Frequency Table

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 46

CHAPTER 4

DATA ANALYSIS

Table 4.1 Age of respondent

Age of the respondent


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 18-25 9 18.0 18.0 18.0
26-34 5 10.0 10.0 28.0
35-44 13 26.0 26.0 54.0
45-54 13 26.0 26.0 80.0
55&above 10 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table, most of the respondents fall in the age group 35-44 &45-54 with
26%, 55&above age group with 20% ,18-25 age group with 18% , 26-34 age group with the
10%

Table 4.2 Family members


Total family members
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 2 4 8.0 8.0 8.0
3 7 14.0 14.0 22.0
4 17 34.0 34.0 56.0
5 16 32.0 32.0 88.0
Above 5 1 2.0 2.0 90.0
6 4 8.0 8.0 98.0
7 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that the family has 2 members are 8%, 3 members are 14%,
4 members are 34%, 5 members of 32%, 6 members of 2% ,7 members 25% based on
distribution family members.

7
8
Table 4.3 Gender Wise Distribution

Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Male 42 84.0 84.0 84.0
Female 8 16.0 16.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the table shows that total valid responses reveal that 84% of male and 16 % of
respondents are female

Table 4.4 Literacy Level Wise Distribution

Distributions of the heads of households by literacy level


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Illiterate 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Primary 1 2.0 2.0 4.0
Secondary 22 44.0 44.0 48.0
Degree 20 40.0 40.0 88.0
Postgraduate 6 12.0 12.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

The above table shows the liter acy level of respondents where 40% are Degree holders, 44% are
Secondary, primary 2%, illiterate 2% and post graduates are 12%.

9
Table 4.5 Monthly Income Wise Distribution

Distributions of households by monthly income


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 10001to20000 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
20001to30000 21 42.0 42.0 44.0
30001to40000 24 48.0 48.0 92.0
40001&above 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that the monthly income of the respondents of less than 10,000 are
2%,10,001 to 20,000 are 42%, 20,001 to 30,000 are 48%, 30001to 40000 48%, and 40001 &
above are 8% according to their monthly income distribution

Table 4.6 Occupation Wise Distribution

Distributions of households by occupation


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid agricultural labour 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Labour 34 68.0 68.0 72.0
salaried people 9 18.0 18.0 90.0
self-employee 5 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that most respondents fall under occupation of agricultural
labour are 4%, labour are 68%, salaried people are 18%, and self-employed are 10%, based
on their occupation

10
Table 4.7 Land Hold Pattern Wise Distribution
Distributions of households by land hold pattern
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid less than one acre 47 94.0 95.9 95.9
1 to 2 acre 1 2.0 2.0 98.0
2 to 3 acre 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 49 98.0 100.0
Missing System 1 2.0
Total 50 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 96% have lessthan one acre, 2% have 1-2 acre, 2%
have 2 to3 acre as their land hold pattern

Table 4.8 Types of Houses Wise Distribution

Distributions of households by type of house


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid thatched house 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
own title house 49 98.0 98.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that the percentage of types of houses where thatched house are
2% and 98% have own title house

11
Table 4.9 Assets Value Wise Distribution

Distibutions of households by assets value


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 200000 to 300000 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
300000 to 400000 5 10.0 10.0 14.0
above 400000 43 86.0 86.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

The total valid responses reveal that 4% of respondents have asset value of between 2,00,000 -
300000; 10% have 3,00,000 to 4,00,000 of asset, 86% have above 400000 asset value

Table 4.10 Bank Account Wise Distribution

Do you have a bank account


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 50 100.0 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

The above table shows that 100% of respondents are having account in the bank

12
Table 4.11 Types of Account Wise Distribution

If yes what type of account


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Savings A/C 46 92.0 92.0 92.0
Current 2 4.0 4.0 96.0
Joint 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The total valid responses reveal that 92% have savings A/c , 4% have current account and 4%
have joint a/c

Table 4.12 Bank Name

Name of the bank


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SBI 19 38.0 38.0 38.0
Kerala Gramin Bank 13 26.0 26.0 64.0
federal Bank 4 8.0 8.0 72.0
Baroda 1 2.0 2.0 74.0
CANARA BANK 3 6.0 6.0 80.0
FEDERAL BANK 1 2.0 2.0 82.0
HDFC 4 8.0 8.0 90.0
HDFC Bank 1 2.0 2.0 92.0
Punjab National 1 2.0 2.0 94.0
BARODA 1 2.0 2.0 96.0
Canara Bank 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that the respondents have their bank accounts in SBI is
38%, Kerala gramin bank is 26%, Federal bank is 8%, Baroda is 4% Canara is 10%
HDFC is 10% and 2% Punjab national bank
13
Table 4.13 Types of Proofs Wise Distribution

What type of ID proofs your submitting to open the account


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid voter card 12 24.0 24.0 24.0
Aadhar card 38 76.0 76.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 76% Aadhar card as a proof and 24% aadhar card as proof

Table 4.14 ATM Wise Distribution

DoyouhaveATMcard
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 47 94.0 94.0 94.0
No 3 6.0 6.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 94% of the respondents have ATM Card, 6% of the
respondents doesn’t have ATM card

14
Table 4.15 Utilization of ATM service Wise Distribution

Utilization of ATM services


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 40 80.0 80.0 80.0
No 10 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 80% of the respondents Utilize ATM Card, 20% of
the respondents don’t use ATM

Table 4.16 Withdraw of money Bank or ATM

Do you know how to with draw money from bank or ATM


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 38 76.0 76.0 76.0
No 12 24.0 24.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 76% of the respondents know how to withdraw
amount and 24% don’t know how to withdraw money from ATM

15
Table 4.17 Help Use ATM Service Wise Distribution
Who will help to use banking services or ATM services
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid family members 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Friends 1 2.0 2.0 54.0
existing staff in the bank 22 44.0 44.0 98.0
BC staff 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that family members helping in ATM services are 52%,
existing staff members in the bank are 44% and banking staff are 24% and friends 2% to help
use ATM service

Table 4.18 Frequency of Bank visiting Wise Distribution

Frequency of bank visit


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Monthly 14 28.0 28.0 28.0
Everytwomonths 26 52.0 52.0 80.0
every three months 8 16.0 16.0 96.0
every four & above 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

The total valid responses reveal that 28% of respondents visit bank monthly, 52% of the respondents
every two months, 16% every three months, 4% are every four months and above.

16
Table 4.19 Deposits and Withdrawals Wise Distribution

Frequency of deposits and withdrawals


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid within week 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
within two weeks 9 18.0 18.0 22.0
within three weeks 23 46.0 46.0 68.0
more than a month 16 32.0 32.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The total valid responses reveal that 18 % of respondents doing deposits and withdrawals within two
weeks, 32% are more than a month, 18% are within two weeks and 4% are doing deposits and
withdrawals within a week.

Table 4.20 Awareness of Internet Banking

Level of awareness on internet banking


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 19 38.0 38.0 38.0
somewhat ware 7 14.0 14.0 52.0
Aware 16 32.0 32.0 84.0
Unaware 7 14.0 14.0 98.0
highly unaware 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 38% of the respondents are highly aware of internet
banking, 14% are somewhat aware, 32% are aware, 14% are unaware and 2% are highly
unaware about Internet banking

17
Table 4.21 Awareness on Mobile Banking Wise Distribution

Level of awareness on mobile banking


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 20 40.0 40.0 40.0
somewhat ware 6 12.0 12.0 52.0
Aware 14 28.0 28.0 80.0
Unaware 10 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

The total valid responses reveal that 20% are unaware, 40% are highly aware, 28% are aware, 12%
are somewhat aware about mobile banking.

Table 4.22 Awareness on Bank Loan Wise Distribution

Level of awareness on bankloan


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 23 46.0 46.0 46.0
somewhat ware 3 6.0 6.0 52.0
Aware 24 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 46% of the respondents are highly aware ,6% of the
18
respondents are somewhat aware, 48% of the respondents are aware about Bank loan

19
Table 4.23 Access to Insurance Wise Distribution

Access to insurance of rural households


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Val id life insurance 22 44.0 44.0 44.0
health insurance 21 42.0 42.0 86.0
accidental insurance 7 14.0 14.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the table shows that 44% of the respondents have life insurance, 42% have health insurance, and
14% of the respondents have accidental insurance

Table 4.24 Banking Quality Services Wise Distribution

Overall perception of banking quality services for rural households


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 4 8.0 8.0 8.0
Satisfied 33 66.0 66.0 74.0
Neutral 13 26.0 26.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that the 8% of the respondents are highly satisfied ,66% of the
respondents are satisfied and 26% of neutral about quality of Banking services

20
Table 4.25 Awareness on Accessing Micro Finance Wise

3.25 a) Aware on Micro Finance

Are you aware about microfinance

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent


Valid Yes 50 100.0 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 100% of the respondents are aware about the micro
finance.

Table 4.25 b) Beneficiary for Economic Activity

Microfinance directly helps the beneficiary for their economic activity


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 9 18.0 18.0 18.0
Agree 38 76.0 76.0 94.0
Neutral 3 6.0 6.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 18% strongly agree, 76% agree and 6% are neutral
about micro finace directly helps beneficiary

21
Table 4.25 c) Costs of Getting Wise Distribution

Costs of getting microfinance is very less when we compared to public banks


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 14 28.0 28.0 28.0
Agree 35 70.0 70.0 98.0
Neutral 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table show that 28% strongly agree, 70% agree and 2% are neutral
about cost of getting microfinance is less compared with public sector bank

Table 4.25 d) Loan requires personnel asset

For availing the microfinance loan one requires personal assest to get it
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 20 40.0 40.0 40.0
Agree 27 54.0 54.0 94.0
Neutral 3 6.0 6.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

The total valid responses reveal that 6% of respondents are neutral with the statement that
personal asset require for availing micro finance loan, 40% are strongly agree and 54% agree,
that availing micro finance requires personal asset.

22
Table 4.25 c) Costs of Getting Wise Distribution

Microfinance loan can be obtained with in short duration


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 36 72.0 72.0 72.0
Agree 13 26.0 26.0 98.0
Neutral 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 72% of the respondents strongly agree , 26% of the
respondents agree and 2% are neutral about loan can be obtained in a short duration

Table 4.25 d) interest rate of microfinance

Interest rate in microfinance is very less when compared to other loans


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
Agree 23 46.0 46.0 98.0
Neutral 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 52% of the respondents strongly agree, 46% of the
respondents agree and 2% of the respondents are neutral about the interest rate is
very less as compared to other loans

23
Table 4.25 g) Repayment pattern Wise Distribution

Repayment pattern are well with in the capacity of borrower


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 15 30.0 30.0 30.0
Agree 31 62.0 62.0 92.0
Neutral 3 6.0 6.0 98.0
11 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 32% of the respondents strongly agree, 62% of the
respondents agree and 6% are neutral about repayment pattern of micro finance

Table 3.26 Awareness on Banking Product and Service under


PMJDY

Table 4.26a) Zero Balance


Zero balance
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
somewhat ware 9 18.0 18.0 20.0
Aware 38 76.0 76.0 96.0
Unaware 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 2% of the respondents are highly aware , 18% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 76% of the respondents are aware and 4% unaware
about Zero balance in Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana scheme

24
Table 4.26 b) Access to Pension, insurance products

Access to pension insurance products


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
somewhat ware 10 20.0 20.0 26.0
Aware 35 70.0 70.0 96.0
Unaware 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 6% of the respondents are highly aware, 20% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 70% of the respondents are aware, 4% of the
respondents are unaware, and about the access to pension and insurance

Table 4.26c) Easy Transfer of money across India

Easy transfer of money across India


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
somewhat ware 9 18.0 18.0 22.0
Aware 37 74.0 74.0 96.0
Unaware 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 4% of the respondents are highly aware, 18% of the
respondents are somewhat aware , 74% of the respondents are aware , 4% of the
respondents are unaware about the easy transfer of money access on banking product
and service under Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana scheme.

25
Table 4.26d) Debit Card and UPI
Debit card UPI
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
somewhat ware 8 16.0 16.0 18.0
Aware 36 72.0 72.0 90.0
Unaware 5 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 2% of the respondents are highly aware, 16% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 72% of the respondents are aware, 10% of the
respondents are unaware, 2% about the Debit Card and UPI on banking product and
service under Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana scheme.

Table 4.26e) Accidental insurance cover of Rs.1 lakh


Accidental insurance cover of Rs.1lakh
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
somewhat ware 7 14.0 14.0 16.0
Aware 38 76.0 76.0 92.0
Unaware 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATON

From the above table shows that 2% of the respondents are highly aware, 14% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 76% of the respondents are aware, 8% of the
respondents are unaware about the accidental insurance cover of Rs.1 lakh on banking
product and service under Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana scheme.

Table 4.27 Awareness towards Rural Development Schemes


(Government Schemes)
26
Table 4.27 a) National Rural Livelihood Mission
National rural livelihood mission
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Aware 26 52.0 52.0 56.0
Unaware 22 44.0 44.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 4% of the respondents are highly aware, 52%
of the respondents are somewhat aware, 44% of the respondents are aware about
thenational rural livelihood mission on awareness towards rural development schemes

Table 4.27 b) Mahatma Gandhi National Rural


Employment Guarantee Act
Mahatma gandhi national rural employment guarantee act
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
somewhat ware 6 12.0 12.0 14.0
Aware 32 64.0 64.0 78.0
Unaware 9 18.0 18.0 96.0
33 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows 2% of the respondents are highly aware ,12% of the respondents are
somewhat aware 64% of the respondents are aware 18% of the respondents are unaware about the
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act on awareness towards rural
development schemes.

Table 4.27 c) Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana

Pradhan mantri kaushal vikas yojana

27
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 5 10.0 10.0 10.0
Aware 18 36.0 36.0 46.0
Unaware 26 52.0 52.0 98.0
33 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 36% of the respondents are aware, 18% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 10% of the respondents, and 52% of the
respondents are unaware about Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana on awareness
towards rural development schemes.

Table 4.27 d) Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana


Pradhan mantri awas yojana
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
Aware 40 80.0 80.0 86.0
Unaware 7 14.0 14.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 80% of the respondents are aware, 6% of the respondents are
somewhat aware, 14% of the respondents are unaware about the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana on
awareness towards rural development schemes.

Table 4.27 e) Prime Minister Arogya Yojana

Prime minister arogya yojana

28
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 5 10.0 10.0 10.0
Aware 44 88.0 88.0 98.0
Unaware 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 88% of the respondents are aware, 10% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 2% of the respondents are unaware, of the Prime
Minister Arogya Yojana on awareness towards rural development schemes.

Table 4.27 f) National Rural Livelihood Mission

National rural livelihood mission


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
somewhat ware 2 4.0 4.0 10.0
Aware 26 52.0 52.0 62.0
Unaware 19 38.0 38.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 52% of the respondents are aware, 6% of the
respondents are highly aware, 4% of the respondents are somewhat aware, 38% of the
respondents are unaware about the national rural livelihood on awareness towards
rural development schemes.

Table 4.27 g) National Old Age Pension Scheme

National old age pension scheme

29
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 11 22.0 22.0 22.0
somewhat ware 3 6.0 6.0 28.0
Aware 33 66.0 66.0 94.0
Unaware 2 4.0 4.0 98.0
33 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 22% of the respondents are highly aware, 6% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 66% of the respondents are aware, 4% of the
respondents are unaware about the national old age pension scheme on awareness
towards rural development schemes.

Table 4.27 h) National Widow Pension Scheme


National widow pension scheme
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 4 8.0 8.0 8.0
somewhat ware 14 28.0 28.0 36.0
Aware 13 26.0 26.0 62.0
Unaware 19 38.0 38.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 8% of the respondents are highly aware, 28% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 26% of the respondents are aware, 38% of the
respondents are unaware about the national widow pension scheme on awareness
towards rural development schemes.

Table 4.27 I) National Family Benefit Scheme

National family benefit scheme


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

30
Valid highly aware 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
somewhat ware 4 8.0 8.0 14.0
Aware 29 58.0 58.0 72.0
Unaware 14 28.0 28.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 6% of the respondents are highly aware, 8% of the
respondent are somewhat aware 58% of the respondents are aware, 28% of the
respondents are unaware about the national family benefit scheme on awareness
towards rural development schemes.

Table 4.27 j) Pradhan mantri bharatiya janaushadhi


pariyojana
Pradhan mantribharatiya janaushadhi pariyojana
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
somewhat ware 5 10.0 10.0 14.0
Aware 8 16.0 16.0 30.0
Unaware 31 62.0 62.0 92.0
highly unaware 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 4% of the respondents are highly aware, 10% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 16% of the respondents are aware 62% of the
respondents are unaware, 8% of the respondents are highly unaware about the Pradhan
mantri bharatiya janaushadi pariyojana awareness towards rural development schemes

Table 4.28 Beneficiary of the Rural Development Schemes

Are you a beneficiary of the rural development schemes


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

31
Valid Yes 43 86.0 87.8 87.8
No 6 12.0 12.2 100.0
Total 49 98.0 100.0
Missing System 1 2.0
Total 50 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 87.8% of the respondents are benefit at the rural
development schemes and 12.2% of the respondents are not benefit at the rural
development schemes

Table 4.29 Not Beneficiary Reason.

If you not a beneficiary what is the reason for this


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid lack of opportunity 4 8.0 80.0 80.0
lack of awareness 1 2.0 20.0 100.0
Total 5 10.0 100.0
Missing System 45 90.0
Total 50 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 80% of the respondents Lack of opportunity , 20% of
the respondents responded that the reason for the not beneficiary is because lack of
awareness

Table 4.30 Beneficary by Rural Development Scheme


Do you think that people benefitted by these rural development schemes
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid always benefitted 33 66.0 66.0 66.0
sometimes benefitted 16 32.0 32.0 98.0
rarely benefitted 1 2.0 2.0 100.0

32
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 66% of the respondents are always benefitted, 32%
of the respondents are sometimes benefitted, 2% of the respondents are rarely
benefitted rural development scheme.

Table 4.31 People’s Participation Enhancement

What are the ways which people participation enhanced


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid initiatives to be taken by official 19 38.0 38.0 38.0
creating awareness among people 26 52.0 52.0 90.0
proper communication 4 8.0 8.0 98.0
through publicity 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 38% of the respondents say that initiatives to be taken by
the officials, 52% of the respondents say that by creating awareness among people, 8% of
the respondents say that propre communication, 2% of the respondents say that through
publicity about how people participation can be enhanced

Table 4.32 Aware of Existing Rural Scheme Developments

How informed are you about rural development programmes in your area
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly informed 19 38.0 38.0 38.0
sometimes informed 29 58.0 58.0 96.0
rarely informed 2 4.0 4.0 100.0

33
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 38% of the respondents are highly informed, 58%
are sometimes informed and 4% rarely informed about existing rural development
schemes.

Table 4.33 Newly Development schemes Communicated

Are new development schemes properly communicated in time to local people


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid always communicated 19 38.0 38.0 38.0
sometimes communicated 29 58.0 58.0 96.0
rarely communicated 2 4.0 4.0 100.0

Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 58% of the respondents are sometimes communicated, 38% oare
always communicated and 4% are rarely communicated on new development schemes

Table 4.34 Introduce of New Rural Scheme


Which area of rural schemes introduced for rural development
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Education 11 22.0 22.0 22.0
Agriculture 7 14.0 14.0 36.0
Irrigation 5 10.0 10.0 46.0
Infrastructure 19 38.0 38.0 84.0

34
social welfare 7 14.0 14.0 98.0
Health 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 22% of the respondents need education, 14% of the
respondents need agriculture, 10% of the respondents need irrigation, 38% of the
respondents need infrastructure ,14% of the respondents need social welfare, and 2%
of the respondents need health to be introduced in a new rural scheme.

Table 4.35 Convenience of Rural Development

What view is the extent of convenience of schemes to rural people


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid very high 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
High 26 52.0 52.0 54.0
Moderate 23 46.0 46.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that the extent of convenience of the schemes
of the rural development to the respondents are 2% are very high, 52% is
high, 46% is moderate

Table 4.35 Convenience of Rural Development

Table 4.36 b) Accidental Death

Accidental death
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

35
Valid highly satisfied 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Satisfied 9 18.0 18.0 22.0
Neutral 39 78.0 78.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 78% are neutral 18% satisfied and 4% highly satisfied on
convenience on accident death

Table 4.36 b) Accidental Disability

Accidental disability
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Satisfied 8 16.0 16.0 18.0
Neutral 40 80.0 80.0 98.0
Dissatisfied 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 80% are neutral 16% are satisfied 2% are highly satisfied and
2% on dissatisfied about convience on accidental disability

Table 4.36 c) Natural Death Assistance

Natural death assistance


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Satisfied 4 8.0 8.0 10.0

36
Neutral 44 88.0 88.0 98.0
Dissatisfied 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 2% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 8% of the
respondents are satisfied, 88 % of the respondents are neutral 2% dissatisfied about natural death
assistance

Table 4.36 d) Funeral Expenses Assistance

Funeral expenses assistance


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Satisfied 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Neutral 44 88.0 88.0 92.0
Dissatisfied 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 4% of the respondents are satisfied, 88% of the
respondents are neutral and 8% of the respondents are dissatisfied about funeral
expenses assistance

Table 4.36 Labour welfare schemes (Educational Assistance)

Table 4.36 e) Girl Children Studying 10th

37
Girl children studying 10th
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 7 14.0 14.0 14.0
Satisfied 23 46.0 46.0 60.0
Neutral 20 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 14% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 46% of the
respondents are satisfied, 40% of the respondents are neutral that the social security benefits girl
children studying 10th in Labour Welfare and social security measures.

Table 4.36 f) If the son or daughter Passed 10th

If the son or daughter passed 10th


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 7 14.0 14.0 14.0
Satisfied 24 48.0 48.0 62.0
Neutral 18 36.0 36.0 98.0
Dissatisfied 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 14% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 48% of
the respondents are satisfied, 36% of the respondents are neutral and 2% of the
respondents are dissatisfied that the social security benefits if the son or daughter
passed 10th in Labour Welfare and social security measures.

Table 4.36 g) Girl Children Studying 11th


Girl children studying 11th
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

38
Valid highly satisfied 8 16.0 16.0 16.0
Satisfied 6 12.0 12.0 28.0
Neutral 32 64.0 64.0 92.0
Dissatisfied 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 16% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 12% of
the respondents are satisfied, 64% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the
respondents are dissatisfied that the social security benefits girl children studying 11 th
in Labour Welfare and social security measures.

Table 4.36 h) Girl Children Studying 12th

Girl children studying 12th


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 8 16.0 16.0 16.0
Satisfied 5 10.0 10.0 26.0
Neutral 33 66.0 66.0 92.0
Dissatisfied 4 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 16% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 10% of
the respondents are satisfied, 66% of the respondents are neutral and 8% of the
respondents are dissatisfied that the social security benefits girl children studying 12 th
in Labour Welfare and social security measures.

Table 4.36 i) If the son or daughter Passed 12th


If the son or daughter passed 12th
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 7 14.0 14.0 14.0

39
Satisfied 3 6.0 6.0 20.0
Neutral 35 70.0 70.0 90.0
Dissatisfied 5 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 14% of the respondent are highly satisfied, 6% of the
respondent are satisfied, 70% of the respondents are neutral, 5% of the respondents
are dissatisfied that the social security benefits if the son or daughter passed 12th in
Labour Welfare and social security measures.

Table 4.36 j) Regular Degree Course with Hostel Facility


Regular degree course with hostel facility
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Satisfied 4 8.0 8.0 10.0
Neutral 34 68.0 68.0 78.0
Dissatisfied 10 20.0 20.0 98.0
33 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 2% of the respondents are highly satisfied ,8% of the
respondents are satisfied ,68% of the respondents are neutral, 20% of the respondents
are dissatisfied in regular degree courses with hostel facility in Labour Welfare and
security measures.

Table 4.36 k) Marriage Assistance


Marriage assistance
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Satisfied 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Neutral 38 76.0 76.0 78.0
Dissatisfied 11 22.0 22.0 100.0

40
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 2% of the respondents are highly satisfied ,76% of
the respondents are neutral a n d 22% of the respondents are dissatisfied about
Marriage assistance

Table 4.36 l) Maternity Assistance Miscarriage

Maternity assistance miscarriage


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Satisfied 6 12.0 12.0 12.0
Neutral 32 64.0 64.0 76.0
Dissatisfied 12 24.0 24.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 12% of the respondents are satisfied, 64% of the
respondents are neutral, 24 % of the respondents are dissatisfied about Maternity
assistance miscarriage

Table 4.36 m) Pension


Pension
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly satisfied 12 24.0 24.0 24.0
Satisfied 20 40.0 40.0 64.0

41
Neutral 18 36.0 36.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 24% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 40% of
the respondents are satisfied, 36% of the respondents are neutral about the pension in
Labour welfare and social security measures.

Table 4.37 Online Purchase Behavior

Do you buy products online


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 25 50.0 50.0 50.0
No 25 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 50% of the respondents buy products o nline and 50%
of the respondents do not buy products online.

Table 4.37 a) Satisfied with online shopping experience


Are you satisfied with online shopping experience
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Agree 19 38.0 38.0 42.0

42
Neutral 29 58.0 58.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 38% of the respondent agree , 4% of the respondents
strongly agree ,58% of the respondents are neutral with online shopping experience.

Table 4.37 b) Online Shopping vs. Traditional Shopping


Online shopping is hassle free as compared to traditional shopping
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Agree 23 46.0 46.0 50.0
Neutral 15 30.0 30.0 80.0
Disagree 10 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 4% of the respondants strongly agree, 46 %
of the respondents agree,30% neutral 20% disagree about that Online shopping is
hassle free as compared to traditional Shopping.

Table 4.37 c) Online Shopping Comfortable


Do you feel online shopping is comfortable than traditional shopping
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 4 8.0 8.0 8.0
Agree 16 32.0 32.0 40.0
Neutral 18 36.0 36.0 76.0
Disagree 12 24.0 24.0 100.0

43
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
The total valid responses reveal that 32% of respondents are agree 36% are neutral,
24% respondents disagree and 8% are strongly agree that online shopping is
comfortable fas compared to traditional shopping

Table 4.37 d) Online Shopping Saves Time

Online shopping saves time and money as compared to traditional shopping


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 18 36.0 36.0 36.0
Agree 24 48.0 48.0 84.0
Neutral 7 14.0 14.0 98.0
Disagree 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0
INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows 36% of respondent strongley agree, 48% of the respondents
agree, and 14% of the respondents are neutral and 2% disagree that Online shopping
saves time and money as compared to traditional

Table 4.37 e) Online Shopping 24*7

Online shopping is preferred because of 24hrs shopping facility


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid strongly agree 19 38.0 38.0 38.0
Agree 24 48.0 48.0 86.0
Neutral 7 14.0 14.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

44
INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 38% strongly agree ,48% agree, 14% neutral about online
shopping is preferred because of 24 hrs shopping facility

Table 4.38 Awareness towards Rural Innovative project

4.38 a) latest technology of water irrigation

Are you aware about the latest technology of water irrigation


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid drip irrigation 8 16.0 16.0 16.0
sprinkler irrigation 42 84.0 84.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 16% of the respondents suggest drip irrigation, 84% of
the respondents suggest sprinkler irrigation,

Table 4.38 b) Benefits of KISAN scheme

Are you aware about benefits of KISAN scheme for farmers


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 5 10.0 10.0 10.0
somewhat ware 6 12.0 12.0 22.0
Aware 32 64.0 64.0 86.0
Unaware 6 12.0 12.0 98.0

45
highly unaware 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 10% of the respondents are highly aware ,12% of the
respondents are somewhat aware ,64% of the respondents are aware 12% of the
respondents are aware and 2% of the respondents are unaware about the benefits of
KISAN scheme for farmers.

Table 4.38 c) KISAN RATH Mobile App


Are you aware about KISAN RATH mobile app
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
Aware 7 14.0 14.0 20.0
Unaware 31 62.0 62.0 82.0
highly unaware 8 16.0 16.0 98.0
44 1 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 6% of the respondents are somewhat aware, 14% of
the respondents are somewhat aware ,62% of the respondents are unaware, 16% of the
respondents are highly unaware about the KISAN RATH Mobile App which
facilitates the farmers and traders across the country for transportation of Agri-
producer

Table 4.38 d) subsidy schemes


Are you aware about subsidy schemes that favours farmers
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 19 38.0 38.0 38.0
somewhat ware 12 24.0 24.0 62.0
Aware 19 38.0 38.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 38% of the respondents are highly aware, 24% of

46
the respondents are somewhat aware ,38% of the respondents are aware, about the
subsidy schemes that are in favor of farmers owning the necessary machinery.

Table 4.38 e) modern agricultural technological


applications
Do you think any training is needed for farmers to use modern agri technology
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 45 90.0 90.0 90.0
No 5 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 90% of the respondents need training and 10% of the
respondents are doesn’t need training to use modern agricultural technological
applications.

Table 4.38 f) advantages of use of modern


technological applications
mention advantages and merits of use of modern technlogical applications in output and agriculutural output
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid increased output 14 28.0 28.0 28.0
increase in productivity 36 72.0 72.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 28% of the respondents say that it has increased output 72% of
the respondents say that it increases in productivity, advantages and merits of use of modern
technological applications in terms of agricultural output

47
Table 4.38 g) Biogas setup

Are you aware about the subsidy schemes for biogas setup from the government
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 15 30.0 30.0 30.0
somewhat ware 6 12.0 12.0 42.0
Aware 29 58.0 58.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 30% of the respondents are highly aware, 12% of the
respondents are somewhat aware, 58% of the respondents are aware, about the
subsidy schemes for Biogas setup from the government.

Table 4.38 h) Solar energy setup


Are you aware about the subsidy schemes for solar energy from government
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 16 32.0 32.0 32.0
somewhat ware 4 8.0 8.0 40.0
Aware 28 56.0 56.0 96.0
Unaware 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 32% of the respondents are highly aware ,8% of the
respondents are somewhat aware ,56% of the respondents are aware, 4% of the

48
respondents are unaware about the subsidy schemes for solar energy setup from the
government.

TABLE 4.39 a) NMDFC SCHEMES


NMDFC schemes
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Aware 9 18.0 18.0 20.0
Unaware 40 80.0 80.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 2% of the respondents are somewhat aware, 2% of the
respondents are somewhat aware and 18% of the respondents are aware about NMDFC Schemes

TABLE 4.39 b) Dairy schemes


Dairy Entrepreneur development schemes
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
somewhat ware 1 2.0 2.0 8.0
Aware 29 58.0 58.0 66.0
Unawar e 17 34.0 34.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 6% of the respondents highly aware, 2% of the respondents are
somewhat aware, 58% of the respondents are aware and 34% unaware about Dairy schemes

49
TABLE 4.39 c) Livestock
National Livestock mission
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Aware 24 48.0 48.0 52.0
Unaware 24 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 4% of the respondents somewhat aware, 48% of the respondents
are aware and 48% of the respondents are unaware about livestock mission

TABLE 4.39 d) NORKA


NORKA Department project for rehabilitation of return emigrants
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid somewhat ware 7 14.0 14.0 14.0
Aware 35 70.0 70.0 84.0
Unaware 8 16.0 16.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 14% of the respondents somewhat aware, 70% of the
respondents are aware and 16% of the respondents are unaware about NORKA

TABLE 4.39 e) Education Repayment

50
Education loan repayment support scheme
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 10 20.0 20.0 20.0
somewhat ware 1 2.0 2.0 22.0
Aware 39 78.0 78.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION

From the above table shows that 20% of the respondents highly aware, 78% of the respondents
are aware and 2% of the respondents are somewhat aware about Eduction Repayment schemes

TABLE 4.39 f) Karshika Keralam

Department of agriculuture development and farmers welfare-Karshika keralam


Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid highly aware 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
somewhat ware 13 26.0 26.0 32.0
Aware 28 56.0 56.0 88.0
Unaware 6 12.0 12.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

INTERPRETATION
From the above table shows that 6% of the respondents highly aware, 56% of the respondents are
aware, 26% of the respondents are somewhat aware and 12% are unaware about Karshika
Keralam

51
Chi-square

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 11.813a 12 .461


Likelihood Ratio 12.383 12 .415
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.349 1 .125
N of Valid Cases 50
a. 16 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .10.

52

You might also like