Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indonesia Ministry of Finance Presentation 27th October 20201
Indonesia Ministry of Finance Presentation 27th October 20201
Indonesia Ministry of Finance Presentation 27th October 20201
Globalised World
Maqbool Lalljee
Director: Tax Risk Solutions
Introduction
• Globalization and the increasing loss of tax from avoidance, evasion-illicit activities
• Use case examples – potential tax avoidance and tax evasion structures
• Benefits realisation
• Key takeaways
1 Globalization
Increasing loss of tax
Lose of tax from avoidance, evasion-illicit activities
Globalisation over the last 10 years has seen considerable tax losses through:
• Tax avoidance over $240 billion are lost annually due to tax avoidance by multinational companies
https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/
• About $190 billion of global tax revenue is lost through offshore tax evasion. Gabriel Zucman, 2015
• From money laundering amounts to around $2.8 trillion, or 5% of global GDP annually Source: European Parliament,
Offshore activities and money laundering: recent findings and challenges, 2017
• Estimated untaxed wealth of individuals in tax havens is around 10% of global GDP Source: Business Insider article,
2017
2
Access to Global Data
• Data and intelligence made available by CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora)
• Each administration now collects vast amounts of data annually through returns, electronic
lodgements, tax amnesty – voluntary disclosure campaigns
• Number of public disclosures are made available to combat tax mischief – for example work of
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and availability of their data and information
• More and more data is collected commercially and made easy to blend with the administrations'
data ( see examples )
Examples of growing source of Bureau van Dijk data
holding
Note: January 2020 figures. Percentage increases are year-on-year. Figures are rounded.
Growing ownership links…
Note: January 2020 figures. Percentage increases are year-on-year. Figures are rounded.
Easier to blend data with a wide range of identifiers…
a) large data warehouses, with relational databases, creating data marts – risk marts for tax risk
data analytics
b) triggered reviewing the IT estate, rationalising the mainframe systems that didn’t speak to each
other
• Large IT and data programmes were initiated with private sector consultants employed
• New recruitment of specialist commenced not just for IT, data but in the areas of international
taxation
Increasing use of Big Data Analytics
• Around 2015, with the growing phenomenon of “Big- Data” (larger volumes of data – digital
data)
• Larger investments being seen in:
a) data architectures – creating data-hubs, using new toolkits, including Artificial Intelligence
b) recruiting new brand of data analysts/data scientists
• 10 years ago less than 10 Tax and Customs administrations employed “Big Data” and
advanced analytics
• 2020 there are more than 40 administrations employing advanced analytics and transforming
their IT Infrastructures
2010: typical data Architecture of a large tax administration
Your own tax data Bureau van Dijk’s External information
efiled and elodged global ownership • electronic data from financial
• returns for individuals, data feed from institutions, third parties (for
partnerships and companies with example, CITES), and
VAT and tax information government exchanges
• customs transactional data • tax jurisdictions reports
• customs duties • public disclosures; for example,
• corporate financials ingested into the lake by linking key the Panama Papers
• commercial data and intelligence variables and gluing data • open source information
16
Use of advanced data analytics
Global Map 2010 - under 10 Tax Global map 2020 - more than 40 Tax
Administrations Administrations
Author’s research
4
Use case examples
Potential tax avoidance and
tax evasion structures
Complex large multinational structures – input for risk model
Risk Model outputs: Example 1: possible South East Asian
Tax Avoidance Structure( Source Bureau van Dijk , Orbis Data Explorer )
2
High increase in income or profit year over year, 1
or a new very large influx of capital
21
Example 2 complex secretive structure
Source: Bureau van Dijk’s Orbis. Note: AHC/IHC – Asset/Investment Holding Company; Nominee – IHC’s nominee officer and shareholder
22
5 Benefit Realisation
Benefits realisation
• Centralising analytics
• Saving technicians’ time through automation
• Accurate output for tax challenges
• Senior team given the access through web-interface
• Support tax and analytics teams empowered
• Data and predictive data modelling capacity enhanced
• Real investigation/litigation successes through data led investigations and analytics
• Able to react to urgent analytical output for policy or rapid campaigns
• Contribution to tax yield achievement in $ hundred of millions
• Better analytical capability to review/risk assess Country by Country Reports and other
BEPS recommendations
• Setting the scene for digital development – make use of cutting edge technology and
Artificial Intelligence
6 Key takeaways
Takeaways
• Big data and advanced analytics play an important role in closing the tax gap
• Investment into global company data and a 21st century IT infrastructure will reduce
the considerable financial losses to revenue and customs administrations.
26
Thank you
maqbool.Lalljee@ | bvdinfo.com