Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edu Leadership
Edu Leadership
Edu Leadership
net/publication/354386654
CITATIONS READS
0 18
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohd Fitri Abdul Razak on 06 September 2021.
1
ABSTRACT
Leadership is both a research area and a practical skill that encompasses an individual's,
group's, or organization's ability to influence, or guide other individuals, teams, or entire
organisations. Leadership research has resulted in theories involving traits, situational
interaction, function, behaviour, power, vision and values, charisma, and intelligence, among
other things. The process of enlisting and directing the talents and energies of teachers,
students, and parents toward the achievement of common educational goals is referred to as
educational leadership. Researchers have selected key informants who have extensive
experience in teaching and learning. Known as Mr ARMF (not his real name) as the first
informant, while the second informant was Mr. MSMS (not his real name). Both have the
same level of higher education at the master's level, but different fields. Yet both in the same
field such as possess the same diploma which is the Diploma in Medical Assistant (DMA)
and Diploma in Health Sciences with Education (DHSE), UNISEL and various aspects of
specialist field development (SME). Organizational leadership can contribute to
organizational success and achieve desired goals. Success of an organization depends on the
support and admiration of all members. To be a competent leader, one needs to have
knowledge and experience and build inner power more than physical strength. There are
several leadership theories in managing organizations, such as contingency theory Fiedler
(1974), goal path theory, and cognitive resource theory.
2
1. INTRODUCTION
3
2. PROFILE OF TWO KEY INFORMANTS.
Researchers have selected key informants who have extensive experience in teaching
and learning. Both of them are the same in terms of year of service in education which is 16
years in training service. Known as Mr. ARMF (not his real name) as the first informant,
while the second informant was Mr. MSMS (not his real name). Both of them also have the
same level of higher education at the master's level, but different fields that are no less
impressive. The first informant has a Master of Management (MOM), USAS, while the
second informant has a Master in Education (Guidance and Counseling), UPSI. At the
bachelor's degree level, the first informant is BSc (Hons.) In Nursing Practice Development
(NPD), Northumbria University, UK while the second informant is BSc (Hons.) In Human
Development (HD), UPM. Possess the same diploma which is the Diploma in Medical
Assistant (DMA), the same training institution but different campuses. Yet both in the same
field such as Diploma in Health Sciences with Education (DHSE), UNISEL and various
aspects of specialist field development (SME) as the first informant in the Advanced Diploma
in Emergency and Trauma Medicine (ADMETC), KPPS (ILKKM SBAN) are different
informants second Advanced Diploma in Mental Health (ADMH), KKI (ILKKM SAS).
4
2.2 QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS DESCRIPTIVELY AND NARRATIVELY
Findings show that leadership style is how a leader uses the power he has as a tool to
influence the instructor. Both informants expressed the same opinion that is;
“I see he can carry out the trust well, is orderly, trustworthy and is believed to be
able to shoulder this task. I personally have worked with him, so I see that the responsibility,
inshaAllah can be borne by him”
5
2.2.2 Moral Personality-Oriented Leadership.
“Of course, this is what I said, as far as I know, this director is the type who practices
the teachings of Islam, it's easy. Judging from his style and character, I'm sure he's the type
who practices the teachings of Islam or at least, he tries to practice… as people say, if you
can't do everything, don't stay all…”
House, R. J., and Mitchell, R. R. (1974) proposed the Path-Goal Theory, which
claimed that leadership behaviour should be viewed as an activity that might encourage
people. In essence, "Goal Leadership Theory" lays forth four different leadership styles that
can be used to encourage people. Support-oriented leadership is one of the characteristics that
distinguish this leadership.
6
work environment. This director likes to treat instructors without being based on social
mobility and also respects their position status”
The words revealed from the first informant's words with the same purpose as the
second informant indicate that, as an educational leader, this refers to demonstrating respect
for the instructor by being courteous and expressing concern. This conduct is intended to
provide a comfortable work environment for the instructor.
“Let me be clear, this director, he’s the type who’s willing to share responsibility with
his officers in all things, in fact, he’s really willing to do it. Empowerment in this way can
only be a productive tool if a trusting relationship exists between the various parties. This
trusting relationship is considered important for realizing something and productivity”
Consistent with the ministry's tagline, which claims that all Malaysian Ministry of
Health members work together to achieve the same goal. The creative leadership style in
solving this problem is highlighted by leaders who open up space for a consultation with the
instructors to contribute ideas and views. Similarly, creating and improving job quality
through self-leadership and inventive behaviour in a decision based on the institutional
agreement is required. Shaping the leadership and organization of the future presents a
challenge to instructors and staff to perform tasks at the highest level to the best of their
ability. This style of leadership is seen to be constantly looking for continuous improvement
and achievement. Thus is through a measure of expressing high confidence that instructors
and staff can achieve the goals for the challenge.
According to this, "Goal Path Theory" does not constrain leaders to use only one
leadership style. Instead, according to the appropriateness, it is open to using various oriented
leadership styles, as Hersey P. (1984) explained in situational leader and Fiedler's (1974)
contingency theory. Through this analysis, both of these leadership styles can be seen.
Transformation-oriented leadership and commitment in organizational politics are more
7
consistent in educational reforms, such as enabling leadership sharing and instituting
organizational learning. In addition, to build capacity and together share the vision and goals
of the institution. In addition, there is a significant gap between transformational leadership
and commitment, enabling the institution to achieve the desired improvement aspirations.
Thus, the institute's educational leadership is strategic and perceived to have a vision
of reorganizing and reorganizing top management. Creating and leaving legacies, maintaining
an ongoing skill set and stability enable them to guide future leadership.
8
2.3 KEY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION.
The leadership style practised by the leader must be appropriate to the situation. A
style of leadership that is practised may be effective for one particular situation and will not
be effective in another situation. There are several leadership theories in managing
organizations, such as background theory, contingency theory Fiedler (1974), goal path
theory, cognitive resource theory, charismatic theory, and the theory of the field of the
driving force. Background theory considers the study of leadership as one of the branches of
social psychology by looking at several different perspectives, namely the group perspective,
the conflict perspective, the perspective of the need to learn, and the perspective of self -
determination. These perspectives can be seen through three approaches: the trait approach,
the functional approach, and the behavioural approach.
9
organizational goals. The last theory is the field theory of driving force, where any behaviour
is due to the balance between the driving force of repulsion and the driving force of
obstruction.
10
2.4 REFERENCE.
Chin, Roger (2015). "Examining teamwork and leadership in the fields of public
Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. (1974). Leadership and effective management. Glenview,
Getzels, J. W., & Guba, E. G. (1957). Social behaviour and the administrative process.
Getzels, J. W., Lipham, J., & Campbell, R. F. (1968). Educational administration as a social
process: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R.E., and McKee, A. (2003) The New Leaders: Transforming the art
Grint, Keith (2005). Leadership: Limits and Possibilities. London: Palgrave. p. 14. ISBN
9780333963876.
House, R. J., & Mitchell, R. R. (1974). The path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory research, and
11
practice (6th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Ishak Mad Shah (2006). Kepimpinan dan hubungan interpersonal dalam organisasi.
Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Englewood
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1991). Moral leadership? Getting to the heart of school improvement. San
Western, Simon (2019). Leadership: A critical text. London: Sage. ISBN 978-1-5264-5951-0.
2.5 INTERVIEWS.
Interviewed Mr. Abdul Razak Mohd Fadzil, Head of Medical Science Subjects and Educator
for Diploma in Medical and Health Sciences Program (DMHS) at Training Institute
Ministry of Health Malaysia Sultan Azlan Shah, Ipoh, on 21 June 2021.
Interviewed Mr. Mohd. Shahezam Mohd Sunar, Examination Secretary and Educator for
12
2.6 APPENDIX
I Does that imply... Do you think the head of this institute has a flawless
personality?
I In the context of the director of this institute?. Are you referring to your point
of view?.
I Social organizations have their characteristics, and the most common aspect
of these characteristics is bureaucracy. This organizes the organization in
(Q5)
almost all aspects of the activity. In your opinion, what makes an institution a
13
social organization?.
I So, if I say this director uses deception, he participates so that his leadership
is seen as leadership by example?. Is that so?. Because you said earlier, he
was willing to do it... this shows that he is like that...or what?.
14
organizations?.
I So you agree, if I say so, did the director manage to deal with problems and
conflicts?.
I Leaders must understand change and how it affects schools. To deal with
change effectively, leaders must understand the process of initiating top-
(Q10)
down transformation and bottom-up transformation. Change requires
strategic leadership. Distinguish between a strategic leader and a visionary
leader?.
I Is there anything more you would like to say before we wrap up our
interview?
15
2.6.2 Table 2 : Emerging Themes and Data Extracted
16