Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acosta Dzun Warren A. Exercise 1
Acosta Dzun Warren A. Exercise 1
Acosta Dzun Warren A. Exercise 1
BSABE 3-1
Perform a rainfall frequency analysis on the rainfall data given to you. Assess its best fit probability distribution
(Normal, Log-Normal, Log-Pearson Type III and Gumbel distribution). Use your assigned annual rainfall data.
o
STATION : ALABAT, QUEZON LATITUDE : 14 06'20.50"N
o
PERIOD : 1994 - 2017 LONGITUDE : 122 01'03.32"E
ELEVATION : 5m
YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC ANNUAL
1994 285.9 79.7 195.4 185.1 162.4 373.9 81.3 69.7 282.7 280.1 291.4 530.9 2818.5
1995 181.3 227.2 8.2 19.6 170.5 229.4 331.4 317.9 450.4 544.8 881.7 1424.7 4787.1
1996 233.2 119.3 176.5 353.0 65.3 233.3 184.1 114.7 212.9 347.8 695.2 415.4 3150.7
1997 91.3 137.9 74.4 45.5 157.5 67.3 249.7 58.9 392.9 181.0 427.2 351.0 2234.6
1998 74.8 40.7 18.2 3.1 85.3 117.3 183.3 74.5 258.5 905.6 317.6 1334.6 3413.5
1999 535.7 174.9 387.2 216.6 96.4 143.2 84.0 282.8 174.4 676.8 684.5 947.0 4403.5
2000 217.0 423.6 296.5 48.0 198.3 127.3 286.1 56.6 298.9 652.0 680.6 746.2 4031.1
2001 143.8 441.3 269.2 78.2 78.5 340.9 162.0 191.8 70.1 548.0 576.7 955.1 3855.6
2002 105.2 112.0 86.8 34.1 93.8 170.3 226.7 437.3 206.4 374.6 792.9 428.4 3068.5
2003 83.8 44.8 69.8 33.3 231.3 196.2 292.9 146.3 281.6 296.2 368.3 406.3 2450.8
2004 188.2 142.8 140.6 109.0 144.2 159.3 301.8 115.0 125.6 593.2 785.7 307.9 3113.3
2005 277.6 74.0 174.3 33.2 6.6 109.0 304.0 149.5 411.7 488.8 336.9 1420.8 3786.4
2006 280.3 302.8 111.4 1.8 120.9 211.5 290.0 143.3 378.1 441.1 262.6 663.1 3206.9
2007 233.5 88.4 169.0 28.4 244.9 199.3 235.9 98.5 264.0 410.8 763.8 -2.0 2736.5**
2008 602.8 680.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 236.9 374.0 -2.0 -2.0 1893.7**
2009 423.4 209.6 200.6 536.5 302.2 -2.0 186.4 32.0 -2.0 -2.0 489.8 -2.0 2380.5**
2010 243.0 2.8 99.7 35.0 23.2 87.2 -2.0 283.0 265.6 368.6 636.3 564.1 2608.5**
2011 195.7 401.1 326.0 19.9 251.2 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0
2012 322.9 375.4 399.7 16.5 266.4 46.1 597.7 75.8 200.1 302.2 177.4 370.3 3150.5
2013 181.1 216 69.8 4.4 73.5 280.4 384.3 181 213.3 379.1 749.5 450.1 3182.5
2014 120.4 94.2 123.1 25.8 50.8 95.3 297.7 166.3 437.4 439.7 686.9 889.6 3427.2
2015 238.8 147.5 81.4 63.9 29.0 143.2 90.3 159.0 245.9 261.5 383.1 539.0 2382.6
2016 236.4 335.6 365.8 19.2 54.7 176.0 104.2 30.7 215.8 448.5 698.0 854.7 3539.6
2017 390.8 166.0 89.4 215.3 125.3 219.2 253.5 112.0 913.3 597.8 667.2 175.3 3925.1
YEAR ANNUAL rank p=m/n+1 log x b p(g) chi square magnitudeprobability of occurrence
1995 4787.1 1 0.041667 3.680072 3.402809 0.033 m+s 0.159
1999 4403.5 2 0.083333 3.643798 2.720836 0.064 m 0.5
2000 4031.1 3 0.125 3.605424 2.058775 0.119 m-s 0.841
2017 3925.1 4 0.166667 3.593851 1.870325 0.143
2001 3855.6 5 0.208333 3.586092 1.746767 0.159
2005 3786.4 6 0.25 3.578226 1.623741 0.179 mean 3197.704
2016 3539.6 7 0.291667 3.548954 1.184975 0.263 standard dev
721.4131
2014 3427.2 8 0.333333 3.534939 0.985148 0.312
1998 3413.5 9 0.375 3.5332 0.960791 0.317
2006 3206.9 10 0.416667 3.506085 0.593493 0.425
2013 3182.5 11 0.458333 3.502768 0.550114 0.438
1996 3150.7 12 0.5 3.498407 0.49358 0.457
2012 3150.5 13 0.541667 3.498379 0.493224 0.457
2004 3113.3 14 0.583333 3.493221 0.427089 0.479
2002 3068.5 15 0.625 3.486926 0.347443 0.507
1994 2818.5 16 0.666667 3.450018 -0.09701 0.668
2007 2736.5 17 0.708333 3.437195 -0.24279 0.72
2010 2608.5 18 0.75 3.416391 -0.47036 0.798
2003 2450.8 19 0.791667 3.389308 -0.75072 0.879
2015 2382.6 20 0.833333 3.377051 -0.87197 0.908
2009 2380.5 21 0.875 3.376668 -0.8757 0.91
1997 2234.6 22 0.916667 3.3492 -1.13508 0.955
2008 1893.7 23 0.958333 3.277311 -1.74114 0.99
Comparing the graphs of these 4 distribution methods
Normal Distribution
6000
Precipitation, mm
5000
4000
3000
2000 Data
1000 Normal Distribution
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Probability of Exceedence
5000
4000
3000
Data
2000
1000 Log Normal
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Probability of Exceedence
1000
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Gumbel Distribution
6000
Precipitation, mm
5000
4000
3000
Data
2000
1000 Gumbel Distribution
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Probability of Exceedence
These graph reveals that Normal and Log-Normal Distributions come the closest to fitting the data, whereas
Gumbel and Log-Pearson Distributions do not. The center of the probability distribution is closer to the data in
the case of the log-normal distribution than it is in the case of the normal distribution at both ends of the linear
lines in both the normal and log-normal probability distributions. The Log-Normal Probability Distribution will
therefore provide the greatest fit among these four probability distributions.