Document

You might also like

Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

In the end , would be very unfair not to look at the arguments presented by he

Sunnis in favor of their First Caliph , Abu Bakr. In the footnote of Sahih
Muslim, the commentator writes:

It was a sort of a misgiving on the part of the Hadrat Fatimah that Hadrat
Abu Bakr was reluctant to give the due share of her part of her great father.
Noble Abu Bakr could not conceive of that. He had intense love and affection
for the family of the Holy Prophet (S) but he was not yielding to her demand
since he found it against the verdict of the Holy Prophet (S) in regards to the
legacy of the Prophets as we find in a hadith!

- Footnote of Sahih Muslim, v3, p958 (English), footnote number 2235

How can it be a misgiving on the part of the Chief of the Women in Paradise
when Her highness was bestowed by the Prophet (S) himself the title of al-
Siddiqah? How can the commentator accuse her of a misgiving when She was
also known as The Splendid One , The Chaste and The Pure One? How can any
Muslim accuse Her of a misgiving with the facts in mind that the Qur ’an
talks about her in the following Verses.

“The Verse of Purity (Chapter 33 Verse 33)

“The Verse of Imprecation (Mubihala Chapter 3 Verse 61)

You might also like