FIT9123 Assignment 2 Group Presentation Marking Rubric (5%)

Group number: Assessed by:

Criterion
Presentation Content (30%)
Presentation Structure (30%)
Presentation Style (20%)
Ability to answer question(s)
(20%)
Comments
N – all of the following:
Lacks novelty and/or lacks coverage
of the main elements/issues
The presentation does not have any
logical structure
Un-business-like/unprofessional
presentation slides etc. and/or poor
presentation time management
Unable to answer question(s)
P – mostly the following:
Some coverage of the main
elements/issues
Some attempt at presenting the
argument in a logical manner but
poorly done.
Needs improvement – but overall
expression and presentation
adequate.
The answer(s) does(do) not
address the question(s) well
C – mostly the following:
D – all of the following:
A higher level of coverage of the
main elements/issues
The presentation has a reasonably
logical structure.
Above average standard of
expression and presentation.
Reasonable answer(s) to the
question(s) raised
HD – all of the criteria for D plus two
or more of:
Highest level of coverage of the main
elements/issues
Relatively sophisticated way of
presenting material in a clear logical
manner.
Excellent overall expression and
presentation.
Well answered question(s)

Grade:

Criterion
Quality Executive Summary
and Clear Introduction and
Background (15%)
Critical Analysis / Synthesis
not just description (25%)
Major elements / issues
identified and analysed /
discussed (25%)
Conclusions drawn (15%)
Literature used &
acknowledgement of the work
of others.
Referencing / Bibliography
(10%)
Logical structure (5%)
Quality of writing
Clarity & Conciseness &
Overall presentation (5%)
Comments
Grade:
FIT9123 Assignment 2 Group Report Marking Rubric (20%)
Group number: Assessed by:
N – four or more of the following: P – mostly the following: C – mostly the following: HD – all of the criteria for D plus two
D – all of the following: or more of:
Lacks clear and/or adequate The executive summary, Reasonable executive summary, Well written and logically presented
executive summary and/or introduction and background are introduction and background are executive summary, introduction and
introduction and/or background. present but do not serve the provided. background.
purpose well.
Purely descriptive. Some attempts at analysis. A higher level of analysis. Highest level analysis and synthesis.
Very few elements identified – Indicates a basic practical and Indicates a reasonably practical Many elements identified indicating a
indicates lack of a practical and theoretical understanding of the and theoretical understanding of clear practical and theoretical
theoretical understanding of the topic. the topic. understanding of the topic.
topic.
No logical conclusion is drawn. The conclusion does not A reasonable conclusion is drawn. A full and well written conclusion is
summarise the paper well. provided.
Inappropriate / insufficient Only limited resources are used. The scope of supporting materials Excellent range and relevance – well
supporting materials / references are Referencing technique is / references used is appropriate. used to elucidate the argument.
used. Materials from other sources inadequate. Too much reliance on Material from other sources is Excellent citing of sources.
not cited. direct quotes. cited clearly and correctly.
The paper does not have any logical Some attempt at presenting the Paper has a reasonably logical Relatively sophisticated way of
structure. argument in a logical manner but structure. presenting material in a clear logical
poorly done. manner.
Issues with grammatical error and/or Needs improvement – but overall Above average standard of Excellent overall expression and
spelling and little / or no care in expression and presentation expression and presentation. presentation.
document layout. adequate.
 FIT9123 Assignment 2 Individual Reflection Marking Rubric (5%)
Student name: Assessed by:

Criterion
Critical reflection, not just
description (50%)
Logical structure (30%)
Overall presentation (20%)
Comments
N – all of the following:
Purely descriptive, very generic
content
The reflection does not have any
logical structure
Issues with grammatical error and/or Needs improvement – but overall
spelling
P – mostly the following:
Mostly repetition of the content
of the group report, some
attempts at critical reflection
Some attempt at presenting the
reflection in a logical manner but
poorly done
expression and presentation
adequate
C – mostly the following:
D – all of the following:
Individual reflection is presented
quite satisfactorily
A reasonably logical structure
Above average standard of
expression and presentation
HD – all of the criteria for D plus two
or more of:
A very good individual reflection
Relatively sophisticated way of
presenting the individual reflection in
a clear logical manner
Excellent overall expression and
presentation

Grade: