Donald super career development theory crystallization

What is donald super career development theory. pubiwa Donald super career development theory stages.

Donald E. Super’s career development theory is perhaps the most widely known life-span view of career development. Developmental theories recognize the changes that people go through as they mature, and they emphasize a life-span approach to career choice and adaptation. lidaxezimowa

But he also believed that they were too static and insufficient in explaining the complexities of vocational behavior. Super proclaimed that occupational choice should be seen as an unfolding process, not a point-in-the-time decision. Therefore, he proceeded to supplement the trait-and-factor approach by constructing a comprehensive career theory in
which (a) career development is seen as a lifelong process unfolding in a series of developmental stages and (b) career selection is not a one-shot decision but the cumulative outcome of a series decisions. cixetosi In his attempts to shape a comprehensive career theory in the 1950s through the mid-1990s, Super complemented the traditional
individual-difference approach to vocational guidance with three additional perspectives: (1) developmental perspective focusing on the life course of vocational behavior and stressing continuity in career development, (2) phenomenological perspective emphasizing the role of self-concept in the development of an individual’s career, and (3)
contextual perspective bringing forward the importance of multiple social roles and their interaction across the life span. Developmental Perspective: Understanding Careers In The Life Span While traditional vocational guidance focused on occupational choice and the prediction of occupational success at some later point in time, Super stressed the
need to understand and predict a career. He defined a career as a sequence of occupations, jobs, and positions held during the course of a lifetime, including also prevocational and postvocational activities. Super asserted that what was actually needed in vocational guidance was a career model, which takes into account the sequence of positions that
an individual occupies during her or his working life. Interest in understanding careers led Super to look into peoples’ career patterns, which portray one aspect of vocational development—the sequence of changes in occupational level and field over a period of time. Although initially “set out” by the individual’s parental socioeconomic level, patterns
are also determined by individuals’ abilities, personality traits, and the opportunities to which they are exposed. The analysis of career patterns supported the view that the life cycle imposes different vocational tasks on people at various times of their lives. Drawing on the work of developmental psychologists and sociologists who independently
studied stages of life and work, Super and his colleagues outlined five major stages of career development, with each one characterized by three or four appropriate developmental tasks: Growth (roughly age 4 to 13), the first life stage, the period when children develop their capacities, attitudes, interests, socialize their needs, and form a general
understanding of the world of work. This stage includes four major career developmental tasks: becoming concerned about the future, increasing personal control over one’s own life, convincing oneself to achieve in school and at work, and acquiring competent work habits and attitudes. Exploration (Ages 14-24) is the period when individuals attempt
to understand themselves and find their place in the world of work. Through classes, work experience, and hobbies, they try to identify their interests and capabilities and figure out how they fit with various occupations. They make tentative occupational choices and eventually obtain an occupation. tetomoyopi This stage involves three career
development tasks.
The first one, the crystallization of a career preference, is to develop and plan a tentative vocational goal.

But he also believed that they were too static and insufficient in explaining the complexities of vocational behavior. Super proclaimed that occupational choice should be seen as an unfolding process, not a point-in-the-time decision. Therefore, he proceeded to supplement the trait-and-factor approach by constructing a comprehensive career theory in
which (a) career development is seen as a lifelong process unfolding in a series of developmental stages and (b) career selection is not a one-shot decision but the cumulative outcome of a series decisions. In his attempts to shape a comprehensive career theory in the 1950s through the mid-1990s, Super complemented the traditional individual-
difference approach to vocational guidance with three additional perspectives: (1) developmental perspective focusing on the life course of vocational behavior and stressing continuity in career development, (2) phenomenological perspective emphasizing the role of self-concept in the development of an individual’s career, and (3) contextual
perspective bringing forward the importance of multiple social roles and their interaction across the life span. Developmental Perspective: Understanding Careers In The Life Span While traditional vocational guidance focused on occupational choice and the prediction of occupational success at some later point in time, Super stressed the need to
understand and predict a career. He defined a career as a sequence of occupations, jobs, and positions held during the course of a lifetime, including also prevocational and postvocational activities. nuyilasazezo

But he also believed that they were too static and insufficient in explaining the complexities of vocational behavior. Super proclaimed that occupational choice should be seen as an unfolding process, not a point-in-the-time decision. Therefore, he proceeded to supplement the trait-and-factor approach by constructing a comprehensive career theory in
which (a) career development is seen as a lifelong process unfolding in a series of developmental stages and (b) career selection is not a one-shot decision but the cumulative outcome of a series decisions. In his attempts to shape a comprehensive career theory in the 1950s through the mid-1990s, Super complemented the traditional individual-
difference approach to vocational guidance with three additional perspectives: (1) developmental perspective focusing on the life course of vocational behavior and stressing continuity in career development, (2) phenomenological perspective emphasizing the role of self-concept in the development of an individual’s career, and (3) contextual
perspective bringing forward the importance of multiple social roles and their interaction across the life span. Developmental Perspective: Understanding Careers In The Life Span While traditional vocational guidance focused on occupational choice and the prediction of occupational success at some later point in time, Super stressed the need to
understand and predict a career. higuyafi He defined a career as a sequence of occupations, jobs, and positions held during the course of a lifetime, including also prevocational and postvocational activities. Super asserted that what was actually needed in vocational guidance was a career model, which takes into account the sequence of positions
that an individual occupies during her or his working life. Interest in understanding careers led Super to look into peoples’ career patterns, which portray one aspect of vocational development—the sequence of changes in occupational level and field over a period of time. Although initially “set out” by the individual’s parental socioeconomic level,
patterns are also determined by individuals’ abilities, personality traits, and the opportunities to which they are exposed. The analysis of career patterns supported the view that the life cycle imposes different vocational tasks on people at various times of their lives. Drawing on the work of developmental psychologists and sociologists who
independently studied stages of life and work, Super and his colleagues outlined five major stages of career development, with each one characterized by three or four appropriate developmental tasks: Growth (roughly age 4 to 13), the first life stage, the period when children develop their capacities, attitudes, interests, socialize their needs, and form
a general understanding of the world of work. This stage includes four major career developmental tasks: becoming concerned about the future, increasing personal control over one’s own life, convincing oneself to achieve in school and at work, and acquiring competent work habits and attitudes. duhibexico Exploration (Ages 14-24) is the period
when individuals attempt to understand themselves and find their place in the world of work.

The dominant assumption was that differing abilities and interests were crucial in determining occupational choice and success.
Developmental theories recognize the changes that people go through as they mature, and they emphasize a life-span approach to career choice and adaptation. These theories usually partition working life into stages, and they try to specify the typical vocational behaviors at each stage. In the 1950s, when Super began to formulate his theoretical
conceptions, differential psychology and the trait-and-factor theory permeated vocational counseling. The dominant assumption was that differing abilities and interests were crucial in determining occupational choice and success. For this reason, vocational counseling was seen primarily as a process of helping individuals match their abilities and
other traits with those required by accessible occupations. By applying the matching model, practitioners of vocational guidance assisted their clients in choosing the “right” vocation, that is, the one that is well matched or congruent with an individual’s abilities, interests, and personality traits. Super recognized the valuable contribution of the trait-
and-factor theory and the matching model to vocational theory and guidance practice. But he also believed that they were too static and insufficient in explaining the complexities of vocational behavior. Super proclaimed that occupational choice should be seen as an unfolding process, not a point-in-the-time decision. Therefore, he proceeded to
supplement the trait-and-factor approach by constructing a comprehensive career theory in which (a) career development is seen as a lifelong process unfolding in a series of developmental stages and (b) career selection is not a one-shot decision but the cumulative outcome of a series decisions. In his attempts to shape a comprehensive career
theory in the 1950s through the mid-1990s, Super complemented the traditional individual-difference approach to vocational guidance with three additional perspectives: (1) developmental perspective focusing on the life course of vocational behavior and stressing continuity in career development, (2) phenomenological perspective emphasizing the
role of self-concept in the development of an individual’s career, and (3) contextual perspective bringing forward the importance of multiple social roles and their interaction across the life span. Developmental Perspective: Understanding Careers In The Life Span While traditional vocational guidance focused on occupational choice and the prediction
of occupational success at some later point in time, Super stressed the need to understand and predict a career. He defined a career as a sequence of occupations, jobs, and positions held during the course of a lifetime, including also prevocational and postvocational activities. Super asserted that what was actually needed in vocational guidance was
a career model, which takes into account the sequence of positions that an individual occupies during her or his working life. Interest in understanding careers led Super to look into peoples’ career patterns, which portray one aspect of vocational development—the sequence of changes in occupational level and field over a period of time. Although
initially “set out” by the individual’s parental socioeconomic level, patterns are also determined by individuals’ abilities, personality traits, and the opportunities to which they are exposed. The analysis of career patterns supported the view that the life cycle imposes different vocational tasks on people at various times of their lives. Drawing on the
work of developmental psychologists and sociologists who independently studied stages of life and work, Super and his colleagues outlined five major stages of career development, with each one characterized by three or four appropriate developmental tasks: Growth (roughly age 4 to 13), the first life stage, the period when children develop their
capacities, attitudes, interests, socialize their needs, and form a general understanding of the world of work. This stage includes four major career developmental tasks: becoming concerned about the future, increasing personal control over one’s own life, convincing oneself to achieve in school and at work, and acquiring competent work habits and
attitudes. Exploration (Ages 14-24) is the period when individuals attempt to understand themselves and find their place in the world of work.
Through classes, work experience, and hobbies, they try to identify their interests and capabilities and figure out how they fit with various occupations. They make tentative occupational choices and eventually obtain an occupation.
This stage involves three career development tasks. The first one, the crystallization of a career preference, is to develop and plan a tentative vocational goal.
The next task, the specification of a career preference, is to convert generalized preferences into a specific choice, a firm vocational goal. The third vocational task is implementation of a career preference by completing appropriate training and securing a position in the chosen occupation. Establishment stage (25-44 years) is the period when the
individual, having gained an appropriate position in the chosen field of work, strives to secure the initial position and pursue chances for further advancement. This stage involves three developmental tasks. The first task is stabilizing or securing one place in the organization by adapting to the organization’s requirements and performing job duties
satisfactorily. The next task is the consolidation of one’s position by manifesting positive work attitudes and productive habits along with building favorable coworker relations. The third task is to obtain advancement to new levels of responsibility. Maintenance (45-65) is the period of continual adjustment, which includes the career development tasks
of holding on, keeping up, and innovating. The individuals strive to maintain what they have achieved, and for this reason they update their competencies and find innovative ways of performing their job routines. They try also to find new challenges, but usually little new ground is broken in this period. Disengagement (over 65) is the final stage, the
period of transition out of the workforce. In this stage, individuals encounter the developmental tasks of deceleration, retirement planning, and retirement living. With a declined energy and interest in an occupation, people gradually disengage from their occupational activities and concentrate on retirement planning. In due course, they make a
transition to retirement living by facing the challenges of organizing new life patterns. Super’s model demarcates the stages both with age bounds and task markers. Originally, Super viewed the stages as chronological, but later he also acknowledged an age-independent, task-centered view of stages. For example, individuals embarking on a new
career in their middle adulthood might go through exploration and establishment stages. Thus the five stages spreading across one’s entire life span, or the “maxicycle,” might also be experienced as “minicycles” within each of the maxicycle stages. Individuals cycle and recycle throughout their life span as they adapt to their own internal changes or
to changed opportunities to which they are exposed. Super assumed that not everyone progresses through these stages at fixed ages or in the same manner. This notion led him to develop and elaborate on the construct of career maturity (initially called vocational maturity), which denotes the readiness of the individual to make career decisions.
Operationally, it is defined as the extent to which an individual has completed stage-appropriate career developmental tasks in comparison with other people of the same age. Super and his colleagues devoted much effort to define this construct and develop appropriate measures. They identified five primary dimensions of vocational maturity:
“planfulness” or awareness of the need to plan ahead, readiness for exploration, informational competence (comprising knowledge about work, occupations, and life career roles), decision-making skills, and reality orientation. Super believed that a young person should be mature enough to benefit from career assessment and counseling. In adults,
where recycling through career stages is less dependent on age, Super suggested that readiness for career decision making should be referred to as career adaptability. Phenomenological Perspective: The Notion Of Occupational Self-Concept In his account of vocational behavior, Super incorporated in his developmental perspective the idea that
people base their career decision on beliefs about their own abilities and other self-attributes. He saw career choice as the process of implementation of self-concepts, work role as a manifestation of selfhood, and career development as an active process of improving the match between one’s self-concept and the occupational environment.
Self-concept can be defined as the way the person sees herself or himself. For example, a young woman might believe that she is bright and creative, self-confident, spontaneous in behavior, and unwilling to assume responsibility. This composite of her beliefs about her own abilities, traits, and values make up her self-concept. Since the self-concept is
a subjective phenomenon or an appearance in experience, this perspective is often denoted as phenomenological. Super accepted the view that self-concept is central for understanding a person’s behavior. It is the product of the interaction of a person’s inherited characteristics, neural and endocrine makeup, opportunity to play various roles, and
resulting outcomes of role-playing success. Formation of self-concept begins in infancy when a sense of identity is developed. As they grow, individuals develop a personal image of their own abilities, personality traits, values, and roles. They then compare this subjective picture of themselves with what they get to know about the world’s occupations,
and they then try to translate their self-concept into an occupational perspective.
The outcome is the occupational self-concept, defined by Super as a constellation of self-attributes that are vocationally relevant for the individual. The occupational self-concept eventually may transform into a vocational preference. Super believed that the career development process can be guided, among others, by aiding subjects to develop and
accept their occupational self-concepts. Thus the process of career choosing and development is basically that of developing and implementing a self-concept.
The degree of satisfaction people attain from the work role is, according to Super, proportional to the degree to which they have been successful in their endeavor to implement self-concepts. This endeavor, however, requires a continuous personal adjustment; self-concepts develop and change throughout people’s lives as does also their living and
working environments. This makes the career choice and adjustment a continuous process. Contextual Perspective: Social Roles And Their Interaction Across The Life Span The third segment of Super’s theory brings forward a contextual perspective, that is, the view of career development in the context of all life roles enacted by an individual. The
work role, albeit of central importance for many people in our culture, is only one among many life roles that an individual occupies in his or her life. None of the roles can be properly understood without taking into account the whole constellation of roles. Already in his early theoretical writings, Super referred to work as a way of life and noted that
satisfactory vocational adjustment is possible only when both the nature of work and the way of life complement an individual’s aptitudes, interests, and values. However, this interdependency of various spheres of life is more completely addressed in Supers’ later writings, when he developed his life-span, life-space view to career development and
portrayed it graphically in his popular Life-Career Rainbow. Super conceives life space as a constellation of social functions arranged in a pattern of core and peripheral roles. People play a variety of roles during their life. Some of them begin early in the life course (e.g., that of child), others later (e.g., that of student), or still later (e.g., that of
pensioner). At some life stages, a number of simultaneous roles (e.g., that of worker, spouse, homemaker, parent, and citizen) may constitute an individual’s life structure. However, usually two or three roles are salient or relatively more important than others. The salient life roles constitute the core of a person; they are fundamental for the person’s
identity and essential for life satisfaction. The fact that people play several simultaneous roles means that roles interact and impact one another. The interaction among the roles can be supportive, supplementary, compensatory, or neutral. It can also be conflicting if some of the roles absorb too much of the available time and energy. As a matter of
fact, for most people the interpenetration of different spheres of life is inevitable in some life stages.
By combining the life space with the life-span or developmental perspective, the Rainbow model shows how the role constellation changes with life stages. As Super noted, life roles wax and wane over time. This simple account was indeed needed to clearly emphasize an all-too-often forgotten point—that peoples’ careers cannot be understood outside
of their social context. To fully understand an individual’s career, it is necessary to explore the whole web of his or her life roles. After all, according to a more recent view of Super’s, it is the constellation of role interactions that constitutes the career. Conclusion Perhaps the most important single idea of Super was his tenet that occupational choice
should be seen as an unfolding process. Interestingly enough, his theory building was also an unfolding process; he continued to augment and refine his theory throughout his life. Thus his theory also evolved through various stages that can be traced in their name modifications: from the original Career Development Theory to Developmental Self-
Concept Theory, and then to the currently prevailing Life-Span, Life-Space Theory. Super incorporated the ideas of many predecessors in his attempt to compile an integrative body of knowledge that comprises various perspectives on career development. The result was a comprehensive but also fragmental theoretical account. Super himself
admitted that disparate segments of his theory need to be cemented together more thoroughly. He hoped that this task will be eventually accomplished by future theorists. However, in spite of his reluctance to present a more parsimonious and coherent theoretical statement, his theorizing was most appealing. Together with his followers, he has had,
and continues to have, a major impact upon career development research and counseling. See also: References: Super, D. E. 1953. “Career Patterns as a Basis for Vocational Counseling.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 1:12-20. Super, D. E. 1953. “A Theory of Vocational Development.” American Psychologist 8:185-190. Super, D. E. 1957.
The Psychology of Careers. New York: Harper& Row. Super, D.
E. 1963. “Self-concepts in Vocational Development.” Pp. 1-16 in Career Development: Self-concept Theory, edited by D. E. Super, R. Starishevski, N. Matlin, and J. P. Jordaan. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. Super, D. E. 1963. “Toward Making Self-concept Theory Operational.” Pp. 17-31 in Career Development: Self-concept
Theory, edited by D. E. Super, R. Starishevski, N. Matlin, and J. P. Jordaan. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. Super, D. E. 1964. “A Developmental Approach to Vocational Guidance: Recent Theory and Results.” Vocational Guidance Quarterly 13:1-10. Super, D. E. 1980. “A Life-span, Life-space Approach to Career Development.”
Journal of Vocational Behavior 16:282-298. Super, D. E., Crites, J. O., Hummel, R. C., Moser, H. P., Overstreet, P. L. and Warnath, C. F. 1957. Vocational Development: A Framework for Research.
New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University. Super, D. E., Savickas, M. L. and Super, C. M. 1996. “The Life-span, Life-space Approach to Careers.” Pp. 121-178 in Career Choice and Development. 3d ed., edited by D. Brown, L. Brooks, and Associates. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Achebe, C. C. (1982). Assessing the
vocational maturity of students in the East Central State of Nigeria. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 20, 153–161.Article Google Scholar Alvi, S. A. & Khan, S. B. (1983). An investigation into the construct validity of Crites' career maturity model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 174–181.Article Google Scholar Ansell, E. M. & Hansen, J. C. (1971).
Patterns of vocational development in urban youth.
Journal of Counseling and Development, 18, 505–508.Article Google Scholar Baloyi, D. K. (1996). Career development in high schools: A systematic cross-cultural perspective. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Google Scholar Bernadelli, A., De Stefano, J. & Dumont, F. (1983). Occupational information-seeking as a
function of perception of locus of control and other personality variables. Canadian Counsellor, 17, 75–81. Google Scholar Brusoki, G. C., Golin, A. K., Gallagher, R. P. & Moore, M. (1993). Career group effects on career indecision, career maturity, and locus of control of undergraduate clients. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, 309–320.Article Google
Scholar Buros, O. K. (1978). Eighth mental measurements year book (Vol II). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press, reviews by Katz (p. 1562), Sorenson (p. 1567) and Zytowski (p. 1565). Google Scholar Cosby, A. G. & Picou, J.
S. (1973). Structural models and occupational aspirations: Blackwhite variations among deep-south adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3, 1–14.Article Google Scholar Creed, P. & Patton, W. (2000). The effect of paid work experience on the career maturity of high school students. Manuscript submitted for publication.Crites, J. O. (1965).
Measurement of vocational maturity in adolescence: I: Attitude scale of the Vocational Development Inventory. Psychological Monographs, 79 (2, Whole No. 595).Crites, J. O. (1978). Theory and research handbook for the Career Maturity Inventory (2nd. ed.). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar Crites, J. O. & Savickas, M. L. (1995).
Career Maturity Inventory: Source book. Clayton, NY: Careerware.
Google Scholar Fouad, N. A. (1988). The construct of career maturity in the United States and Israel.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 49–59.Article Google Scholar Gupta, N. (1987). Career maturity: A function of grade and sex. Indian Psychologist, 4, 19–31. Google Scholar Hartman, B. W., Fuqua, D. R. & Hartman, P. T. (1983). The predictive potential of the Career Decision Scale in identifying chronic indecision. The Vocational Guidance
Quarterly, 32, 103–108.Article Google Scholar Healy, C. C., O'shea, D.
& Crook, R. C. (1985).
Relation of career attitudes to age and career progress during college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 239–244.Article Google Scholar Healy, C. C., Mitchell, J. M. & Mourton, D. L. (1987). Age and grade differences in career development among community college students. The Review of Higher Education, 10, 247–258.Article Google
Scholar Herr, E. L. & Enderlein, T. E. (1976). Vocational maturity: The effects of school, grade, curriculum and sex. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 8, 227–238.Article Google Scholar Hickson, J.
& White, E. (1989). Career maturity development in black South African adolescents: Implications for vocational counselling. South African Journal of Education, 9, 77–81. Google Scholar Jackson, G. C.
(1992).
The career development of high-risk college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, USA (DAI 53, 3120-A). Google Scholar Jordaan, J. P. & Heyde, M. B. (1979). Vocational maturity during the high school years. New York: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar Kelly, K. R. & Colangelo, N. (1990). Effects of
academic ability and gender on career development.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 168–175.Article Google Scholar Khan, S. B.
& Alvi, S. A. (1983). Educational, social and psychological correlates of vocational maturity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 357–364.Article Google Scholar King, S. (1989). Sex differences in a causal model of career maturity. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 208–215.Article Google Scholar Langley, R. (1990). Career Development
Questionnaire (CDQ) manual. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council. Google Scholar Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.Article Google Scholar Levy, B.
(1987). A longitudinal study of vocational maturity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Google Scholar Lokan, J. (1977). Locus of control in relation to Super's theory of vocational maturity during adolescence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, Canada. Google Scholar Lokan, J. (1984).
Manual of the Career Development Inventory — Australian Edition. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. Google Scholar Lokan, J. J., Boss, M. W. & Patsula, P. J. (1982). A study of vocational maturity during adolescence and locus of control. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 20, 331–342.Article Google Scholar Lokan, J. J. & Biggs, J.
B. (1982). Student characteristics and motivational and process factors in relation to styles of career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 1–16.Article Google Scholar Lokan, J. J. & Shears, M. J. (1995). Studies of work importance in Australia. In D. E. Super & B. Sverko (Eds.), Life roles, values and careers: International findings of the
work importance study (pp. 77–99). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar Loughhead, T. A., Liu, S. & Middleton, E. B. (1995). Career development for at risk youth: A program evaluation. The Career Development Quarterly, 43, 274–291.Article Google Scholar Loughlin, C. A. & Barling, J. (1998). Teenagers' part-time employment and their work-related attitudes and aspirations. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 19, 197–207.Article Google Scholar Luzzo, D. A. (1993). Predicting the career maturity of undergraduates: A comparison of personal, educational, and psychological factors. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 271–275.
Google Scholar Luzzo, D. A. (1995). The relationship between career aspiration-current occupation congruence and the career maturity of undergraduates. Journal of Employment Counseling, 32, 132–140.Article Google Scholar Luzzo, D. A., McWhirter, E. H.& Hutcheson, K.G. (1997). Evaluating career decision-making factors associated with
employment among first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 38(2), 166–172. Google Scholar Luzzo, D. A. & Jenkins-Smith, A. (1998). Development and initial validation of the Assessment of Attributions for Career Decision Making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 224–245.Article Google Scholar Moracco, J. C. (1976).
Vocational maturity of Arab and American high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 8, 367–373.Article Google Scholar Naidoo, A. V., Bowman, S. L. & Gerstein. L.
H.
(1998). Demographics, causality, work salience, and the career maturity of African-American students: A causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 15–27.Article Google Scholar Neely, M. A. & Johnson, C. W. (1981). The relationship of performance on six scales of the Career Development Inventory to sex, father's education, and father's
occupation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 917–921.Article Google Scholar Neice, D. E. & Bradley, R.W. (1979). Relationship of age, sex and educational group to career decisiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 271–278.Article Google Scholar Nevill, D. D. & Super, D. E. (1986). The Salience Inventory: Theory, application
and research (Manual). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar Nevill, D. D. & Super, D. E. (1988). Career maturity and commitment to work in university students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 139–151.Article Google Scholar Niles, S.G. (1998). Special section introduction: Time and timing in career development. The
Career Development Quarterly, 47(1), 4–5.Article Google Scholar Niles, S. & Herr, E. L. (1989). Using secondary school behaviors to predict career behaviors in young adulthood: Does “success” breed “success”?
The Career Development Quarterly, 32, 345–355.Article Google Scholar Niles, S. G.
& Goodnough, G. E. (1996). Life-role salience and values: A review of recent research. The Career Development Quarterly, 45, 65–86.Article Google Scholar Patton,W. & Creed, P. (in press). Developmental issues in career maturity and career decision status. The Career Development Quarterly.Ponterotto, J. G. & Casas, J. M. (1991). Handbook of
racial/ethnic minority counseling research. Springfield, Il: Charles C Thomas. Google Scholar Post-Kammer, P. (1987). Intrinsic and extrinsic work values and career maturity of 9th and 11th grade boys and girls. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, 420–423.Article Google Scholar Powell, D. F. & Luzzo, D. A. (1998). Evaluating factors
associated with the career maturity of high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 47, 145–149.Article Google Scholar Raskin, P.
M. (1998). Career maturity: The construct's validity, vitality, and viability. The Career Development Quarterly, 47, 32–35.Article Google Scholar Reid-Van Niekerk, H. H. & Van Niekerk, E. C. (1990). Career maturity of black, coloured and white university students.
Journal of Industrial Psychology, 16, 1–4. Google Scholar Rogers, W. B. & Westbrook, B. W. (1983). Measuring career indecision among college students: Toward a valid approach for counseling practitioners and researchers. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 16, 78–85. Google Scholar Rojewski, J. W. (1994). Predicting career maturity
attitudes in rural economically disadvantaged youth. Journal of Career Development, 2, 49–61.Article Google Scholar Rojewski, J. W., Wicklein, R. C. & Schell, J. W.
(1995). Effects of gender and academic risk behaviour on the career maturity of rural youth. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 11, 92–104. Google Scholar Schmitt-Rodermund, E. & Silbereisen, R. K. (1998). Career maturity determinants: Individual development, social context, and historical time. The Career Development Quarterly, 47, 16–
31.Article Google Scholar Sheridan, B. (1981). Career development in adolescents: Its relationship to orientation to work and locus of control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia, Perth. Google Scholar Stead, G. B. & Watson, M. B. (1998). The appropriateness of Super's career theory among Black South Africans.
South African Journal of Psychology, 28, 40–43.Article Google Scholar Super, D.
E. (1955). Dimensions and measurement of vocational maturity. Teachers College Record, 57, 151–165. Google Scholar Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13, 282–298.Article Google Scholar Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D.
Brown & L. Brooks (eds.), Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (2nd ed., pp. 197–262).
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar Super, D. E. & Forrest, D.
J. (1972). Career Development Inventory Form I: Preliminary Manual. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Google Scholar Super, D. E. & Nevill, D. D. (1984). Work role salience as a determinant of career maturity in high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 25, 30–44.Article Google Scholar Super, D. E., Thompson, A. S.,
Lindeman, R. H., Jordaan, J.-P. & Myers, R. A. (1981). Career Development Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar Super, D. E., Thompson, A. S. & Lindeman, R. H. (1988). Adult Career Concerns Inventory: Manual for research and exploratory use in counselling. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google
Scholar Super, D. E. & B. Šverko (eds). (1995). Life roles, values and careers: International findings of the work importance study. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar Super, D. E., Savickas, M. L.
& Super, C. M. (1996). The life-span, life-space approach to careers. In D.
Brown, L. Brooks & Associates (eds.), Career choice and development (3rd ed., pp. 121–178). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar Thomas, H.
B. (1974, April). The effects of sex, occupational choice and career development responsibility on the career maturity of ninth-grade students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Thompson, A. S. & Lindeman, R. H. (1981). Career Development Inventory, Volume 1: Users' manual.
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar Thompson, A.S. & Lindeman, R. H. (1984). Career Development Inventory, Volume 2: Technical manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar Tilden, A. J. (Jr) (1978). Is there a monotonic criterion for measures of vocational maturity in college students? Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 12, 43–52.Article Google Scholar Trice, A. D., Haire, J. R. & Elliott, K. A. (1989). A career locus of control scale for undergraduate students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 555–561.Article Google Scholar Vondracek, F.W., Lerner, R.M. & Schulenberg, J. E. (1986). Career development: A life-span developmental approach.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar Vondracek, F. W. & Reitzle, M.
(1998). The viability of career maturity: A developmental-contextual perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 47, 6–15.Article Google Scholar Wallace-Broscious, A., Serafica, F. C. & Osipow, S. H.
(1994). Adolescent career development: Relationships to self-concept and identity status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4(1), 127–149.Article Google Scholar Ward, R. (1981). The use of the Career Development Inventory in Britain. Cambridge: National Institute for Careers Education and Counselling. Google Scholar Watson, M. B. (1984).
Career development of coloured high school pupils. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Google Scholar Watson, M.
B. & Van Aarde, J. A. (1986). Attitudinal career maturity of South African colored high school pupils. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29, 7–16.Article Google Scholar Watson, M. B., Stead, G. B. & De Jager, A. C. (1995). The career development of black and white South African university students. International Journal for the Advancement of
Counselling, 18, 39–47.Article Google Scholar Westbrook, B. W., Cutts, C.
C., Madison, S. S. & Arcia, M. A. (1980). The validity of Crites' model of career maturity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 249–281.Article Google Scholar Westbrook, B.
W. (1984). Career maturity: The concept, the instruments, and the research. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 263–303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar Williams, C. P.& Savickas,M. L.
(1990). Developmental tasks of career maintenance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 166–175.Article Google Scholar