RUBRICS IN GROUP REPORTING
NEED IMPROVEMENT
CRITERIA EXELLENT (5)
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of the topic.
Content Presents clear, well-researched
information with relevant
examples.
Engages the audience with
confident and dynamic delivery.
Delivery Maintains eye contact/ camera is
on and uses varied tone and body
language.
Visual aids enhance the
presentation, are clear, and
Visual Aids support key points effectively.
Content is well-structured with a
clear introduction, logical main
Organization points, and a concise conclusion.
All group members contributed
actively and effectively.
Teamwork &
Collaboration is seamless, and
Collaboration
roles are well-defined.
Leaves a strong and memorable
impression. Engages and
Overall Impact
effectively communicates the
importance of the topic.
Over All
Score
GOOD (4)
Presents a solid understanding
of the topic. Provides relevant
information with some
examples.
Engages the audience with
mostly confident delivery.
Maintains reasonable eye
contact/ camera is on and uses
some tone and body language.
Visual aids are mostly clear and
support key points. Some
improvements could be made
for clarity or relevance.
Content is mostly well-
structured with a clear
introduction, logical main
points, and a conclusion.
Most group members
contributed actively and
effectively. Collaboration is
generally smooth, with clear
roles.
Leaves a positive impression.
Communicates the importance
of the topic.
SATISFACTORY (3)
Presents basic information on
the topic. Some relevant
information is missing or
unclear.
Delivery is adequate, but may
lack enthusiasm. Limited eye
contact/ no camera is on and
minimal use of tone and body
language.
Visual aids are present but may
not always enhance
understanding. Some are
unclear or unrelated to the
topic.
Content is somewhat
organized, but lacks a clear
introduction or conclusion.
Main points are loosely
connected.
Some group members
contributed, but collaboration
and roles need improvement.
Leaves a somewhat positive
impression, but the significance
of the topic is unclear.
POOR (1)
(2)
Presents limited information on Fails to present any
the topic. Lacks clear meaningful content.
explanations and examples.
Delivery appears nervous or Delivery is monotonous,
disinterested. Poor eye unclear, and disengaging.
contact/ no camera and
minimal use of tone and body
language.
Visual aids are unclear, No visual aids are used.
irrelevant, or distracting.
Content lacks clear Content is disorganized and
organization. Main points are lacks a coherent structure.
difficult to follow.
Few group members Group members did not
contributed, and collaboration collaborate effectively, and
was challenging. Roles were roles were not followed.
unclear or ignored.
Leaves a weak impression. The Fails to make any meaningful
importance of the topic is not impact.
effectively communicated.
Note:
1. Choose your Group Leader that will coordinate for the result of presenter assessment.
2. Assessment could be in google form or through essay(optional).
3. Result of the assessment shall be sent privately by the group leader. Sent it in MSWord Format.
4. Don’t forget to put all the references like books or websites where the content came from. It will be put on the last slide of the
powerpoint presentation. Also include the Names of the presenter on the first slide.
Example:

5. Assessment will be minimum of 15 items and maximum of 30 items for long topics. Send it in MSWord format with answer key.
6. All PowerPoint presentation and assessments in MsWord format with answer key shall be sent in google drive. Please check for
section and group folders.
Link: https://tinyurl.com/BSEntrp3 or
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12z0qcZOnYV6m09ApDjcU60Iur90NXVkk?usp=sharing