Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ekn 110
Ekn 110
Have the greatest possible utility (U) with Must maximizeHave maximum profit of
unlimited wants/needs and certain the business/ company they own with
budget constraints, such as salary cost constraints and certain production
earners, owners of businesses, athletes techniques that are cost-effective to
and film actors. Credit is also limited to maximize profits.
individual budget constraints as there is
only a certain limit an individual can
operate with the credit given and the
credit must be paid back.
Inferior options
o There are other combinations of A and B in which the marginal utility of the last
rand spent is the same for the same for both A and B. But all such combinations
either are unobtainable with limited money income or do not yield the
maximum utility attainable and there is still money left to spend.
Algebraic re-statement
o A consumer will maximize their satisfaction when they allocate their money
income so that the last rand spent on product A, the last on product, and so
forth, yield equal amounts of additional, or marginal utility.
o Money income is allocated so that the last rand spent on each product yields the
same extra or marginal utility.
Utility maximization and the demand curve
o Basic determinants of an individual’s demand for a specific product asre
1. Preferences or tastes
2. Money income
3. Prices of the other goods
o Concentrating on the construction of a simple demand cure for product B, we
assume that the price of A, representing ‘other goods’, is still R1.
Deriving the demand schedule and curve
o If the marginal-utility-per-rand doubles because the price of a
product/ service has been halved; the new data in column 3(b)
will be identical to those column 3 (a). But the purchase of 2
units of A and 4 of B is no longer an equilibrium combination.
By applying the same reasoning used previously, it is now
found that the utility-maximizing combination is 4 units of A
and 6 units of B. Using the data in the marginal utility table, the
downward-sloping demand curve DB which links the utility
maximizing behavior of a consumer and that person’s demand curve for a
particular product.
Ordinal Approach
o The notion that utility is measurable is dropped and the focus is on the
preferences of the consumer and how he or she expresses these preferences. In
this theory, indifference curves (a curve showing the different combinations of
two products that yield the same satisfaction or utility to a consumer), which are
used to express consumer preferences, as well as budget constraints via the
budget line (a line that shows the different combinations of two products a
consumer can purchase with a specific money income, given the products’
prices), of the consumer are used to identify a utility-maximizing rule.
Indifference curve analysis: what is preferred?
o In this more advanced analysis, the consumer must simply rank various
combinations of two goods in terms of preference.
o Indifference curves reflect ‘subjective’ information about consumer
preferences for A and B. and indifference curve shows all the combinations
of two products A and B that will yield the same total satisfaction or total
utility to a consumer. The consumer’s subjective preferences are such that
he or she will realize the same total utility from each combination of A and B
show in the table or on the curve. So the consumer will be indifferent (will
not care) as to which combination is actually obtained because the level of
satisfaction regardless of the combination of A and B selected stays the
same.
o Indifference curves have several important characteristics:
An indifference curve slopes downward because more of one product
means less of the other if the total utility is to remain unchanged.
Suppose the consumer moves from one combination of A and B to
another say, from j to k, in doing so the consumer obtains more of
product B, increasing his or her total utility. But because total utility is the
same in any combination on the curve, the consumer must give up some
of the other product, A, to reduce total utility by a precisely offsetting
amount. Thus ‘more of B’ necessitates ‘less of A’, and the quantities of A
and B are inversely related. A curve that reflects inversely related
variables is downward-sloping.
The slope of an indifference curve at each point measure the marginal
rate of substitution (MRS) (the rate at which a consumer is willing to
substitute one good for another (from a given combination of goods) and
remain equally satisfied (have the same total utility); equal to the slope of
a consumer’s indifference curve at each point on the curve) of the
combination of two goods represented by that point. The slope or MRS
shows the rate at which the consumer who possesses the combination
will substitute one good for the other to remain equally satisfied. The
diminishing slope of the indifference curve means that the willingness to
substitute B for A diminishes as more of B is obtained. The rationale for
this convexity- that is, for diminishing MRS – is that a consumer’s
subjective willingness to substitute B for A (or A for B) will depend on the
amounts of B and A he or she has to begin with.
Due to the fact that the utility with different combinations of two
commodities on one indifference curve stays the same, it
is not possible that any two indifference curves can cross
or even form a tangent. If indifference curves crossed,
then in theory they should also reveal the same total
utility and that is not possible given the assumption that
indifference curves further away from the origin (or then
high indifference curves) will reveal high total utility.
The single indifference curve reflects some constant (but
unspecified) level of total utility of satisfaction. It is
possible and useful to sketch a whole series of indifference curves or an
indifference map. Each curve reflects a different level of total utility and
therefore never crosses another indifference curve. As we move out from
the origin, each successive indifference curve
represents a high level of utility.
o The budget line
A schedule or curve that shows various
combinations of two products a consumer can
purchase with a specific income. The analysis
generalizes to the full range of products available
to consumers.
All combinations within the budget line are attainable and all
combinations beyond the budget line are unattainable.
Budget lines illustrate the idea of trade-offs arising from limited income,
thus the straight-line budget constraint, with its constant slope, indicate
constant opportunity cost.
o Limited income forces people to choose what to buy and what to forgo. People
have to evaluate the marginal benefits and marginal costs to make choices that
maximize their satisfaction.
o The budget line varies with income. And increase in income shifts the budget line
to the right, a decrease in money income shifts it to the left.
o If the axes are identical, a superimposed budget line can be implemented on the
consumer’s indifference map. Specifically, the utility-maximizing combination
on the indifference curve will be the combination lying on the highest
attainable indifference curve which is called the consumer’s equilibrium
position (the combination of two goods at which a consumer maximizes his or
her utility (reaches the highest attainable indifference curve), given a limited
amount to spend (a budget constraint)).
o Because the slope of the indifference curve reflects the MRS (marginal
rate of substitution) and the slope of the budget line is P B /PA, the consumer’s
optimal or equilibrium position is the point where:
o Vertical reference lines can be dropped down to the horizontal axis of the
demand curve, if the horizontal axes are identical and measure the same
quantity of a product/ service. By locating two prices on the curve and knowing
that the prices will yield the relevant quantities demanded, two points can be
located on the demand curve. Thus through simple manipulation of the price in
an indifference curve-budget line context, a downward-sloping demand has
been obtained. Therefore, the law of demand assuming ‘all things equal’, but in
this case the demand curve has been derived without resorting to the
questionable assumption that consumers can measure utility in units called
‘utils’, rather consumers simply compare combinations of products and
determine which combination they prefer, given their incomes and the prices of
the two products.
o An important difference exists between the marginal-utility theory of consumer
demand and the indifference curve theory. The marginal-utility theory assumes
that utility is numerically measurable, i.e. the consumer can say how much extra
utility the derive from each extra unit of A or B. the consumer needs that
information to realize the utility-maximizing (equilibrium) position:
o The indifference curve approach imposes a less stringent requirement on the
consumer. He or she only specify whether a particular combination of A and B
will yield more than, less than or the same amount of utility as some other
combination of A and B will yield. Indifference curve theory does not require that
the consumer specify how much more (or less) satisfaction will be realized.
o When the equilibrium situations in the two theories are compared, indifference
curves show that the MRS equals PB / PA at equilibrium. However, in the marginal-
utility approach, the ratio of marginal utilities equals PB / PA. Therefore, the
deduction is made that at equilibrium the MRS is equivalent to the ratio of the
marginal utilities of the last purchased units of the two products.
Chapter 4
Economic costs/ opportunity cost
o Costs exist because resources are scarce, productive and have alternative uses
o When society uses a combination of resources to produce a particular product, it
forgoes all alternative opportunities to use those resources for other purposes.
Explicit costs: the monetary payments (or cash expenditures) it makes to
those who supply labor services, materials, fuel, transportation services
etc. such money payments are for the use of resources by others.
Implicit costs: Opportunity costs of using its self-owned, self-employed
resources. To the firm, implicit costs are the monetary payments that
self-employed resources could have earned in their best alternative use.
Normal profit: the payment made by a firm to obtain and retain
entrepreneurial ability.
Economic or pure profit: total revenue minus total cost (both explicit and
implicit, the latter including normal profit to the entrepreneur).
Short run and long run
o Short run: period too brief for a firm to alter its plant capacity, yet long enough
to permit a change in the degree to which the fixed
plant is used.
o Long run: period long enough for the firm to adjust
the quantities of all the resources that it employs,
including plant capacity.
Short-run production relationships
o Total product (TP): Total quantity or total output of
a particular good or service produce.
o Marginal product (MP): The extra output or added
product associated with adding a unit of variable
resource to the production process.
o Average product (AP): Total Output per unit of input, thus total
output divided by units of labor.
Law of diminishing returns:
o As successive units of a variable resource are added to a fixed resource, beyond
some point the extra, or marginal product that can be attributed to each
additional unit of the variable resource decline.
Chapter 5
Demand: Demand is the various amounts of a product that consumers are willing to
purchase at each of a series of possible prices during a specified period of time. Dead
shows the quantities of a product that will be purchased at various possible prices, other
things equal.
o Demand schedule: Demand can be easily shown in table
form, it reveals the relationship between the various prices of
the product and the quantity of the product a particular
consumer would be willing and able to purchase at each of
these prices.
o Law of demand: Ceteris paribus, as price falls, the quantity
demanded rises, and as price rise, the quatity demanded falls:
there is a negative/ inverse relationship between quantity
demanded and price.
The law of demand is consistent with common sense. People ordinarily
do buy more of a product at a low price than at a high price. Price is an
obstacle that deters consumers from buying. The higher that obstacle,
the less of a product they will buy; the lower the price obstacle, the more
they will buy. The fact that businesses have ‘sales’ is evidence of their
belief in the law of demand.
In any specific time period, each buyer of a product will derive less
satisfaction (or benefit, or utility) from each successive unit of the
product consumed. That is, consumption is subject to diminishing
marginal utility, and because successive units of a particular product yield
less and less marginal utility, consumers will buy additional units only if
the price of those units is progressively reduced.
The income effect indicates that a lower price increases the purchasing
power of a buyer’s money income, enabling the buyer to purchase more
of the product than before. A higher price has the opposite effect. The
substitution effect suggesrs that lower-price buyers have the incentive to
substititue what is a now less expsenive product for similar products that
are now relatively more expensive. The product whose price has fallen is
now ‘a better deal’ relative to the other products.
o Market Demand: Competition requires more than one buyer to be present in
each market, by adding the quantites demanded by all consumers at each of the
various possible prices, market demand can be derived from individual demand.
Compettition, of course, ordinarily entails many more than three buyers of a
product. To avoid hundreds or thousands or millions of additions, it is supposed
that all the buyers in a market are willing to buy the same amounts at each of
the possible prices. Then the amounts will be multiplied by the number of buyers
to obtain the market demand.
o Change in Demand: A change in one or more of the determinants of demand will
change the demand data (the demand schedule) and therefore the location of
the demand curve. A change in the demand schedule or, graphically, a shift in
the demand curve is called a change in demand. In constructing a demand curve,
economists assume that price is the most important influence on the amount of
the any product purchased. But economists know that other factors can and do
affect purchases, such as determinants of demand, which are assumed to be
constant when a demand curve is drawn. They are the ‘other things equal’ in the
relationship between prices and quantity demanded. When any of these
determinants changes, the demand curve will shift to the right or left. For this
reason, determinants of demand are referred to as demand shifters. The basic
determinants of demand are:
Consumers’ tastes (preference): A favorable change in consumer tastes
(preferences) for a product- a change that makes the product more
desirable - means that more of it will be demanded at each price.
Demand will increase; the demand curve will shift rightward. A
unfavorable change in consumer preferences will decrease demand,
shifting the demand curve to the left.
Number of buyers and population growth: An increase in the number of
buyers in a market, which can be due to an increase in population size, is
likely to increase product demand; a decrease in the number of buyers
will probably decrease demand.
Income: Products whose demand varies directly with money income are
called superior goods, or normal goods (a good or service whose
consumption increases when income increases and falls when income
decreases, price remaining constant). Although most products are normal
goods, there are some exceptions. As income increases beyond some
point, the demand may decrease, because the high incomes enable
consumers to buy new versions of those products. Goods whose demand
varies inversely with money income are called inferior goods (a good or
service whose consumption declines as income rises (and conversely),
price remaining constant).
Prices of related goods: A change in the price of a related good may
either increase or decrease the demand for a product, depending on
whether the related good is a substitute or a complement:
Substitute good: Products or services that can be used in place of
each other. When the price of one falls, the demand for the other
prodcut falls; conversely, the price of one product rises, the
demand for the other product rises.
Complementary goods: Products and services that are used
together. When the price of one falls, the demand for the other
increase (and controversially).
Consumer expectations: A newly formed expectation of a higher future
prices may cause consumers to buy now in order to ‘beat’ the anticipated
price rises, and thus increases current demand. Similarly, a change in
expectations concerning future income may prompt consumers to
change their current spending.
Changes in Quantity Demanded: A change in demand must not be
confused with a change in quantity demanded. A change in demand is a
change in the quantity demanded of a good or service at every price; a
shift of the demand curve to the left (decrease in demand) or right
(increase in demand). It occurs because the consumer’s state of mind
about purchasing the product has been altered in response to a change in
one or more of the determinants of demand. In contrast, a change in
quantity demanded, is a change in the amount of the product that
consumers are willing and able to purchase because of a change in the
product’s price.