19/stat.

30/1

Ing. Milan Svoboda

U Sv. Anny 521
391 56 Tábor-Měšice
ID No.: 18302289

Design Structural Analysis

Order number ................................................................ 19/stat.30 2019-08-20

Author: ing. V. Chobot, Tábor, Buzulucká 2332
Authorized Civil Engineer, ČKAIT 0101501
Compiled for: ALBIXON a.s. Cintlovka 535, 268 01 Hořovice

Volume content:

Technical report ....................................... pp. 2-3

Drawings of the structure 1 and 2 ............ pp. 4-5
Calculation model ......................................... p. 6
Structural analysis of KZS 1 .................. pp. 7-10
Structural analysis of KZS 2 .................. pp. 11-14
Conclusion ........................................... p. 15
 19/stat.30/2

Technical report:
Assessment of the stability of the “Casablanca infinity L+ 110°” skeleton enclosure structure made of aluminium
profiles according to EN AW 6063. The enclosure will be installed on the outside. Climate load specified by the
customer: snow of 0.65 kNm-2, wind with a reference pressure corresponding to 120 km/h. The shape of the skeleton
structure is specified according to the attached drawing. The structure will be provided with a lightweight enclosure
made of organic glass panels with an adjustable shape, 4-6 mm, or polycarbonate honeycomb panels. The structure
will be anchored to a travel rail in the bases of the arches.
Assessed loading conditions:
ZS 1. Self-weight load of 0.129 t, including enclosure panels.
ZS 2. Vertical surface snow load of 0.55 kNm-2.
ZS 3. Horizontal enclosure surface loading by wind v ref = 33.33 ms-1; γair= 1.29 e-3 tm-3; h<4 m); pressure of 0.22
kNm-2; suction of 0.11 kNm-2.
Computation load combinations:
Combination of enclosure load KZS 1 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2; snow load of 0.55 kNm-2.
combination of enclosure load KZS 2 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2 + ZS 3 super position of snow and wind load
Standard references:
Publication date: March 1, 2010
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural
components.
EN 1090-1:2010/Z1 (732601), Date of issue: September 1, 2010 *Amendment
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural
components.
EN 1090-3 (732601), Date of issue: March 1, 2009
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 3: Technical requirements for aluminium structures.
EN 1991-1-3 (730035), Date of issue: June 1, 2005
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Correction 1 (730035), Date of issue: February 1, 2010 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z1 (730035), Date of issue: October 1, 2006 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z2 (730035), Date of issue: February 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z3 (730035), Date of issue: March 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-4 (730035), Date of issue: April 1, 2007
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/A1 (730035), Date of issue: October 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 1 (730035), Date of issue: September 1, 2008 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 2 (730035), Date of issue: May 1, 2010 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 3 (730035), Date of issue: January 1, 2011 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Z1 (730035), Date of issue: March 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.

List of materials specified and used:

E1, E2 [MPa] Modules of elasticity (E2 only for orthotropic material)
ni Poisson effect
Gamma [t/m3] Bulk density
K1, K2 [kN/m3] Coefficients of thermal expansion
Attenuation Decrement of attenuation

Material Type E1 ni Gamma K 1 E2 K2 Attenuation

[MPa] [t/m3] [kN/m3] [MPa] [kN/m3]
Aluminium STEEL 72000.000 0.330 2.700 2.340e-05 0.010
PC 1000 OTHER 2400.000 0.360 1.200 6.500e-06

Material Volume Weight

[mm3] [t]
Aluminium 1.994e+07 0.054
PC 1000 6.261e+07 0.075
Total 0.129

List of cross-sections:

Iy, Iz [mm4] Main moments of inertia

Ik [mm4] Moment of stiffness in simple twist
 19/stat.30/3

Beta y, beta z Shear stiffness coefficients

P Full cross-section
S Combined
D Partial

Cross-
section Type Material Area Iy Iz Ik beta y beta z
[m2] [m4] [m4] [m4]
12669 S 5.465e-04 1.066e-07 1.527e-07 8.599e-09 0.590 0.599
12677 S 0.862e-04 1.813e+05 3.703e+05 25022.185 0.734 0.390
12665 S 1.310e-04 1.598e-08 7.640e-09 3.122e-10 0.482 0.525
12664 S 3.277e-04 5.758e-08 4.807e-08 2.728e-09 0.711 0.415
12670 S 8.060e-04 3.609e-07 1.580e-07 2.033e-08 0.573 0.824

Units used:
Geometry – length mm Deformation – displacements mm
Geometry – angles deg Deformation – rotation deg
Cross-sections – length mm Time s
Loading, results – forces kN Temperature °C
Loading, results – voltage MPa Mass t
Loading, results – length mm

Comparative calculation values for material according to EN AW 6063 (AlMgSi)

The determination of the significance class of the building for its service life according to EN 1991-1 is 25 years.
Minimum tensile strength 245 MPa
Minimum yield strength RP 0.2 200 MPa

Derived comparative tension for EN AW 6063 σ = 149.3 MPa

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 polycarbonate σ = 142 MPa

 19/stat.30/4

ROZMÍSTĚNÍ VZPĚR A DĚLÍCÍHO PROFILU LAYOUT OF STRUTS AND DIVIDING PROFILE

PROFIL PROFILE
 19/stat.30/5

POPIS POSLEDNÍ ZMĚNY INDEXU DESCRIPTION OF LATEST INDEX CHANGE

TOLEROVANÍ ISO 8015 TOLERANCE ISO 8015
VŠEOBECNÉ TOLERANCE ISO 2768 mK GENERAL TOLERANCES ISO 2768 mK
HMOTNOST (kg) WEIGHT (kg)
FORMÁT FORMAT
MĚŘÍTKO SCALE
KRESLIL DRAWN BY
DATUM DATE
MATERIÁL MATERIAL
POLOTOVAR INTERMEDIATE
Montážní sestava Mounting assembly
OP OP
INDEX INDEX
NÁZEV TITLE
VÝKRES DRAWING
LIST SHEET
 19/stat.30/6

POPIS POSLEDNÍ ZMĚNY INDEXU DESCRIPTION OF LATEST INDEX CHANGE

TOLEROVANÍ ISO 8015 TOLERANCE ISO 8015
VŠEOBECNÉ TOLERANCE ISO 2768 mK GENERAL TOLERANCES ISO 2768 mK
HMOTNOST (kg) WEIGHT (kg)
 19/stat.30/7

FORMÁT FORMAT
MĚŘÍTKO SCALE
KRESLIL DRAWN BY
DATUM DATE
MATERIÁL MATERIAL
POLOTOVAR INTERMEDIATE
Montážní sestava Mounting assembly
OP OP
INDEX INDEX
NÁZEV TITLE
VÝKRES DRAWING
LIST SHEET
 19/stat.30/8

Rod elements and surfaces

Prut Rod
 19/stat.30/9

Assessment of the structure Snow load on the roof KZS 1 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2

The results of the entire assessment of the structure – internal forces, all rods, total limits for the module

Derived comparative tension for EN AW 6063 σ = 149.3 MPa

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 polycarbonate σ = 142 MPa

Loading scheme KZS 1:

Results of assessment – internal forces, all rods, selected results, total limits
Mx, My, Mz [kNm] Bending moments on axes
Nx, Qy, Qz [kN] Normal and shear forces on axes
Sig.min, Sig.max [MPa] Tension on outer fibres

Rod Position My Nx Qz Sig.min Sig.max

[mm] [kNm] [kN] [kN] [MPa] [MPa]
Rod555 0.000 -0.411 -1.207 0.034 -66.587 42.356
Rod547 561.805 0.877 -1.388 1.551 -95.471 137.966
Rod561 439.005 0.874 -1.628 0.829 -95.480 137.287
Rod520 426.973 -0.179 0.736 -0.161 -32.697 35.831
Rod562 374.646 0.293 -1.512 -1.558 -32.892 44.628
Rod547 187.268 0.293 -1.508 1.562 -32.969 44.756
Rod531 561.805 0.498 -0.812 0.885 -97.789 94.582
Rod564 199.091 -1.694e-03 0.317 -0.048 0.471 1.746
Rod562 561.969 9.001e-04 -1.495 -1.557 -1.925 -1.531
Rod547 561.805 0.877 -1.388 1.551 -95.471 137.966
The design is compliant; the comparative tension is not reached.
Results of the assessment – deformation, all rods, selected results, total limits
Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Rod Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Rod548 87.801 -9.587 -2.422e-04 0.890 9.628
Rod561 351.204 9.473 -5.707e-05 0.901 9.516
Rod545 439.005 9.321 -0.119 0.768 9.353
Rod529 439.005 9.326 0.134 0.768 9.358
Rod563 696.818 -0.063 0.012 -64.651 64.651
Rod529 351.204 9.368 0.092 0.925 9.414
Rod563 696.818 -0.063 0.012 -64.651 64.651
The ratio of max. deflection and assessed structure span of 6000 mm is 1: 93
 19/stat.30/10

The curve of tension and deflection on the structure:

 19/stat.30/11

Results of the assessment – internal forces, all surfaces, panels.

sx, sy, sxy, sef [MPa] Tension on local axes

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 142 MPa

Limits for result: KZS1 snow

Area Node Position sef sef sef

top centreline bottom
[mm] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
Polygon16 77 7.500, 1095.000, 93.333 0.038 0.076 0.129
Polygon2 2485 5568.000, 1095.000, 670.000 4.510 1.207 2.239
Polygon10 1159 2254.000, 1095.000, 945.000 2.646 0.016 2.674
Polygon2 2490 5782.734, 1200.520, 614.422 0.721 1.248 1.966
Polygon16 69 0.000, 1095.000, 0.000 0.068 0.045 0.026
Polygon3 2091 5144.000, 1692.273, 763.000 2.829 0.799 4.345
Isolines of tension in panels:
 19/stat.30/12

Results of the assessment – transformation, all surfaces, panels.

Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes

Utotal [mm] Total displacements

Limits for result: KZS1 snow

Area Node Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal

[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Polygon16 261 37.332, 1642.321, 464.577 -12.070 0.033 0.982 12.110
Polygon1 2391 6001.009, 1642.321, 464.570 11.996 0.033 1.019 12.040
Polygon1 2796 5993.000, 99.545, 560.000 9.431 -0.128 0.783 9.464
Polygon1 2235 5993.000, 2190.000, 560.000 9.326 0.134 0.768 9.358
Polygon8 1401 3199.481, 1696.436, 970.187 -0.132 0.020 -66.228 66.229
Polygon1 2391 6001.009, 1642.321, 464.570 11.996 0.033 1.019 12.040
Polygon8 1401 3199.481, 1696.436, 970.187 -0.132 0.020 -66.228 66.229

Isolines of transformation in panels:

 19/stat.30/13

Assessment of structure Loading of enclosure by load superposition KZS 2 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2 + ZS

3
The results of the entire assessment of the structure – internal forces, all rods, total limits for the module
Derived comparative voltage for calculated effective values for Al σ = 149.3 MPa
Loading scheme KZS 3:

Results of assessment – internal forces, all rods, selected results, total limits
Sig.min, Sig.max [MPa] Tension on outer fibres
Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 149.3 MPa
Limits for result: KZS2 - loading superposition
Rod Position My Nx Qz Sig.min Sig.max
[mm] [kNm] [kN] [kN] [MPa] [MPa]
Rod555 0.000 -0.411 -1.212 0.030 -66.476 42.273
Rod547 561.805 0.889 -1.398 1.564 -96.761 139.857
Rod548 0.000 0.889 -1.640 -0.834 -97.016 139.541
Rod531 561.805 0.505 -0.818 0.893 -99.140 95.906
Rod542 429.076 2.115e-03 0.588 0.264 0.663 1.480
Rod562 561.969 -1.439e-03 -1.477 -1.524 -2.040 -1.468
Rod547 561.805 0.889 -1.398 1.564 -96.761 139.857
The design is compliant; comparative tension not exceeded.
Results of the assessment – deformation, all rods, selected results, total limits
Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition
Rod Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Rod548 87.801 -10.268 -2.463e-04 1.023 10.319
Rod561 351.204 8.754 -7.189e-05 0.763 8.787
Rod531 561.805 -10.093 -0.120 0.797 10.125
Rod1 561.805 -10.097 0.135 0.797 10.130
Rod563 696.818 -0.835 0.012 -64.526 64.532
Rod516 87.801 -10.164 0.092 1.047 10.219
Rod563 696.818 -0.835 0.012 -64.526 64.532
The ratio of max. deflection and assessed structure span of 6000 mm is 1: 93
 19/stat.30/14

The curve of tension and deflection from KZS 2:

 19/stat.30/15

Results of the assessment – internal forces, all surfaces, panels.

sx, sy, sxy, sef [MPa] Tension on local axes
Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 140 MPa
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition

Area Node Position sef sef sef

top centreline bottom
[mm] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
Polygon1 2825 6034.736, 65.381, 62.722 0.018 0.141 0.285
Polygon15 471 470.000, 1095.000, 670.000 4.545 1.228 2.234
Polygon10 1159 2254.000, 1095.000, 945.000 2.646 0.016 2.674
Polygon15 373 259.773, 1200.314, 615.588 0.795 1.264 1.941
Polygon16 69 0.000, 1095.000, 0.000 0.061 0.045 0.029
Polygon3 2091 5144.000, 1692.273, 763.000 2.820 0.791 4.321

Isolines of tension in panels from KZS 2:

 19/stat.30/16

Results of the assessment – transformation, all surfaces, panels.

Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition
Area Node Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Polygon16 261 37.332, 1642.321, 464.577 -13.327 0.033 1.084 13.371
Polygon1 2391 6001.009, 1642.321, 464.570 10.006 0.033 0.851 10.042
Polygon15 171 45.000, 99.545, 560.000 -10.204 -0.129 0.811 10.237
Polygon15 246 45.000, 2190.000, 560.000 -10.097 0.135 0.797 10.130
Polygon8 1401 3199.481, 1696.436, 970.187 -0.906 0.020 -66.197 66.203
Polygon16 261 37.332, 1642.321, 464.577 -13.327 0.033 1.084 13.371
Polygon8 1401 3199.481, 1696.436, 970.187 -0.906 0.020 -66.197 66.203

Isolines of transformation in panels from KZS 2:

 19/stat.30/17

Conclusion:
The assessment has shown that the Casablanca Infinity L+ 110° enclosure structure is compliant for snow load in
combination with KZS 1 specified in the technical report as ZS 2 = 0.66 kNm -2 and wind load for the reference speed
of 120 km/h-1 (3.33 ms-1) ZS 3 = pressure 0.22 kNm-2; suction 0.11 kNm-2, at the stated superpositions KZS 1; KZS
2 and for the load combination, which is a superposition of the loading conditions ZS1 + ZS2 + ZS3. On the basis
of the assessment of stability, for the first shape of buckling, the critical coefficient of linear stability K = 2.61 > 2. It
has been shown that the designed structure of the enclosure meets the mechanical requirements for the limit
strength, usability limit and planned life of 2.19*105 hours according to EN 1991-1 and additional standards, and
decrees specifying technical requirements for structures 268/09 Coll. as amended by Decree 20/12 Coll. Section 9
Mechanical Resistance and Stability.
It has been proved by the assessment that the structure cannot collapse, as neither of its parts reaches the limits
of comparative tension.
There is no unacceptable transformation of the structure, as was demonstrated by the previous assessment. There
is no risk of damage to other parts of the building or its technical facilities and equipment that is installed as a result
of unacceptable transformation.
Damage, in the case of a disproportionate extent in relation to the cause, is eliminated by the calculated degree of
safety of Sb 2 for the main structures.