Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Succession Notes Arts 825-839
Succession Notes Arts 825-839
Succession Notes Arts 825-839
1. a. What is a codicil?
A codicil is a supplement or addition to a will, made after the execution of a will and
annexed to be taken as a part thereof, by which any disposition made in the original will
is explained, added to, or altered. (Art. 825, Civil Code of the Philippines)
Codicil is a way to modify or amend a will without preparing a whole new one.
c. What is/are the requirement/s of a codicil to be valid?
Art. 826. In order that a codicil may be effective, it shall be executed as in the case of a
will.
2) The will must clearly describe and identify the same, stating among other things the
number of pages thereof;
4) It must be signed by the testator and the witnesses on each and every page, except in
case of voluminous books of account or inventories.
Will is ambulatory means that all wills could be considered as ambulatory, because as
long as the person who made it is still alive, then it can always be changed or even
revoked.
4. What is/are the law/s governing revocation of a will by a testator not domiciled in the
Philippines:
6. How does implied revocation of a will takes place? And what is its effect?
Implied revocation of a will occurs when a testator, who already has a will, executes a
new will which is inconsistent with the first and fails to include a provision expressly
revoking the first will.
In case of inconsistent wills, the subsequent will prevails over the prior will because it is
the latest expression of testamentary intent of the testator.
The subsequent will which do not revoke the previous will in an express manner, only
annuls the dispositions in the previous will which are inconsistent with or contrary to
those contained in the subsequent will. (Art. 831)
Where the testator’s act of destruction is connected with the making of another will, so as
fairly to raise the inference that the testator meant the revocation of the old to depend
upon the efficacy of the new disposition intended to be substituted, the revocation will be
conditional and dependent upon the efficacy of the new disposition; and if, for any
reason, the new will intended to be made as a substitute is inoperative, the revocation
fails and the original will remains in full force. (Molo v. Molo, G.R. No. L‐2538, Sept.
21, 1951)
Simply put, for this doctrine to operate, the testator must have intended that the
revocation of his first will be dependent on the validity of his second will. In this case the
intention of the testator is clear: He does not want to die intestate.
8. Give an example of revocation based on false or illegal cause and what is its effect?
Example: GG made a will making JJ his heir. GG then learned that JJ was dead, so he
made another will instituting RR as heir. If JJ turns out to be still alive, JJ will be the one
to inherit, because the revocation was based on a false cause. Under Article 833, a
revocation of a will based on a false cause or an illegal cause is null and void.
9. What is the rationale why does a recognition of an illegitimate child do not lose its legal
effect even if the will where it was made should be revoked?
Art. 834. The recognition of an illegitimate child does not lose its legal effect, even
though the will wherein it was made should be revoked.
Reason for Art. 834: While a will is essentially revocable, recognition is irrevocable
(unless there be vitiated consent).
Moreover —
(1) recognition is not really a testamentary disposition;
(2) recognition does not wait for the testator’s death to become effective. (See 1 Manresa
592)