Republic of the Philippines

Northwest Samar State University

Rueda St., Calbayog City 6710
Website: http//www.nwssu.edu.ph
Email: main@nwssu.edu.ph
ISO 9001:2015 Certified
Telefax: (055) 2093657

MODULE 2: The Teacher as a Knower of Curriculum

Take Action

Activity 1: Comparison of the Three Models

Name: Millano, Guia A. Course Section BTVTED 2

Instruction: Determine the similarities and differences of the three models of Curriculum
Development Process.
How are the models similar?

Saylor and
Similar Features Tyler’s Taba’s
Alexander
Tyler and Taba’s
model Are similar in
There are some
a way that Both of
consideration to
them has
follow and be made
Tyler ****** considerations to
there’s an
follow in examining
evaluation at the
the needs of the
end
well as there’s an
evaluation
Their module bothe They both specify
Taba emphasize on the ******** major educational
planning phase goals.
Saylor models Their models are
included the four both design that
Saylor and phases of follows appreciate
********
Alexander curriculum learning
development opportunities are
process provided
All of the models
utilize the process
of curriculum
Comment:
planning, designing
implementing and
evaluation.
How are the models different?
Different Saylor and
Tyler’s Taba’s
Features Alexander
Tyler’s model is Tyler model does
different from Taba not only focuses on
because it starts goals, objective
Tyler ******** the step of and domains are
curriculum consideration on
development from curriculum
the top. development
Taba grassroots Taba model is
Taba ********
approach begins different from

1|Page
 Republic of the Philippines
Northwest Samar State University
Rueda St., Calbayog City 6710
Website: http//www.nwssu.edu.ph
Email: main@nwssu.edu.ph
ISO 9001:2015 Certified
Telefax: (055) 2093657

from the bottom, saylor because

rather than from taba had specified
the top which Tyler step towards
proposed. developing unlike,
saylor are directly
submit the goals
and objectives to
the curriculum.
Saylor and
Alexander model
Saylor models different from Taba
different from Tyler in a way that saylor
model in a way that model direct the
Saylor and
Tyler model give four major step but ********
Alexander
experience while taba give attention
saylor model does to anything that
not. may interfere the
learning of the
students
The experience in
Comment: school and it’s
purpose has been
given the attention
in Tyler model. The
step were specified
in taba while saylor
is identities,
objective and goal
and follow by
curriculum
designing,
implementing and
evaluation.
Self Reflect
What phase of the curriculum process do you find very important as teacher? Why?

Answer:

All Phase of the curriculum process are essential however , from my standpoint, the
curriculum planning is way more important than the rest since in this phase some of
the questions that need to be addressed to define the issue iss being exploded. That
includes ways to identify gaps between knowledge and practice trends emerging from
the data; a process to prioritize needs; and identification of the characteristics of the
target audience which I think the most essential things to be considered in the
curriculum process.

References
Bilbao P., Dayagbil F., and Corpuz B. (2020) The Teacher and The School
Curriculum , Manila. Lorimar Publishing Inc.

2|Page
 Republic of the Philippines
Northwest Samar State University
Rueda St., Calbayog City 6710
Website: http//www.nwssu.edu.ph
Email: main@nwssu.edu.ph
ISO 9001:2015 Certified
Telefax: (055) 2093657

Bilbao P., Dayagbil F., and Corpuz B. (2015) Curriculum Development, Manila.
Lorimar Publishing Inc.
Jung, J.-H., & Pinar, W. F. (2015). Conceptions of curriculum. In D. Wyse, L.
Hayward, & J.

3|Page