Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AATCC 193 - Water Repellent Test
AATCC 193 - Water Repellent Test
mentioned in this test method. Users of this test method are expressly advised that determination of the validity
of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This test method is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed
every five years and if not revised, either reaffirmed or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for
revision of this test method or for additional methods and should be addressed to the AATCC Technical
Center. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee,
which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing, you should make your
views known to Amy G. Hammonds, Laboratory Director, at the address shown below.
This test method is copyrighted by AATCC, PO Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA.
Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this method may be obtained by contacting AATCC at the
above address or tel: 919-549-3526; fax: 919-549-8933, or e-mail: orders@aatcc.org.
AATCC License Agreement: This test method is copyrighted by the American Association of Textile Chemists
and Colorists (AATCC), PO Box 12215, 1 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC USA. All rights reserved.
AATCC grants you a license as follows: The right to download an electronic file of this AATCC test method
for temporary storage on one computer for purposes of viewing, and/or printing one copy of the AATCC test
method for individual use. Neither the electronic file nor the hard copy print may be reproduced in any way.
In addition, the electronic file may not be distributed elsewhere over computer networks or otherwise. The
hard copy print may only be distributed to other employees for their internal use within your organization.
This test method is not for resale.
AATCC Test Method 193-2005
obvious. However, some fabrics will different from either of the first two, re- ponents of variance in 11.2, two observa-
show progressive wetting under several port the median value. For example, if the tions should be considered significantly
test liquids as evidenced by a partial first two grades are 3.0 and 4.0 and the different at the 95% probability level if
darkening of the fabric at the liquid- third determination is a 4.5 value, report the difference equals or exceeds the criti-
fabric interface (see Fig. 1, Examples B, the median value of 4.0. Report the aque- cal differences shown in Table II.
C and D). For such fabrics, the point of ous solution repellency grade to the near- 11.4 Bias. The true value of the aque-
failure is considered to be that test liquid est 0.5 value (see Fig. 1 and 9.3). ous solution repellency grade can only be
which exhibits complete darkening of the defined in terms of this test method.
interface or any wicking within 10 ± 2 s. 11. Precision and Bias Within this limitation, this test method
9.3 A failure occurs when two (or has no known bias.
more) of the three drops applied from a 11.1 Summary. Intralaboratory tests
given test liquid show complete wetting were conducted in November 2002 and
(Fig. 1[D]) or wicking with loss of con- January 2003 to establish the precision of
tact angle (Fig. 1[C]). A pass occurs if this test method. Both intralab testings in- Table II—Critical Differencesa
two (or more) of the three drops applied volved two participants in one laboratory
show clear well rounded appearance with rating two specimens of each of seven No. of Single Within
Observationsb Operator Laboratory
high contact angle (Fig. 1[A]). The grade fabrics each day for three days. The
is expressed as the integer value of the grades of these intralabs use the scale 1 0.50 0.79
pass test liquid immediately prior to the from 1-10. All materials necessary for the 2 0.18 0.59
fail test liquid. A borderline pass occurs intralabs were provided by customer fab- 3 0.15 0.48
if two (or more) of the three drops ap- ric trials and were processed at two finish
plied show the rounded drop with partial load levels. The fabrics used included a
The critical differences were calculated using t –
darkening of the test specimen (Fig. nylon, polyester, cotton and polyester/ 1.950, which is based on infinite degrees of
1[B]). The grade is expressed to the near- cotton materials. The unit of measure was freedom.
est 0.5 value determined by subtracting the median of the grades of the two (or b
An observation is a unit of measure obtained
one-half from the number of the border- three) specimens rated each day. from the median of the grades for 2 (or 3)
line pass test liquid. specimens.
11.2 The components of variance as
standard deviations of the aqueous solu-
10. Report tion repellency grade were calculated as
shown in Table I.
10.1 The aqueous solution repellency Table III—Mean Values from
grade should be measured on two sepa- Testing of Specimens
rate specimens. If the two grades agree, Table I—Components of Variance
report the value. When the two grades are Table for Alcohol/water test Finish load level
not in agreement, a third determination Fabric Low High
should be made. Report the grade of the Single operator 0.26
Cotton 3.5 5.5
third determination if that value is the Between operator/within laboratories 0.43
Polyester 7.5
same as either of the first two determina- Cotton/Polyester 1.5 2.5
tions. When the third determination is 11.3 Critical differences. For the com- Nylon 6 8
*N = dynes/cm at 25°C
12. Notes transfer the test liquids from stock solutions to face tension of the liquids should be checked
dropping bottles; each marked with the appro- every month or the liquids in the dropper
12.1 Available from Publications Office, priate AATCC Aqueous Solution Repellency bottles should be replaced every month from
ACGIH, Kemper Woods Center, 1330 Grade number. A typical system found useful a sealed stock solution bottle since the iso-
Kemper Meadow Dr., Cincinnati OH 45240; consists of 60 mL dropping bottles with propyl alcohol concentration decrease due to
tel: 513/742-2020. ground-in pipettes and Neoprene bulbs. Prior evaporation.
12.2 Test Liquids 1-8 are available from to use the bulbs should be soaked in heptane 12.4 Available from AATCC, P.O. Box
CBM Group of N.C. Inc., 1308 N. Ellis Ave., for several hours and then rinsed in fresh hep- 12215, Research Triangle Park NC 27709; tel:
Dunn NC 28334; tel: 910/892-8985; fax: tane to remove soluble substances. It has been 919/ 549-8141; fax: 919/549-8933; e-mail: or-
910/892-5701; or Textile Innovators Corp., found helpful to place the test liquids in se- ders@ aatcc.org.
div. of SDL Atlas, P.O. Box 8, Windsor quential order in a wooden platform on the 12.5 Isopropyl alcohol is available from
NC 27983; tel: 252/794-9703; fax: 252/794- grading table. NOTE: Ratio of test liquids any chemical vendor such as Aldrich, P.O.
9704. does affect surface tension of the liquid. Use Box 355, Milwaukee WI 53201; tel: 800/
12.3 For convenience, it is desirable to only analytical grades of test liquids. The sur- 558-9160.