19/stat.

32/1

Ing. Milan Svoboda

U Sv. Anny 521
391 56 Tábor-Měšice
ID No.: 18302289

Design Structural Analysis

Order number ................................................................ 19/stat.32 2019-08-26

Author: ing. V. Chobot, Tábor, Buzulucká 2332
Authorized Civil Engineer, ČKAIT 0101501
Compiled for: ALBIXON a.s. Cintlovka 535, 268 01 Hořovice

Volume content:

Technical report ....................................... pp. 2-3

Drawings of the structure 1 ..................... p. 4
Calculation model ......................................... p. 5
Structural analysis of KZS 1 ................... pp. 6-9
Structural analysis of KZS 2 ................... pp. 10-13
Conclusion ............................................. p. 14
 19/stat.32/2

Technical report:
Assessment of the stability of the “Casablanca infinity L+ 118°” skeleton enclosure structure made of aluminium
profiles according to EN AW 6063. The enclosure will be installed on the outside. Climate load specified by the
customer: Snow of 0.35 kNm-2, wind with a reference pressure corresponding to 120 km/h. The shape of the
skeleton structure is specified according to the attached drawing. The structure will be provided with a lightweight
enclosure made of organic glass panels with an adjustable shape, 4-6 mm, or polycarbonate honeycomb panels.
The structure will be anchored to a travel rail in the bases of the arches.
Assessed loading conditions:
ZS 1. Self-weight load of 0.167 t, including enclosure panels.
ZS 2. Vertical surface snow load of 0.35 kNm-2.
ZS 3. Horizontal enclosure surface loading by wind v ref = 33.33 ms-1; γair= 1.29 e-3 tm-3; h<4 m); pressure of 0.22
kNm-2; suction of 0.11 kNm-2.
Computation load combinations:
Combination of enclosure load KZS 1 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2; snow load.
combination of enclosure load KZS 2 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2 + ZS 3 super position of snow and wind load
Standard references:
Publication date: March 1, 2010
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural
components.
EN 1090-1:2010/Z1 (732601), Date of issue: September 1, 2010 *Amendment
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural
components.
EN 1090-3 (732601), Date of issue: March 1, 2009
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 3: Technical requirements for aluminium structures.
EN 1991-1-3 (730035), Date of issue: June 1, 2005
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Correction 1 (730035), Date of issue: February 1, 2010 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z1 (730035), Date of issue: October 1, 2006 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z2 (730035), Date of issue: February 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z3 (730035), Date of issue: March 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-4 (730035), Date of issue: April 1, 2007
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/A1 (730035), Date of issue: October 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 1 (730035), Date of issue: September 1, 2008 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 2 (730035), Date of issue: May 1, 2010 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 3 (730035), Date of issue: January 1, 2011 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Z1 (730035), Date of issue: March 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.

List of materials specified and used:

E1, E2 [MPa] Modules of elasticity (E2 only for orthotropic material)
ni Poisson effect
Gamma [t/m3] Bulk density
K1, K2 [kN/m3] Coefficients of thermal expansion
Attenuation Decrement of attenuation

Material Type E1 ni Gamma K 1 E2 K2 Attenuation

[MPa] [t/m3] [kN/m3] [MPa] [kN/m3]
Aluminium STEEL 72000.000 0.330 2.700 2.340e-05 0.010
PC 1000 OTHER 2400.000 0.360 1.200 6.500e-06

Material Volume Weight

[mm3] [t]
Aluminium 2.466e+07 0.067
PC 1000 8.400e+07 0.101
Total 0.167

List of cross-sections:

Iy, Iz [mm4] Main moments of inertia

 19/stat.32/3

Ik [mm4] Moment of stiffness in simple twist

Beta y, beta z Shear stiffness coefficients
P Full cross-section
S Combined
D Partial

Cross-section Type Material Area Iy Iz Ik beta y beta z

[m2] [m4] [m4] [m4]
12669 S 5.465e-04 1.066e-07 1.527e-07 8.599e-09 0.590 0.599
12677 S 0.862e-04 1.813e+05 3.703e+05 25022.185 0.734 0.390
12665 S 1.310e-04 1.598e-08 7.640e-09 3.122e-10 0.482 0.525
12664 S 3.277e-04 5.758e-08 4.807e-08 2.728e-09 0.711 0.415
12670 S 8.060e-04 3.609e-07 1.580e-07 2.033e-08 0.573 0.824

Units used:
Geometry – length mm Deformation – displacements mm
Geometry – angles deg Deformation – rotation deg
Cross-sections – length mm Time s
Loading, results – forces kN Temperature °C
Loading, results – voltage MPa Mass t
Loading, results – length mm

Comparative calculation values for material according to EN AW 6063 (AlMgSi)

The determination of the significance class of the building for its service life is 25 years according to EN 1991-1.
Minimum tensile strength 245 MPa
Minimum yield strength RP 0.2 200 MPa

Derived comparative tension for EN AW 6063 σ = 149.3 MPa

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 polycarbonate σ = 142 MPa

 19/stat.32/4

POPIS POSLEDNÍ ZMĚNY INDEXU DESCRIPTION OF LATEST INDEX CHANGE

 19/stat.32/5

TOLEROVANÍ ISO 8015 TOLERANCE ISO 8015

VŠEOBECNÉ TOLERANCE ISO 2768 mK GENERAL TOLERANCES ISO 2768 mK
HMOTNOST (kg) WEIGHT (kg)
FORMÁT FORMAT
MĚŘÍTKO SCALE
KRESLIL DRAWN BY
DATUM DATE
MATERIÁL MATERIAL
POLOTOVAR INTERMEDIATE
Montážní sestava Mounting assembly
OP OP
INDEX INDEX
NÁZEV TITLE
VÝKRES DRAWING
LIST SHEET
 19/stat.32/6

Rod elements and surfaces

Prut Rod
Polygon Polygon
 19/stat.32/7

Assessment of the structure Snow load on the roof KZS 1 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2

The results of the entire assessment of the structure – internal forces, all rods, total limits for the module

Derived comparative tension for EN AW 6063 σ = 149.3 MPa

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 polycarbonate σ = 142 MPa

Loading scheme KZS 1:

Results of assessment – internal forces, all rods, selected results, total limits
Mx, My, Mz [kNm] Bending moments on axes
Nx, Qy, Qz [kN] Normal and shear forces on axes
Sig.min, Sig.max [MPa] Tension on outer fibres

Rod Position My Nx Qz Sig.min Sig.max

[mm] [kNm] [kN] [kN] [MPa] [MPa]
Rod561 409.176 -0.606 -0.016 -0.057 -95.985 64.399
Rod569 0.000 0.858 -1.284 -0.488 -93.367 135.137
Rod554 0.000 -1.653e-03 -1.550 0.444 -2.089 -1.595
Rod580 0.000 -0.285 0.855 0.196 -52.024 55.452
Rod555 0.000 0.855 -0.780 -0.925 -92.426 135.192
Rod568 441.780 0.858 -0.778 0.926 -92.761 135.698
Rod553 0.000 0.497 -0.747 -0.284 -97.443 94.469
Rod590 800.000 -1.213e-03 0.227 0.024 0.499 2.911
Rod569 1823.770 -1.635e-03 -1.549 -0.446 -2.085 -1.596
Rod568 441.780 0.858 -0.778 0.926 -92.761 135.698
The design is compliant; the comparative tension is not reached.
Results of the assessment – deformation, all rods, selected results, total limits
Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Rod Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Rod554 1418.623 -31.801 -2.207e-03 2.749 31.919
Rod569 405.282 32.354 -2.212e-03 2.762 32.472
Rod552 441.780 27.707 -0.101 2.348 27.806
Rod584 441.780 27.720 0.119 2.349 27.820
Rod586 600.000 0.342 0.020 -108.517 108.518
Rod569 405.282 32.354 -2.212e-03 2.762 32.472
Rod586 600.000 0.342 0.020 -108.517 108.518
The ratio of max. deflection and assessed structure span of 6000 mm is 1: 55
 19/stat.32/8

The curve of tension and deflection on the structure:

 19/stat.32/9

Results of the assessment – internal forces, all surfaces, panels.

sx, sy, sxy, sef [MPa] Tension on local axes

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 142 MPa

Limits for result: KZS1 snow

Area Node Position sef sef sef

top centreline bottom
[mm] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
Polygon1 3422 6040.000, 1200.000, 0.000 0.024 0.076 0.147
Polygon2 2929 5474.000, 1100.00, 1984.000 3.277 1.062 1.308
Polygon1 2895 5952.611, 1865.628, 101.375 0.298 0.024 0.307
Polygon2 2943 5676.836, 1205.265, 190.180 0.739 1.072 1.459
Polygon32 79 0.000, 1100.000, 0.000 0.090 0.066 0.043
Polygon19 2504 5065.000, 1700.00, 2125.000 2.124 0.617 3.293
Isolines of tension in panels:
 19/stat.32/10

Results of the assessment – transformation, all surfaces, panels.

Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes

Utotal [mm] Total displacements

Limits for result: KZS1 snow

Area Node Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal

[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Polygon32 508 123.667, 1100.000, 1413.222 -31.801 -2.207e-03 2.749 31.919
Polygon1 2760 5898.211, 1599.16, 1640.960 32.397 0.025 2.776 32.515
Polygon1 3290 5883.000, 100.00, 1817.000 27.803 -0.111 2.359 27.903
Polygon1 2701 5883.000, 2200.00, 1817.000 27.720 0.119 2.349 27.820
Polygon24 1740 3180.446, 1679.73, 2429.293 0.280 0.022 -109.722 109.722
Polygon1 2760 5898.211, 1599.16, 1640.960 32.397 0.025 2.776 32.515
Polygon25 1567 2853.568, 1715.32, 2429.117 0.406 0.024 -109.722 109.722

Isolines of transformation in panels:

 19/stat.32/11

Structure assessment Enclosure loading by load superposition KZS 2 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2 + ZS 3

The results of the entire assessment of the structure – internal forces, all rods, total limits for the module
Derived comparative voltage for calculated effective values for Al σ = 149.3 MPa
Loading scheme KZS 3:

Results of assessment – internal forces, all rods, selected results, total limits
Sig.min, Sig.max [MPa] Tension on outer fibres
Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 149.3 MPa
Limits for result: KZS2 - loading superposition
[mm] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
Rod Position My Nx Qz Sig.min Sig.max
[mm] [kNm] [kN] [kN] [MPa] [MPa]
Rod561 409.176 -0.598 -0.036 -0.102 -94.834 63.587
Rod554 1823.944 0.980 -1.338 0.515 -106.416 149.384
Rod554 0.000 3.291e-04 -1.587 0.547 -1.909 -1.768
Rod568 441.780 0.721 -0.777 0.867 -78.087 113.878
Rod1 1823.944 0.570 -0.784 0.305 -111.163 107.999
Rod557 338.687 1.506e-03 0.668 -0.625 0.612 1.011
Rod554 0.000 3.291e-04 -1.587 0.547 -1.909 -1.768
Rod555 0.000 0.980 -0.824 -0.962 -105.799 149.951
The design is compliant; comparative tension not exceeded.
Results of the assessment – deformation, all rods, selected results, total limits
Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition
Rod Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Rod554 1621.283 -58.597 -2.421e-03 5.088 58.818
Rod569 810.565 8.070 -1.047e-03 0.674 8.098
Rod1 1823.944 -57.166 -0.106 4.955 57.381
Rod570 1823.944 -57.179 0.127 4.955 57.393
Rod562 102.294 -31.197 0.013 -107.128 111.578
Rod554 1621.283 -58.597 -2.421e-03 5.088 58.818
Rod562 102.294 -31.197 0.013 -107.128 111.578
The ratio of max. deflection and assessed structure span of 6000 mm is 1: 54
 19/stat.32/12

The curve of tension and deflection from KZS 2:

 19/stat.32/13

Results of the assessment – internal forces, all surfaces, panels.

sx, sy, sxy, sef [MPa] Tension on local axes
Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 140 MPa
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition

Area Node Position sef sef sef

top centreline bottom
[mm] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
Polygon20 2794 5065.000, 1100.000, 2125.000 0.035 0.062 0.157
Polygon1 3262 5961.500, 1100.000, 908.500 4.655 0.062 4.597
Polygon32 291 88.590, 1860.989, 1012.374 0.298 0.021 0.302
Polygon31 689 363.734, 1206.620, 1900.801 0.797 1.100 1.459
Polygon32 7 0.000, 2100.000, 0.000 0.148 0.086 0.025
Polygon1 3262 5961.500, 1100.000, 908.500 4.655 0.062 4.597

Isolines of tension in panels from KZS 2:

 19/stat.32/14

Results of the assessment – transformation, all surfaces, panels.

Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition
Area Node Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Polygon32 468 135.775, 1650.401, 1551.591 -64.435 0.027 5.618 64.679
Polygon1 3258 5952.778, 1100.00, 1009.444 8.070 -1.047e-03 0.674 8.098
Polygon31 617 159.000, 100.000, 1817.000 -57.266 -0.116 4.967 57.481
Polygon31 550 159.000, 2200.000, 1817.000 -57.179 0.127 4.955 57.393
Polygon24 1829 3197.068, 600.351, 2428.805 -31.281 8.165e-03 -109.075 113.472
Polygon32 468 135.775, 1650.401, 1551.591 -64.435 0.027 5.618 64.679
Polygon24 1829 3197.068, 600.351, 2428.805 -31.281 8.165e-03 -109.075 113.472

Isolines of transformation in panels from KZS 2:

 19/stat.32/15

Conclusion:
The assessment has shown that the Casablanca Infinity L+ 118° enclosure structure is compliant for snow load in
combination with KZS 1 specified in the technical report as ZS 2 = 0.35 kNm-2 and wind load for the reference speed
of 120 km/h-1 (3.33 m.s-1) ZS 3 = pressure 0.22 kNm-2; suction 0.11 kNm-2, at the stated superpositions KZS 1; KZS
2 and for the load combination, which is a superposition of the loading conditions ZS1 + ZS2 + ZS3. On the basis
of the assessment of stability, for the first shape of buckling, the critical coefficient of linear stability K = 2.61 > 2. It
has been shown that the designed structure of the enclosure meets the mechanical requirements for the limit
strength, usability limit and planned life of 2.19*105 hours according to EN 1991-1 and additional standards, and
decrees specifying technical requirements for structures 268/09 Coll. as amended by Decree 20/12 Coll. Section 9
Mechanical Resistance and Stability.
It has been proved by the assessment that the structure cannot collapse, as neither of its parts reaches the limits
of comparative tension.
There is no unacceptable transformation of the structure, as was demonstrated by the previous assessment. There
is no risk of damage to other parts of the building or its technical facilities and equipment that is installed as a result
of unacceptable transformation.
Damage, in the case of a disproportionate extent in relation to the cause, is eliminated by the calculated degree of
safety of Sb 2 for the main structures.