templeton, pg. 197, 2022). A suggestion that I would make to enhance this lesson in the
future based off of the assessment results is to provide students with a completed example
of the worksheet based off of other narrative texts of the same genre. This allows students
to view a completed piece of work that can be used to guide their thinking and worry less
about the elements all combined, in a way in which they can work prompt by prompt on
the worksheet to provide a written response that is thoughtful and reflective. Modeling a
composition to students that would ease their stress when given multiple writing prompts
would be effective in teaching this lesson in the future as comprehension strategies and
scaffolded example of the printed text they are to create based off of a set of given prompts
2. Self-Reflection
What I saw and heard What it means Instructional Alternatives
with References
In making Students have Visual thinking
assumptions before previously been strategy if individuals
reading, students taught inferencing do not participate in
were excited to skills in the before-reading
connect their prior comprehension that discussion. This
knowledge of fables. allow them to would serve as an
Students were connect various texts extension activity for
confused about the within the same students that are
multiple settings genre. having trouble
present in the story, Students have been recalling elements of
as the environment given instruction the text to aid in their
the main characters based in comprehension
were in was comprehension using strategies (Gehsmann
everchanging. context clues to & Templeton, pg.
Students were able to determine the setting 198, 2022)
differentiate between of a story; however, The students may
proper and improper they may need benefit from a
nouns in vocabulary further instruction of timeline of events in
that related to places how to differentiate the story that is more
and main characters between multiple descriptive than the
in the story. settings. plot described simply
The students have on their worksheet
been given explicit (newspaper article).
vocabulary This could include
instruction that various times and
allows them to places the characters
differentiate between interact within in a
proper and improper chronological order
nouns with the throughout the story.
related written work This may help
connection in print. students in their
differentiation
between the main
setting found in the
story and other
supporting details
with the usage of this
extension activity
(Gehsmann &
Templeton, pg. 198,
2022).
The students that may
struggle
differentiating
between proper and
improper nouns
might benefit from a
chart of characters as
a supplemental
resource to attach a
meaning to the words
spoken, also found in
the title, “Turtle and
Rabbit”
(McLenighan, 1981).
This resource of
providing students
with a chart to
supplement their
thinking of characters
in the story serves to
conceptual
knowledge that could
also include an
illustration to attach a
meaning to the
characters proper
noun names and
illustration
(Gehsmann &
Templeton, pg. 211,
2022
3. Analysis of Three (3) Students’ Learning of the Lesson Objective During/After the Lesson
Student #1: Student #2:
Student #3:
1. Student #1 met the lesson objective by providing an inference as a presumption to the story
based off of prior knowledge, correctly listing character names, accurately identifying the
main idea or moral seen in the story and giving three supporting details that supplement
the main idea of the story. Student #2 met the lesson objective by providing an inference
relevant to prior knowledge of the story based on the before discussion, correctly listing
character names, giving multiple events in their description of the plot of this story, giving
the main idea or moral based on the genre of a fable, and giving two supporting details.
Student #3 met the lesson objective by giving an inference based off of prior knowledge of
the story given knowledge of the fable in other literary forms, correctly listing characters
seen in the story, giving a main idea or moral that encompasses the main message of the
story, and giving a descriptive supporting detail that supplements the main idea of the story
in a relevant way.
2. Student #1 was given the feedback of being reminded of being more specific in providing
the setting of the story, or multiple settings of a story. They were also given feedback on
the details a plot should encompass as a string of multiple events. Student #2 was given the
feedback of listing the main setting seen in the story and recalling this using
comprehension strategies of thinking back to where events took place. This student was
also given feedback on listing three supporting details instead of two in assessing the
details that supplement the main idea of a story as specified in the instructions. Student #3
was given the feedback of carefully examining the setting of the story in order to dictate
which is the main setting, giving multiple events in order when describing the plot of the
story given it is a string of events, and giving two more supporting details as stated in the
instructions to provide three supporting details.
3. Other assessments that could be used to inform this group of student’s reading instruction
include informal discussions with peers using visual thinking strategies, asking students to
provide a chart of characters and events occurring within the plot of a story, and giving a
short quiz rather than an article with written responses. These are all forms of assessment
that are informal and formal ways of assessing both students’ usage of academic and
general vocabulary knowledge, as well as comprehension strategies that require students to
discuss and use text-based evidence from a storybook. The connection between reading a
story and translating the ideas comprehended about characters, setting, plot, main idea,
inferences, and supporting details gives important information to teachers about reading
instruction. This is due to the current knowledge and abilities students encompass in
dictating these elements of a story following a reading and writing workshop or lesson
based off a given text.
References
Gehsmann, K.M., & Templeton, S. (2022). Teaching reading and writing: The developmental