20) r i r e T mUreEs aA 20)

A1197589

IN THE COURT OF THE UI ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: BANGALORE

RURAL DISTRICT: AT BANGALORE.
0.S.NO.833 (2009
BETWEEN:
SMT. RENUKA & OTHERS PLAINTIFFS
AND
SRI. KESHAVA REDDY & OTHERS DEFENDANTS
UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE
PLATIFFS AND THE DEFENDANTS 8 TO 10 AND 30TH DEFENDANT BEG TO
STATE AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the plaintiffs filed the above suit for partition of the suit schedule
properties.
The defendants 8 to 10 filed an application for dismissal of the suit as
the same is
barred under Proviso to Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in respect of portions
of
Iten No.4 to 6 of the suit schedule properties, so far as related to the properties of
the defendants 8 to 10. The said application is pending for consideration
.. 2.
During pendency of the above suit ahd the application, the plaintiffs, the
defendants 8 to 10 and 30th defendant, at the intervention of their brothers, friends,
well-wishers and middiemen, settled the disputes between them amicably in full and
final settlement of all their clains in respect of portions of Item No.4 to 6 of the suit
schedule properties belongs to the defendahts.8 to 10 in the following manner:

I. That the plaintiffs and defendant No.30, admit and concede that defendant

No.8 was the absalute owher in possession and enjoyment of 3 Acres of land
in Sy.No.78, i.e., portion of Item No.6 of the suit schedule property, having
purchased the same under the registered sale deed Dt: 21-10-1993,
registered as Document No2460/1993-94, of Book-I, Volume 3776 at pages
55-65, registered in the sub-registrar, Bangalore South Taluk and that the 4th
plaintiff is also signatory to the same. The sale is in accordance with law. That
the 8 the defendant in turn sold the same to Smt. Lakshmi Prakash and the
defendant No.9 under two different sale deeds DT: 30-08-2005 and 29-08
2005, registered as Document No.7102/2005-06 and Document
No.7103/2005-06 respectively.

Civ)

Dangakore
or
 -2

That the plaintiffs and defendant No.30, admit and

concede that
defendant No.9 is the absolute owner in possession and enjoyment of 1
Acres
of land in Sy. No.77, i.e., portion of Item No.5 of the suit
schedule property,
having purchased the same under the registered sale deed DT: 21-10-1993,
,registered as Document No2453/1993-94, of Book-I, Volume 3776 at pages
48-55, registered in the sub-registrar, Bangalore South Taluk. The sale is in
accordance with law. The 4h plaintiff is also signatory to the samel.
That the plaintiffs and defendant No.30, admit and
concede that
defendant No.10 is the absolute owner in possession and enjoymènt of 1
Acres 09 Guntas of land in Sy.No.72, i.e., portion of Item No.4
of the suit
schedule property, having purchased the same under the registered sale
deed DT: 20-10-1993, Registered as Document
No2458/1993-94, of Book-I,
Volume 3776 at pages 153-162, registered in the
sub-registrar, Bangalore
South Taluk. The sale is in accordance with law. The 4h
plaintiff is also
signatory to the same.
IV. In termns of the settlement, the plaintiffs agrees to withdraw the above
suit in full and final settlement of all their claims, title and interest in respect of
portions of Item No.4 to 6 of the suit schedule properties i.e., in respect of the
properties scheduled to this compromise petition and they have also agree to
modify/amend the schedules of Item 4 to6 of the suit schedule properties.
V. And on the request of the plaintiffs and the defendant No.30, the
defendants 8 tò 10 agree to give 5.5 Guntas of land i.e., 2 Guntas of land in
Sy.NO.77 and 3.5 Guntas of land in Sy.No.78 on the eastern side of Item 5
and 6 of the schedule propertles to the plaintiffs and defendant No.30, which
is shown in green and yelloW color in the sketch annexed to this compromise.
The annexed sketch may be treated as part and parcel of this compromise.

3. In view of the above understanding, 'the plaintiffs and defendant No.30

withdrawing their claim in respect of portions of.tem No. 4 to 6 of the suit schedule
properties without any demur or reserving any manner of rights in them in full and
final settlement their claim, the plaintiffs have absolutely no manner of right, title or
interest in respect of the properties of the defendants 8 to 10. In view of the dispute

Renua, Riteehi'
N Rethna
Ssngaion
having been amicably settled between the parties as
aforesaid, the plaintiffs
unconditionally withdraws all their allegations made in the suit
against the
defendants and in respect of the
compromise petition schedule properties.
4 That the plaintiffs and the defendant No.30
have no objection for the defendants
8 to 10 in getting podded their
lands and further the plaintiffs and
here in shall not in any manner interfere with the rights or
defendant No.30
possession of the
defendants 8 to 10 in respect.of compromise a) to c)
manner here aftenwards. schedule properties in. any
5. This compromise has been
entered into between the parties without any
Coercion, undue influence or threat from any angle, The
interest of both the parties. The compromise is in the best
contents of the compromise is
explained to the
parties. They have understood the
contents of the compromise and felt that the
compromise is at the best interest of the plaintiffs and the
às defendants 8 to 10
defendant No.30, as well
hence accepted the same as fair and
parties have understood the contents of this reasonable. Both the
compromise to the language known to
them by explaining the contents of the same through
their Advocates.
6 It is agreed between the plaintiff and
the defendants that in view of the
aforesaid compromise they have no claims whatsoever against
each other.
WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs the defendánt No.30 and the defendants 8 to 10
pray that this Hon'ble Court be
pleased to dispose off the above suit in terms of the
compromise in the interest of justice and equity.
Portion of properties purchased by the defendants 8 to 10 in Item
4 to 6 of suit
Schedule properties after giving up 5.5 Guntas to the plaintiffs and the
defendant 30
as follows:

a) Portion of property purchased by the\8h defendant in Item No.6 of Suit

Schedule property:
All that piece and parcel of property bearing Sy.No.78, measuring 2 Acres 36.5
Guntas situated at Hommadevanahali Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk
and Bangalore District and bounded on:

East By Remalning Land of 3.5 Suntas in Sy.No.78, left out tó plaintiffs and
D No.30 today under this compromise.
West By Land of Rayappa apg KuROswamy
North By Land in Sy. Nor77 ard KüppusAmy
South By : Land in Sy.No.7Z belongs'tohe bendant No.10 Smt Vijayalakshmi

Kenua.
NRhna
 -4.

b) Portion of property purchased by the gth defendant in Item No,5 of Suit

schedule property:
All that piece and parcel of property bearing Sy.No.77, New No 7712, measuring
38 Guntas, situated at Hommadevanahali Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South
Taluk and Bangalore District and bounded on:

East By :2 Guntas land in Sy.No.77/2 today given up to the plaintiffs and the
defendant 30 and Land in Sy.No.77, i.e. 77/1
West By Land in same Sy.No.77, ie., 77//1
North By Road
South By :Land in Sy.No.78

c) Portion of property purchased by the 10th defendant in Item Eo.4 of Suit

schedule property:
All that piece and parcel of property bearing Sy.No.72, measuring 1 Acres 9
Guntas situated at Hommadevanahalli Village Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk
ánd Bangalore District and bounded on:

East By Remaining Land in Sy.No.72

West By Land of Rayappa
North By : Land in Sy. No.78
South By : remaining Land in Sy.No.72

d) Land given up to plaintiffs andthe dofendant No.30 today by the

8 to 10 collectively in Sy.No.77/2 of
defendants
Hommadevanahalli
shown in yeliow colour annexed to this compromise petition Village, whichis
i.e.,
All that piece and parcel of property bearing New No
7712, (old Sy.No.77),
measuring 2 Guntas, situated at Hommadevanahalli Village, Bequr Hobli,
Bangalore
South Taluk and Bangalore District and bounded on:

East By Remaining Land in Sy.No.77, i.e. 77!/1

West By Remaining Land in same 77/2 belong to the defendant No.9
North By Road
South By Land in Sy.No.78
e) Land givèn up to plaintiffs and the defendant No.30 today by the
defendants 8to 10 collectively in Sy.No.78 of Hommadevanahalli Village,
whichis shown in Green colour annexed to this compromise petition i.e..
All that pjece and parcel of property bearing New No 78, measuring 3.5 Guntas.
situated at Hommadevanahali Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk and
Bangalore District and bounded

Remaa
N.Reathna
Banse
 -5
East By
West By Remaining Land in Sy.No.78
North By :Remaining
:Landdin Land in same 78 belong to the
Sy.No.77/2, Guntas today givendefendant
The Defendant No.303.5and up to the
No.8
South By Land in land in Sy. No. 7/1. plaintiffs and
Sy.No.72/2 belongs to 1oth defendant
1.

2.
Rewua,
N Rathna
3. fauitteaN
4 yjlabshmi
ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFFS
PLAINTIFFS

ADVOCATE FOR DEFENDANT No.30

DEFENDANT 30
8. S . 4 t

ADVOCATE FOR DEFENDANTS8 TO 10

DEFENDANTS8 TO 10
What is stated above
VERIFICATION
is true and
information and belief. correct to the best of our knowledae.

1.RenuKA.
2
NRathna
3. auitia. N
ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFFS
yjalabhmi
PLAINTIFFS
 -6

Bdaate
ADVOCATE FOR DEFENDANT No.30 DEFENDANT No. 30

8. . .
9.

10.

ADVOCATE FOR DEFENDANTS 8 TO 10 DEFENDANTS 8 TO 10

BANGALORE
DATED: 13-01-2021

59nio

angakors
 PLAN SHOWING OF PLOT
SY.NO77,78&79/8, AT
HOMMADEVANAHALLI VILLAGE,BEGUR HOBL,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
NEAR NARAYANA REDDY.CIRCLE, CK PALYA
ROAD,OFF BANNERUGHATTA ROAD.

SY.NO.88
SY.NO.76

SY.NO Ss
SY.NO.77/1
A:
3acres 35 guntas
SY.NO.7a

HEW

,
.NO.77/
3YNO./2
SY.NO.77,
Renuka.P,
SY.N
A:23euntas SrUntar

SY.NO.73 SY.NO.7
A: 3acres78

Airuah (Dro)
ORTON-A UNTAS
MEAs ACRE-150 SY,NO.7a
:lacre

Runtas

A: iar runt

Civi! AREA STATEMENT

pESCRIPTON AREA IN CMNER'S NAME
|ACRE-GUNTIS
PURTON-A -20

SY.NO.723angaiore
|Byno.7I/2 RS. NAUNOMN
A: 3achAu
2 MES SRONKA
TOTNL 0-0650
 0
0a613-5900-0596
a,

Date
14 B131E9247E36F
THI
To
2S01/2024 13
tet 29-01-2024
03,

58
trom Jsed
29/01/2024
T18/2023-2024
MR
ON UniqueNumber:
RTC42.
ad M
12 KUMAR40,
kat,
BY:SHASHI
d
1986
11
Rotatne
SIGNED
7
DIGITALLY
atocnct
0.02.00.00

RTC trus

Jocdat
tC
,

25
te.
00.00.00 51o:

13:1438

0.07 Sao821-02-2024
.00 J.0U
o6.020000
o0.00ols00
0000 00.00
olo.00 u00

231BR31A5R
(
tHata
)

dot,Srozo o9o,
deto
a)
11E9247E3EF 0.02.00.00
0.00.00.00
.00
00 U02.00.00

ded
3,

.2. 2023-2024
6.Z
 ೂೕಂದ ಸಂ / Enrolment No.: 1177/84076/08065
Download Date: 22/07/2021

To
ಪ ತಎ
Pavithra N
D/O: Narasimha Reddy R
rampura
Kudiyanur
Kudenoor
Kolar Karnataka - 563130
9611519056
Issue Date: 30/11/2013

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by DS
UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION
AUTHORITY OF INDIA 05
Date: 2021.07.22 16:37:32
IST

6092 9051 6161

VID : 9144 3924 5025 0501

ಸ:
D/O: ನರ ಂಹ ಆ , ಂ ರ, ಕು ಯನೂರು,
Download Date: 22/07/2021

ಪ ತಎ
ೂೕ ರ,
Issue Date: 30/11/2013

Pavithra N
ಕ ಟಕ - 563130
ಜನ ಂಕ/DOB: 23/01/1992
/ FEMALE Address:
D/O: Narasimha Reddy R, rampura,
Kudiyanur, Kolar,
Karnataka - 563130

6092 9051 6161 6092 9051 6161

VID : 9144 3924 5025 0501 VID : 9144 3924 5025 0501
 GISPP5345F

PAVITHRA N

NARASIMHA REDDY

23/01/1992

Female

Signature Not
Verified
Digitally signed by
Income Tax Deptt.
Date: 2021.07.25 09:02:49 IST

Cut

GISPP5345F

PAVITHRA N

NARASIMHA REDDY

23/01/1992

Electronically issued and Digitally signed ePAN is a valid mode of issue of Permanent Account Number (PAN) post amendments in clause (c) in the
Explanation occurring after sub-section (8) of Section 139A of Income Tax Act, 1961 and sub-rule (6) of Rule 114 of the Income Tax Rules, click here