Securing Virtual Realms: A Biometric Age-Verified Metaverse

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Securing Virtual Realms: A Biometric Age-

Verified Metaverse
Dr. Juhi Singh*, Pranjali Sharma* and Navneet Arora*
*
Department of Computer Science, SRM Institute of Science and Technology

Abstract: The burgeoning Metaverse presents a thrilling frontier for human interaction and exploration,
but alongside the excitement lies potential security risks. This research paper delves into the possibilities of
biometrics, particularly iris and pupil recognition via infrared cameras embedded in VR headsets, as a
safeguard for virtual environments. We investigate the efficacy of this method in verifying user age, a
critical step in shielding young and impressionable users from unsuitable content and interactions. The
paper explores the technical viability of iris/pupil recognition, contrasting its advantages in user comfort
and security with those of conventional methods. We then delve into potential challenges concerning privacy
and data protection, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of this biometric approach. By critically
analysing the strengths and limitations of iris/pupil recognition, this research paper endeavours to
contribute meaningfully to the ongoing dialogue about establishing a safe and secure Metaverse accessible
to all age groups.

Keywords: Metaverse, Virtual reality, Biometric authentication, Security measures, Cybersecurity, Identity
verification, Digital identity, Age verification, Biometric identifiers, Facial recognition, Iris scans, VR
headsets, Privacy protection, Cyber threats, Digital environment.

1. Introduction

The Metaverse, a captivating convergence of This approach stands in contrast to


physical and virtual worlds, is poised to traditional methods that often rely on
revolutionize the way we interact, learn, and self-reported information, which can be
play [5]. However, amidst the boundless easily falsified.
potential lies a critical question: how do we  Iris and pupil recognition offer distinct
ensure the safety and security of users within advantages due to their unique
this immersive environment? With the characteristics. Unlike fingerprints or
potential for unrestricted access, the facial features, which can change over
Metaverse presents particular concerns for time, iris patterns are stable throughout
younger users who may be vulnerable to an individual's lifetime [2]. This
inappropriate content or interactions. inherent robustness makes iris
 This research paper explores the recognition a highly reliable method for
potential of biometrics, specifically iris user identification.
and pupil recognition technology, as a
safeguard for the Metaverse. Embedded  Several studies have explored the
infrared cameras in VR headsets could efficacy of iris recognition in various
provide a non-intrusive and highly applications. [2] demonstrates the
secure method for verifying user age.
 Accuracy and efficiency of iris-based [Insert citation of another research
authentication systems. Similarly, paper on iris recognition technology
here] investigates the user acceptance VR headsets, evaluating its
of iris recognition systems, highlighting effectiveness in age verification. We
its positive perception due to its non- then explore the potential challenges
invasive nature and ethical considerations surrounding
 By leveraging the power of soft the use of biometric data in the
biometrics, we can create a more secure Metaverse. Through a critical analysis
Metaverse, ensuring a responsible and of this technology, this paper aims to
inclusive environment for all users. contribute to the ongoing discourse on
This research delves into the technical securing the Metaverse and fostering a
aspects of iris/pupil recognition within safe and enriching experience for users
of all ages

2. Background

The Metaverse, a captivating realm card verification, on the other hand,


blurring the lines between physical and excludes those without access to their own
virtual experiences, beckons with the cards, further limiting its effectiveness.
promise of revolutionizing numerous Facial recognition technology, while
aspects of human interaction. Imagine explored as a potential solution, raises
collaborative workspaces where colleagues concerns about privacy violations,
from across the globe convene as potential bias in algorithms, and the ever-
customized avatars, or immersive evolving nature of facial features in
classrooms where students embark on younger users.
virtual journeys through historical periods.
Even the entertainment landscape stands to Biometric solutions offer a compelling
be redefined, with virtual concert venues alternative for securing the Metaverse.
fostering a sense of shared experience that Biometrics leverage unique physical or
transcends physical limitations. However, biological characteristics for user
amidst this exhilarating potential lurks a identification, and iris/pupil recognition
shadow of security concerns. Unfettered stands out for its inherent advantages.
access to the Metaverse could expose Unlike fingerprints or facial features that
younger users to a multitude of risks, can change over time due to wear and tear
including encountering inappropriate or growth, iris patterns exhibit remarkable
content, interacting with malicious actors, stability throughout an individual's
or even falling prey to addictive lifetime. This inherent stability makes iris
behaviours. recognition a highly reliable method for
user identification. Existing research
Traditional methods for verifying user age, strengthens this claim, demonstrating the
often relying on self-reported information accuracy and user acceptance of iris
or credit card verification, are recognition technology in various
demonstrably flawed. Self-reported applications.
information can be easily falsified,
particularly by younger users eager to This research delves deeper, venturing
bypass age restrictions. Credit beyond the established benefits of iris
recognition to explore its specific
application within the context of the
Metaverse. We will examine the technical Metaverse for younger users. Furthermore,
feasibility of integrating iris/pupil we will explore any challenges that might
recognition technology into VR headsets need to be addressed to ensure a secure and
for age verification purposes. By critically inclusive virtual environment that fosters
analyzing this approach, we aim to assess responsible participation for all users
its potential benefits in safeguarding the

3. Synthesis of Existing Research and Argument

An approach for age prediction was primary focus lies in gaze estimation rather
introduced [1] from iris images, employing than age prediction.
geometric features and intelligent classifier The proposed research aims to bridge the
structures. It emphasizes the segmentation methodologies of these two studies by
of the iris region, extraction of geometric harnessing the capabilities of IR sensors
features, and utilization of various present in VR headsets. By integrating the
classifiers for age prediction. Despite its iris and pupil analysis techniques from the
efficiency in utilizing simple geometric first paper with the IR sensor-based eye
features, limitations exist in its tracking capabilities of the second paper,
applicability to real-time scenarios and the research seeks to develop a robust and
robustness in diverse environmental real-time system for age estimation.
conditions.
The VR headset's IR sensors will be
In contrast, [2] focuses on 3D gaze utilized to capture detailed information
estimation using a VR headset equipped about the iris and pupil. Leveraging deep
with IR sensors. This framework leverages learning algorithms trained on iris and
three cameras, including IR and RGB pupil data, the system will extract relevant
cameras, to track the pupil and compute a features for age prediction. Additionally,
3D model of the eye in real-time. By the 3D gaze estimation framework will
circumventing the challenges of pupil facilitate accurate localization of the iris
detection in RGB images, it achieves high and pupil positions, enhancing the
accuracy in gaze estimation even in precision of age estimation.
complex environments. However, its

Furthermore, the proposed solution will address the limitations of existing approaches by
ensuring real-time performance, robustness in varying environmental conditions, and
seamless integration with VR applications. By combining the strengths of both research
domains, the proposed solution aims to achieve a comprehensive and accurate age estimation
system suitable for diverse real-world scenarios.
This research proposes an innovative approach to age estimation leveraging the IR sensors
present in VR headsets. By amalgamating insights from research papers on iris image
analysis and 3D gaze estimation, the proposed solution aims to advance the state-of-the-art
in biometric authentication and human-computer interaction. Through empirical validation
and experimentation, this research seeks to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of
the proposed approach, contributing to the advancement of age estimation techniques in the
era of immersive computing.
4. Conclusion

The Metaverse beckons with the raises privacy concerns and potential
promise of revolutionizing human bias. Iris recognition offers a promising
interaction, but amidst its potential lies alternative. Iris patterns remain stable
the crucial responsibility of ensuring a throughout life, unlike fingerprints or
safe and secure environment for all faces, and the iris is well-protected
users, particularly younger ones. This within the eye. Additionally, iris
research explored the potential of iris recognition boasts high accuracy.
recognition technology as a tool for age Technically, integrating iris recognition
verification within the Metaverse. into VR headsets seems feasible. This
Traditional age verification methods in could unlock significant benefits for the
the Metaverse fall short. Self-reported Metaverse, particularly in safeguarding
information is easily manipulated, younger users from inappropriate
credit card verification excludes content and interactions by ensuring
younger users, and facial recognition their true age.

5. Future Scope
The potential of iris recognition for  Alternative Applications: Exploring the
Metaverse age verification extends beyond use of iris recognition for other Metaverse
the initial technical hurdles. Future security measures, such as user
research can explore: authentication for in-world purchases or
Liveness Detection: Developing robust age-gated virtual spaces, could further
methods to ensure a real person's iris is enhance user safety and security.
being scanned, not a photograph or image,
could significantly improve security.

 Decentralized Storage: Storing encrypted By addressing these future areas of


iris data in a decentralized blockchain research, iris recognition can evolve into a
could mitigate privacy concerns by powerful tool for creating a safe and
eliminating a central point of vulnerability. trustworthy Metaverse experience for all
 Mitigating Bias: Research on mitigating ages. This research can play a pivotal role
potential bias in iris recognition in shaping the responsible development
algorithms, particularly for diverse and implementation of iris recognition
ethnicities, is crucial for ensuring fair and technology within the virtual world.
inclusive age verification.
REFERENCES

[1] Moayad Mokatren, Tsvi KuflikORCID [4] Kim J. L. Nevelsteen, “Virtual world,

Ilan Shimshoni “3D Gaze Estimation defined from a technological perspective

Using RGB-IR Cameras”, MDPI and applied to video games, mixed reality,

DOI:10.3390/s23010381, December 2022. and the Metaverse,” in Computer

[2] M. Erbilek, M. Fairhurst, M. C. D. C. Animation and Virtual worlds Volume 29,


Abreu
Issue 1, January/February 2018.
“Age prediction from Iris Biometrics”, 5th

International Conference on Imaging for [5] S. Mystakidis, “Metaverse,”

Crime Detection and Prevention (ICDP Encyclopedia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 486–497,

2013) 2022.

[3] Ankur Gupta, Habib Ullah Khan, Shah [6] Zefeng Chen; Jiayang Wu; Wensheng

Nazir, Muhammad Shafiq and Mohammad Gan; Zhenlian Qi, “Metaverse Security and

Shabaz, “Metaverse Security: Issues, Privacy: An Overview,” 2022 IEEE

Challenges and a Viable ZTA Model,” International Conference on Big Data, 26

MDPI Journal Electronics Vol. 12, Issue January 2023.

2, 12 January 2023.
[7] Ruoyu Zhao, Yushu Zhang, Youwen [11] Jaber, Tanya Abdulsattar, “Security

Zhu, Rushi Lan, Zhongyun Hua, Risks of the Metaverse World,”

“Metaverse: Security and Privacy International Journal of Interactive Mobile

Concerns,” Volume 1, Issue 2, 93-99, 31 Technologies Volume 16, Issue 13, July

December 2023. 2022.

[8] Y. Wang, Z. Su, N. Zhang, R. Xing, D. [12] R. U. Long, "Roblox and effect on

Liu, T. H. Luan, and X. Shen, “A survey education", 2019.

on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and [13] J. Kemp and D. Livingstone, "Putting

privacy,” IEEE Communications Surveys a second life ‘metaverse’ skin on learning

& Tutorials, 2022. management systems", Proc. 2nd Life

[9] Giluk Kang; Jahoon Koo; Young-Gab Educ. Workshop Second Life Community

Kim, “Security and Privacy Requirements Conv., vol. 20, pp. 22-47, 2006.

for the Metaverse: A Metaverse [14] A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein, "The

Applications Perspective,” IEEE fairyland of second life: Virtual social

Communications Magazine Volume 62, worlds and how to use them", Bus.

Issue 1, January 2024. Horizons, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 563-572, Nov.

[10] Lee, L.-H Braud, T Zhou, P Wang, L 2009.

Xu, D Lin, Z Hui P, “All one needs to [15] H. Duan, J. Li, S. Fan, Z. Lin, X. Wu

know about metaverse: A complete survey and W. Cai, "Metaverse for social good: A

on technological singularity, virtual university campus prototype", Proc. 29th

ecosystem, and research ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, pp. 153-161,

agenda,” arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.05352. Oct. 2021.


[16] D. Chatzakou, N. Kourtellis, J. [21] S. Kraus, D. K. Kanbach, P. M.

Blackburn, E. De Cristofaro, G. Stringhini, Krysta, M. M. Steinhoff, and N. Tomini,

and A. Vakali, “Measuring #gamergate: A “Facebook and the creation of the

tale of hate, sexism, and bullying,” in The metaverse: radical business model

26th International Conference on World innovation or incremental transformation?”

Wide Web (WWW’17 Companion), 2017, International Journal of Entrepreneurial

pp. 1285–1290. Behavior & Research, 2022.

[17] S. Bardzell and J. Bardzell, “Docile [22] K. W. Lau, “The gender differences in

avatars: Aesthetics, experience, and sexual metaverse: a study of university art &

interaction in Second Life,” in The 21st design students,” Open Journal of Art and

British HCI Group Annual Conference on Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–19,

People and Computers (BCS-HCI’07), 2014.

2007, pp. 1–11. [23] S. Y. Ko, H. K. Chung, J. I. Kim, and

[18] Venkatesha, S., Reddy, K.R. & Y. Shin, “A study on the typology and

Chandavarkar, B.R. Social Engineering advancement of cultural leisure-based

Attacks During the COVID-19 Pandemic. metaverse,” KIPS Transactions on

SN COMPUT. SCI. 2, 78 (2021). Software and Data Engineering, vol. 10,

[20] J. Guan, J. Irizawa, and A. Morris, no. 8, pp. 331–338, 2021.

“Extended reality and internet of things for

hyper-connected metaverse environments”,

in IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and

3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Work

shops. IEEE, 2022, pp. 163–168.

You might also like