SECTION POM NO OBSERVATION REPLY

CHP-VM POM NO. The following orders for hiring of vehicles have been issued on Confirmatory Vehicle providing by CHP (Vehicle )
& 18 basis. section till 31/03/2018 but later on dated new
APR-19 tender was not finalised by CHP (Vehicle)Later
SECURIT TO Name on dated new tender was not finalized by CHP
Y JUNE-19 Order Date of the Period Amount (Rs.) (Vehicle ) section and clear that in internal
No.
party circular no.00263 dtd. 31/03/2018 Vehicle will
not be available for sevices to various section
01/11/ and another circular no. 00351 on dated
450001 M/s.
2018 to 20/04/2018 of CHP told that to arrange the
04571/ 10/5/2019 K.M. 75000
30/11/ Vehicle for day to day internal office movement
343 Patil
2018 by their respective section itself.In the view of
the above vehicle was available in security
01/12/ section day To day movement on the basis of
450001 M/s.
2018 to confirmatory till Tender not finalized. Due to
04854 / 10/5/2019 K.M. 75000
31/12/ tender not compledted Vehicle which running in
338 Patil
2018 November it is to be continued in December as
Total 150000 well. So there is no any splitting volume.
M/S.K.M.Patil and M/s.Siddhi Enterprises are
The above two confirmatory orders have been issued by security department
by splitting the volume to bring the same within the DOP capacity of CE. one and same company. So the Mobile number
It has been noticed that in both three quotations have been submitted and on was kept the same. The confirmatory was given
the face of the quotations, it is seen that all the presentations are identically to M./s.k.m.Patil through proper channel. So
same. Moreover in case of order no. 343, the mobile number mentioned in the The GST bill taken from him. Essential internal
quotation pad of K.M. Patil (L1) is identically same of Siddhi Enterprise i.e. circular attached here with.
7756987053. Moreso only GST number of K.M. Patil has been mentioned in the
pad and none of the two other parties are having any GST number and except
Saksam Enterprise (order no. 338). Hence it appears that K.M. Patil and Siddhi
Enterprise are one and the same and one party has submitted all the budgetary
offers.
Moreover, the department never attempted to go through the present
departmental rate before deriving at a reasonable rate.
In this connection this may be mentioned that a copy of the Internal Circular
263 dated 31/03/18 issued by SE CHP stating that the terms of existing order
for providing vehicle has been expired on 31/03/18 and the tender for this
work (no details of the tender) is in process.
It is a matter of great surprise to note that all the concerned departments have
an idea for the tentative time lag for finalization of the tender and the process
for issuing the tender could be made keeping a sufficient time frame, so that the
tender could be finalized well before completion of the existing order to
smoothly run the issue and perhaps this should not be a reason for issuing
confirmatory order even on 18/11/18 i.e. 8 months from the date of expiry of
the last order within which the said tender could not be finalized.