Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pertemuan Ke-11 - Karangan Ilmiah - Struktur Karangan Ilmiah
Pertemuan Ke-11 - Karangan Ilmiah - Struktur Karangan Ilmiah
Pertemuan Ke-11 - Karangan Ilmiah - Struktur Karangan Ilmiah
A. INFORMASI UMUM
Mata Kuliah : Bahasa Indonesia
Kode/Bobot : /2 sks
Pokok Bahasan : Struktur Karangan Ilmiah
Pertemuan ke- : 11
Dosen : Dr. Amril Amir, M.Pd. (Tim Dosen MK B. Indonesia)
B. KOMPETENSI DASAR
Mahasiswa mampu mengenal dan memahami, struktur karangan ilmiah secara te
pat.
C. MATERI
1. Struktur Karangan Ilmiah
Sebuah karangan ilmiah harus ditulis dengan mengikuti aturan baku yang biasa
digunakan. Di samping itu, kualitas suatu karangan ilmiah juga ditentukan pula oleh
kemampuan individu penyusun dalam menuangkan idenya secara lancar dan runtut.
Weissberg dan Buker (1990) mengemukakan lima komponen utama di dalam
penulisan karangan ilmiah dalam bentuk laporan penelitian. Kelima komponen itu
adalah abstrak, pendahuluan, metode, hasil, dan diskusi. Ahli lain, Day (1993)
mengemukakan empat komponen dasar untuk setiap karangan ilmiah, yaitu
pendahuluan, metode, hasil, dan diskusi. Kedua ahli ini tampaknya betul-betul hanya
mengemukakan komponen dasar untuk sebuah karangan ilmiah.
Komponen karangan ilmiah secara lebih representatif yang tidak saja
mengemukakan komponen utama, tetapi juga komponen tambahan yang melengkapi
struktur sebuah karangan ilmiah, dikemukakan antara lain oleh Wardani, dkk., (2007).
Komponen yang dimaksud terdiri atas tiga bagian pokok, yaitu bagian pembuka,
bagian inti, dan bagian penutup. Berikut ini ketiga komponen tersebut akan dijelaskan
satu persatu.
1
a) Bagian Pembuka
Secara umum bagian pembuka sebuah karangan ilmiah, terutama dalam bentuk
laporan penelitian (termasuk skripsi) sebagai sebuah laporan yang utuh terdiri atas:
judul, halaman pengesahan, halaman penerimaan, kata pengantar, abstrak, daftar isi,
daftar tabel, daftar grafik, bagan, skema, dan daftar singkatan dan lambang. Untuk
Laporan yang diterbitkan di dalam sebuah jurnal , tidak semua komponen itu
diperlukan. Barangkali hanya judul saja yang diperlukan.
b) Bagian Inti
Bagian inti ini merupakan bagian yang secara spesifik dan eksplisit berisikan
informasi ilmiah yang ingin dikomunikasikan. Bagian inti ini terdiri atas
pendahuluan, kajian pustaka dan kerangka teori, metodologi penelitian, hasil dan
pembahasan, serta simpulan dan saran.
c) Bagian Penutup
Bagian penutup pada umumnya terdiri atas daftar pustaka, lampiran, serta daftar
indeks atau glosarium. Daftar pustaka merupakan komponen wajib yang harus ada di
dalam sebuah karangan ilmiah. Daftar pustaka tentu menggambarkan acuan yang
digunakan penulis baik dalam melaksanakan penelitian maupun di dlaam menulis
laporan penelitian. Lampiran dapat berupa tabel, gambar, peta, bagan, instrumen yang
digunakan dan bentuk lain yang sangat terkait dengan penjelasan yang sudah
dipaparkan di dalam bagian inti laporan. Indeks berisikan tentang daftar kata atu
istilah yang terdapat pada laporan.
2
ANALYSIS OF FACTORS PREDICTING SKILLS OF READING
UNDERSTANDING BASED ON TYPE OF LITERATION IN HIGHER
EDUCATION
Amril Amir *
Faculty of Languange and Art, Padang State University.
*Corresponding author Email: amril.amir23@fbs.unp.ac.id
ABSTRACT:
This study aims to identify factors that predict students' reading
comprehension skills based on literacy types. The population is 150 students.
Furthermore, a sample of 83 students was selected using the proportional
random sampling technique. The research instrument was a Likert scale
questionnaire and a reading comprehension skills test. The data obtained
were analyzed by analysis of variance (Analysis of Variance / ANOVA). The
results showed the calculated F-value obtained was equal to 5,948, while Sig.
at degrees of freedom (DK) 1 and alpha (α) 0.05 is 0.024, then according to
the hypothesis testing criteria through analysis of variance (ANOVA), Sig.
smaller than 0.05 which means that there are differences in students' reading
comprehension skills when viewed from the type of literacy.
I. Introduction
3
numeracy literacy, scientific literacy, digital literacy, financial literacy, and
cultural and citizenship literacy.
Indonesian society in the last decade of the 20th century did not yet
have a literacy culture even though we had entered the XXI century, this
century for the Indonesian Nation was an industrial age that was supported
by the advancement of sophisticated information technology, in fact the
progress of information technology was very challenging for us to build a
literacy culture ( reading and writing). This reading and writing culture is a
form of manifestation of behavior that includes elements, habits, hobbies, and
literacy needs.
We are still classified as primitive if in this century which is the age of
modern technology without reading books. Reading must be able to be a
necessity, but the facts show that people watch or listen more often than read
or write. We are not accustomed to doing anything based on the
understanding of reading (Amril, 2018), even we cannot actualize ourselves
through writing. Reading and writing are not yet firmly rooted in our nation's
culture.
The literacy movement that developed in Indonesia refers to many
statistics, especially the release of UNESCO (2012) which says that the level
of reading tradition in our country is very minimal. Based on that, then the
government intensively and popularized the literacy movement with various
policies, one of them by making the National Literacy Movement policy in
2015. Indonesia's target adult literacy rate in 2015 was 94.7 percent. The
biggest challenge faced in achieving this target is to reduce the number of
illiterates who are 45 years old and above. Data from the International
Literacy Association on the global population, about 12 percent of the world's
population is considered functionally illiterate, with only a basic or lower
literacy rate in their native language. 781 million people worldwide still cannot
read or write, and 126 million young people are illiterate.
II. Methods
4
III. Finding and Discussion
A. Finding
5
B. Discussion
6
The results of data analysis also show that all literacy components
affect reading comprehension skills. This is in accordance with the objectives
of literacy, including helping to increase public knowledge by reading a variety
of useful information (Zimmerer, Skidmore, Chuppa-Cornell, Sindel-Arrington,
Beilman, 2018). enhance one's ability to provide a critical assessment of a
paper, help foster and develop good character in a person. enhance the value
of one's personality through reading and writing activities, fostering and
developing literacy culture in the midst of society at large (Lafontaine, Dupont,
& Schillings, 2018); help improve the quality of one's use of time so that it is
more useful.
Data based on the type of literacy reading can be seen that reading
comprehension skills are in the medium category, meaning that students are
not yet optimal in developing literacy. Globally, at least 750 million young
people and adults still cannot read and write and 250 million children fail to
acquire basic reading skills. This results in the exclusion of low-educated and
less skilled youth and adults from full participation in their community and
society (UNESCO, 2019). Besides, the importance of literacy is also
reinforced by technological change. The results showed that digital literacy
affects students' reading comprehension skills. Students who are skilled in
utilizing digital media will be able to read, understand, and most importantly,
evaluate and filter information and will be able to reap the benefits of online
resources, while those who lack equipment will have difficulty obtaining
information (Nel, 2018). The high use of digital literacy is also strengthened
by data that conclude that on average every day Indonesian people use the
internet through any device: 8 hours, 36 minutes (Riyanto, 2019).
References
Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., Kamarul, M., & Abdullah, K. (2013). The
Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading
Comprehension 6: 235–244. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p235
Amir, A. (2018, December). The Contribution of National Examination Score
Indonesia Language in High School and Reading Strategies toward
Students Reading Comprehension Skill in Universitas Negeri Padang.
In International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education
(ICLLE 2018). Atlantis Press.
Amir, A. (2019, March). The Effect of Reading Strategies and Speed Reading
on Students’ Reading Comprehension Skill in Higher Education.
7
In Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA
2018). Atlantis Press.
Baggia, A., Znidarsic, A., Borstnar, M. K., Pucihar, A., Sorgo, A., Bartol, T., ...
& Dolnicar, D. (2016). Factors influencing the Information Literacy of
Students: Preliminary Analysis. In Bled eConference (p. 2).
Hamdan, B., Kana, I., Din, S., Rab, A., & Siddiqui, A. (2014). The Effect of
Expansion of Vision Span on Reading Speed : A Case Study of EFL
Major Students at King Khalid University 7:, 57–68.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n10p57
Lafontaine, D., Dupont, V., & Schillings, P. (2018). Does reading literacy
instruction vary according to language or culture? Similarities and
differences in English-, German-and French-speaking education
systems in PIRLS 2016. IEA Compass: Briefs in Education, (4).
Nel, C. (2018). A blueprint for data-based English reading literacy instructional
decision-making. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 8(1),
1-9.
Riyanto, A.D. (2019). Hootsuite (We are Social): Indonesian Digital Report
2019. https://andi.link/hootsuite-we-are-social-indonesian-digital-
report-2019/
Sadeghi, E., Afghari, A., & Zarei, G. (2016). Shadow-Reading Effect on
Reading Comprehension : Actualization of Interactive Reading
Comprehension : ( A Vygotskyan View !), 9: 130–138.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p130.
Solari, E. J., Grimm, R., McIntyre, N. S., Lerro, L. S., Zajic, M., & Mundy, P. C.
2017. The relation between text reading fluency and reading
comprehension for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in
Autism Spectrum Disorders 41: 8–19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2017.07.002
UNESCO. (2019). Literacy. https://en.unesco.org/themes/literacy
Van Staden, S., & Bosker, R. (2014). Factors that affect South African reading
literacy achievement: evidence from prePIRLS 2011. South African
Journal of Education, 34(3).
World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–
2017. Retrieved from World Economic Forum Website:
https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-
2016-2017-1
Zimmerer, M., Skidmore, S. T., Chuppa-Cornell, K., Sindel-Arrington, T., &
Beilman, J. (2018). Contextualizing Developmental Reading through
Information Literacy. Journal of Developmental Education, 41(3), 2-8.