Pt SorRes 30(1) 65-71 2014
satus of Seed Mycoflora of Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)
SC Jain and Rekha Kumawat
siagurwal087@gmail.com
wither were also seen
Seed M
sample *E’
lant Pathology, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner-303329 (Jaipury Ravastine
mples were collected from different sources, showing deformed (shrivelled and gait
ned), discoloured (brown) and damaged (insects and mechanical) seeds. Impurities of one
all the six samples. Six different kinds of fungal spores were detected by
shing Test on the seed testa of all the seed samples tested. The spore load was maximum in
while it was minimum in sample ‘F’. A total of eight seed borne fungi were obtained in
or
Motter and Agar Plate Methods and these were Allernaria alternata, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus
ricer, Cladosporium cladosparioides, Drechslera australiensis, Fusarium moniliforme, Fusarium
sporwn and Rhizopus 5
1 Sollowed by “AY, “BY, 4
Scovmrds: Lucerne, Aspergillus, Ger
YPRODUCTION
vig or altalla (Medicago sativa L.) vernacularly
| Rika” is one of the important fodder crop of
ic and genus Medicago grown on
ros scule in USA, Argentina, Australia, India, New
ul, Frans, ttaly and USSR
Rahusflian, iis grown as fodder erop almost in all
‘cept partially in one or two district like
ual chittor where it also grown for seed
11s (Anonymous, 2009-10). One of the
ypovtaut factors which limit the production of the crop
1» foulder or a5 seeds in Rajasthan or in other seed
reas is the use of contaminated/
contaminated seeds purchased by the farmers from
«al seed selling shopkeepers or rarely seeds saved
\ hom. which culminating into heavy losses atall the
20> ol the crop growth, specially at germination by
nce mortality (seed rots). post
vice moriality (wilt, damping off, seedling rot
citing various fungal diseases at
»p whose pathogens also reported
te through such seeds.
! PERIALS AND METHODS
lection of seed samples
inpies nf lucerne seeds were collected. Out of
Pout thur samples were collected from local seed
Highest count of mycoflora was abserved hy Agar Plate Method in sample
“D’ and ‘F" in comparison to Blotter Method.
ration, Seed mycoflora, Agar Plate Method.
selling shops situated in nearby areas of vegetable
grain mandies of Bagru, Phulera, Renwal. Chomu
towns which belongs tb nearby areas Jobner vicinity
(District-Jaipur, Rajasthan) and the fifth samples was
collected from Bilada a town belongs to Jodhpur district
‘where some farmers cultivated the lucerne crop both
as fodder and seed production purpose (Table 1). At
each mandi /town level 5-15 samples were collected
from 5-15 shops/farmers depending upon the number
of shops/farmers and availability of seeds on shops or
in farmers houses situated in respective mandi/town
respectively. Ateach mandi/town level all the collected
samples mixed together to represent a composite
sample of that particular mandi / town. Sixth sample
was obtained from office of Assistant Agriculture
Officer, Department of Agriculture Govt. of Rajasthan,
Jobner (Jaipur, Rajasthan) who distributes the improved
seeds of lucerne (developed/collected by them from
registered seed producing agencies where seed
production done by usingimproved cultivation /storave
practices) to the farmers belong to different viliazes
of unit area (lobner / town and adjoining viit
grow green fodder for their animals. Sample
collected 2-3 weeks before sowing from the she
town, kept in fresh cotton cloth bags brought
laboratory and stored in refrigerator fort
Sampling was done by the methods suggested
1976 and Vishunawat. 2007Ccece
C
Pankaj Agar'.al, SC Jain and Rekha Kumawat
lable t: Place of samples collection in Jobner vicinity
Distriet-Jaipury and Bilada (District Jodhpur) Rajasthan,
‘ner code number
Place of collection Code No.
2 | chome
Phulera
Renwal
alolalml>
Bilada®
6 | Depn or Agreatture,
L Govt, of Rajasthan F
* Local seed producing village belong to Jadhpur district
Examii
ation of Dry Seeds
The method suggested by Agarwal and Sinclair (1987)
vith slight modification was followed. Twenty grams
seeids from each sample were taken at random and
divided into 4 fractions (5.0 gm). Each fraction was
spreaded on bottom of a Petridish and examined with
the help of a hand-lens or if required under
stereobinocular microscope. The inspected material
was categorized as follows
A. Discoloured seeds
(i) Brown
% Deformed sceds
() Shrivelled
1) Gall formed,
Damaged seeds
(i By insects
D. Impurities
(i) Other crop seeds
(ii) Stone or sand/ Ash partials
ii) Plant debries
E. Apparently healthy seeds
Seeds and impurities of each category were pooled
separately and weighted on modern electric balance
and per cent content by weight was calculated
Incidence of mycoflora, in particular category was also
recorded by using standard incubation methods.
Seed Washing Test
The Seed Washing Test suggested by Agarwal and
Sinclair (1987) was followed with slight modification,
oh
Tine Toaraal of Plan Sevonce Res
From each sample 600 seeds (approximately 2 am by
weight) were selected at random and divided into two
‘groups of 300 seeds and were immersed in 20 ml double
2alass distilled and sterlized water in 100ml conical flask
and shaken for 15 minutes on a mechanical shaker.
The seeds were discarded and the liquid was
‘centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 15 minutes. The supematant
was discarded and sediment was resuspended in 2 ml
of lactophenol. A drop of suspension was placed at the
centre of the haemacyrometer and spores of the funy
were counted in 10 large squares, chosen at randam
under stereobinocular microscope. Spore load per seed
was calculated by using following formula :-
Nxv
Spore load per seed = <——
Where,
N = Total number of spores counted/ number of
squares
X = Volume of mounting between thecover giass
and above the square covered (area of large
square x depth of chamber = 10* cm?)
Volume of the mounting fluid added to the
sediment’and
Number of seeds washed
ve
ne
Incubation Method
Mycoflora associated with seed samples cotfevied
post storage (just before next sowing) stage were
isolated using two incubation methods 1.¢. Blotter
Method and Agar Plate Method (ISTA, 1976 and
Agarwal and Sinclair, 1987) and incubated at 22 + 1 °C
with 12 hours of light altering with 12 hrs of darkness.
‘The seeds were examined alternatively on 3° to 7
day of incubation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Examination of dry seed samples revealed the presence
of deformed (shrivelled and gall formed seeds),
discoloured (brown) and damaged (mechanically and
insect) seeds. In addition to inert material (impurities
and apparently healthy seeds (Table 2). It is likely that
different types of seed mycoflora during storage might
have caused such deformation / discolouration in seedsStatus of Seu
malities and impurities in different lucerne seed samples
J Myroflora of Lucerne (Medicago sativa 1.)
vie oe Tern ony 3
rin ine mop fe ed
5 zi
home See eerie trrso tarot Eteos
] Detormed
ove Beene esa
[Saves ue | 3s | te | oe | te | is
ae
nies Beet eeep a |e oc) mn alle cso
1h ei ae | a8 | ae eds | ee
17 impurities '
[PRPS eter srp sw | 2m | as | 20 | am | ive
elon |S | | te | Ley os
‘sows
| ora ro | 150 | 200 | 10 | 2m | ow |
eamasaang asia testers imLomsia noe a
Talons sees enn
Se Te Bltenel F=Biatt P= Dept of gules Con 1 Bact
vocnce of such deformation and discolouration — sp,, Fusarium sp. and Rhizopus sp. Total “nga!
siongw ith impurities have also been reported during Joad was observed to be less in sample F . Table
vopeotion » examination of dry seeds of gram, black
seam, cowpea, mothbean and sesame by Ahmed and
Reidy, 1993; Khatik, 1998; Goyal, 1996; Cheema, 1997;
ali 2001 and Singh and Singh, 1983, respectively.
Sirangely, six fungal species could be detected by the
‘Sowd Washing Test and these fungi were Alternaria
1». Aspergillus sp. Cladosporium sp. Drechslera
‘comparison to sample collected from different regio"
‘A possible reason for the occurrence of fungi on see
coat might be the contamination during harvest:
follo -.." by the prevailing favourable weather condi
during si.sage for the survival and multiplication of furw
Non-adoption of improved cultural practices by ‘>:
farmers might be another reason also. Presence oi
fuble 3: Fungal spore load in different lucerne seeds samples detected by Seed Washing Test
Seat Tovar Fone 1 Teal oe
ie Ime oi
Alt. Asp. cid Fus. Rh.
a iso _ 228 1.50, ans $.20 050
h 125 Lis 050 2.00 4.00 1.00, ve!
ms Lo 1.00, o4s 1.50 2.70 1.20 :
a5 425 1.00 0.75 228 04s |
7 3.00 20 3.00 6.00 075, re
"he as 03S 1.00 150) 0.25
‘P04 (300 » 2) seeds
reennia sp. Asp = Aspergillus sp.. Ck
wi= Chom, C=Phulera = Renwal
‘adosporium sp, Dre = Drechslera sp.
Fas, = Fusarium gh
E=Diladat —F = Deptt. of Agriculture, Gos
The Journal of Plani Sve“8 Pankaj Agarwal, 5 C Jain and Rekha Kumawat
Table 4: Per cent incidence of mycoflora of lucerne seeds isolated by Blotter Method
| Mycomtors T Per cent incidence [sample TI
‘ x ® ¢ D z Fo] uw
j_Mernaria alternata 4.50 225 “350 3.00 6350 | 100 1
peril fas 700 250 300 soo | i020 | 200
iipergi niger 350 450 7.00 x50 | ers | aa
Cindospartan cadosporiores | 318 200 30 sot lasso a oop le
Drechalera australiensis 7.00) 550 325 3.00 1050 [208 | sz
Tasoriim moniliforme 335 750 as | a0 | aso | a0 | om
Fusarium epeporam 7200 | 1050 900 | 750 | 1850 | a0
Ricophas se 300 325 250 | 200 | 330 | 100
Tol 4 mpeaora sao | 3700 | soo | 2030 | avs] aay
* Seed tested 400 seeds / samples ~ ~
A= Bagru B = Chom ula -D~Renwal_—E=Dilads* = Deptt. of Ait, Govt. of Raa
different fungal spore on seed coat of clusterbean,
fenugreek. cowpea, mothbean and soybean, have been
also reported by Jaiman, 2003; Singh, 2001; Cheema,
1997; Ramnath ef ai., 1970 and Gujar, 2011. This
‘method provides quick detection of fungi which adhere
to the seed surface in the form of easily indentifiable
spores.
1m the present investigation, Blotter Method, Agar Plate
Method and Seedling Symptom Test were employed
for the isolation of seed mycoflora of lucerne. “otal
eight fungi ie, Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus nig?
Aspergillus flavus, Cladosporium cladosporivite
Drechslera australiensis, Fusarium moniliform.
Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizopus sp. were isolated
from the samples of lucerne by Blotter Method and
‘Agar Plate Method (Table 4 & 5 and Fig. 1)
In general variation was observed in Blotter Metliod
and Agar Plate Method. Higher per cent counts of fun
table S: Per cent incidence of mycoffora of lucerne seeds isolated by Agar Plate Method
Mycotora _ Per cent incidence / sample
a a ¢ D E
ierariaaliernata 650 325 a5 a0 | 850
[sports Raves 50 550 450 00 | wso[ 250) 9%
[cece 375 5.00 430 350 | soo | am) sit a
(Cladosporium cladosporioides | 450 350 200 230 | 430 [ 130) sun]
Drecstera austratensis 330 600 350 as | nso[ sof oa |
Fusarium moniliforme 7050 | _#25 700 550 | woo [ 250) |
Fsartum oxsporam 335 1150 950 sas [oof asof vm
[Rhizoma sp 00 3.50 3.00 250 | 4.00 2.00 1
Ton % myeatora aso [4630 ars | 3500 | 7400 | 2150
* Seed tested = 200 seeds / samples
A» Bagra B= Chomu, C~Phulera D = Renwal E = Bilada F = Deptt, of Agriculture. Govt. of Rajasthan
i-Iournal of Plant Science ResearchStas of Seed Mvcoflora of Lucerne /Medivage sativa L
Altemaria altemata
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus flavus B
A B
Cladosporium cladosporides
‘vcutial yrowth on seed B = Conidia witgh conidiophore
Lncome (Medicago satva L.) seed showing growth of seed byre mycator
The Town= 70 Pankay Agurwal, S.C Juin and Rekha Kumawat
Drechslera australiensis
= Fusarium moniliforme
Fusarium oxysporum
A Rhizopus sp. oe
A = Mycelial growth on seed 18 = Conidia with und ithStatus of Seed Mycoflora of Lucerne (Medicago sativa Ly 7)
sece observed in Agar’ Plate Method (46.70%) as
‘compared to Blotter Method (38.76%). This variation
zhi be due to the reasons that some of the weak and
‘ow ing flngi could not grow in Blotter Method
#» comparisons to fast growing saprophytic fungi, pre
sterilization of seeds and different substratum
the method employed (de-Tempe. 1961
*canve and Sadd, 1962 and Jain, 1990), Neergaard
s8 Saude (1962) also observed that Blotter Method
Plate Method are equally valuable and
supplementary to each other. Deterioration of seeds
Sarious raps in storage has also réported by
Christensen (1973).
REFERENCES
\carval V K and Sinelait B 1987 Prineiplesof Seed Pathology
Vol. 1 (l= 157) and Vol.« I (PI-153) CRC Press. Ine
Foca Raten Florida USA,
Anined KM and Reddy CR 1993 A pictorial guide to the
‘dentifieation of seed borne fungi of sorghum, peal,
‘inger mille. chickpea, pigeonpes and groundnut. Inf
Bulletin No. 34 ICRISAT, Patacheru, A.P. - 02324,
pp. 192
\somymous 2009-10 Agriculture Statisties of Rajasthan
rectorate of Economics and Statistics, Rajasthan,
Yoana Bhawan. Jaipur
licema IS 1997 Studies of seed mycoflora of cowpes (Vigna
unpviewlaraL. Walp) in Rajasthan an their pathogenic
sonsequences. Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Pl. Pathology.
Ray Agri, University, Bikaner, S.K.N. College of
\crieultare, Jobner, pp.-180.
4s fonype J 1961 Proc. Internal. Seed Test Asoc. 26 :27-60,
Received : 19.08.2013
Accepted : 23.12.2013
Goyal SK 1996 Mycoflora of black gram seeds [Vigna mungo
(L.) Hepper] under storage conditions. their patholo!
effect and control. Se. (Ag.) Thesis, RAL! ikaver
Campus. Jobner. $0 pp
Gujar CP 2011 Association of Root Rot Causing Fung! wit
Soybean (Giseine max (L.) Merril] Seeds. shoot
Pathogenicity and Management. M.Se. (Ag.
Depit. of Pl, Pathology. Swami Keshwanand ia), Ars
University. Bikaner. SKN. College of Agricul
Jobnet
ess
ISTA 1976 Seed Sci. and Technol, 13: 307-520,
ISTA 1985 Seed Set. anc Technol. 13: 307-520.
Jaiman RK 2003 Seeds. their Pothopenicidtw and Manapemet
Jain SC 1990 Studies on seed mycotora of bajra (Ponnivrtn
‘americanum |..\.ecke). Ph.D Thesis. Ra Agi. Univ
Bikaner. S.K.N. College of A. Jobner pp. 3)
Kthatik RK 1998 Detection of seed-bomne fungs causing ro:
diseases in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and thei
‘control. M.Se. (Ag.) Thesis, Deptt. of Pl, Patholvey
RAU, Bikaner, Campus, Jobner. 40 pp.
Mali SN 2001 Seed mycoftora studies of mothbean [Vigna
caconifolia Vaca.) Mareche!)] in Rajasthan. Ph.D. Thesis,
Department of Plant Pathology, RAW, Bikaner, Campos-
Jobner, p. 158
[Neecpaand Pand Sad A 1962 Indion Phytopathalogy, 18:8:
Ramnath Mathur SB and Neergaurd P 1970 Proc. Inst Seed Tew
Ass, 38:225-24)
Singh N 2001 Detection and control of Fusarium sp. Assia
with fenugreek (Trigonella foemum grascu L,) seeds
MS. (Ag) Thesis, RAU. Bikaner, S.K.N. College of
Agriculture, fobnet. 67 pp.
Singh Tand Singh D 1983 Jndion Journal of Mycol. PI Pathol 13:
32.42,