19/stat.

16/1

Ing. Milan Svoboda

U Sv. Anny 521
391 56 Tábor-Měšice
ID No.: 18302289

Design Structural Analysis

Order number ................................................................ 19/stat.16 2019-05-27

Author: ing. V. Chobot, Tábor, Buzulucká 2332
Authorized Civil Engineer, ČKAIT 0101501
Compiled for: ALBIXON a.s. Cintlovka 535, 268 01 Hořovice

Volume content:

Technical report ....................................... pp. 2-3

Drawings of the structure 1 and 2 ............ pp. 4-5
Calculation model ......................................... p. 6
Structural analysis of KZS 1 .................. pp. 7-10
Structural analysis of KZS 2 .................. pp. 11-14
Conclusion .............................................. p. 15
 19/stat.16/2

Technical report:
Assessment of the stability of the “Dallas L, 4500 x 2500 mm” skeleton enclosure structure made of aluminium
profiles according to EN AW 6063. The enclosure will be installed on the outside. Climate load specified by the
customer: snow of 0.65 kNm-2, wind with a reference pressure corresponding to 120 km/h. The shape of the skeleton
structure is specified according to the attached drawing. The structure will be provided with a lightweight enclosure
made of organic glass panels with an adjustable shape, 4-6 mm, or polycarbonate honeycomb panels. The structure
will be anchored to a travel rail in the bases of the arches.
Assessed loading conditions:
ZS 1. Self-load weight of 0.089 t, including enclosure, for a span of 4.5 m.
ZS 2. Vertical surface snow load of 0.65 kNm-2.
ZS 3. Horizontal enclosure surface loading by wind v ref = 33.33 ms-1; γair= 1.29 e-3 tm-3; h<4 m); pressure of 0.22
kNm-2; suction of 0.11 kNm-2.
Computation load combinations:
Combination of enclosure load KZS 1 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2; snow load of 0.65 kNm-2.
combination of enclosure load KZS 2 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2 + ZS 3 super position of snow and wind load
Standard references:
Publication date: March 1, 2010
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural
components.
EN 1090-1:2010/Z1 (732601), Date of issue: September 1, 2010 *Amendment
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural
components.
EN 1090-3 (732601), Date of issue: March 1, 2009
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Part 3: Technical requirements for aluminium structures.
EN 1991-1-3 (730035), Date of issue: June 1, 2005
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Correction 1 (730035), Date of issue: February 1, 2010 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z1 (730035), Date of issue: October 1, 2006 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z2 (730035), Date of issue: February 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-3:2005/Z3 (730035), Date of issue: March 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-3: General loads – Snow loads.
EN 1991-1-4 (730035), Date of issue: April 1, 2007
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/A1 (730035), Date of issue: October 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 1 (730035), Date of issue: September 1, 2008 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 2 (730035), Date of issue: May 1, 2010 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Correction 3 (730035), Date of issue: January 1, 2011 *Correction
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.
EN 1991-1-4:2007/Z1 (730035), Date of issue: March 1, 2010 *Amendment
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General loads – Wind loads.

List of materials specified and used:

E1, E2 [MPa] Modules of elasticity (E2 only for orthotropic material)
ni Poisson effect
Gamma [t/m3] Bulk density
K1, K2 [kN/m3] Coefficients of thermal expansion
Attenuation Decrement of attenuation

Material Type E1 ni Gamma K 1 E2 K2 Attenuation

[MPa] [t/m3] [kN/m3] [MPa] [kN/m3]
Aluminium STEEL 72000.000 0.330 2.700 2.340e-05 0.010
PC 1000 OTHER 2400.000 0.360 1.200 6.500e-06

Aluminium 2.043e+07 0.055

PC 1000 6.607e+07 0.079
Total 0.134

List of cross-sections:

Iy, Iz [mm4] Main moments of inertia

Ik [mm4] Moment of stiffness in simple twist
Beta y, beta z Shear stiffness coefficients
 19/stat.16/3

P Full cross-section
S Combined
D Partial

Cross-section Type Material Area Iy Iz Ik beta y beta z

[mm2] [mm4] [mm4] [mm4]
12669 S 0.546 1.066e+05 1.527e+05 8599.480 0.590 0.599
- External
D Aluminium 0.546 1.066e+05 1.527e+05 8599.480 0.590 0.599
outline
12665 S 0.131 15981.577 7639.524 312.168 0.482 0.525
- External
D Aluminium 0.131 15981.577 7639.524 312.168 0.482 0.525
outline
309932 S 0.328 57575.281 48072.069 2727.998 0.711 0.415
- External
D Aluminium 0.328 57575.281 48072.069 2727.998 0.711 0.415
outline
12677 S 0.862 1.813e+05 3.703e+05 25022.185 0.734 0.390
- External
D Aluminium 0.862 1.813e+05 3.703e+05 25022.185 0.734 0.390
outline

Units used:
Geometry – length mm Deformation – displacements mm
Geometry – angles deg Deformation – rotation deg
Cross-sections – length mm Time s
Loading, results – forces kN Temperature °C
Loading, results – voltage MPa Mass t
Loading, results – length mm

Comparative calculation values for material according to EN AW 6063 (AlMgSi)

The determination of the significance class of the building for its service life is 25 years according to EN 1991-1.
Minimum tensile strength 245 MPa
Minimum yield strength RP 0.2 200 MPa

Derived comparative tension for EN AW 6063 σ = 142.3 MPa

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 polycarbonate σ = 142 MPa

19/stat.16/4
 19/stat.16/5

ROZMÍSTĚNÍ VZPĚR A DĚLÍCÍHO PROFILU LAYOUT OF STRUTS AND DIVIDING PROFILE

PROFIL PROFILE
KRYTINA - POLYKARBONÁT (PK4 mm) PLNÝ ENCLOSURE – FULL POLYCARBONATE (PK4 mm)
POPIS POSLEDNÍ ZMĚNY INDEXU DESCRIPTION OF LATEST INDEX CHANGE
TOLEROVANÍ ISO 8015 TOLERANCE ISO 8015
VŠEOBECNÉ TOLERANCE ISO 2768 mK GENERAL TOLERANCES ISO 2768 mK
HMOTNOST (kg) WEIGHT (kg)
FORMÁT FORMAT
MĚŘÍTKO SCALE
KRESLIL DRAWN BY
DATUM DATE
MATERIÁL MATERIAL
POLOTOVAR INTERMEDIATE
Montážní sestava Mounting assembly
OP OP
INDEX INDEX
NÁZEV TITLE
VÝKRES DRAWING
LIST SHEET
 19/stat.16/6

POPIS POSLEDNÍ ZMĚNY INDEXU DESCRIPTION OF LATEST INDEX CHANGE

TOLEROVANÍ ISO 8015 TOLERANCE ISO 8015
VŠEOBECNÉ TOLERANCE ISO 2768 mK GENERAL TOLERANCES ISO 2768 mK
HMOTNOST (kg) WEIGHT (kg)
 19/stat.16/7

FORMÁT FORMAT
MĚŘÍTKO SCALE
KRESLIL DRAWN BY
DATUM DATE
MATERIÁL MATERIAL
POLOTOVAR INTERMEDIATE
Montážní sestava Mounting assembly
OP OP
INDEX INDEX
NÁZEV TITLE
VÝKRES DRAWING
LIST SHEET
 19/stat.16/8

Rod elements and surfaces

Prut Rod
Polygon Polygon
 19/stat.16/9

Assessment of the structure Snow load on the roof KZS 1 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2

The results of the entire assessment of the structure – internal forces, all rods, total limits for the module

Derived comparative tension for EN AW 6063 σ = 142.3 MPa

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 polycarbonate σ = 142 MPa

Loading scheme KZS 1:

Results of assessment – internal forces, all rods, selected results, total limits

Sig.min, Sig.max [MPa] Tension on outer fibres

Limits for result: KZS1 – snow

Rod Position Sig.min Sig.max
[mm] [MPa] [MPa]
Rod467 0.000 -62.580 58.830
Rod514 700.000 0.692 0.982
Rod485 799.340 -3.084 -2.504
Rod490 308.526 -57.541 61.340< 142 MPa
The design is compliant; the comparative tension is not reached.
Results of the assessment – deformation, all rods, selected results, total limits
Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Limits for result: KZS1 snow
Rod Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Rod483 240.666 -22.682 1.199e-04 2.484 22.817
Rod491 240.666 22.681 -1.599e-04 2.484 22.817
Rod450 308.526 -21.658 -0.042 2.103 21.760
Rod474 308.526 21.658 0.042 2.103 21.760
Rod494 800.000 4.608e-04 -2.509e-04 -39.655 39.655
Rod491 240.666 22.681 -1.599e-04 2.484 22.817
Rod494 800.000 4.608e-04 -2.509e-04 -39.655 39.655
The ratio of max. deflection and assessed structure span of 4500 mm is 1: 122
 19/stat.16/10

The curve of tension and deflection on the structure:

 19/stat.16/11

Results of the assessment – internal forces, all surfaces, panels.

sx, sy, sxy, sef [MPa] Tension on local axes

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 142 MPa

Limits for result: KZS1 snow

Area Node Position sef sef sef

top centreline bottom
[mm] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
Polygon20 850 3546.072, 1552, 2071.607 0.013 0.264 0.524
Polygon18 1352 2680.000, 600.000, 2340.000 4.493 0.421 5.299
Polygon28 1921 1780.000, 1100.000, 2340.000 0.295 0.016 0.306
Polygon18 1274 2680.000, 1700.000, 2340.000 4.455 0.456 5.326
Polygon26 192 4423.484, 1271.825, 398.171 0.195 0.115 0.047
Polygon18 1348 2680.000, 500.000, 2340.000 4.476 0.449 5.332

Isolines of tension in panels:

 19/stat.16/12

Results of the assessment – transformation, all surfaces, panels.

Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes

Utotal [mm] Total displacements

Limits for result: KZS1 snow

Area Node Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal

[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Polygon32 2651 162.000, 1100.000,98.000 -22.682 1.199e-04 2.484 22.817
Polygon24 568 4298.000, 100.000, 1198.000 22.681 -1.599e-04 2.484 22.817
Polygon31 2713 250.000, 100.000, 1422.000 -21.757 -0.043 2.137 21.862
Polygon22 546 4210.000, 100.000, 1422.000 21.757 0.043 2.137 21.862
Polygon28 1723 1495.989, 48.279, 2276.485 1.868 -3.520e-03 -45.336 45.375
Polygon24 568 4298.000 1100.000, 1198.000 22.681 -1.599e-04 2.484 22.817

Isolines of transformation in panels:

 19/stat.16/13

Assessment of the structure Loading of enclosure by load superposition KZS 2 = 1.1 x ZS 1 + ZS 2 +

ZS 3
The results of the entire assessment of the structure – internal forces, all rods, total limits for the module
Derived comparative voltage for calculated effective values for Al σ = 142.3 MPa
Loading scheme KZS 3:

Results of assessment – internal forces, all rods, selected results, total limits
Sig.min, Sig.max [MPa] Tension on outer fibres
Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 142.3 MPa
Limits for result: KZS2 - loading superposition
Rod Position Sig.min Sig.max
[mm] [MPa] [MPa]
Rod467 0.000 -126.185 120.818
Rod514 900.000 0.796 1.224
Rod485 799.340 -3.408 -3.045
Rod482 308.526 -116.326 126.774
The design is compliant; comparative tension not exceeded.
Results of the assessment – deformation, all rods, selected results, total limits
Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition
Rod Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Rod481 449.139 -118.246 -1.957e-03 20.288 119.974
Rod458 308.526 -72.789 -0.055 -12.660 73.882
Rod474 308.526 -72.794 0.053 -12.661 73.887
Rod487 281.793 -102.703 -2.800e-03 -47.342 113.090
Rod465 449.153 -118.167 0.015 20.313 119.900
Rod481 449.139 -118.246 -1.957e-03 20.288 119.974
The ratio of max. deflection and assessed structure span of 4500 mm is 1: 95
 19/stat.16/14

The curve of tension and deflection from KZS 2:

 19/stat.16/15

Results of assessment – internal forces, all surfaces, polycarbonate panels.

sx, sy, sxy, sef [MPa] Tension on local axes

Derived comparative tension for PC 1000 4 mm polycarbonate panels σ = 142 MPa

Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition

Area Node Position sef sef sef

top centreline bottom
[mm] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa]
Polygon20 850 3546.072, 1552.807, 2071.607 0.021 0.311 0.619
Polygon18 1352 2680.000, 600.000, 2340.000 4.666 0.443 5.512
Polygon20 1220 3230.000, 1100.000, 2217.000 0.199 0.012 0.184
Polygon31 2019 250.000, 2200.000, 1422.000 0.367 0.540 0.888
Polygon36 2970 0.000, 100.000, 0.000 0.264 0.132 0.018
Polygon18 1348 2680.000, 500.000, 2340.000 4.649 0.470 5.546

Isolines of tension in panels from KZS 2:

 19/stat.16/16

Results of assessment – deformation, all rods, selected results, total limits

Ux, Uy, Uz [mm] Displacements on axes
Utotal [mm] Total displacements
Limits for result: KZS2 – loading superposition
Area Node Position Ux Uy Uz Utotal
[mm] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
Polygon30 2566 495.000, 1100.000, 1733.833 -118.246 -1.957e-03 20.288 119.974
Polygon22 617 4210.000, 100.000, 1422.000 -72.663 -0.060 -12.601 73.748
Polygon22 546 4210.000, 2100.000, 1422.000 -72.667 0.059 -12.602 73.752
Polygon18 1070 2964.172, 1650.297, 2276.449 -106.345 7.806e-04 -23.515 123.869
Polygon30 1982 494.990, 2200.000, 1733.824 -118.167 0.015 20.313 119.900
Polygon18 1070 2964.172, 1650.297, 2276.449 -106.345 7.806e-04 -63.515 123.869
The ratio of max. deflection and assessed structure span of 4500 mm is 1: 195

Isolines of transformation in panels from KZS 2:

 19/stat.16/17

Conclusion:

The assessment has shown that the DALLAS L pro 4500 x 2500 mm enclosure structure is compliant for snow
load in combination with KZS 1 specified in the technical report as ZS 2= 0.65 kNm-2 and wind load for the reference
speed of 120 km.h-1 (3.33 m.s-1) ZS 3 = pressure 0.22 kNm- 2; suction 0.11 kNm-2, at the stated superpositions KZS
2; KZS 1 and for the load combination, which is a superposition of the loading conditions ZS1 + ZS2 + ZS3. On the
basis of the assessment of stability, for the first shape of buckling, the critical coefficient of linear stability K = 3.12
> 2. It has been shown that the designed structure of the enclosure meets the mechanical requirements for the limit
strength, usability limit and planned life of 2.19*105 hours according to EN 1991-1 and additional standards, and
decrees specifying technical requirements for structures 268/09 Coll. as amended by Decree 20/12 Coll. Section 9
Mechanical Resistance and Stability.
It has been proved by the assessment that the structure cannot collapse, as neither of its parts reaches the limits
of comparative tension.
There is no unacceptable transformation of the structure, as was demonstrated by the previous assessment. There
is no risk of damage to other parts of the building or its technical facilities and equipment that is installed as a result
of unacceptable transformation.
Damage, in the case of a disproportionate extent in relation to the cause, is eliminated by the calculated degree of
safety of Sb 2 for the main structures.