IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL Appeal Ref: HU/51393/2022

IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER

B E T W E E N:-
MOHAMMED ARIF HOSSAIN
MRS SHAHANAZ AKTER
Appellants
- and -

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent
____________________________

GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND REASONS FOR APPEAL

____________________________

1) I, Mohammed Arif Hossain, DoB: 12/06/1984, Bangladesh, am the first

appellant, and the second appellant is my wife, Mrs Shahanaz Akter, DoB:

15/01/1986 also a national of Bangladesh. We are appealing against the

respondent’s decisions dated 14 February 2022, refusing our application

for further leave to remain.

2) These appeals are brought within 14 days from the date the said decision-

letter was sent, and is therefore brought in-time.

E. GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND REASONS FOR THE APPEAL

3) We rely on the following grounds of appeal:

i) The decision is not in accordance with the Immigration Rules

ii) The decision is otherwise not in accordance with the law
iii) The decision is unlawful under section 6 of the Human
Rights Act 1998 (c. 42) (public authority not to act contrary
to Human Rights Convention) as being incompatible with the
appellant’s Convention rights.

1
DETAIL REASONS WHY WE BELIEVE THAT THE HOME OFFICE
DECISIONS ARE WRONG:

(1) I, the first appellant, arrived in the UK on 21 January 2014. Since than
I have always been living in the UK lawfully. I married to the second
appellant and from our marriage; the second appellant gave birth of
our first child on 14th February 2016.
(2) Our second child born on 13th April 2019.
(3) We have established a solid private and family life in our residency in
the UK. Our children and going to school and they have already
established so many friends and well-wishers in the UK. Our children
never visited Bangladesh and they are not even aware of the culture in
Bangladesh.
(4) I have spent significant amount of monies in my studies and
maintaining my family here in the UK. I have no savings or assets so
that I can relocate in Bangladesh with my children. In fact my children
will be facing significant hardship to stay in an alien states for them.
(5) The Home Office did not consider these aspects in her decisions. For
the reasons of that I believe that my appeal should be allowed under
Human Rights aspect. Precisely, I believe that I have compassionate
reasons to seek Home Office’s discretion in my further leave to remain,
as I have already established solid family and private life here in the
UK.

In line with the above, I respectfully submits to the learned Court and
Tribunal to allow our appeal.

2
3