Height of the Students from Grade 11 – St.

Uriel

# Boys Height
1 Alvarez, Jeri Ryan 162 cm
2 Ancheta, Chester 175 cm
3 Balbacal, Mike Adrian 183 cm
4 Castillo, Romel Jacob 176 cm
5 Conserva, Roger Rafael 153cm
6 Dipalac, Patrick 165 cm
7 Dizon, Carl 177 cm
8 Landicho, Aaron 173 cm
9 Leynes, John Paolo 170 cm
10 Lualhati, Kim 170 cm
11 Macapagal, Francis Daniel 178 cm
12 Manguiat, Rogelio Eduardo 152 cm
13 Mayo, Rikkiel 172 cm
14 Morada, Rod Vincent 163 cm
15 Ramirez, John Harvey 182 cm
16 Templo, Angel Julian 181cm
17 Tuagan, Paul James Andre 173 cm
18 Walker, Joshua 163 cm
# Girls Height
1 Aldueza, Breanna Sofia 155 cm
2 Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 163 cm
3 Bergonio, Louise Joy 152 cm
4 Deriquito, Chanel Maxine 155 cm
5 Fabul, Kate Gwyneth 163 cm
6 Garcia, Samantha Gabrielle 154 cm
7 Garing, Louise Lorraine 173 cm
8 Guevara, Andrea Selina 163 cm
9 Gutierrez, Mheibelle 157 cm
10 Janaban, Lucille 163 cm
11 Libuit, Aissa Lisette 152 cm
12 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 153 cm
13 Mendoza, Suzette Claire 153 cm
14 Monoso, Francesca Mae 153 cm
15 Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 160 cm
16 Rigos, Vanna Mikyla 160 cm
17 Rosales, Ingrid 144 cm
18 Saob, Diane Roshan 160 cm
19 Silang, Pamela Mae 157 cm
20 Sumudlayon, Fatima 154 cm
21 Torres, Darra Beyonce 155 cm
22 Tumesa, Keesha 163 cm
23 Vidal, Riane Charise 160 cm

Population mean

𝜇: 163.17

Population Variance

𝜎 2 : 94.87

Population Standard Deviation

𝜎: 9.74
 1. Simple Random Sampling

A type of probability sampling in which the researcher randomly selects a subset of

participants from a population. Each member of the population has an equal chance
of being selected. Data is then collected from as large a percentage as possible of this
random subset.
1. On a piece of paper, write the names of the students in the class and cut it into
bits. Fold the paper in half with same size and shape.
2. Place all of the paper scraps in a container
3. Choose 15 pieces at random. You shall not look and cheat
Name of Student X (Height) ̅)
(𝒙 − 𝒙 (𝒙 − ̅̅̅
𝒙)𝟐

Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 160 cm -1.2 1.44

Walker, Joshua 163 cm 1.8 3.24
Vidal, Riane Charise 160 cm -1.2 1.44
Conserva, Roger Rafael 153cm -8.2 67.24
Morada, Rod Vincent 163 cm 1.8 3.24
Bergonio, Louise Joy 152 cm -9.2 84.64
Janaban, Lucille 163 cm 1.8 3.24
Mayo, Rikkiel 172 cm 10.8 116.64
Mendoza, Suzette Claire 153 cm -8.2 67.24
Aldueza, Breanna Sofia 155 cm -6.2 38.44
Garing, Louise Lorraine 173 cm 11.8 139.24
Ancheta, Chester 175 cm 13.8 190.44
Rosales, Ingrid 144 cm -17.2 295.84
Torres, Darra Beyonce 155 cm -6.2 38.44
Dizon, Carl 177 cm 15.8 249.64

∑𝑥 2418
Sample Mean: 𝑥̅ = = = 161.2
𝑛 15

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1300.4
Sample Variance: 𝑠 2 = = = 92.89
𝑛−1 15−1

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1300.4
Sample Standard Deviation: 𝑠 = √ = √ 15−1 = 9.63
𝑛−1
 2. Systematic Random Sampling

A type of probability sampling method in which sample members from a larger population
are selected according to a random starting point but with a fixed, periodic interval

1. Make a sample frame.

2. Then, at random, arrange 41 students in no particular order.
3. By drawing names, assign a number from 1 to 41 to each student, with student 1
being the first to be chosen.

Number Name Number Name

1 Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 22 Templo, Angel Julian
2 Castillo, Romel Jacob 23 Janaban, Lucille
3 Rigos, Vanna Mikyla 24 Bergonio, Louise Joy
4 Macapagal, Francis Daniel 25 Garcia, Samantha Gabrielle
5 Lualhati, Kim 26 Garing, Louise Lorraine
6 Guevara, Andrea Selina 27 Ramirez, John Harvey
7 Torres, Darra Beyonce 28 Ancheta, Chester
8 Manguiat, Rogelio Eduardo 29 Fabul, Kate Gwyneth
9 Tumesa, Keesha 30 Mendoza, Suzette Claire
10 Monoso, Francesca Mae 31 Sumudlayon, Fatima
11 Dizon, Carl 32 Mayo, Rikkiel
12 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 33 Walker, Joshua
13 Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 34 Vidal, Riane Charise
14 Rosales, Ingrid 35 Dipalac, Patrick
15 Leynes, John Paulo 36 Silang, Pamela Mae
16 Morada, Rod Vincent 37 Deriquito, Chanel Maxine
17 Gutierrez, Mheibelle 38 Balbacal, Mike Adrian
18 Conserva, Roger Rafael 39 Libuit, Aissa Lisette
19 Landicho, Aaron 40 Alvarez, Jeri Ryan
20 Saob, Diane Roshan 41 Tuagan,Paul James Andre
21 Aldueza, Breanna Sofia

4. Determine the sampling interval k. Simply divide the population size, 41, from the sample
size, 15.
41
K= 15
5. Using a simple random technique, choose a number between 0 and 4 (k+1).
6. 1, 2 and 3 are the numbers between 0 and 4. This selected value is referred to as the
random start.
7. As a starting point, use the number 2. It's the one with the red highlight and bold text in
the table above.
8. Starting with the second student, choose every second student from the sampling frame
until you reach the desired sample size.
9. In the table above, selected students are highlighted in yellow with bold text.
 15 random pick for Systematic Random Sampling

Name of Student X (Height) ̅)

(𝒙 − 𝒙 ̅̅̅𝟐
(𝒙 − 𝒙)

Castillo, Romel Jacob 176 cm 10.13 102.62

Rigos, Vanna Mikyla 160 cm -5.87 34.46
Lualhati, Kim 170 cm 4.13 17.06
Manguiat, Rogelio Eduardo 152 cm -13.87 192.38
Dizon, Carl 177 cm 11.13 123.88
Rosales, Ingrid 144 cm -21.87 478.30
Gutierrez, Mheibelle 157 cm -8.87 78.68
Saob, Diane Roshan 160 cm -5.87 34.46
Janaban, Lucille 163 cm -2.87 8.24
Garing, Louise Lorraine 173 cm 7.13 50.84
Fabul, Kate Gwyneth 163 cm -2.87 8.24
Mayo, Rikkiel 172 cm 6.13 37.58
Dipalac, Patrick 165 cm -0.87 0.76
Balbacal, Mike Adrian 183 cm 17.13 293.44
Tuagan, Paul James Andre 173 cm 7.13 50.84

∑𝑥 2488
Sample Mean: 𝑥̅ = = = 165.87
𝑛 15

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1511.78
Sample Variance: 𝑠 2 = = = 107.98
𝑛−1 15−1

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1511.78
Sample Standard Deviation: 𝑠 = √ =√ = 10.39
𝑛−1 15−1
 3. Stratified Random Sampling

A method of sampling that involves the division of a population

into smaller sub-groups known as strata. The samples are
randomly selected from each stratum.
1. Separate the class into two sub-groups: boys and girls.
2. Calculate the sample size in each gender group by dividing the
total number of students by the number of students per gender,
then multiplying the result by 15.

Population (N=41) Number of Students Sample

Per Stratum
Male 18 7

Female 23 8

Total 41 15

𝟏𝟖
Male: 𝒙 𝟏𝟓 = 𝟔. 𝟓𝟗 𝒐𝒓 𝟕
𝟒𝟏

𝟐𝟑
Female: 𝒙 𝟏𝟓 = 𝟖. 𝟒𝟏 𝒐𝒓 𝟖
𝟒𝟏
3. Select students using simple random sapling

Name of Student (Male) X (Height) ̅)

(𝒙 − 𝒙 (𝒙 − ̅̅̅
𝒙)𝟐
1 Alvarez, Jeri Ryan 162 cm -9.14 83.54
2 Balbacal, Mike Adrian 183 cm 11.86 140.66
3 Morada, Rod Vincent 163 cm -8.14 66.26
4 Walker, Joshua 163 cm -8.14 66.26
5 Mayo, Rikkiel 172 cm 0.86 0.74
6 Ramirez, John Harvey 182 cm 10.86 117.94
7 Tuagan, Paul James Andre 173 cm 1.86 3.46
 ∑𝑥 1198
Sample Mean: 𝑥̅ = = = 171.14
𝑛 7

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1198
Sample Variance: 𝑠 2 = = = 79.81
𝑛−1 7−1

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1198
Sample Standard Deviation: 𝑠 = √ = √ 7−1 = 8.93
𝑛−1

Name of Student (Female) X (Height) ̅)

(𝒙 − 𝒙 (𝒙 − ̅̅̅
𝒙)𝟐
1 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 153 cm -5.25 27.56
2 Guevara, Andrea Selina 163 cm 4.75 22.56
3 Mendoza, Suzette Claire 153 cm -5.25 27.56
4 Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 163 cm 4.75 22.56
5 Janaban, Lucille 163 cm 4.75 22.56
6 Tumesa, Keesha 163 cm 4.75 22.56
7 Monoso, Francesca Mae 153 cm -5.25 27.56
8 Deriquito, Chanel Maxine 155 cm -3.25 10.56

∑𝑥 1266
Sample Mean: 𝑥̅ = = = 158.25
𝑛 8

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1266
Sample Variance: 𝑠 2 = = = 26.21
𝑛−1 8−1

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 1266
Sample Standard Deviation: 𝑠 = √ = √ 8−1 = 5.12
𝑛−1
 15 random pick (Male & Female) Stratified Sampling

Name of Student X (Height) ̅)

(𝒙 − 𝒙 (𝒙 − ̅̅̅
𝒙)𝟐

Alvarez, Jeri Ryan 162 cm -2.27 5.15

Balbacal, Mike Adrian 183 cm 18.73 350.81
Morada, Rod Vincent 163 cm -1.27 1.61
Walker, Joshua 163 cm -1.27 1.61
Mayo, Rikkiel 172 cm 7.73 59.75
Ramirez, John Harvey 182 cm 17.73 314.35
Tuagan, Paul James 173 cm 8.73 76.21
Andre
Mactal, Hannah Beverly 153 cm -11.27 127.01
Guevara, Andrea Selina 163 cm -1.27 1.61
Mendoza, Suzette Claire 153 cm -11.27 127.01
Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 163 cm -1.27 1.61
Janaban, Lucille 163 cm -1.27 1.61
Tumesa, Keesha 163 cm -1.27 1.61
Monoso, Francesca Mae 153 cm -11.27 127.01
Deriquito, Chanel Maxine 155 cm -9.27 85.93

∑𝑥 2464
Sample Mean: 𝑥̅ = = = 164.27
𝑛 15

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 2464
Sample Variance: 𝑠 2 = = = 91.64
𝑛−1 15−1

∑(𝑥−𝑥̅ )2 2464
Sample Standard Deviation: 𝑠 = √ =√ = 9.57
𝑛−1 15−1
 4. Cluster Random Sampling

A method of probability sampling that is often used to study large populations,

particularly those that are widely geographically dispersed

1. During the first week of the semester, the class adviser of St. Uriel
class divided the students into seven groups. These groups were formed
to facilitate group activities and/or discussions.
2. Using simple random sampling, select three clusters or groups.
3. Using simple random sampling, select 15 students from groups or
clusters 3, 5, and 6.

Name x (x - 𝒙̅) (x - 𝒙̅)2

1 Conserva, Roger 153 cm -9.87 97.42

2 Silang, Pamela 157 cm -5.87 34.46

3 Morada, Rod Vincent 163 cm 0.13 0.02

4 Dizon, Carl 177 cm 14.13 199.66

5 Sumudlayon, Fatima 154 cm -8.87 78.68

6 Ramirez, John Harvey 182 cm 19.13 365.96

7 Manguiat, Lio 152 cm -10.87 118.16

8 Monoso, Francesca Mae 153 cm -9.87 97.42

9 Dipalac, Patrick 165 cm 2.13 4.54

10 Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 160 cm -2.87 8.24

11 Vidal, Riane Charise 160 cm -2.87 8.24

12 Janaban, Lucille 163 cm 0.13 0.02

13 Garing, Louise Lorraine 173 cm 10.13 102.62

14 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 153 cm -9.87 97.42

15 Macapagal, Francis 178 cm 15.13 228.92

Daniel
 ∑𝒙 𝟐𝟒𝟒𝟑
𝒙=
Sample Mean: ̅ = = 𝟏𝟔𝟐. 𝟖𝟕
𝒏 𝟏𝟓

̅) 𝟐
∑(𝒙−𝒙 𝟐𝟒𝟒𝟑
Sample Variance: 𝒔𝟐 = = = 𝟏𝟎𝟐. 𝟗𝟖
𝒏−𝟏 𝟏𝟓−𝟏

̅)𝟐
∑(𝒙−𝒙 𝟐𝟒𝟒𝟑
Sample Standard Deviation: 𝒔 = √ = √𝟏𝟓−𝟏 = 𝟏𝟎. 𝟏𝟓
𝒏−𝟏
 Weight of the Students of Saint Uriel

Boys Weight
1 Alvarez, Jeri Ryan 112 lbs
2 Ancheta, Chester 141 lbs
3 Balbacal, Mike Adrian 132 lbs
4 Castillo, Romel Jacob 132 lbs
5 Conserva, Roger Rafael 88 lbs
6 Dipalac, Patrick 127 lbs
7 Dizon, Carl 131 lbs
8 Landicho, Aaron 136 lbs
9 Leynes, John Paolo 141 lbs
10 Lualhati, Kim 123 lbs
11 Macapagal, Francis Daniel 130 lbs
12 Manguiat, Rogelio Eduardo 150 lbs
13 Mayo, Rikkiel 132 lbs
14 Morada, Rod Vincent 147 lbs
15 Ramirez, John Harvey 130 lbs
16 Templo, Angel Julian 173 lbs
17 Tuagan, Paul James Andre 127 lbs
18 Walker, Joshua 143 lbs
 Girls Weight
1 Aldueza, Breanna Sofia 114 lbs
2 Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 132 lbs
3 Bergonio, Louise Joy 93 lbs
4 Deriquito, Chanel Maxine 110 lbs
5 Fabul, Kate Gwyneth 126 lbs
6 Garcia, Samantha Gabrielle 108 lbs
7 Garing, Louise Lorraine 134 lbs
8 Guevara, Andrea Selina 108 lbs
9 Gutierrez, Mheibelle 106 lbs
10 Janaban, Lucille 125 lbs
11 Libuit, Aissa Lisette 112 lbs
12 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 128 lbs
13 Mendoza, Suzette Claire 92 lbs
14 Monoso, Francesca Mae 143 lbs
15 Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 113 lbs
16 Rigos, Vanna Mikyla 108 lbs
17 Rosales, Ingrid 88 lbs
18 Saob, Diane Roshan 114 lbs
19 Silang, Pamela Mae 132 lbs
20 Sumudlayon, Fatima 101 lbs
21 Torres, Darra Beyonce 90 lbs
22 Tumesa, Keesha 109 lbs
23 Vidal, Riane Charise 115 lbs

Population Mean - 𝝁 = 121.85

Population Variance - 𝝈𝟐 = 339.20

Population Standard Deviation - 𝝈 = 18.42

 Simple Random Sampling
1. Go to a website where you can randomly pick a name using a spinning wheel. You can go to
https://wheelofnames.com/#

2. Type all of the names of the students from St. Uriel.

3. Randomly pick 15 students by spinning the wheel 15 times.

Name x (Weight) (x - 𝒙̅) (x - 𝒙̅)2

Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 113 lbs -3.4 11.56

Walker, Joshua 143 lbs 26.6 707.56

Vidal, Riane Charise 115 lbs -1.4 1.96

Conserva, Roger Rafael 88 lbs -28.4 806.56

Morada, Rod Vincent 147 lbs 30.6 936.36

Bergonio, Louise Joy 93 lbs -23.4 547.56

Janaban, Lucille 125 lbs 8.6 73.96

Mayo, Rikkiel 132 lbs 15.6 243.36

Mendoza, Suzette Claire 92 lbs -24.4 595.36

Aldueza, Breanna Sofia 114 lbs -2.4 5.76

Garing, Louise Lorraine 134 lbs 17.6 309.76

Ancheta, Chester 141 lbs 24.6 605.16

Rosales, Ingrid 88 lbs -28.4 806.56

Torres, Darra Beyonce 90 lbs -26.4 696.96

Dizon, Carl 131 lbs 14.6 213.16

∑𝑥 1746
Sample Mean - 𝑥̅ = = = 116.4
𝑛 15

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 6561.6
Sample Variance – s2 = = = 468.6857143 >> 468.69
𝑛−1 15−1

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 6561.6
Sample Standard Deviation – s = √ = √ 15−1 = 21.64915043 >> 21.65
𝑛−1
 Systematic Random Sampling

1. Randomly arrange the students of St. Uriel in a sample frame.

2. Assign each student a number from 1 to 41.

Number Name Number Name

1 Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 22 Templo, Angel Julian
2 Castillo, Romel Jacob 23 Janaban, Lucille
3 Rigos, Vanna Mikyla 24 Bergonio, Louise Joy
4 Macapagal, Francis Daniel 25 Garcia, Samantha
Gabrielle
5 Lualhati, Kim 26 Garing, Louise Lorraine
6 Guevara, Andrea Selina 27 Ramirez, John Harvey
7 Torres, Darra Beyonce 28 Ancheta, Chester
8 Manguiat, Rogelio 29 Fabul, Kate Gwyneth
Eduardo
9 Tumesa, Keesha 30 Mendoza, Suzette Claire
10 Monoso, Francesca Mae 31 Sumudlayon, Fatima
11 Dizon, Carl 32 Mayo, Rikkiel
12 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 33 Walker, Joshua
13 Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 34 Vidal, Riane Charise
14 Rosales, Ingrid 35 Dipalac, Patrick
15 Leynes, John Paolo 36 Silang, Pamela Mae
16 Morada, Rod Vincent 37 Deriquito, Chanel Maxine
17 Gutierrez, Mheibelle 38 Balbacal, Mike Adrian
18 Conserva, Roger Rafael 39 Libuit, Aissa Lisette
19 Landicho, Aaron 40 Alvarez, Jeri Ryan
20 Saob, Diane Roshan 41 Tuagan, Paul James
21 Aldueza, Breanna Sofia

3. Compute for the sampling interval k. Divide the population size, 41 by the sample size, 15.
𝑵 𝟒𝟏
k = 𝒏 = 𝟏𝟓 = 2.733333 >> k = 3

4. Select a random start between 0 to k + 1 through the simple random technique. Using the given values
above, you can choose the random start number between 0 and 4, which are 1, 2, and 3.

5. Use 2 as the random start. You will start with the name in bold and highlighted in yellow.

6. Starting from the 2nd student on the randomly arranged list with assigned numbers, select every 3 rd
student until you reach the sample size. The chosen students are those with highlighted typed names in bold
letters. (The red-highlighted is where it starts. Both red and yellow colors are included and chosen.)
 Name x (Weight) (x - 𝒙̅) (x - 𝒙̅)2

Castillo, Romel Jacob 132 8.33 69.39

Lualhati, Kim 123 -0.67 0.45

Manguiat, Rogelio 150 26.33 693.27

Eduardo
Dizon, Carl 131 7.33 53.73

Rosales, Ingrid 88 -35.67 1272.35

Gutierrez, Mheibelle 106 -17.67 312.23

Saob, Diane Roshan 114 -9.67 93.51

Janaban, Lucille 125 1.33 1.77

Garing, Louise Lorraine 134 10.33 106.71

Fabul Kate Gwyneth 126 2.33 5.43

Mayo, Rikkiel 132 8.33 69.39

Dipalac, Patrick 127 3.33 11.09

Balbacal, Mike Adrian 132 8.33 69.39

Tuagan, Paul James 127 3.33 11.09

Rigos, Vanna Mikyla 108 -15.67 245.55

∑𝑥 1855
Sample Mean - 𝑥̅ = 𝑛
= 15
= 123.6666667 = 123.67

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 3015.35
Sample Variance – s2 = = = 215.3821429 >> 215.38
𝑛−1 15−1

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 3015.35
Sample Standard Deviation – s = √ =√ = 14.67590348 >> 14.68
𝑛−1 15−1
 Stratified Random Sampling

1. Divide the class into two sub-groups: male and female.

2. Divide the number of students of a specific gender by the total number of students in the class, then
multiplying it to 15 to find the sample size in each sub-group.

Population (N=41) Number of Students Per Sample

Stratum
Male 18 7

Female 23 8

Total 41 15

18
Male - 41 x 15 = 6.59 >> 7

23
Female - 41 x 15 = 8.41 >> 8

3. Based on the computed sample size in each sub-group, randomly select students for each sub-group
using the simple random technique. You can use the website: https://wheelofnames.com/#

Male x (x - 𝒙̅) (x - 𝒙̅)2

1 Alvarez, Jeri Ryan 112 -19.86 394.42

2 Balbacal, Mike Adrian 132 0.14 0.02

3 Morada, Rod Vincent 147 15.14 229.22

4 Walker, Joshua 143 11.14 124.1

5 Mayo, Rikkiel 132 0.14 0.02

6 Ramirez, John Harvey 130 -1.86 3.46

7 Tuagan, Paul James 127 -4.86 23.62

Andre
 ∑𝑥 923
Sample Mean - 𝑥̅ = = = 131.857143 >> 131.86
𝑛 7

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 774.86
Sample Variance – s2 = = = 129.1433333 >> 129.14
𝑛−1 7−1

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 774.86
Sample Standard Deviation – s = √ =√ = 11.36412484 >> 11.36
𝑛−1 7−1

Female x (x - 𝒙̅) (x - 𝒙̅)2

1 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 128 9.62 92.54

2 Guevara, Andrea Selina 108 -10.38 107.74

3 Mendoza, Suzette Claire 92 -26.38 695.9

4 Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 132 13.62 185.5

5 Janaban, Lucille 125 6.62 43.82

6 Tumesa, Keesha 109 -9.38 87.98

7 Monoso, Francesca Mae 143 24.62 606.14

8 Deriquito, Chanel Maxine 110 -8.38 70.22

∑𝑥 947
Sample Mean - 𝑥̅ = = = 118.375 >> 118.38
𝑛 8

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 1889.84
Sample Variance – s2 = = = 269.9771429 >> 269.98
𝑛−1 8−1

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 1889.84
Sample Standard Deviation – s = √ =√ = 16.43098119 >> 16.43
𝑛−1 8−1
 Name x (x - 𝒙̅) (x - 𝒙̅)2

1 Alvarez, Jeri Ryan 112 -12.67 160.53

2 Balbacal, Mike Adrian 132 7.33 53.73

3 Morada, Rod Vincent 147 22.33 498.63

4 Walker, Joshua 143 18.33 335.99

5 Mayo, Rikkiel 132 7.33 53.73

6 Ramirez, John Harvey 130 5.33 28.41

7 Tuagan, Paul James 127 2.33 5.43

Andre

8 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 128 3.33 11.09

9 Guevara, Andrea Selina 108 -16.67 277.89

10 Mendoza, Suzette Claire 92 -32.67 1067.33

11 Baclayon, Gabrielle Mae 132 7.33 53.73

12 Janaban, Lucille 125 0.33 0.11

13 Tumesa, Keesha 109 -15.67 245.55

14 Monoso, Francesca Mae 143 18.33 335.99

15 Deriquito, Chanel 110 -14.67 215.21

Maxine

∑𝑥 1870
Sample Mean - 𝑥̅ = = = 124.6666667 >> 124.67
𝑛 15

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 3343.35
Sample Variance – s2 = = = 238.8107143 >> 238.81
𝑛−1 15−1

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 3343.35
Sample Standard Deviation – s = √ =√ = 15.45350168 >> 15.45
𝑛−1 15−1
 Cluster Sampling
1. Divide the population into clusters using the given groups made by the class adviser of St. Uriel.
The group of students were divided into 7 groups made for group activities and/or discussions
during the start of the semester.

2. Using the simple random technique, choose a cluster. Again, you can use this website for random
selection: https://wheelofnames.com/#

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Group 7

3. Select 15 students from the members of groups 3,5 and 6 using simple random sampling.

Name x (x - 𝒙̅) (x - 𝒙̅)2

1 Conserva, Roger 88 -12.67 160.53

2 Silang, Pamela 132 7.33 53.73

3 Morada, Rod Vincent 147 22.33 498.63

4 Dizon, Carl 131 18.33 335.99

5 Sumudlayon, Fatima 101 7.33 53.73

6 Ramirez, John Harvey 130 5.33 28.41

7 Manguiat, Lio 150 2.33 5.43

8 Monoso, Francesca Mae 143 18.33 335.99

9 Dipalac, Patrick 127 -16.67 277.89

10 Pascual, Sophia Lorraine 113 -32.67 1067.33

11 Vidal, Riane Charise 115 7.33 53.73

12 Janaban, Lucille 125 0.33 0.11

13 Garing, Louise Lorraine 134 -15.67 245.55

14 Mactal, Hannah Beverly 128 18.33 335.99

15 Macapagal, Francis 130 -14.67 215.21

Daniel
 ∑𝑥 1894
Sample Mean - 𝑥̅ = = = 126.2666667 >> 126.27
𝑛 15

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 3829.39
Sample Variance – s2 = = = 273.5278571 >> 273.53
𝑛−1 15−1

∑(𝑥−x̅)2 3829.39
Sample Standard Deviation – s = √ =√ = 16.53867761 >> 16.54
𝑛−1 15−1
 Analysis for the Height of students from Grade 11 – St. Uriel

Population Mean Population Standard Deviation

𝝁 𝝈

163.17 9.74

Sampling Sample Standard

Techniques Sample Mean Deviation |𝝁 − 𝒙̅| |𝝈 − 𝒔|
̅𝒙 𝒔

Simple Random
Sampling 162.2 9.63 0.97 0.11
Systematic
Random Sampling 165.87 10.39 -2.7 -0.65
Stratified Random
Sampling 164.27 9.57 -1.1 0.17

Cluster Random
Sampling 162.87 10.15 1 -0.41

As you can see in the results, the sampling method that has the nearest
sample mean and sample standard deviation is the Simple Random Sampling. In
conclusion, we can state that it is the most compatible random sampling to be
used. Moreover, this is an unbiased one since we randomly picked those members
who were included in the list.

Furthermore, since it was the closest sampling technique among the four,
simple random sampling has a difference of only 0.97 and its sample standard
deviation from its population is only 0.11. It can be inferred that it was the
population mean's closest approximate technique.
 Confidence Intervals for Height
. (Simple Random Sampling)

̅ = 162.2
𝒙 𝝁 = 163.17
𝒔 = 9.63 𝝈 = 9.74

90% 95% 99%

𝑠𝑥 𝑠𝑥 𝑠𝑥
𝑥̅ ± 𝑧 𝑥̅ ± 𝑧 𝑥̅ ± 𝑧
√𝑛 √𝑛 √𝑛
9.63
= 162.2 ± 1.645
9.63
= 162.2 ± 1.96 = 162.2 ± 2.575
√15 √15

= 162.2 ± 4.09
162.2 + 4.09 = 166.25
162.2 – 4.09 = 157.91
157.91< 𝜇 < 166.25
= 162.2 ± 6.4
= 162.2 ± 4.87
162.2 + 6.4 = 168.6
162.2 + 4.87 = 167.07
162.2 – 6.4 = 155.8
162.2 – 4.87 = 157.33
155.8 < 𝝁 < 168.6
157.33 < 𝝁 < 167.07

The population mean, which is 162.2, is enclosed by the 90%, 95%, and
99% confidence levels. The range of values in all of the above-mentioned
confidence intervals shows that they include and enclose the population
mean. However, there is one exception. It's impossible to tell if the
population has a 90%, 95%, or 100% chance of surviving. The mean falls
within the range.

According to the results, the lower confidence limit decreases as the

confidence level rises, while the upper confidence limit rises. Furthermore, it
is worth noting that the variance widens as the confidence increases.
 Population Mean (𝝁) Population Standard Deviation (𝝈)

121.85 18.42

Sampling Technique Sample Mean (𝑥̅) Sample Standard

Deviation (s) |𝝁 − 𝒙̅| |𝝈 − 𝒔|

Simple Random 116.4 21.65 5.45 3.23

Sampling

Systematic Random 123.67 14.68 1.82 3.74

Sampling

Stratified Sampling 124.67 15.45 2.82 2.97

Cluster Sampling 126.27 16.54 4.42 1.88

Based on the computation and table above, systematic random sampling

has the nearest sample mean to the population mean. With a difference of 1.82,
we can conclude that the said sampling technique most accurately and nearly
shows the population, compared to other sampling techniques. On the other
hand, cluster sampling has the nearest standard deviation to the population
standard deviation. This means that the said sampling technique is nearer and
offers the least change in variation or dispersion of the population set of values.

With the results above, it does not necessarily mean that these sampling
techniques are best for every analysis. These are just only based on the given
values, results, and interpretations of this given data analysis.
 Confidence Intervals for Weight
(Systematic Random Sampling)

̅ = 123.67
𝒙 𝝁 = 121.85
𝒔 = 14.68 𝝈 = 18.42

90% 95% 99%

𝑠𝑥 𝑠𝑥 𝑠𝑥
𝑥̅ ± 𝑧 𝑥̅ ± 𝑧 𝑥̅ ± 𝑧
√𝑛 √𝑛 √𝑛
14.68 14.68 14.68
= 123.67 ± 1.645 = 123.67 ± 1.96 = 123.67 ± 2.575
√15 √15 √15

= 123.67 ± 6.22 = 123.67 ± 7.43 = 123.67 ± 9.76

123.67 + 6.22 = 129.89 123.67 + 7.43 = 131.1 123.67 + 9.76 = 133.43

123.67 – 6.22 = 117.45 123.67 – 7.43 = 116.24 123.67 – 9.76 = 113.91

117.45 < 𝝁 < 129.89 116.24 < 𝝁 < 131.1 113.91 < 𝝁 < 133.43

Based from the computation above, the population mean 121.85 is within
the 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence levels. In every confidence level, the
computed range of values encloses the population mean. It can also be
interpreted that as the confidence interval increases, the range of values
widens as well.