Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Professor Boussagui

S6 Phonology

Allophonic Rules
Adapted from Kuiper and Scott Allan’s An Introduction to English Language: Word, Sound
and Sentence (2010).

Allophones are the predictable realizations of phonemes, and as such their occurrence can be
expressed formally by a rule. These rules that link an abstract phoneme to its allophonic
realizations are called allophonic rules.

The function of the rules may be illustrated by the following diagram:

INPUT OUTPUT
Phonemic Form → Acted on by → Phonetic Representation
(Abstract Unit) Allophonic rule(s) (What speakers produce)

The form of allophonic rules may be best illustrated by an example:

(Context)
/t/ → [tj] / ____ j
(Input) (Output) (Conditioning factor)

This rule tells us that the phoneme /t/ is realized by its palatalized allophone when it occurs
before a palatal approximant. Like all allophonic rules, this rule may be divided into two
halves, which are separated from each other by a slash, /. We shall refer to the first half, on the
left side of the slash, as the process side. On the process side of the rule, we find the input
segment to the rule and its output, in this case /t/ and [tj]. The part of the rule to the right of
the slash specifies the context in which the rule operates and gives the conditioning factor. In
this example, the allophone occurs before a palatal approximant, which is the conditioning
factor.

The process side of any allophonic rule is basically:


/X/ → [Y] /

That is, phoneme X is realized as allophone Y.

The context of a rule may be quite complex, and there are three basic possibilities.

First, the conditioning factor may occur to the right of the input phoneme:
/ ____A
This possibility is illustrated by the palatalization of /t/ discussed above.

Secondly, the conditioning factor may precede the input:

/ A ____

As an example, consider the realization of /t/ in bathtub. In this sequence, /t/ may be
dentalized under the influence of the preceding dental. We can capture this in the following
rule:

/t/ → [ t̪ ] / θ___

Thirdly, the input phoneme occurs between two conditioning factors:

/ A____B

In some varieties of English /t/ and /d/ are realized between vowels as an alveolar tap, [ɾ]. If
we take /t/ as our input, then the rule for this process would be:

/t/ → [ɾ] / V____V (where V = any vowel)

In each of the examples above, the process applies in a single context. If a process applies in
two (or more) contexts, do we write two rules or can we still write a single rule?

Consider our dentalized and unreleased allophones of /t/; /t/ is dentalized when it is followed
by a dental fricative, for example in eighth. However, /t/ is also dentalized if it is word-final
and the next word begins with a dental fricative, for example in no think. Dentalization occurs
both within a word and over word boundaries.

This gives us two rules:

/t/ → [ t̪ ] / ___ θ /t/ → [ t̪ ] / ___#θ (# = word boundary)

In both of these rules the process is the same; only the context is different. We can collapse
these two rules into one by isolating the common material, in this case the process and part of
the environment, and then by placing the non-overlapping part of the contexts inside curved
brackets or parentheses:

/t/ → [ t̪ ] / ___(#) θ

The material inside the brackets is optional. It may or may not be present. The rule states that
/t/ is realized by its dentalized allophone when it is followed by a voiceless dental fricative,
and when it is followed by a word boundary and a voiceless dental fricative.
Now consider the unreleased /t/. /t/ is unreleased when it is followed by another stop, for
example /d/, but let us say that it is also unreleased in word-final position. This would give as
two rules:

/t/ → [ʈ ̚ ] / ___d /t/ → [ʈ ̚ ] /____#

In both of these rules the process is the same: only the context is different. We can collapse
these two rules into one by isolating the common material, in this case the process, and then
by replacing the non-overlapping part of the contexts inside braces:

/t/ → [ʈ ̚ ] / ___ {d #}

The braces indicate a disjunction (you must choose or the other), /t/ is unreleased before either
/d/ or a word boundary. The braces tell us that the rule will apply only if one of the contexts
inside the braces is met.
Consonants & Vowels: Place and Manner of Articulation
George Yule’s The Study of Language (2006, 2010)

You might also like