Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Africa
Africa
A series of cases , well past their prime have been making it to court rooms and
demanding redressal. Although the cases in West have garnered attention,
those in Africa are hidden in plain sight. This piece explores the historical and
ecological violations Africa was subjected to and the legal mechanism to
compensate the victims and plug further subjugation.
Disgraceful Concoction
While economic gains generally besmirch an area with small-scale
environmental degradation, here was a region that has been wobbling between
floods and droughts of stratospheric proportions. Severe floods engulfed South
Sudan, Nigeria, Republic of Congo and Democratic Republic of Congo in 2021
and drought-led forest fires have enveloped the north of Africa. The intermittent
floods and droughts will hit 250 million Africans and take a beating on the
GDP. Besides, the resource exploitation also feeds the militias that control vast
swathes of Africa, further exacerbating the deteriorating ecological and political
conditions. The foundering economy and the environment degradation ( with
the rampant corruption in the government and lawlessness)legitimises the rule
of militia. Thus, the aftermath and the factors that contribute to the ‘economic
colonization’ are two sides of the same coin. In short, Africa is caught in a
vicious circle, where the timely exit of China and the West is the only way
forward.
Suitable Legal Action
Although an exit of the West is much desired, a withdrawal, after having left a
continent to the dogs, is to be accounted for. With the stringent international
norms, holding the West accountable is no longer a pipe dream. However, with
the multifaceted destruction, legal action has to be effected on various fronts.
Ecological front
With Africa caught in a double whammy situation, (the ecological destruction
aggravating the conflicts), it recently saw light at the end of the tunnel. Suits
such as the one brought out by Nigeria against Shell are just the baby steps. In
the above case, Shell’s Nigerian subsidy SPDC was held responsible for the
disastrous oil spill in the Niger Delta which costed the livelihoods of the
farmers and had a toll on the environment. However, the problem here is twin-
fold.
The human cost of ecological destruction isn’t foreseeable. An illustrious
case would be the curative petition submitted in the case of Union
Carbide Corporation V Union of India, where Union Carbide fervently
denied to pay a farthing more of the compensation, though the number of
victims had surged since the disaster occurred. Factory pollution, oil spill
and disasters of like nature involve seepage of toxic chemicals (such as
lead) into soil and water bodies, which will be hard to detect. The
repercussions of such a disaster could span generations. The remedy is
that the compensation should primarily be used to clean up the
environment. Victim compensation shall be restricted to 1 st generation
victims. A similar view is expressed by the Nagasaki court as it curtailed
the ambit of aid to 1st generation hibakusha (atom bomb survivors). Now
as Zambians, move to court against, the mining company, Anglo
American, on charges of lead poisoning, though a laudable feat, care has
to be taken to dole out the compensation prudently.
The consequences of Africa’s problems not just transcend generations,
but also borders. Africa’s shared waters imply a stop-gap approach
shouldn’t be adopted to deal with the crisis. It also means the fall-out of
an ecological crisis could spill over to neighbouring countries leading to
an increasing number of compensation-seekers. This buttresses my earlier
proposition to focus on recuperating the environment.
Further, a huge burden of compensation may also deter foreign
companies, when Africa is in acute need of investment. Therefore, a
balance must be struck between achieving a clean environment and
fostering businesses.
Therefore, from the above, it is evident that the tort of historical wrongs
had a bumpy ride.
Indigenous people are also receiving the justice that has been denied to
them for years. The probe into Canada’s Indian Residential School
System, though reopened old wounds, is in a manner, a delivery of
justice. Similarly, in the case of Kailas and Ors. V. State of Maharashtra,
the Indian Supreme Court, gave a clarion call to redress for the wrongs
done to the nation’s tribal people. The Court noted that the mentality of
considering tribal people as “inferior or sub-humans” is detestable.
With a vast majority of Africans native to the continent(thereby
indigenous) all this offers a glimmer of hope to Africa’s populace that
their grievances too will be answered.
Further, the suits filed on the ecological and human costs have not always
been met with success. There have been setbacks on the above fronts.
Lately, a French Court dismissed a case against Total Energies for oil
projects in Uganda and Tanzania on its failure to adhere to the ‘duty of
vigilance’. These days, when oil companies are drawing ire from climate
activists (with ravages of climate change occurring daily too), this
judgement is unacceptable.
South Korean policy to compensate its citizens who were forced to work
in Japanese factories has angered the South Korean masses as it doesn’t
hold Japan accountable. Thus, not merely justice must be done but a
sense of justice must also prevail.
Conclusion
As, Carl Sagan remarked, “You have to know the past to understand the
present”, Africa’s past wrongs (be it the ecological destruction or historical
atrocities) have left festering wounds. Better late than never, these wrongs must
be undone lest the ramifications shall not be confined to Africa( resulting in a
deluge of refugees and undoing the efforts to taper off climate change.) Thus,
it’s not just Africa’s, but is the concern of the world, that Africa’s wrongs be
remedied.