Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis - Proposed 12 Car Garage
Analysis - Proposed 12 Car Garage
GARAGE
BULACAN
This report discusses the load criteria, combinations and member fixity of the
PROPOSED 12-CAR GARAGE. The structure utilized reinforced concrete
members and designed using NCSP 2015 Provisions and ACI Code.
STRUCTURAL
CALCULATION
REPORT
APRIL 2023
This report discusses briefly the design, criteria, assumptions, and design calculation
of the structural members for the PROPOSED 12-CAR GARAGE. The analysis was
carried out using ETABS. The load cases and combinations are based on the latest
edition of The National Structural Code of the Philippines.
DESIGN BRIEF
A. DESIGN CONCEPT
The structure shall be modeled as three - dimensional space frame using
Structural Analysis and Design software (STAAD ProV8i) or Extended Three-Dimensional
Analysis for Building System (ETABS) or RAM Structural System (RAM).
C. DESIGN LOADS
I. Dead Load
Unit Weight of Concrete = 23.54 kN/m³
Unit Weight of Light Weight Concrete = 16.50 kN/m³
Unit Weight of Steel = 77.30 kN/m³
E. FOUNDATION
Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity (Assumed) = 75 kPa
DESIGNED BY:
S T O R Y D A T A
S T A T I C L O A D C A S E S
A U T O S E I S M I C U B C 9 7
Case: EQXPE
Direction: X + EccY
Typical Eccentricity = 5%
Eccentricity Overrides: No
Top Story: RF
Bottom Story: GF
R = 8
I = 1
hn = 6000.000 (Building Height)
1
Soil Profile Type = SD
Z = 0.4
Ca = 0.4400
Cv = 0.6400
Ta = Ct (hn^(3/4))
V = (Cv I W) / (R T)
(Eqn. 1)
V <= 2.5 Ca I W / R
(Eqn. 2)
V >= 0.11 Ca I W
(Eqn. 3)
V >= 0.8 Z Nv I W / R, if Z = 0.40 and Ca & Cv from code
(Eqn. 4)
Ta = 0.2804 sec
T Used = 0.3645 sec
W Used = 2270030.94
V (Eqn 1) = 0.2195W
V (Eqn 2) = 0.1375W
V (Eqn 3) = 0.0484W
V (Eqn 4) = 0.0400W
Ft Used = 0.00
STORY FX FY FZ MX
2
MY MZ
A U T O S E I S M I C U B C 9 7
Case: EQYPE
Direction: Y + EccX
Typical Eccentricity = 5%
Eccentricity Overrides: No
Top Story: RF
Bottom Story: GF
R = 8
I = 1
hn = 6000.000 (Building Height)
Ta = Ct (hn^(3/4))
3
V = (Cv I W) / (R T)
(Eqn. 1)
V <= 2.5 Ca I W / R
(Eqn. 2)
V >= 0.11 Ca I W
(Eqn. 3)
V >= 0.8 Z Nv I W / R, if Z = 0.40 and Ca & Cv from code
(Eqn. 4)
Ta = 0.2804 sec
T Used = 0.3645 sec
W Used = 2270030.94
V (Eqn 1) = 0.2195W
V (Eqn 2) = 0.1375W
V (Eqn 3) = 0.0484W
V (Eqn 4) = 0.0400W
Ft Used = 0.00
STORY FX FY FZ MX
MY MZ
M A S S S O U R C E D A T A
4
M A S S S O U R C E L O A D S
LOAD MULTIPLIER
DEAD 1.0000
LIVE 0.1000
SDEAD 1.0000
A S S E M B L E D P O I N T M A S S E S
STORY UX UY UZ RX
RY RZ
MODAL INFORMATION
LOAD FX FY FZ MX
MY MZ
5
ETABS v9.7.4 File: PROPOSED 12-CAR GARAGE Units:N-mm April
20, 2023 10:00 PAGE 9
S T O R Y F O R C E S
STORY LOAD P VX VY
T MX MY
STORY DRIFTS
RF X EQXPE 1/307
2F X EQXPE 1/138
GF X EQXPE 1/199
RF Y EQYPE 1/446
2F Y EQYPE 1/205
GF Y EQYPE 1/211
6
AISC-LRFD99
Steel Frame Design Report
Prepared by
20 April 2023
ETABS® v9.7.4 Steel Frame Design Design Summary Output
AISC-LRFD99 Units: N-mm
Page 2
ETABS® v9.7.4 Steel Frame Design Design Summary Output
AISC-LRFD99 Units: N-mm
Page 3
ETABS® v9.7.4 Steel Frame Design Design Summary Output
AISC-LRFD99 Units: N-mm
Page 4
ETABS® v9.7.4 Steel Frame Design Design Summary Output
AISC-LRFD99 Units: N-mm
Page 5
ETABS® v9.7.4 Steel Frame Design Design Summary Output
AISC-LRFD99 Units: N-mm
Page 6
ETABS® v9.7.4 Steel Frame Design Design Summary Output
AISC-LRFD99 Units: N-mm
Page 7
PROJECT: PROPOSED 12-CAR GARAGE DESIGNER: YGTJDC
FOOTING: F01 DATE: 4/20/2023
OWNER: SHEET NO.: 1
F. SHEAR
Ly
Xc Lx 0.3m
t
Xf
Xf
D. LOAD CONSIDERED
I. Service Load
Load, P = 131.9 kN
0.4m
II. Ultimate Load II. Punching Shear
Load, Pu = 179 kN ø Vc = 0.75(1/3 √ f'c )(b) (d) = 395.66 kN
Vu = qu x Shear Area = 152.86 kN Safe!
III. Additional Weight
Weight of Soil = 0 kN
Weight of Footing = 12 kN
0.57m
E. SOIL CAPACITY
qallowable = SBC = 75 kPa
qactual = P/A + 6M/bd² = 73.2 kPa Safe!
0.47m
SUMMARY
Therefore Provide 8-ø16 along X
Therefore Provide 8-ø16 along Y
F. SHEAR
Ly
Xc Lx 0.4m
t
Xf
Xf
D. LOAD CONSIDERED
I. Service Load
Load, P = 174.3 kN
0.5m
II. Ultimate Load II. Punching Shear
Load, Pu = 241 kN ø Vc = 0.75(1/3 √ f'c )(b) (d) = 395.66 kN
Vu = qu x Shear Area = 214.15 kN Safe!
III. Additional Weight
Weight of Soil = 0 kN
Weight of Footing = 15 kN
0.57m
E. SOIL CAPACITY
qallowable = SBC = 75 kPa
qactual = P/A + 6M/bd² = 74.0 kPa Safe!
0.47m
SUMMARY
Therefore Provide 9-ø16 along X
Therefore Provide 9-ø16 along Y
F. SHEAR
Ly
Xc Lx 0.6m
t
Xf
Xf
D. LOAD CONSIDERED
I. Service Load
Load, P = 232.8 kN
0.6m
II. Ultimate Load II. Punching Shear
Load, Pu = 293 kN ø Vc = 0.75(1/3 √ f'c )(b) (d) = 395.66 kN
Vu = qu x Shear Area = 269.81 kN Safe!
III. Additional Weight
Weight of Soil = 0 kN
Weight of Footing = 21 kN
0.57m
E. SOIL CAPACITY
qallowable = SBC = 75 kPa
qactual = P/A + 6M/bd² = 70.4 kPa Safe!
0.47m
SUMMARY
Therefore Provide 10-ø16 along X
Therefore Provide 10-ø16 along Y
F. SHEAR
Ly
Xc Lx 0.7m
t
Xf
Xf
D. LOAD CONSIDERED
I. Service Load
Load, P = 296.9 kN
0.7m
II. Ultimate Load II. Punching Shear
Load, Pu = 371 kN ø Vc = 0.75(1/3 √ f'c )(b) (d) = 395.66 kN
Vu = qu x Shear Area = 346.98 kN Safe!
III. Additional Weight
Weight of Soil = 0 kN
Weight of Footing = 26 kN
0.57m
E. SOIL CAPACITY
qallowable = SBC = 75 kPa
qactual = P/A + 6M/bd² = 73.2 kPa Safe!
0.47m
SUMMARY
Therefore Provide 11-ø16 along X
Therefore Provide 11-ø16 along Y
F. SHEAR
Ly
Xc Lx 0.8m
t
Xf
Xf
D. LOAD CONSIDERED
I. Service Load
Load, P = 380.8 kN
0.8m
II. Ultimate Load II. Punching Shear
Load, Pu = 501 kN ø Vc = 0.75(1/3 √ f'c )(b) (d) = 563.84 kN
Vu = qu x Shear Area = 470.11 kN Safe!
III. Additional Weight
Weight of Soil = 0 kN
Weight of Footing = 41 kN
0.62m
E. SOIL CAPACITY
qallowable = SBC = 75 kPa
qactual = P/A + 6M/bd² = 73.2 kPa Safe!
0.52m
SUMMARY
Therefore Provide 13-ø16 along X
Therefore Provide 13-ø16 along Y