Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Non Verbal Communication (Importance of Listening)
Non Verbal Communication (Importance of Listening)
Non-verbal communication:
the importance of listening
Lynn Kacperek
Hea lth ervlce Commissio ner; one th ird of fo und th at interviewing pa tients and listening
these a re related to communication problems to th eir experi ences of ca re provided va lu able
wi th nursing staff (Yo un g, 1995). in fo rm ati o n w hi ch could be utili zed to
imp rove the qua lity o f care. Thi s tud y
THE IMPORTANCE OF LISTENING empha ized the impo rtance of listening as a
va lua ble ski ll fo r nu rse researchers. In add i-
The UKCC's (1996) recent Guidelines for tio n, Bu rnard (1992) states th at listening and
Professional Practice devotes an entire section attend ing are the twO most impo rtant ele-
to commu nicatio n. It highl ights the fac t that ments of thera peutic communica ti on and
effective commu nicati o n requ ires th e use of 'over-ta lking' is the least productive.
many interpersona l sk ill s a nd emph asizes t he
importa nce of li stening to patient. T his per- NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION
spective is re in fo rced by Adair (1994 ) who
on-verba l com mun ica ti on is the term u ed
to describe a ll fo rms of human communica-
. Experience is described
tion not contro lled by speech. Mehra bi an
(1971) fo und that the tota l impact of a mes-
sage could be broken down to 7% ve rba l
1 (words o nl y), 38% vocal o r pa ra lingui stic
as pects (tone of voice, silence, inflecti on,
other sounds) and 55 % non-verba l. Argy le
(1988) sugge ts that th e no n-verba l compo-
Experience is analysed within the
nent of communica tion is fi ve times mo re
conte xt of current re search
in fl uentia l t han t he ver ba l as pect . Pease
and literature
(1985) highlights the impo rta nce of recogni z-
ing peop le's non-ve rba l messages as conveyed
r by their clo thes, ma ke-up, perfume, hair tyle,
personal hygie ne and genera l appea rance.
one side, smiling gently ai'ld eye contact potential benefits for patients. The subtle use ... touch is an
helped to reinforce and encourage patients to of gentle touch was a potent and effective way ,
integral part of
talk. Keeping a relaxed and open body pos- of communicating. It signified a depth of feel-
ture and mirroring the patient'S body position ing and understanding which words could not nursing care and
and body language helped demonstrate inter- so easily convey. I remember sitting quietly may have many
est and involvement. Also, by being in tune with a patient who had returned to the ward potential benefits
with my own non-verbal behaviour it was immediately after surgery. No words were
easier to react to patients' non-verbal cues. spoken, but as I gently stroked the back of her for patients. The
One patient's non-verbal cues were communi- hand she relaxed, later commenting that this subtle use of
cating anxiety, i.e. he was wringing his hands, was precisely what she had needed. gentle touch was
putting his fingers up to his mouth and wrin-
kling his forehead, but he was actually saying PRESENCE, INTUITION AND EMPATHY: a potent and
that everything was fine. By changing my TOWARDS HOLISTIC PRACTICE effective way of
body position, i.e. moving to sit closer to him, communicating
he gradually began to express his concerns. At this time] used all my resources of mind,
Faulkner (1992) reinforces the notion that body and spirit to communicate with patients with patients. It
patients often give non-verbal cues as to how and, as a result, an intangible quality natural- signified a depth
they are feeling and states that nurses should ly emerged within the nurse/patient relation- of feeling and
be receptive to this as these cues frequently ship. Benner and Wrubel (1989) describe this
lead to valuable opportunities for communi- as 'present tense concern' or 'being there', understanding
cation. Thus, being unable to speak encour- stating: which words
aged me to be more receptive to patients'
' ... the ability to presence oneself, to be could not so ,
non-verbal communication.
with a patient in a way that easily convey.
acknowledges your shared humanity, is
SILENCE
the base of much of nursing as a caring
practice.. .'
Silence that is coupled with a relaxed
approach gives patients time and space to Gardner (1992) refers to this intuitive under-
think. However, Davidhizar and Newman- standing (which is expressed mainly through
Giger (1994) point out that many nurses are non-verbal communication) as 'presence' and
uncomfortable with silence during their inter- believes that:
actions and interrupt the silence by talking.
'Presence is the gift of the self, verified
The authors recommend that nurses should
by the nurse and the patient .. .'
make use of silence in order to promote com-
munication and not be intimidated by it. Being more sensitive to the message I was
They also note that cultural differences may conveying enabled me to create and adapt this
alter the meaning of silence. in a more caring and personal way.
Porritt (1990) explains that silence often Interestingly, however, Burnard and Morrison
causes the listener to feel anxious; the patient, (1991) suggest that nurses perceived their
however, will usually signal (non-verbally) interpersonal style as tending to be authorita-
when he/she wants verbal interaction, e.g. by tive rather than facilitative. Perhaps my inter-
making eye contact. personal style was normally more authorita-
tive; however, by ada pting and expanding the
TOUCH non-verbal aspects of my communication it
had become facilitative. Moreover, by aban-
Touch was another powerful non-verbal doning professional detachment in favour of
method of responding to the patient. I fre- closeness between myself and the patients,
quently used light touch on the hand or arm empathic relationships developed.
and this seemed to bring comfort and enrich Morse et al (1992) explored the use of
the meaning of my communication. Fry empathy in nursing, believing empathy to be
(1994) found that the careful use of touch the essence of the nurse/patient relationship.
when relating to people with visual disabili- Non-verbal behaviours were considered
ties had a therapeutic effect. important in communicating empathy, and
Tutton (1991) states that touch is an inte- were expressed through moderate head nod-
gral part of nursing care and may have many ding and gesturing, a steady gaze and the min-
,
because they are difficul t ies in empl oying empirica l methods o f been cha llenging and difficult. When entering
difficult to enqu iry. Thi s may have been du e, in part, to into meaningful refl ectio n on practica l experi-
the intangibility o f the subj ect matter. H e ence, it is vital that support and encourage-
define and
a rgued that interpersonal skill s are a phe- ment are ava ilable as the process of reflectio n
evaluate. nomeno n whi ch do no t fit eas il y into reduc- can be uncomfortable as well as rewarding. As
ti oni st resea rch method s. Ackn owledging this stated in a recent Government document
d ilemma, it ap pea rs th at deve loping funda- (Department of Health, 1993), clinical super-
menta l understa nding within nu rs ing is just vision ca n provide an ideal environment in
as impo rtant as esta bli shing ca use/effect rela- w hich to explore reflecti ve practice. Indeed,
ti onshi ps . J o hn s (1995) ad vocates guided refl ection,
Refl ectio n is an idea l sta rting po int fo r through clinica l supervision, as a structured
developing this understanding. The practice way of enabling and suppo rtin g nurses to
o f kee ping re fl ecti ve diaries a nd logs could reflect and lea rn from their experiences.
help to develop the resea rch skills necessa ry
to record ri goro us fi eld notes a nd di aries. CONCLUSION
Insights and ideas un covered by reflecti on
could be explo red furth er throu gh qua litati ve There a re pertinent messages to be learn ed
research meth o ds such as pa rti cipant o bser- from this personal account. If learning from
va ti o n, ca se studi es and bi ogra phica l practice is to occur then refl ection on experi-
acco unts. Interpersonal skills, pa rticul a rl y ence is vita l. In additi on, refl ectio n is a valu -
non- verba l communication, must no t suffer a ble meth od of un covering tacit kn owledge,
from lack o f attention in the nursing litera - which sho uld be exa mined w ithin the context
ture, edu cation and resea rch or lose signifi - of current research and literature, in order to
cance simply beca use they a re difficult to a na lyse findings critica ll y, develop knowl edge
define and eva luate. a nd stimulate further inquiry.
Explicit within thi s re fl ection is confirma-
EDUCATION IN NON-VERBAL ti o n that nursing is dependent on effecti ve
COMMUNICATION huma n interactio n within the context o f care.
Acti ve listening ap pears to be demonstrated
Fo r co mmuni ca ti o n to be effecti ve, the ma inly th ro ugh no n-verbal communicatio n.
non-verba l aspects of nurse/patient intera c- Th erefore, the need fo r a comprehensive
ti on must be understood. This issue wa understanding of and education in non-verba l
explored by D avi s (1994 ), who concluded communicati on skills is reinforced. It is rec-
th a t mi sunderst andin gs occur a nd ma ny ogni zed th at nurses need to give info rmation
opportuniti es fo r effecti ve communication a re and negotiate ca re ve rball y with patients.
lost beca use o f insufficient kn owledge . H e H owever, the importa nce of fa cilitating effec-
beli eves th a t pati ents wo uld benefit a nd ti ve communication through active listening
become mo re coopera ti ve and compliant if a nd the sk illed use of non-ver ba l communica-
nurses had a better understa nding o f non- tio n is clea r and sho uld not be underestimat-
verba l behavio ur. ed in the prac tice setting. IDD
Adair L (1994) The patienr's agenda. Nurs Stand Morse ], Botteroff J, Anderson G, O'Brian B,
9(9}: 20-3 Solberg S (1992) Beyond empathy: expressions
Argyle M ( 1988) Bodily Communication . 2nd edn. of caring. } Adv Nurs 17(7}: 809-21
Methuen, London Pease A (1985) Body Language. Sheldon Press,
Benner P (1984) From Novice to Expert: London
Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Porritt L (1990) in teraction Strategies: An
Practice. Addison-Wesley, California Introduction for Health Professionals. 2nd edn.
Benner P, Wrubel J (1989) The Primacy of Caring: Churchill Livingsrone, London
Stress and Coping in Health and [l/ness. Tutton E (1991) An exploration of touch and its
Addison-Wesley, California use in nursing. In: McMahon R, Pearson A, eds.
Burnard P (1992) Effective Communication Skills for Nursing as Therapy. Chapman and H all,
Health Professionals. Chapman and Hall, London London: 142-69
Burnard P, Morrison P (1991) urses' inrerperson- UKCC (1996) Guidelines for Professional Practice.
al skills: a study of nurses' perceptions. Nurs UKCC, London
Educ Today 11 (1}: 24-9 Young A (1995) Compla inrs. Br} Nurs 4 (1}: 59
Davidhizar R, Newman-Giger ], (1994) When your
patienr is si lenr. } Adv Nurs 20(4}: 703-6
Davis P (1994) on-verba l comm unica tio n with
patienrs. Br} Nurs 3(5}: 220-3 KEY POINTS
Deparrmenr of Health (1993) A Vision for the • Reflection is a valuable method of uncovering and exploring tacit
Future. The Nursing, Midwifery and Health
Visiting Contribution to Health Care. HS knowledge in nursing.
Managemenr Executive, London
Faulkner A (1992) Effective Interactions with • Nursing is dependent on effective communication; however, words
Patients. Chu rch ill Livingsrone, London can often prevent optimal interaction_
Fry A (1994 ) Effective communication with people
with visual disabilities. Nurs Times 90(44}: 42-3 • Communicating non-verbally is a quick and effective way of
Gardner D (1992) Presence. In: Bulechek G,
McCloskey ], eds. Nursing Interventions: transcending other forms of communication_
Essential Nursing Treatments. 2nd edn.
Saunders, Philadelphia: 191-200 • Listening is often demonstrated through non-verbal communication.
Johns C (1995) The value of reflective practice for • The skilled use of non-verbal communication can develop the
nursing. } Clin Nurs 4(1}: 23-30
Jones A (1994) What are inrerpersonal skills? Br} intangible qualities of presence. intuition and empathy.
Nurs 3(1 9} : 992-5
Ley P (1988) Communicating with Patients: • The document Guidelines for Professional Practice (UKCC. 1996)
Improving Communication, Satisfaction and states that effective communication requires all the nurses' skills and
Compliance. Chapman and Hall, London
Mehrebian A (1971) Silent Messages. Wandsworth, places strong emphasis on the importance of listening to patients.
Ca li fornia
Oncology '97
British Journal of Nursing and British Journal of Hospital Medicine
in association with University College London Hospitals
\ 3-5 June 1997
New Connaught Rooms, Great Queen Street, London, UK
Oncology 97 will be a major 3-day conference that will reflect and debate many of the current issues in oncology and
look to future directions. It represents a major educational opportunity and a chance to meet and talk to colleagues
from a variety of disciplines. The conference will encourage maximum participation from the audience. The conference
will adopt a multidisciplinary approach and will include sessions covering:
• Protocols in care • Specialist services in cancer care
• Perspectives in cancer care • The issues of supportive care • Sources of information
• Evidence-based cancer care • Buying and selling cancer care
Interest in Oncology 97 is very high: to be certain of your place. you are advised to book early. For further information.
please fill in and return the form below to: Jackie Ford. Conference Manager. Oncology 97. Mark Alien International
Conferences limited. Croxted Mews. 286A-288 Croxted Rd. London SE24 9BY Tel: 0181-671 7521 Fax: 0181-674 4550
Title (Dr/Mr/Mrs etc}_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Surname Forenames lob title
Full address _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Postcode Country
Tel Fax
Signature
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1997, VOL 6, No 5 Downloaded from magonlinelibrary.com by 130.102.042.098 on September 29, 2020.
279